Dem Analyst Eugene Robinson Castigates Santorum for Family Mourning Baby’s Death

Eugene Robinson: Rick Santorum’s Stillborn Baby Story Is “Very Weird”

Eugene Robinson: That story about Santorum

and his infant son certainly is weird

 

posted   by Allahpundit   at HotAir:

 

 

First Colmes, now this guy. Is the way Santorum grieved for his dead child really going to be part of the lefty commentariat’s oppo playbook this year? Really? Even after Santorum’s wife was reduced to tears by what Colmes said? If she had aborted the baby a few weeks earlier and let the body be dumped in the trash, these cretins would be marveling at how much more “progressive” she is than her husband. Instead she carried the child to term and the two of them brought the body home for a few hours so that the family could mourn together, and Robinson’s prepared to disqualify him for elected office because of it. Vote Democrat.

Via Peter Wehner, here’s how “weird” this is according to the American Pregnancy Association. Advice to parents of stillborn babies (Santorum’s son was born alive but lived only a few hours):

After the tests are completed, you will usually have the choice to spend time alone with your baby. You can find comfort in looking at, touching, and talking to your baby. Most parents find it helpful to make memories of this precious time that will last a lifetime…

With the loss of your baby, your family members will also grieve. Your baby is someone’s granddaughter, brother, cousin, nephew or sister. It is important for your family members to spend time with the baby. This will help them come to terms with their loss. If you have other children, it is very important to be honest with them about what has happened by using simple and honest explanations. It is your decision whether you would like the children to see the baby. Ask for a Child Life Specialist at the hospital; these are trained professionals who can help you prepare your children for the heartbreaking news, and prepare them to see the baby if you wish.

They suggest bathing the baby, taking photos as a keepsake, or even singing it a lullaby. Go figure that, knowing they’ll have only a precious few hours to share with a lost child, some people want to do what they can to capture the moment. I wonder what Robinson thinks Santorum and his wife should have done instead. Is it a simple matter of venue, i.e. he should have brought his kids to the hospital to see the baby there instead of bringing it to them at home? He did that, I assume, only because he wanted the family to have time together in a normal setting, not an antiseptic obstetrics ward. And yet this personal story, which has zero policy implications but does vividly illustrate Santorum’s belief that dead babies are family members too, somehow has unnerved not one but two pro-choicers to the point where they feel obliged to remark about its “weirdness” on TV. Again, go figure. Click the image to watch.

Krauthammer: Obama Begins America’s Great Decline as a World Power

“A ROAD MAP TO AMERICAN DECLINE”

Video of Charles Krauthammer  from RealClearPolitics:

“This budget strategy is a road map of American decline. It is going to reduce our capacity. It does exactly what the President had said he was not going to do, which is it will adapt our capacity and our strategies to fit a budget,” Charles Krauthammer said on FOX News’ “Special Report” tonight.

“This is a budget that is going to reduce American capacity. It will make it extremely hard to carry on the role that we have for 70 years,” Krauthammer warned.

Click below for video:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/01/05/krauthammer_obamas_military_reductions_a_roadmap_to_american_decline.html

STAR WSJ Man Henninger Claims Romney Campaign SMUG….Divisive.

One of my favorite opinion guys is Dan Henninger at the Wall Street Journal.   He belongs to my favorite clique on political television, one nearly without competition, the Wall Street Journal Report led by Paul Gigot and usually starring Henninger and Dorothy Rabinowitz each weekend.

Henninger so often grasps the core of the matter and writes well clarifying it.    I offer this, his most recent observation in today’s Wall Street Journal.    I don’t agree with the knives so many Republicans throw at Governor Romney.   I do not see him as smug, but polite, clean thinking, appearing, and speaking.    I do feel there is something wrong with his  campaign managing….which Henninger calls ‘smug’.

Mitt Romney is an honorable man,  a fine representative of American conservative life to run for the nation’s highest office.    How is it that HE is divisive when all of his opponents and the conservative sympathizers in the news and  industry gather to rail against him?   Does he comb his hair too well?

I do like Rick Santorum, but sorry folks, his religious conviction unfortunately is out of today’s American mainstream.   The Left in the nation is ever much more deceitful and vulgar and less well educated than yesterday’s American  left.  Many prefer to push drugs and be drugged, show up at college where they can join Women’s Studies, Black or Wall Street Occupier Klans, or  browbeat conservatives  with union baseball bats rather than find honest work. 

