• Pragerisms

    For a more comprehensive list of Pragerisms visit
    Dennis Prager Wisdom.

    • "The left is far more interested in gaining power than in creating wealth."
    • "Without wisdom, goodness is worthless."
    • "I prefer clarity to agreement."
    • "First tell the truth, then state your opinion."
    • "Being on the Left means never having to say you're sorry."
    • "If you don't fight evil, you fight gobal warming."
    • "There are things that are so dumb, you have to learn them."
  • Liberalism’s Seven Deadly Sins

    • Sexism
    • Intolerance
    • Xenophobia
    • Racism
    • Islamophobia
    • Bigotry
    • Homophobia

    A liberal need only accuse you of one of the above in order to end all discussion and excuse himself from further elucidation of his position.

  • Glenn’s Reading List for Die-Hard Pragerites

    • Bolton, John - Surrender is not an Option
    • Bruce, Tammy - The Thought Police; The New American Revolution; The Death of Right and Wrong
    • Charen, Mona - DoGooders:How Liberals Hurt Those They Claim to Help
    • Coulter, Ann - If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans; Slander
    • Dalrymple, Theodore - In Praise of Prejudice; Our Culture, What's Left of It
    • Doyle, William - Inside the Oval Office
    • Elder, Larry - Stupid Black Men: How to Play the Race Card--and Lose
    • Frankl, Victor - Man's Search for Meaning
    • Flynn, Daniel - Intellectual Morons
    • Fund, John - Stealing Elections
    • Friedman, George - America's Secret War
    • Goldberg, Bernard - Bias; Arrogance
    • Goldberg, Jonah - Liberal Fascism
    • Herson, James - Tales from the Left Coast
    • Horowitz, David - Left Illusions; The Professors
    • Klein, Edward - The Truth about Hillary
    • Mnookin, Seth - Hard News: Twenty-one Brutal Months at The New York Times and How They Changed the American Media
    • Morris, Dick - Because He Could; Rewriting History
    • O'Beirne, Kate - Women Who Make the World Worse
    • Olson, Barbara - The Final Days: The Last, Desperate Abuses of Power by the Clinton White House
    • O'Neill, John - Unfit For Command
    • Piereson, James - Camelot and the Cultural Revolution: How the Assassination of John F. Kennedy Shattered American Liberalism
    • Prager, Dennis - Think A Second Time
    • Sharansky, Natan - The Case for Democracy
    • Stein, Ben - Can America Survive? The Rage of the Left, the Truth, and What to Do About It
    • Steyn, Mark - America Alone
    • Stephanopolous, George - All Too Human
    • Thomas, Clarence - My Grandfather's Son
    • Timmerman, Kenneth - Shadow Warriors
    • Williams, Juan - Enough: The Phony Leaders, Dead-End Movements, and Culture of Failure That Are Undermining Black America--and What We Can Do About It
    • Wright, Lawrence - The Looming Tower

Mark Steyn comments about Geert Wilders’ Critics

I heard Charles Krauthammer’s comments on Fox last week regarding Geert Wilders position on the Koran.  Charles, my top favorite news analyst, dismissed Wilders as a modern day minor fascist.  I assume his assessment arises from the Wilders claim the Koran is racist and vile  and should be treated in Holland like Mein Kampf….hard to find.

Charles was very wrong in his remarks…as a matter of fact, although I cannot remember the wording verbatim, he gave no examples for his negatives, and  very unlike the usual Krauthammer his comments were shallow and unconvincing.   Well, no one is perfect, and as far as I know he is not my clone.  Besides he made up for this blip when he condemned Obamacare tactics.  

 I seek Charles Krauthammer’s  opinions whenever they are given. He just missed on this one.   The folks at powerline think so, too….and better yet, so does Mark Steyn….as in the following article from steynonline:

“Out of Dutch” …by Mark Steyn 

“These aren’t words one has cause to type terribly often, but I think Charles Krauthammer is being deeply naïve in his observations on Geert Wilders (as, reportedly, was Glenn Beck, to whom I am otherwise well disposed, not least because he liked my Christmas single).

