• Pragerisms

    For a more comprehensive list of Pragerisms visit
    Dennis Prager Wisdom.

    • "The left is far more interested in gaining power than in creating wealth."
    • "Without wisdom, goodness is worthless."
    • "I prefer clarity to agreement."
    • "First tell the truth, then state your opinion."
    • "Being on the Left means never having to say you're sorry."
    • "If you don't fight evil, you fight gobal warming."
    • "There are things that are so dumb, you have to learn them."
  • Liberalism’s Seven Deadly Sins

    • Sexism
    • Intolerance
    • Xenophobia
    • Racism
    • Islamophobia
    • Bigotry
    • Homophobia

    A liberal need only accuse you of one of the above in order to end all discussion and excuse himself from further elucidation of his position.

  • Glenn’s Reading List for Die-Hard Pragerites

    • Bolton, John - Surrender is not an Option
    • Bruce, Tammy - The Thought Police; The New American Revolution; The Death of Right and Wrong
    • Charen, Mona - DoGooders:How Liberals Hurt Those They Claim to Help
    • Coulter, Ann - If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans; Slander
    • Dalrymple, Theodore - In Praise of Prejudice; Our Culture, What's Left of It
    • Doyle, William - Inside the Oval Office
    • Elder, Larry - Stupid Black Men: How to Play the Race Card--and Lose
    • Frankl, Victor - Man's Search for Meaning
    • Flynn, Daniel - Intellectual Morons
    • Fund, John - Stealing Elections
    • Friedman, George - America's Secret War
    • Goldberg, Bernard - Bias; Arrogance
    • Goldberg, Jonah - Liberal Fascism
    • Herson, James - Tales from the Left Coast
    • Horowitz, David - Left Illusions; The Professors
    • Klein, Edward - The Truth about Hillary
    • Mnookin, Seth - Hard News: Twenty-one Brutal Months at The New York Times and How They Changed the American Media
    • Morris, Dick - Because He Could; Rewriting History
    • O'Beirne, Kate - Women Who Make the World Worse
    • Olson, Barbara - The Final Days: The Last, Desperate Abuses of Power by the Clinton White House
    • O'Neill, John - Unfit For Command
    • Piereson, James - Camelot and the Cultural Revolution: How the Assassination of John F. Kennedy Shattered American Liberalism
    • Prager, Dennis - Think A Second Time
    • Sharansky, Natan - The Case for Democracy
    • Stein, Ben - Can America Survive? The Rage of the Left, the Truth, and What to Do About It
    • Steyn, Mark - America Alone
    • Stephanopolous, George - All Too Human
    • Thomas, Clarence - My Grandfather's Son
    • Timmerman, Kenneth - Shadow Warriors
    • Williams, Juan - Enough: The Phony Leaders, Dead-End Movements, and Culture of Failure That Are Undermining Black America--and What We Can Do About It
    • Wright, Lawrence - The Looming Tower

JFK Nephew Programmed to Believe Rightwingers Responsible for Uncle’s Assassination

There is n0 end to the political myths the American young are programmed to believe when they attend the social science classes at an American university.   It is here in the American university where American Marxism is indoctrinated.

Who killed John Fitzgerald Kennedy?……A MARXIST!   An American who admired Fidel Castro…..so much so he moved to Cuba and was married there.

At university and pumped up by the Kennedy family, the myth has been spread that President Kennedy was assassinated by a right winger because of his devotion to the Civil Rights causes in general and to integrating Southern public schools iin particular…..so that he died in sacrifice….a hero!

The twisted of mind Oliver Stone directed a movie to further the LIE…a LEFT WING LIE  that the murderer of the President was not Lee Harvey Oswald.  

The Murderer of John Fitzgerald Kennedy was Lee Harvey Oswald, a MARXIST!   

This twisting of the facts and the invention of the romance that JFK was a martyr for  the Civil Rights Movement was a LIE and remains a LIE.

Why does this LIE continue?

Because for the past 40 uears or so, the American Establishment has become Marxist-sympathetic at university, in government, in unions, in entertainment, and almost universally in the mass media.  In addition during this period the old religion, Christianity, has been replaced by the new, atheistic Marxism.

As Dennis Prager constantly reminds us, the Left is not interested in Truth, it is interested in POWER!

Click on here regarding JFK’s nephew’s false claims of the terrible event of November 22, 1963:


(Marxists never sleep.)

Sarah Palin Answers Her Democrat-Left Attackers

The following was posted at HotAir by Ed Morrissey: 

(Click on below to hear former Governor, Saray Palin’s presentation.)