 The Center of the nation is ever so much less well educated, less  churched,  and very confused about traditional American values.  Most work and prefer families to  politics.  What they see is   unwinsome extremes on the dangerous  Left or the  old time Christian Right, for the Center went to college rather than get an education. 

Anyone who will defeat the Marxist, Obama, must win the Center.

The following is Dan Henninger’s article from the Wall Street Journal:

‘A house divided against itself cannot stand,” is attributed mainly to Newt Gingrich’s and Barack Obama’s favorite Republican, Abraham Lincoln, but its appeal to unity has been around since the Gospel of Mark. As is its habit, the Republican Party is trying to affirm this eternal truth one more time.

Much as it benefits the incumbent president, there is little point in not admitting the obvious: The Republican divider is the party’s front-runner, Mitt Romney. This is the one clear message delivered the past half year by the patient people of Iowa.

Once all the other top-tier Republican presidential candidates chose not to run, the heavyweight Mr. Romney should have cruised well above the bench-warmers who opposed him in Iowa. It never happened.

Mr. Romney had already run in 2008′s Iowa caucuses. You can guess what his vote percentage was in 2008. That’s right, 25.1%, essentially what he got in his eight-vote win Tuesday.

Whatever time Mr. Romney chose to spend in Iowa this year, the voters knew him. Surveying the current edition of the Romney candidacy and charged with picking a GOP presidential nominee, Iowa’s voters in their wisdom commenced a time-honored technique for finding a solution to a problem with no obvious answer: They threw every candidate against the wall to see if any would stick.

The dogged Rick Santorum stuck.

Two quick Santorum thoughts: What were all those debates about? And national security still beats isolationism among Republicans.

Beyond this, what Mr. Santorum’s astonishing whip-hand run to a photo finish from the rear of the pack means is hard to know exactly, but the increasingly smug Romney campaign ought to give it thought. The implications of the Santorum run are both positive and ominous.

The positive answer to the meaning of Mr. Santorum’s late rise can be found in the campaign of Ron Paul. One thing we learned this year in Iowa is that voters—and likely this includes voters across the spectrum—are willing to look past a lot of oddities or peccadilloes if a candidate displays political values that many voters think have vanished from our political culture. And the greatest among these is simple political consistency.

Sitting at 12% of the Iowa vote for weeks, Ron Paul suddenly jumped 10 points into contention. What was his appeal? Any writer who has criticized Mr. Paul got buried in emails of outrage from his supporters. What seemed to unite them in ardor for the Texas congressman was—this was their word—his “consistency.”

Sophisticates can transform Mr. Paul’s views on government and economics into various absurdities, but that misses how much voters are seeking consistency of political belief in a candidate. The only other GOP candidate who ultimately matched, and perhaps surpassed, Mr. Paul’s consistent set of beliefs was Rick Santorum. The unflattering word most often attached to Mr. Santorum, straining to be heard from stage left, is “earnest.” That’s true. While there are no saints in politics, the guy seems genuine.

 

The divider of the Republican party is its front-runner, Mitt Romney.

Consider all that voters have had to slog through since the 2008 financial meltdown—high unemployment, tepid economic growth, flatlined retirement savings, gridlock in Washington. Read any account of voter sentiment in the country and the common thread is disgust and alienation from the political process. Many have arrived in 2012 looking for one trustworthy politician who doesn’t seem covered with the residue of this bad experience. On Tuesday, that looked like Rick Santorum.There’s a less inspiring side to the Iowa results. Analysis of the caucus voters makes clear that Mitt Romney holds the Republican vote that most values electability, defeating Barack Obama with whatever works. Nothing wrong with that. Winning matters. There’s much to like in the Romney candidacy. But no one doubts that Mr. Romney’s strategy is counting on two things: electability and inevitability.

The problem is that any campaign running on a mixture of electability and inevitability this year is by definition filling the atmosphere with a lot of cynicism. Electability is self-limiting, though, if Mr. Romney never closes the deal with the angry Republicans who gave their votes to Messrs. Santorum, Paul and the others. It’s a lot of votes.

Political cynicism and political anger are not cut from the same cloth. If Mr. Romney doesn’t find a way to make his candidacy bridge this divide in the Republican Party, Barack Obama—the one real cynic in this campaign—will exploit the GOP’s division and weaken him.