Wilders does not need to be lectured condescendingly about distinctions within Islam, because he lives with them every day. And he has concluded, notwithstanding Dr. Krauthammer’s views on the precise “minority” that identifies as “Islamist,” that Islam itself is the issue — and that, therefore, regardless of the “moderation” of the “overwhelming majority” of Muslims, the more Islam the less Netherlands in any recognizable sense. Are the gangs of gay bashers on the streets of Amsterdam “Islamist” by Krauthammer’s definition? Maybe, maybe not. But, either way, they make the running, and the rest of the community is either indifferent or quiescent.

As for whether Wilders is “extremist,” his views on the cultural compatibility of immigrants were routine and unexceptional until the 1960s, not only in Europe, but also in the U.S. And, even in North America today, they are the stated policy of the Government of Quebec. One can certainly disagree with that, but does that make Quebec also “fascist” (Beck) or even “extreme” (Krauthammer)?

Dr. Krauthammer is also incorrect to suggest there are two issues here. When the state attempts to constrain further Europe’s already too shriveled bounds of public discourse, the only issue is state power. The Continental political class does not want to debate the question of its ever more assertive Muslim populations, and so has decided to criminalize that debate. Geert Wilders lives under 24/7 security because Muslims (including the killer of Theo van Gogh) have pledged to murder him. Yet he’s the one on trial for incitement? The issue is not Wilders or his views, but the Dutch state and their ever more “extreme, radical, and wrong” views on core Western liberties.”

Comment:  To repeat, I don’t think Krauthammer has been following the Wilders  saga very closely.  When he does,  he will realize his mistake.

The Balkanization of America and the Textbook Wars

Hagling and political this and that  were going on in Texas in the textbook wars this past week.  A couple generations ago our country had not yet entered the Marxist Age of local and national politics.  Most, even blacks and latinos, Jews and the puritanical, still supported E Pluribus Unum as a basic pillar of Americana.  America was not supposed to be  a land of warring tribes.

All that has changed.  Lefty Jews pour great wads of money into the ACLU to destroy Christianity, Boy Scouts, traditional marriage,  and disrupt public education in the name of “Human Rights” those invented and the yet uninvented for the pimpled and the not yet pimpled.   Latinos rally and threaten behind the Mexican flag.   Trial lawyers make millions to fund the ACLU and Obamaville.  Six yearolds must be made sensitive to gay and lesbian expressions “or else”.   Parents of the sexually unusual and their attorneys work overtime to equate how one expresses their post puberty selves to the most  vital Constitutionally provided civil right, the freedom of speech.

Blacks rally first graders to sing Psalms to St. Obama, “The Capital”.  The National Endowment for the Arts fund St. Obama’s disciples to spread his holy name and presence.   No other grants are available.

Once the American Democrat Party totally withdrew from its responsibilities to represent, protect and strenthem the nation, and accepted Marxism as its beacon for its future, it was only a matter of time the country would slump  into its Balkan Wars…..one tribe versus another………..

……no, that isn’t  accurate……..The Democrats have organized these  tribes, all of them,  to oppose and hate  the American conservative white male and their wives…….in their Balkanization of America to win political power.   Their Marxist priests dominate or already control the university monastic life, now quite safe from any interference from the freer thinking on the outside. 

A battlefront in these wars against America is exemplified below in an article by Gary Scharrer of the Houston Chronicle, entitle “New Standards in  the History”.

“The often contentious process has been watched closely across the nation, particularly this week as the board gathered to debate and vote on the proposed standards. Because of Texas’ size, decisions by the board on what should and should not be included can influence publishers whose textbooks may be adopted by other states.

Democrats on the board — all of them black or Hispanic — complained the new standards dilute minority contributions to Texas and U.S. history.

