James S. Robbins at the Washington Times reminds readers of the difference between Christian terror and Muslim terror in our 2011 modern times. At National Public Radio hosts there advertise that there is absolutely no difference between these terror groups.
It is true that ten or so years ago an above-the-law abortionist was shot to death by a “Christian” anti-abortionist. It is true that in Nigeria some Christians have dared to defend themselves against attacking muslim jihadists on a ‘crusade’ of murder and slaughter of those unwashed of Islam.
There have been no reports of such defense efforts among Christians in Baghdad the other day who survived a bombers attack on a Church.
Christian organizations throughout the world are so threatening they intimidate by remain totally silent regarding these assaults to accent their terrorism.
To equal the Chistian policy of intimidation by silence, muslim jihadist reacted by detonating a car bomb in Alexandria, Egypt.
President Barack Hussein Obama recognized the status quo with acceptance as James S. Robbins at the Washington Times noted:
“Radical Muslims detonated a car bomb outside a Coptic Christian church in Alexandria, Egypt, on Saturday, killing 21 and wounding many others. The White House condemned the attack as a “barbaric and heinous act” but – true to form – remained silent on the jihadist motives of its perpetrators.
President Obama, his fans at NPR and PBS, and the Left in general, seem quite pleased with this moral equivalence. Many from the Saul Alinsky Left in the West rally around the jihadists of Islam to assist America’s atheist-Marxists to eliminate Christianity from the human stage.
Dennis Prager recently wrote an article published in National Review Online, THE NEW MORAL EQUIVALENCE.
“Little has changed regarding the Left’s inability to identify and confront evil. Its moral equation of good guys and bad guys was made evident again in recent weeks by hosts on three major liberal networks: ABC, National Public Radio (NPR), and the Public Broadcasting System (PBS).
First, on May 25, PBS host Tavis Smiley interviewed Ayaan Hirsi Ali, the ex-Muslim Somali writer and activist for human, especially women’s, rights in Islamic countries. After mentioning American Muslim terrorists Major Nidal Hasan (who murdered 13 fellow soldiers and injured 30 others at Fort Hood) and Faisal Shahzad (who attempted to murder hundreds in Times Square), this dialogue ensued:
Ali: “Somehow, the idea got into their [Hasan’s and Shahzad’s] minds that to kill other people is a great thing to do and that they would be rewarded in the hereafter.”
Smiley: “But Christians do that every single day in this country.”
Ali: “Do they blow people up?”
Smiley: “Yes. Oh, Christians, every day, people walk into post offices, they walk into schools, that’s what Columbine is — I could do this all day long. There are so many more examples of Christians — and I happen to be a Christian.
“There are so many more examples, Ayaan, of Christians who do that than you could ever give me examples of Muslims who have done that inside this country, where you live and work.”
Then, on August 22, Michel Martin, host of NPR’s Tell Me More, in discussing whether the Islamic Center and mosque planned for near Ground Zero should be moved, said this on CNN’s Reliable Sources with Howard Kurtz: “Should anybody move a Catholic church? Did anybody move a Christian church after Timothy McVeigh, who adhered to a cultic white supremacist cultic version of Christianity, bombed [the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City]?”
And third, on August 26, ABC 20/20 anchor Chris Cuomo tweeted this to his nearly 1 million followers: “To all my christian brothers and sisters, especially catholics – before u condemn muslims for violence, remember the crusades . . . . study them.”
I have known Tavis Smiley since the 1980s, when we both worked at the same radio station in Los Angeles. He is smart, and he is a gentleman who has accorded me great respect both on and off the air.
How, then, does such a man equate Muslims who murder in the name of Islam with Americans who “murder every day,” none of whom commit their murders in the name of Christianity?
How does Michel Martin equate the thousands of Islamic terrorists around the world, all of whom are devout Muslims, with a single American (one who professed no religion at all)?
And how does ABC’s Chris Cuomo claim that Christians cannot condemn Muslims for violence because of the Christian Crusades?
First of all, the Crusades occurred a thousand years ago. One might as well argue that Jews cannot condemn Christian and secular anti-Semitic violence because Jews destroyed Canaanite communities 3,200 years ago.
Second, it is hardly a defense of Muslims to cite comparable Christian conduct that occurred a thousand years ago.
Third, even if we do compare the Crusades with contemporary Islamic jihadism, there is little moral equivalence. The Crusades were waged in order to recapture lands that had been Christian for centuries until Muslim armies attacked them. (Some Crusaders also massacred whole Jewish communities in Germany on the way to the Holy Land, and that was a grotesque evil — which Church officials condemned at the time.) As the dean of Western Islamic scholars, Princeton professor Bernard Lewis, has written, “The Crusades could more accurately be described as a limited, belated and, in the last analysis, ineffectual response to the jihad — a failed attempt to recover by a Christian holy war what had been lost to a Muslim holy war.”
So how did Tavis Smiley, Michel Martin, and Chris Cuomo make such morally egregious statements?
The answer is not that these are bad people, or that they are not repulsed by terrorist violence.
The answer is leftism, the way of looking at the world that permeates high schools, universities, and the news and entertainment media. Those indoctrinated by leftist thinking become largely incapable of making accurate moral judgments. They once regarded America and the Soviet Union as morally similar. Today, they claim that the people they call Christian “extremists” (who are they?) and Islamist terrorists and their supporters pose equal threats to America and to the world.
That is how bright and decent people become moral relativists and thereby undermine the battles against the greatest evils — Communist totalitarianism in its time, and Islamic totalitarianism in ours.
The only solution is to keep exposing leftist moral confusion. One problem, however, is that in countries without talk radio, an equivalent to the Wall Street Journal editorial page, conservative columnists, and a vigorous anti-Left political party, this is largely impossible.
The other major problem is that the media that dominate American life have little problem — indeed, they largely concur — with the foolish and dangerous comments made by their mainstream-media colleagues. That is why these comments, worthy of universal moral condemnation, were ignored by the mainstream (i.e., left-wing) media. Instead, they directed mind-numbing attention and waves of opprobrium toward Dr. Laura.
Those who don’t fight real evils fight imaginary ones.”
Comment: It is the human female, by nature, who cowers before real evils never wanting to disturb her world of security. Any nation reaching an over- feminized stage of governance and the governed, has entered the last stages of life experiencing the first seizures of its death throes.
This is a classic moment of human life at any level. When female romance overwhelms male instinct for danger, there is little hope for the neighborhood, for the city, for the nation to survive.
Good Morning, America! Have a nice day!
Filed under: American Culture, Barack Obama, Education, Foreign Affairs and News, Marxism, National Politics | Leave a Comment »