Mr. Romney still lacks the consistency of political belief that drove voters to Rick Santorum and Ron Paul. An example:

Yesterday, Barack Obama was in Shaker Heights, Ohio, to deliver his awful class-war speech again. On page 39 of Mr. Romney’s 160-page economic plan, he attacks the president’s “inflammatory” rhetoric against “so-called millionaires and billionaires.” Mr. Romney adds: “He actually includes every household earning more than $250,000 in that category.” But turn to the next page, and you read that Mr. Romney will eliminate taxes on capital gains, dividends and interest “for any taxpayer with an adjusted gross income of under $200,000.”This transparently insulates the wealthy Mr. Romney from attack, but the ploy discomfits and annoys his natural base. He’s trying to force Republicans to cast a cynical vote in a year when many don’t want to do that. Some will, but not all. It’s the “not all” that could cost him the election.

Write to henninger@wsj.com

Comment:   I would encourage Dan Henninger to  zero in on the campaign staff ‘s politics first.   Then appeal to the candidate himself  to offer Romney  Henninger wisdom, a valuable commodity, to make Henninger corrections  to improve his campaign and  redirect its cause  as soon as possible.   

We Prager fans may want to send Mitt Dennis Prager for improvements, as well.

Why not elect the electable Mitt  Romney with Preacher Good Guy Santorum as his running mate and conservative conscience and mentor.   If  Romney is as wishy washy about his conservative thoughts as all his Republican enemies claim, he should be  easy pickings to be converted to Rick Santorum’s conservatism.     Let Vice President Santorum follow an eight year reign by Mitt  as  followup conservative president buoyed in popularity by the successful Romney-Santorum ticket……

It will take more than eight years of winning budget wars and winning back American minds , to restore  faith in our government and  to strengthen  the basic tenets which have made America the great:  

“In God We Trust”…..”Liberty”, and “E Pluribus Unum”……ALL THREE  PILLARS  WHICH HAVE  FORMED  AMERICA.    

ALL  THREE  PILLARS HAVE BEEN UNDER ASSAULT BY THIS  BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA AND HIS LEFTIST ALLIES.

Atheism is the preferred Obamaland religion……Obamaland  directorship and ownership  replaces citizen  enterprise and creativity…….and   Obamaland diveristy and its inherent , national,  and racist bigotries it nurtures replaces   E Pluribus Unum, from  the many, ONE, that despite race or wealth, formal of life education,  owner or laborer we are equally American in law and opportunity.

Obama’s wars against traditional America must be ended.

 

 

The Obama THEN would VETO the Obama NOW

That was then, this is now

from Scott Johnson   at   PowerLine:

“Responding to President Obama’s putative recess appointments yesterday, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell distributed the following collection of quotes to provide a little context:

THEN-SEN. BARACK OBAMA (D-IL): Recess appointments ‘the wrong thing to do.’ “‘It’s the wrong thing to do. John Bolton is the wrong person for the job,’ said Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., a member of Foreign Relations Committee.” (“Officials: White House To Bypass Congress For Bolton Nomination,” The Associated Press, 7/30/05)

· OBAMA: A recess appointee is ‘damaged goods… we will have less credibility.’ “To some degree, he’s damaged goods… somebody who couldn’t get through a nomination in the Senate. And I think that that means that we will have less credibility…” (“Bush Sends Bolton To U.N.” The State Journal-Register [Springfield, IL], 8/2/05)

SEN. HARRY REID (D-NV): ‘An end run around the Senate and the Constitution.’ “I will keep the Senate in pro forma session to block the President from doing an end run around the Senate and the Constitution with his controversial nominations.” (Sen. Reid, Congressional Record, S.15980, 12/19/07)

· REID: ‘They are mischievous.’ “Also, understand this: We have had a difficult problem with the President now for some time. We don’t let him have recess appointments because they are mischievous, and unless we have an agreement before the recess, there will be no recess. We will meet every third day pro forma, as we have done during the last series of breaks.” (Sen. Reid, Congressional Record, S.7558, 7/28/08)

· REID: Recess appointments an ‘abuse of power.’ “Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) denounced the appointment as ‘the latest abuse of power by the Bush administration,’ adding that Bolton would arrive at the UN ‘with a cloud hanging over his head’ because he could not win confirmation.” (“Bush Puts Bolton In UN Post,” Chicago Tribune, 8/2/05)