“We have been about conservative versus liberal. We have manipulated the standards to insist on what we want to be in the document, regardless whether it’s appropriate,” said Mavis Knight, D-Dallas. “We are perpetrating a fraud on the students of this state.”

But Terri Leo, R-Spring, called the proposal “a world class document” and told her Democratic colleagues the board has “included more minorities and historical events than ever before … I am very disappointed at those allegations because they are simply not true.”

Ken Mercer, R-San Antonio, said the proposed standards reflect the desires of his constituents to emphasize “personal responsibility and accountability” and “to honor our Founding Fathers, and our military.”

Mary Helen Berlanga, D-Corpus Christi, said the standards ignore the Ku Klux Klan in Texas, Texas Rangers “killing Mexican-Americans without justification” and the U.S. Army’s role in the attempted extermination of American Indians.

“Until we are ready to tell the truth about history, we don’t have a good history or a good social studies curriculum for Texas,” she said.

She had failed in an attempt earlier in the meeting to get the history standards to identify Tejanos who fell defending the Alamo.

The board majority’s conservative approach to “culture, government and the changing political landscape” was impossible 13 years ago when the social studies curriculum last was updated, said David Bradley, R-Beaumont.

“There’s been a cultural and political shift in Texas, at least in the policy-making level,” he said. “We all represent a constituency. Elections matter.”

In 1997, Bradley was on the losing end of an 11-4 vote. Every conservative-pushed amendment got tabled then, he recalled.

Shifting demographics and political winds likely will produce yet another outcome when Texas tackles the standards again sometime after 2020, Bradley acknowledged.

“Mary Helen may have her wish, and it will be the Hispanic Education Agency,” he said.

At least until then, the proposed standards are aligned with the Republican Party platform’s traditional call for limited government, regulation and taxation.

Although the proposal is “fair, accurate and well-balanced,” it could stand improvement before final action, said Bob Craig, R-Lubbock.

Craig and Lawrence Allen Jr., D-Houston, said they were concerned about its length. It has nearly 300 historical figures and prominent people for students to study.

Some board members failed Friday to restore “hip- hop” music to the draft proposal’s high school social studies standard on culture.

Experts had recommended students study the impact of cultural movements in art, music and literature, such as Tin Pan Alley, the Beat Generation, rock and roll, the Chicano Mural Movement, country-western music and hip-hop. The board’s seven social conservatives, joined by Geraldine “Tincy” Miller, R-Dallas, considered some of the hip-hop lyrics offensive and voted to eliminate hip-hop as an option for students to consider.

Rick Agosto, D-San Antonio, said it was a double standard to delete hip-hop, but retain the Beat Generation, a genre that rejected mainstream values and celebrated illegal drugs and alternative sex. He pushed for it to be dropped from the standard, but was unsuccessful.

The board’s success in exposing students to more conservative government and cultural principles follows similar efforts in recent years to put a more conservative imprint on other public school subjects, including a back-to-basics English language arts and reading curriculum two years ago and adding caveats to the teaching of evolution when adopting new biology curriculum standards last year.

The document faces a public hearing and a final board vote in May.”

Comment:  Sixty plus  years ago as a student, I remember a  chapter in America’s Manifest Destiny move to unite the West with the East called, “Empire Builders”. 

The next year with a replacement text, that same chapter was called, “Robber Barons”.

I wonder which political party won the texbook war that year?

Anita Dunn, Lover of Chairman Mao, The Charlie Manson of China, on ABC Today

For decades I enjoyed roaming the Sunday television news round tables and interviews.  Lawrence Spivak hosted “Meet the Press”.  Even  I knew he was a Democrat, but there he was Sunday after Sunday, looking like an owl, “giving” the public news on a more personal level. 