“Sarah Palin has given her first extensive public remarks after the shootings in Tucson and the media attempts to blame the Tea Party and herself for the violence. She firmly but calmly rebuts that notion, quoting Ronald Reagan to insist that individuals are responsible for their actions, and that robust political dialogue in a free country should not be blamed for acts of individual lunacy. Palin reserves her harshest criticism, delivered in a tone of sadness, for those journalists and pundits who wound up slandering not just her but millions of people who participated in political activism:”


An Interview with Zach Oster, a High School Friend of the Young Man Held in the Tucson Shooting

I found at PowerLine this terrific interview of a high school friend of Jared Loughner, the 22 year old accused of the shooting last Saturday in Tucson, Arizona.   The friend’s name is Zach Oster…….who explains brightly, succinctly, and likely very, very accurately the  impulses and reflections of the troubled Jared.  

“I wish I could have helped!…..I wish there was something I could have done!”  Jared’s friend Zach said, choking up.


The Sacredness of Free Speech!……….The Enemy of the American Left

I have written and I have taught in formal class  settings that the most important right of the human with soul, is the right to free speech.  All other human intercourse which depends upon civility emanates from this human right.  It is the mark of a free peoples.

The right of free speech is sacred.  Without it there is no freedom of religion…Without it religion or any grouping of concepts without the mind and mouth well exercised in the open air of public scrutiny, can lock mankind into mental servitude for centuries…….Look at today’s Islam, for example.

We humans have been there and done that.    (And still do that…..at the New York Times, for instantce.)

We   as a species  have suffered grievously, we believe  from our prejudiced and limited understandings  of  ‘learned’ America, AD 2011.   I write thusly  from what I believe is common sense.

Common sense also suggests that talk…….talk as in ‘talk radio’ (as well as “talk” as in letters to the editor, etc.)……is a wonderful elixir  for a population in a free society to relieve anxiety from ideas bottled up in an individual mind.  It is essential for ideas to grow…..the good ones and the bad.    This is where  the moral standards of the people become vital.   

Arguing ideas is an inherent ‘guy’ thing…….part of the male drive to solve problems……which I believe is also common sense if one is allowed to  see the truth of this idea  through the screens of   feminist “political correctness”; screens blinding both male and female eyes.   Hysteria, real guys know, is the enemy of problem solving……..yet it is the first reaction in the human female’s  natural call for help.  Young girls practice  screaming outdoors naturally, especially when they are in their own groups.

Have you ever noticed any differences between girl-boy behavior on a play ground?   Take count of what you observe from Nature.

Take count also of the damage done by the Leftwing censorship laws of our day  called POLITICAL CORRECTNESS , protecting our  feminized ideology defining Democrat Party government today……the ideology of  educated New York Times writers and other Leftists , that American Indians must dislike words such as Warriors, Indians, Braves, Fighting Sioux, Seminoles, Redskins attached to sport teams. 

But, ‘Indians’  didn’t dislike such words attached to sports teams. 

Leftists at university, the New York Times, Washington Post, Mpls StarTribune, Los Angeles Times, Time, Newsweek, AP, Reuters, UPI, throughout the American world rational and irrational,   nearly everywhere  became  hysterical and demanded in courts  of law that Native Americans (called “Indians” for a couple of centuries before Leftist demands) should dislike  “Warriors, Braves, Indians” if they had half a brain and would accept Democrat Party-obtained  largesse from the American taxpayers.   Vote Democrat! 

This Leftist muzzling  of thought and speech doesn’t even need a board of government  to punish violators of these Leftwing  politically  correct speech rules, which are epidemic  throughout America….at the federal, state and local government levels, in the schools.   It is established deep in our minds and speech.   Leftwing  censorship reaches  into every American home spreading  its Marxist  infections such as,  if one speaks or writes anything critical….(NO MATTER HOW JUSTIFIED, NOT MATTER HOW TRUE, and no matter how well known by even gays, blacks, latinos, union members, normal women, to be true,  the critic is a bigot unworthy of human concern and friendship.

 America already is deeply crippled by the Left’s censors…..such as those at the New York Times, Post, Time, Newsweek, or  the ACLU and elsewhere)……such as those in our churches , schools and universities… dictated to benefit  any group on the list of Democrat Party ‘sacred’ victimhood groups.

The kickback price for gays, blacks, latinos, feminists, lesbians, unionists voting  Democrat Party, for this  government censorship is that they VOTE DEMOCRAT, and the will bet protection money.  