· REID: A recess appointee will have ‘a cloud hanging over his head.’ “Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) denounced the appointment as ‘the latest abuse of power by the Bush administration,’ adding that Bolton would arrive at the UN ‘with a cloud hanging over his head’ because he could not win confirmation.” (“Bush Puts Bolton In UN Post,” Chicago Tribune, 8/2/05)

SEN. DICK DURBIN (D-IL): ‘Troubling.’ “When you have an appointment that is this critical and this sensitive, and the president basically says he’s going to ignore the will of the senate and push someone through, it really is troubling.” (“Bush Sends Bolton To U.N.” The State Journal-Register [Springfield, IL], 8/2/05)

· DURBIN: ‘Could easily be unconstitutional.’ “I agree with Senator Kennedy that Mr. Pryor’s recess appointment, which occurred during a brief recess of Congress, could easily be unconstitutional. It was certainly confrontational. Recess appointments lack the permanence and independence contemplated by the Framers of the Constitution.” (Sen. Durbin, Congressional Record, S.6253, 6/9/05)

SEN. JOHN KERRY (D-MA): Recess appointments an ‘abuse [of] the power of the presidency.’ “‘It’s sad but not surprising that this White House would abuse the power of the presidency to reward a donor over the objections of the Senate,’ Kerry said in a statement …” (“Recess Appointments Granted to ‘Swift Boat’ Donor, 2 Other Nominees,” The Washington Post, 4/5/07)

SEN. FRANK LAUTENBERG (D-NJ): “…bends the rules and circumvents the will of Congress.” (“President Sends Bolton to U.N.; Bypasses Senate,” The New York Times, 8/2/05)

SEN. MAX BAUCUS (D-MT): “Senate confirmation of presidential appointees is an essential process prescribed by the Constitution that serves as a check on executive power and protects Montanans and all Americans by ensuring that crucial questions are asked of the nominee — and answered…” (“Dem Baucus Joins GOP In Blasting Obama CMS Recess Appointment,” The Hill, 7/7/10)

Several of these quotes arose from Democratic opposition to President Bush’s recess appointment of the great John Bolton as Ambassador to the United Nations, an appointment which raised none of the legal or constitutional issues that yesterday’s appointments by Obama did. Senator McConnell issued the following statement yesterday afternoon regarding Obama’s “unprecedented” recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board:

“Just hours after he circumvented the American people by ‘recess’ appointing Richard Cordray to the CFPB, the President has upped the ante by making several additional recess appointments, this time to the NLRB. Although all of these appointments potentially raise legal and constitutional questions, the NLRB appointments are particularly egregious. Because the President waited to nominate Sharon Block and Richard Griffin until just two days before the Senate was scheduled to adjourn last month, neither has undergone a single confirmation hearing or a single day of debate by the representatives of the American people. Congress has a constitutional duty to examine presidential nominees, a responsibility that serves as a check on executive power. But what the President did today sets a terrible precedent that could allow any future President to completely cut the Senate out of the confirmation process, appointing his nominees immediately after sending their names up to Congress. This was surely not what the framers had in mind when they required the President to seek the advice and consent of the Senate in making appointments.”

Comment:   Let us pray the American people will VETO this Marxist Obama of today in NOVEMBER>

The American Left’s Diminishment of the Human Being and the Rise of the Coyote

I have coyote preying on my grounds.   The resident couple have produced a pup.   We seldom see these folks, but they are there and we have quicky pictures to prove their settlement.

In the thirty eight years of my residency here in suburban Minneapolis , I have been able to create and maintain a beautiful  classic landscape garden.   We live in a climate in which winter is the major landscape season, as long as all of the other landscape seasons combined.   

As a boy I noticed that.   I delivered papers both morning and after school.  It was an outdoor job…..Although I hated delivering papers in the winter, I loved  the early mornings throughout the year….the 5 AM mornings  before anyone but paper boys were prowling the streets…..except once in a long while  when a coyote came to view.      Fox at 5AM were fairly common, but not coyote.   Fearless through ignorance, I’d drop my paper boy’s delivery bag and tried  to follow the creature.

We haven’t noticed coyotes anywhere in my neighborhood until  three or four years ago.   I had seen one in the center of Minneapolis about ten years back  in the garden of a good friend of mine.   It was dark winter and I had just  turned into the driveway.   Suddenly a coyote I disturbed  looked up at me.  ”He”  had  torn something apart which was drooping from its jaws…..and it wasn’t a plant.   “He” was mangy-looking (all coyotes in my vocabulary are male unless proved otherwise), and “he” was a coyote which grabbed his kill and ran off into the dark.

