Democrat and Republican politicians alike are indoor people. When at college they played around the so-called social sciences rather than the natural sciences such as, geology, geomorphology, botany, chemistry, physics, astronomy, climatology, etc. The younger ones likely have been subjected to the bigotries concocted within the Black Studies and Women’s Studies Departments, which studies are beginning to dominate the world of Left wing instruction in American public schools.
These politicians have been taught not to believe in Truth. That is a lesson they learned well.
Al Gore was raised in a hotel room in Washington, D. C. While running for president in 2000, he hired a feminist guru to teach him how he could become an Alpha Male. He failed his lessons.
He said he had invented the internet. Later on he gathered together a movie with the word “Truth” in it which has netted him over $300,000,000 in just a few years.
People raised in hotel rooms believe CO2 is a pollutant. They believe the climate around us is fixed. After all, politicians now say so. They have been told to believe Americans have ruined nature. If they are modern Democrats, and most are, they rail against America and its free enterprise system….something they also learned at university. To profit from business, they believe, is a crime. These modern Democrats run our public schools, and so, made certain Goretruth about polar bears drowning unfed in warming waters was shown in public schools throughout the country and where possible, throughout the world. They think Polar Bears look cute and cuddly. Lucky for them Goretruth is Gorefraud. Polar bear population in increasing.
But today’s waters are not warming. Here and there, maybe yes….but real research indicates the Cold is coming, and it has been coming and going, coming and going for eons. Those who know the basics of Earth’s life, recognize Gorefraud. Mother Earth, or any other Mother, is not static. Mother this or Mother that is always changing someway or another.
Goretruth included the Gorefraud pronouncement that all the pertinent information had been collected…there was no further reason to debate Goretruth. No need to study Global Warming further……Science “had spoken” was the Goreclaim. Only in Soviet type dictatorships did politicians guarantee the speeches of Science.
Goretruth went to the United Nations. Dictators and Marxists revelled at an opportunity to attack American prosperity and found Indoor Person president Barack Obama, Marxist trained community organizer, an ally.
Indoor Person Barack Obama and his fellow leftist indoor people developed legislation called Cap and Trade, a scheme to tax Americans in perpetuity for their sins of being inventive and prosperous over the years and for defending liberty and economic competition and a number of tiresome personal human freedoms. Mr. Obama is an Indoor Person Marxist, supported by Indoor Person billionaire, George Soros, a Marxist from Hungary.
To hell with freedoms and liberty. Mr. Obama believes in legislating equality.
Most outdoor people can recognize Gorefraud by its claims.
The scandal is beginning to be uncovered….
Gorefraud and Obamafraud had us believing the Earth was being seriously endangerd by American type industry in America and throughout the world….that American things such as industrial production and vehicle emissions and cow farts were pushing the pollutant CO2 to threateningly high levels, and that these levels will cause disasters which would be imminent and final unless drastic measures be taken to save the Earth. Number one drastic measure was to tax everything American and send the money to the rest of the world.
Special note to Gorefraud fans: Neither human nor vegetative life on Earth can exist without CO2, (carbon dioxide). Furthermore, this tag along gas among gases, is at one of its lowest levels in known history at the moment. It is not a pollutant, but a gas essential to life.
Barack Obama has just decided that he will skip off to Copenhagen, Denmark in a week or two, where he has been planning to sign an unrevokeable treaty to distribute America’s profit margin throughout the world. EveryAmerican, even Obama’s victimhood people who worship the president, will be paying dearly into these gifts to the world.
ALL OF THIS ARISING FROM GOREFRAUD, whose claims supported by bought scientists are now coming unravelled. Please follow all the stories coming out of East Anglia University in England and the ensuing corruptions within the United Nations.
The following article was taken from blogsite, QandO:
Whether you prefer “Climategate” or “Warmaquiddick” or “Climaquiddick” (most seem to prefer something with “quiddick” v. “gate” for some reason) as a name for the developing scientific scandal, the fact is that the emails revealed this week from the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit are significant and damning.
The leaked documents (see our previous coverage) come from the Climatic Research Unit of the University of East Anglia in eastern England. In global warming circles, the CRU wields outsize influence: it claims the world’s largest temperature data set, and its work and mathematical models were incorporated into the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s 2007 report. That report, in turn, is what the Environmental Protection Agency acknowledged it “relies on most heavily” when concluding that carbon dioxide emissions endanger public health and should be regulated.
To me that’s more than enough reason to step back, call a halt to all this talk about global treaties and take a good hard look at the science involved in all of this. What should be obvious to everyone is that more than enough questions have emerged over the past year to seriously question the conclusions reached by the CRU.
This data is the source of the EPA’s decision to regulate CO2. The fact that the data may be false or fudged then throws into question not only the conclusions of the IPCC’s report, but the EPA’s decision. If, in fact, they indicate scientific fraud as they seem too, then it also calls into question any other science or decisions made based on their conclusions. We’re literally talking about trillions of dollars hanging in the balance and a massive shift in government power (through regulation and taxation) and intrusion in our lives.
Yet, despite the fact that this story has been circulating for at least a week, some media outlets have declined to pursue it and have done the journalistic equivalent of yelling “damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead” by publishing editorials and articles which talk about the threat of global warming. Thankfully their readers, in some cases unmercifully, clue them in. The Washington Post, one of the few media outlets to even acknowledge the scandal, essentially blows it off in an editorial ironically entitled “Climate of Denial”, preferring to pretend that there’s really nothing of significance to the emails except perhaps, the CRU should have been a little more transparant than they were. It also refers to the emails as “stolen”.
In fact, it appears that the revelation of the emails may have been the work of a whistleblower, who, unlike WaPo, saw the real significance of what was being concealed:
It’s not clear how the files were leaked. One theory says that a malicious hacker slipped into East Anglia’s network and snatched thousands of documents. Another says that the files had already been assembled in response to a Freedom of Information request and, immediately after it was denied, a whistleblower decided to disclose them. (Lending credence to that theory is the fact that no personal e-mail messages unrelated to climate change appear to have been leaked.)
Interestingly the media exception to that is Declan McCullagh at CBS’s blog “Taking Liberties”. He does a pretty good and indepth job of looking at it all. I’ve linked ot his piece above (about the significance of the scandal). Make sure you read the emails concerning the programing and the data base. If that alone doesn’t set off alarm bells and tell you that what CRU produced might have some very serious problems, I’m not sure what will. Also read Phil Jones attempt to explain away the “hiding the decline” comment in one of his emails as meaning something colloquial which, of course, he claims doesn’t mean what in means otherwise. Very poor.
With all of that said, and ending with citing the Jones quote, I present for your entertainment, “Hiding The Decline”: