• Pragerisms

    For a more comprehensive list of Pragerisms visit
    Dennis Prager Wisdom.

    • "The left is far more interested in gaining power than in creating wealth."
    • "Without wisdom, goodness is worthless."
    • "I prefer clarity to agreement."
    • "First tell the truth, then state your opinion."
    • "Being on the Left means never having to say you're sorry."
    • "If you don't fight evil, you fight gobal warming."
    • "There are things that are so dumb, you have to learn them."
  • Liberalism’s Seven Deadly Sins

    • Sexism
    • Intolerance
    • Xenophobia
    • Racism
    • Islamophobia
    • Bigotry
    • Homophobia

    A liberal need only accuse you of one of the above in order to end all discussion and excuse himself from further elucidation of his position.

  • Glenn’s Reading List for Die-Hard Pragerites

    • Bolton, John - Surrender is not an Option
    • Bruce, Tammy - The Thought Police; The New American Revolution; The Death of Right and Wrong
    • Charen, Mona - DoGooders:How Liberals Hurt Those They Claim to Help
    • Coulter, Ann - If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans; Slander
    • Dalrymple, Theodore - In Praise of Prejudice; Our Culture, What's Left of It
    • Doyle, William - Inside the Oval Office
    • Elder, Larry - Stupid Black Men: How to Play the Race Card--and Lose
    • Frankl, Victor - Man's Search for Meaning
    • Flynn, Daniel - Intellectual Morons
    • Fund, John - Stealing Elections
    • Friedman, George - America's Secret War
    • Goldberg, Bernard - Bias; Arrogance
    • Goldberg, Jonah - Liberal Fascism
    • Herson, James - Tales from the Left Coast
    • Horowitz, David - Left Illusions; The Professors
    • Klein, Edward - The Truth about Hillary
    • Mnookin, Seth - Hard News: Twenty-one Brutal Months at The New York Times and How They Changed the American Media
    • Morris, Dick - Because He Could; Rewriting History
    • O'Beirne, Kate - Women Who Make the World Worse
    • Olson, Barbara - The Final Days: The Last, Desperate Abuses of Power by the Clinton White House
    • O'Neill, John - Unfit For Command
    • Piereson, James - Camelot and the Cultural Revolution: How the Assassination of John F. Kennedy Shattered American Liberalism
    • Prager, Dennis - Think A Second Time
    • Sharansky, Natan - The Case for Democracy
    • Stein, Ben - Can America Survive? The Rage of the Left, the Truth, and What to Do About It
    • Steyn, Mark - America Alone
    • Stephanopolous, George - All Too Human
    • Thomas, Clarence - My Grandfather's Son
    • Timmerman, Kenneth - Shadow Warriors
    • Williams, Juan - Enough: The Phony Leaders, Dead-End Movements, and Culture of Failure That Are Undermining Black America--and What We Can Do About It
    • Wright, Lawrence - The Looming Tower

Dems Cannot Enjoy Life and Laugh at themselves. Obama’s Marxist Presidency is a Firestorm of Incompetence

by John Hinderaker in Media and at PowerLine

Who’s Funnier, Republicans Or Democrats?

No one in America has more experience at making fun of Democrats and Republicans, so Jay Leno’s views on the parties’ senses of humor are of interest:

Jay Leno, who celebrates his 20th anniversary as host of “The Tonight Show” this year, said on the political-humor spectrum, Republicans “laugh at themselves more” than their opponents across the aisle.

“Democrats and Republicans are interesting because Republicans really laugh at themselves more. Like when Bush came on, it was, ‘We want to do a skit, we’re kind of making fun of… — ‘Yeah, go ahead!’” said Leno on NBC’s “Press Pass” with David Gregory, who appeared on Leno’s show earlier in April.

Former Vice President Al Gore wasn’t quite as easy going on camera as former President Bush, according to Leno.

“We went up to Al Gore, ‘can we do this skit?’ — ‘Hang on.’ And there was this focus group, and then media people came in: ‘Where will Al be sitting? Will Al have the punchline?,” Leno said.

Lately Leno has had a lot of fun at Mitt Romney’s expense, but in Leno’s case it is fun, not hate, and politicians know the difference:

Despite jabs at the presumptive GOP nominee, Leno praised Romney’s sense of humor.

“I like the fact that I can do weeks of Mitt Romney jokes, and Mitt Romney then comes here. Because I haven’t insulted his religion…I mean I’ve made fun of him, but I haven’t questioned his patriotism or his loyalty or his family,” he said.

Interesting perspective, I thought.

Comment:    Marxist Americans such as  Barack Obama dislike America the way it is.   They demand that they have the exclusive right to decide what is good for the American citizen at home and abroad,  what is best to eat, how to clothe,  how much water must be used, gas not used, what radio to listen to,  in making men women and women men, and become mindless Obamalings in all subjects.  Americans must be made equal.  They  get their training at university.

Obamalings dream UN instead.