My grounds are filled with evergreen conifers……the plants of good memory when I needed them as a news delivery boy  to hide behind during the wild blizzards over   50  years ago,  long before these wonderful days of global warming in our Northland.

Conifers  come in many  sizes and shapes these days.   Those sizes and shapes are well displayed in my ‘paradise’.   So is snow in winter…..except for this winter thus  far.   

Rabbits and squirrels, birds and voles used to love these conifers-of-all-sizes winter garden.   Until about three years ago.  

Today, only the birds still  do.  Actually, there are more of them of all kinds nesting and enjoying the sites.    

No longer do the rabbits and voles eat up all of the lower foliage of my  arborvitaes.   No longer are squirrels fighting to burrow into my house eaves to mooch off of  my expensive winter heating and escape the winter winds.

Instead, I  see replacement  foot prints in the winter snow as I walk  along my garden paths.   They are dog-like, but I allow no dogs to enter my space whereever I think I rule.  

My lovely garden now houses new visitors,  ’Canis latrans’ the coyote,  allowed  into my space, whether I like it or not.   They are about the only footprints etched in the snow these days.    New prints arrive with each new snow dusting or snowfall.

While searching for television something or another a few days ago, I came across an hour’s worth on the expansion of the coyote population  throughout America……the America that still includes Arizona, New York , California, and Florida.

“Although assaults upon humans are rare, they do happen…..” the narrators admitted more than once.   The deaths are more  frequent in PARKS  in  the Northeast….Massachusetts and New York, for instance.    They noted an example of an ourdoor-type gal who was a regular hiker  in an urban public park.   Two  coyote had stalked her, run her down and destroyed her as others in the park who had heard  her screams arrived at  the scene  too late to save her…….and fended off the two coyote killers.

We live in a time where equality among mankind and ’other’ animals  is required by some politicians and university instructors…..we must live ‘as one’ with nature.   I accept  this dogma, but I do believe I must add, “barely”.    

I still believe the human being is sacred; not the equal of the coyote or squirrel.    I prefer me to rule in my landscape garden rather than  coyote.   If I have to put up with something of a lower order than I am  in my paradise, I’ll go for the hungry mink, who have happened to drop by upon occasion.

The equality people, the stars of this  television program on coyote, that is, the park rangers, the animal huggers who work for the state to protect wild life, and their similars, (isn’t English a terrific language) who love coyote, seem quite sincere in their warnings to the general public reminding  them that coyote can be our killers.  

“Don’t feed them”, they politely  advise…..and then they move on to their coyote-loving.   I admit.   Coyote  ’chicks’ ARE cute.

“Coyote have naturalized nearly everywhere throughout the United States, even on Manhattan Island in New York City”. 

Rangers who keep an eye on these exploding coyote populations mark the  ’cute’ beasts in their youth  to follow  their roamings henceforth…..(your tax money at work).      “They lack competition from bigger predators.”  the experts  announced, hinting  that it wouldn’t have happened if we had let the timberwolf prowl our streets like they did before human kind  had streets.

Besides “Don’t feed the animals”, here is the official message from these state officials representing urban  American  visits from the ever larger coyote flocks……

“When taking  your nature  hikes in your local parks, suburban or urban, or your landscape gardens, you should take a stick along with you……just in case.” concluding that the coyote is our human equal in the eyes of the modern educated park bureaucrats.   “We must learn to live along side ‘nature’ and stay out of coyote way.

The narrators did give viewers  a moment of politico-social-religious  ’balance’, a brief one for sure, but an effort nevertheless.   I think it was in Colorado, a suburb of Denver. where a  park ranger being interviewed by the coyote huggers,  glanced with a hint of a wink at his power rifle when he was asked about his recommentdations  for coyote control.

I enjoyed the program as you, dear readers, might have noticed from the rhythms and a embellishments of this writing.

The American has become and indoor population despite their occasional bicycle and hiking jaunts from their bureaucratic life  into the great outdoors.    When I was a kid most Americans worked outdoors for their living.    Most  owned a rifle for their outdoor business…..controlling wolves and coyote, puma and wild this or  that which decimated their food supply and not infrequently some of these outdoor people as well.