America was America then;  Lawrence Spivak included.  There were grievous conflicts fifty years ago, both at home and abroad.  But, I felt good about my country.  No drugs, no Jihad Janes, no Irani nuclear weapons, bananas were high in potassium but low in grade school sex education value,  teachers were respected and actually had learned something when in college (other than lesbian and black studies), and, although struggling,  the country was finally beginning to win its battle against racial division. 

And no one would be perverted or dumb enough to extoll Charles Manson or Mao Tse Dung as their hero….their mentor…..the persons “most admired for their political philosophy”.

This morning I turned on “This Week” expecting to endure David Gregory, one of the most obnoxious personages on television, hosting some collection of lefties and George Will.  David must have overslept.  He wasn’t there. Among the lefties was Cokie Roberts who in yesteryear brought us leftwing news, “All Things Considered” from “public” radio …paid for, in part, then as today, by your and my tax dollars.   I have always liked her despite her talent avoiding any subject that might suggest conservatives exist.    She charms.

George Will  joined “This Week” per usual.

And also, for all America to see and hear, ABC paraded before the public, Anita Dunn…..as if she were your kindly next door neighbor…..an esteemed madame of the Left.

Maybe she is!   But this is the same Anita Dunn who worships a certain MaoZeDong….the same Mao Tse Dung of yesteryear….the mass murderer of 60,000,000 to 80,000,000 of his fellow Chinese citizens in his playful way of exercising forced Marxist equality……For those of you unable to grasp the size or settings of the slaughter….think  of Charlie Manson and his minions multiplied by the many millions. 

Anita Dunn is the recently retired WHITE HOUSE COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR  of guess who?

Anita Dunn spoke last June to a Missouri high school graduating class…….and announced with all the  female conviction and hysteria she could muster, that Dictator Mao, was her favorite “political philosopher” of all time.  She loved Mother Teresa as well…..she told her teenage listeners in Missouri.

Who hired her?  Whom was she hired to serve?    

BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA!   

Anita Dunn was the White House Communications Director for president Barack Hussein Obama……until her emotions got the better of herself last June in Missouri….

The woman is an accomplished talker….whether in Missouri or on ABC television.  There she was, passed off by ABC as an  ”honored and respected” representative and defender of Obamacare government run health industry legislation.   That it has plodded its way through stench, muck and rot to arrive at Congressional  voting this coming week is hardly noticed  by the “This Week”  entertainers.  

Where would Anita Dunn have come from?  How could she worship a Charlie Manson type murderer multiplied by the millions?  How could her mind be so empty….or full, if  she believes in mass murder in the millions to satisfy  political moods alaChairman Mao?  America  is not accustomed to such poltical policy…at least not yet.

Why isn’t this empty headed, or vile lover of serial murder in exile in Nevada somewhere, in solitude of disgrace?

Because she went to college, where she began her romance with the good Chairman.  And she is a woman.  Women prefer to read the romance of fiction.

I’ll never forget a television  interview of  a juror of the Menendez brothers” first trial of two decades ago, the gal causing the mistrial……The brothers were accused of the  viscious murder of their wealthy  parents.  Only an ostrich confined to the sands of Iwo Jima covering its buried head could have juried these killers as innocent.  “No boys that handsome could have committed a crime like that”, this  juror declared…with all the depth and warmth of heart as a loving  mother.  But, she was supposed to be a juror, not a loving  mother.

I believe Anita Dunn learned her Mao-love in college.  Perhaps she never heard of the Charlie Manson side of the good Chairman Mao.   That is possible  to learn in college as well. 

Ask around your own family, especially those of high school and college age, about Chairman Mao. 

Conduct your own survey.  You may want to do a little reading first……just in case you have never heard of Chairman Mao.

Churchill on Capitalism and Democracy

More quotes from the art collection of words created by Winston Spencer Churchill:

Capitalism is the uneven distribution of wealth, socialsim is the even distribution of poverty, and communism is socialism with a gun at your back.

Democracy is the worst form of goverrnment except for all of the rest.

The best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with a voter.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 130 other followers