Conservatives have a distinct disadvantage in American political combat.  Almost universally they have other lives and interests than living and sleeping  government to manipulate how to punish those who aren’t  of the same Leftwing faith.

With Marxists, church and government are one and the same.   There is neither good nor evil.   Everything is a matter of   university opinion, and as  Obama speechifies,  it is the duty of  Obamaling bureaucrats to replace knowledge and the strange ideas which amassing knowledge might cause,  with the peacefulness of everyone thinking the same,  being made the same, buying the same, laughing the same,  living the same,  voting the same……and there are no differences between the human male and female beyond socialization.

Mark Steyn Analyzes Obama’s Big-Government HOOKER PROBLEM

Grope and Change

by Mark Steyn     at the National Review:

Unlike the government of the United States, I can’t claim any hands-on experience with Colombian hookers. But I was impressed by the rates charged by Miss Dania Suarez, and even more impressed by the U.S. Secret Service’s response to them.

Cartagena’s most famous “escort” costs $800. For purposes of comparison, you can book Eliot Spitzer’s “escort” for $300. Yet, on the cold grey fiscally conservative morning after the wild socially liberal night before, Dania’s Secret Service agent offered her a mere $28.

Twenty-eight bucks! What a remarkably precise sum. Thirty dollars less a federal handling fee? Why isn’t this guy Obama’s treasury secretary or budget director? Or, at the very least, the head honcho of the General Services Administration, whose previous director has sadly had to step down after the agency’s taxpayer-funded public-servants-gone-wild Bacchanal in Vegas.

All over this dying republic, you couldn’t find a single solitary $28 item that doesn’t wind up costing at least 800 bucks by the time it’s been sluiced through the federal budgeting process. Yet, in one plucky little corner of the Secret Service, supervisor David Chaney, dog-handler Greg Stokes, or one of the other nine agents managed to turn the principles of government procurement on their head. If the same fiscal prudence were applied to the 2011 Obama budget, the $3.598 trillion splurge would have cost just shy of $126 billion. The feds’ half a billion to Solyndra would have been a mere $18 million. The 823-grand GSA conference on government efficiency at the M Resort Spa & Casino would have come in at $28,805.

Chaney-Stokes 2012! Grope . . . and Change! Red lights, not red ink.

Alas, young Miss Suarez, just 24 and with a nine-year-old son and a ravenous pimp to feed, didn’t care for the cut of her Secret Service man’s jib. He made the fairly basic mistake — for an expensively trained government operative — of attempting to pay a prostitute in the hotel corridor, and Dania caused an altercation whose fallout has brought the Secret Service to its knees. Which isn’t how these encounters usually go. 

What we know so far is this: All eleven Secret Service men and all ten U.S. military personnel staying at the Hotel Caribe are alleged to have had “escorts” in their rooms that night. All of them. The entire team.

Twenty-one U.S. public servants. Twenty-one Colombian whores. Unless a couple of the senior guys splashed out for the two-girl special. “Some of them were saying they didn’t know they were prostitutes,” explained Congressman Peter King, chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee.

“Some are saying they were women at the bar.”

Amazing to hear government agents channeling Dudley Moore in Arthur: “You’re a hooker? I thought I was doing so well.” It turns out U.S. Secret Service agents are the only men who can walk into a Colombian nightclub and not spot the professionals. Are they really the guys you want protecting the president?

Congress is not happy about this. “It was totally wrong to take a foreign national back to a hotel when the president is about to arrive,” said Representative King.

It’s wrong to take a “foreign national” up to the room, but it would have been okay if she’d been from Des Moines? We’re all in favor of outsourcing, but in compliance with Section 27(e)viii of the PATRIOT Act this is the one job Americans will do?

With respect to the congressman, sometimes it helps to step back and consider the bigger picture. Why were 21 officials of the United States government able to enjoy a night of pleasure with 21 prostitutes, whether “foreign nationals” or all-American? The answer isn’t difficult. Indeed, one retired agent spelled it out: “They just didn’t have anything to do.”

So they did Dania Suarez and her friends instead.

The 21 dedicated public servants jetted in on the so-called car-planes, the big transports flying in the tinted-windowed black Suburbans for the presidential motorcade. The “car-plane” guys show up a few days in advance, but usually two weeks or so after the really advanced advance team has hit the ground. And there was nothing for them to do. There is no reason for them to be there.

So instead they went to the Pleyclub.

As I understand it, the 21 public servants did not technically bill U.S. taxpayers for their “escorts.” But you suckers paid for them to fly to Cartagena, and they were enjoying those women on your time. On foreign trips, aside from the 40 or so armored limousines, there are usually 200 Secret Service agents plus a couple of dozen sniffer dogs. Did the latter take any Colombian bitches back to their kennels? Or are they just the entrée for Obama’s embassy banquet?