Today indoor people look at animal life romantically.   I do too.   One of the most beautiful sites Mother Nature can cook up for me  is to see the beautiful sleak cougar eyeing and plotting the kill of its prey….as long as one doesn’t romance too much  of the prey’s immediate future.   

I think it a tragedy  that  ”lions, tigers and bears”…..well not bears, yet…..are disappearing from Earth due to mankind’s ‘interference’.   

Nevertheless, I shall die believing that human life is sacred.     Much of that devotion came from my public school education.

In the meantime, I guess I shall have to position sticks ‘artistically’ along the paths of my landscape garden…..just in case.

Are Republican Writers and Pundits too Narrow and Extreme to Accept a Quality Romney?

Whether before or after  yesterday’s Iowa vote results, those who claim the conservative mantle in words and deeds seemed to be united in their contempt for fellow conservative, Mitt Romney.    I have searched my usual sources via the air waves, televeision  waves, and the internet……almost all ‘conservative’ voices use the name ‘Romney’   as if it meant the enemy…..the one who must be beaten……..but who is going to do it?

Some like many of the folks at Fox seem to stir  any  cauldron boiling Mitt Romney as if it is a sporting  even  to increase viewer ratings.

Among his sins…..well combed hair, nice suits, good voice, Republican establishment, Governor of Massachusetts, successful, very successful business man and reorganizer of  the Olympic Games,  smiles too much and seems plastic……and is a Mormon……..and worst of all he doesn’t belong in the ANTI-MITT ROMNEY camp.

If some elected Republican dares to endorse him, he or she is identified  as a member of  the Republican ‘establishment’, a humanhood of sinners, the cruelest of all beings.

Nearly every airwave voice positions decent American, Mitt Romney, as an enemy to conservative principles.

I am glad to report that Dennis Prager does not list himself as among them.   He does raise a rather important point, however, which is the following, in my, not Dennis’ words. 

  Do conservatives want to rebuild America to restore its traditional principles and rightfully and dutifully  remove from office Barack Hussein Obama, the leader of the Marxist cancer now afflicting the nation, or do they  merely want to run a sufficiently narrow thinking , dogma-driven cur, of  mixed bloods  of loony, navel picking Ron, sour,  vitriolic, revengeful and  clever  Newt, a charming, but forgetful God fearing   Governor Perry to get rid of a blood clot of emotional frustration over the collapse of their beloved homeland?

None of these folks are going to win any election on November 6, 2012……Please be honest in your thinkging!   Even a mongrel of their creation with all of the fangs of the dogmatic Conservative ’stars’  of communication are not going to create  this winner.

Of the lot still on hand for the battle to regain citizen freedoms, there are two, the winners of the Iowa caucus system yesterday, Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum……who need some review following the caucuses.

Mitt Romney has, by far, the best chance of defeating Barack Hussein, both by credentials and by tolerance and tolerance’s ability to work with people who are not conservative.    Thank God he will not be a Republican Barack Hussein Obama!    He has experience working with Americans of a variety, even enemy-like persuasions….as he expressed during his term as Governor of  Massachusetts, a muddy-left state if their ever was one.

Sorry, immoderate Republicans, of which I am one on nearly every dogmatic conservative  front, let’s be rational.  

Stop slicing apart your champion of our November 6, future.    If your convictions of ‘true’ conservatism are superior to those of   Governor Romney……..then persuade Governor Romney  of their degrees of superiority……..Remind him of the errors of his ways.   Envigorate  his conservative  corpuscles.

You claim he is easily persuaded?….well then PERSUADE  him……he should be a push-over,  rather than devour him like a pack of wolves.   You do your Party, your conservatism, and your America no good by continuing  your antiRomney frenzies.

Let Rick Santorum, or a similar  skilled communicator of  our cause  be your nation’s conservative conscience and preacher, the ‘clarity’ man  as Vice President to guide country and President Romney into our better American future.    Let us develop a union  between us  conservatives  and our beloved Americans who pride themselves of being in the middle……those who would oppose Rick Santorum, but happily and willingly vote for Mitt Romney.

WIN THE NOVEMBER 2012 ELECTION  by uniting the voters to elect some electable conservative!!!!    Rick Santorum could be an excellent preacher-clarifier of the conservative movement! 

Mitt Romney  is the best conservative on hand to cause  this union to defeat the opponents of free enterprise America.      Advise Mitt Romney to UPLIFT our American politics out of the Obamamud so everyone will not the quality of our candidate over the opposition.