This Leftwing corruption becomes SACRED  rather than free speech as SACRED…….and produces Leftwing propagandists with the likes of  Bob Herbert, Frank Rich, Paul Krugman, Nicholas Kristof, Tom Friedman, etc, etc, and the New York Times and their clones at the news desks nearly everywhere in the country.

Nowhere has this cabal been better exposed than in the past several days, the aftermath of the tragedy in Tucson.

Our American representatives of government must be free and safe to meet their supporters and critics directly  for our democracy to survive.   Its press must above all publish truth as clearly and hoestly as possible as their profession in a democracy demands, and reserve spaces for opinions.

The Mental Illness of the New York Times Exposed! The Vileness of the American Leftists!


                         “THE AUTHORITARIAN MEDIA”                         from the Wall Street Journal

“After the horrific shooting spree, the editorial board of New York Times offered a voice of reasoned circumspection:

“In the aftermath of this unforgivable attack, it will be important to avoid drawing prejudicial conclusions . . .,” the paper counseled.

Here’s how the sentence continued: “. . . from the fact that Major Hasan is an American Muslim whose parents came from the Middle East.”

The Tucson Safeway massacre prompted exactly the opposite reaction. What was once known as the paper of record egged on its readers to draw invidious conclusions that are not only prejudicial but contrary to fact. In doing so, the Times has crossed a moral line.

Here is an excerpt from yesterday’s editorial:

It is facile and mistaken to attribute this particular madman’s act directly to Republicans or Tea Party members. But it is legitimate to hold Republicans and particularly their most virulent supporters in the media responsible for the gale of anger that has produced the vast majority of these threats, setting the nation on edge. Many on the right have exploited the arguments of division, reaping political power by demonizing immigrants, or welfare recipients, or bureaucrats. They seem to have persuaded many Americans that the government is not just misguided, but the enemy of the people.

That whirlwind has touched down most forcefully in Arizona, which Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik described after the shooting as the capital of “the anger, the hatred and the bigotry that goes on in this country.” Anti-immigrant sentiment in the state, firmly opposed by Ms. Giffords, has reached the point where Latino studies programs that advocate ethnic solidarity have actually been made illegal. . . .

Now, having seen first hand the horror of political violence, Arizona should lead the nation in quieting the voices of intolerance, demanding an end to the temptations of bloodshed, and imposing sensible controls on its instruments.

To describe the Tucson massacre as an act of “political violence” is, quite simply, a lie. It is as if, two days after the Columbine massacre, a conservative newspaper of the Times’s stature had described that atrocious crime as an act of “educational violence” and used it as an occasion to denounce teachers unions. Such an editorial would be shameful and indecent even if the arguments it made were meritorious.

The New York Times has seized on a madman’s act of wanton violence as an excuse to instigate a witch hunt against those it regards as its domestic foes. “Instigate” is not too strong a word here: As we noted yesterday, one of the first to point an accusatory finger at the Tea Party movement and Sarah Palin was the Times’s star columnist, Paul Krugman. Less than two hours after the news of the shooting broke, he opined on the Times website: “We don’t have proof yet that this was political, but the odds are that it was.”

This was speculative fantasy, irresponsible but perhaps forgivable had Krugman walked it back when the facts proved contrary to his prejudices. He did not. His Monday column evinced the same damn-the-facts attitude as the editorial did.

In the column, Krugman blames the massacre on “eliminationist rhetoric,” which he defines as “suggestions that those on the other side of a debate must be removed from that debate by whatever means necessary.” He rightly asserts that “there isn’t any place” for such rhetoric. But he falsely asserts that it is “coming, overwhelmingly, from the right.”

He provides exactly one example: Rep. Michele Bachmann, a Minnesota Republican, “urging constituents to be ‘armed and dangerous.’ ” Such a statement does seem problematic, although in the absence of context, and given what former Times public editor Daniel Okrent has described as Krugman’s “disturbing habit of shaping, slicing and selectively citing numbers in a fashion that pleases his acolytes but leaves him open to substantive assaults”–an observation that surely applies to nonnumeric facts as well–we are disinclined to trust Krugman’s interpretation of Bachmann’s statement.

In any case, the evidence Krugman offers is insufficient to establish even the existence of “eliminationist rhetoric” on the right. To be sure, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Such rhetoric does exist on the right, and we join Krugman in deploring it.