I’ve written before about the U.S. government’s motorcade culture. Just last month, it cost U.S. taxpayers half a million bucks to fly Obama and David Cameron to Dayton, Ohio, to pretend to enjoy a basketball game. I’ve attended previous “Summits of the Americas” and G7 meetings and other international confabs, and always heard the same story wearily retailed by representatives of the host nation — that the money-no-object Yanks are flying in a bigger and more disruptive presidential entourage than everybody else put together. At this point, the local official usually rolls his eyes, and mostly, but not always, leaves the thought unspoken: “Americans! What do you expect?” The Queen routinely turns down requests from visiting U.S. presidents to reinforce the garden walls and replace the windows of Buckingham Palace — for an overnight stay. When the U.S. was the richest country on earth, the mad excess used to impress in a crude kind of way: If you’ve got it, flaunt it. Now it’s the Brokest Nation in History: America hasn’t got it, but still flaunts it. Which is kind of pathetic.

 

Does more equal better? No. All eleven Secret Service johns had their “security clearances” canceled. That still leaves over 4 million Americans (or about 2 percent of the adult population) with “security clearances,” and, according to the director of national intelligence last October, just under 1.5 million federal employees with “top secret”clearances. Which helps explain why one army private was able singlehandedly to download bazillions of (admittedly mostly worthless) “secrets” for WikiLeaks. Imagine the entire population of New Zealand with security clearances, and the entire population of Philadelphia or Phoenix with “top secret” clearances. 

And yet the more guys on the payroll, the less anyone does. For all the hooker-cavorting among a bored entourage with time on its hands, there was no one to proofread President Obama’s speech. So he stood up in public and attempted to pander to the Latins by referring to the sovereign British territory of the Falkland Islands by the designation of its temporary Argentine usurpers 30 years ago: “Las Malvinas.” Except that his writers got it wrong. So the president of the United States called it “the Maldives,” an entirely different bit of British Commonwealth real estate half a world away in the Indian Ocean. Were the speechwriting staff also face down in the hooker bar? “Jush a minute, baby. Hic. The preshhhiduh wansh a couple rewrites. ‘I call on London to return British Columbia to Colombia.’ Thash should do it. Lesh go back to my room and I’ll show you my prompter.”

It’s not just the entitlements. Everywhere you look in the bloated federal Leviathan, all is waste, all is excess. But the absurd imperial presidency is a good place to start. The next citizen-executive of this republic would be sending a right message were he to halve the motorcade, halve the security detail, halve the hookers.

Otherwise, America’s foreign creditors will start to figure out that another half decade of U.S. spendaholism and they’re likely to wind up like Dania Suarez: You loan the U.S. government $800 billion, and come the due day the treasury secretary reaches in his pocket and says: “So how about we call it 28 bucks even?”

Mark Steyn, a National Review columnist, is the author of After America: Get Ready for Armageddon. © 2012 Mark Steyn

Why Marxist Obama Buys His Votes…..to Prove de Tocqueville right about democracy

Truly Scary Statistic of the Day
Or, Why Democrats Really Are a Bunch of Moochers
Update: Are We This Stupid?

from the Jawa Report     sent by Lisa Rich:

Over at Drudge he’s running the headline “Only 85 Million Pay Fed Taxes” based on a Tax Foundation report showing just that. There are plenty of scary statistics in there, most of them which you are already familiar with. Such as the finding that those making over $50,000 pay 93.3% of the total tax burden. You do the math, but that means that those making under $50k only pay 6.7% of the feds tax revenue.

How can you have a democracy when a plurality of people don’t pay?

But, you know what sticks out in my mind as the worst thing in the report?

Out of the 143 million tax returns that were filed with the IRS in 2010, 58 million – or 41 percent – of those filers were non-payers…. 

But Tax Foundation data also shows that people who didn’t pay any income tax received $105 billion in refundable tax credits from the IRS

In other words, not only are those making under $50k not paying any income taxes …. lots of them are actually being paid off by the government!

That is, they have an effective tax rate that is negative.

If this isn’t directly buying votes, I don’t know what is.

File under: why tax reform will probably never happen without a few major riots.

Or, why I hate it when the French are right:

“A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship. The average age of the world’s greatest civilizations has been 200 years.” 

~Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America

UPDATE: Try to square the fact that the vast majority of the so-called “working class” is either paying nothing, next to nothing, or is being directly subsidized through negative taxation with the circle of the perception fed to them by the Democratic party and their media allies that they are being exploited by the wealthy:

In the CNN/ORC survey, 68% of respondents said the current tax system benefits the rich and is unfair to ordinary workers, compared with 29% who disagreed with that view.

Unfair: I do not think that word means what you think it means.

Pelosi on Stage stirring her Cauldron of words about Obamalove for GOP foe

There are liars.   They are Democrats. 

There are deceit mongers.   They are Democrats

There are the TOP THREE Democrats who top them all, Obama, Pelosi, and Reid.     Let’s Tune in to  a Madam Pelosi Spin spun today:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/04/20/pelosi_obama_has_been_so_respectful_of_the_republicans_in_congress.html

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 147 other followers