But Krugman’s assertion that such rhetoric comes “overwhelmingly from the right” is at best wilfully ignorant. National Review’s Jay Nordlinger runs down some examples on the left:

Even before [George W.] Bush was elected president, the kill-Bush talk and imagery started. When Governor Bush was delivering his 2000 convention speech, Craig Kilborn, a CBS talk-show host, showed him on the screen with the words “SNIPERS WANTED.” Six years later, Bill Maher, the comedian-pundit, was having a conversation with John Kerry. He asked the senator what he had gotten his wife for her birthday. Kerry answered that he had taken her to Vermont. Maher said, “You could have went to New Hampshire and killed two birds with one stone.” (New Hampshire is an early primary state, of course.) Kerry said, “Or I could have gone to 1600 Pennsylvania and killed the real bird with one stone.” (This is the same Kerry who joked in 1988, “Somebody told me the other day that the Secret Service has orders that if George Bush is shot, they’re to shoot Quayle.”) Also in 2006, the New York comptroller, Alan Hevesi, spoke to graduating students at Queens College. He said that his fellow Democrat, Sen. Charles Schumer, would “put a bullet between the president’s eyes if he could get away with it.”

One example Nordlinger misses: Just this past October, then-Rep. Paul Kanjorski of Pennsylvania told the Times-Tribune of Scranton: “That [Rick] Scott down there that’s running for governor of Florida. Instead of running for governor of Florida, they ought to have him and shoot him. Put him against the wall and shoot him.” Kanjorski was defeated for re-election the following month, but he turns up today on the op-ed page of–oh, yes–the New York Times:

The House speaker, John Boehner, spoke for everyone who has been in Congress when he said that an attack against one of us is an attack against all who serve. It is also an attack against all Americans.

Does that include Gov. Rick Scott, Mr. Kanjorski?

Left-wing eliminationist rhetoric has occasionally made its way into the very pages of the Times. Here are the jaunty opening paragraphs of a news story dated Dec. 26, 1995:

As the Rev. Al Sharpton strode through Harlem toward Sylvia’s restaurant and a meeting with the boxing promoter Don King last week, the greetings of passers-by followed him down Lenox Avenue.

“Hey, Reverend Al, you going to kill Giuliani?” one man shouted, in a joking reference to the latest confrontation between Mr. Sharpton and the Mayor. Mr. Sharpton waved silently and walked on.

“Giuliani,” he said, “is the best press agent I ever had.”

The next paragraph puts this eliminationist rhetoric into context:

Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani and others have accused Mr. Sharpton of using racially charged language that contributed to the emotional pitch of a dispute between a Jewish clothing store owner and the black owner of a record shop. They have suggested he had a responsibility to defuse the tensions that rose until a gunman set Freddy’s clothing store afire Dec. 8, killing himself and seven others.

(As an aside, it is no credit to our colleagues at Fox News Channel that Sharpton is a frequent guest on their programs.)

Another bit of eliminationist rhetoric appeared as the lead sentence of an article on the Times op-ed page in December 2009: “A message to progressives: By all means, hang Senator Joe Lieberman in effigy.” The author: Paul Krugman.

A March 2010 profile of Krugman in The New Yorker featured this related detail:

Once Obama won the primary, Krugman supported him. Obviously, any Democrat was better than John McCain.

“I was nervous until they finally called it on Election Night,” Krugman says. “We had an Election Night party at our house, thirty or forty people.”

“The econ department, the finance department, the Woodrow Wilson school,” [Robin] Wells [Krugman’s wife] says. “They were all very nervous, so they were grateful we were having the party, because they didn’t want to be alone. We had two or three TVs set up and we had a little portable outside fire pit and we let people throw in an effigy or whatever they wanted to get rid of for the past eight years.”

“One of our Italian colleagues threw in an effigy of Berlusconi.”

Burning an effigy, like burning an American flag, is constitutionally protected symbolic speech. It is also about as eliminationist as speech can get, short of a true threat or incitement. To Krugman, it is a fun party activity. It is shockingly hypocritical for such a man to deliver a pious lecture about the dangers of eliminationist rhetoric.

The Times is far from alone in responding to the Tucson massacre with false accusations and inflammatory innuendoes against its foes. We focus on the Times because it is the leader–the most authoritative voice of the left-liberal media, or what used to be called the “mainstream” media.

What accounts for this descent into madness? We think the key lies in this sentence from yesterday’s Times editorial: “But it is legitimate to hold Republicans and particularly their most virulent supporters in the media responsible . . .”

Particularly their supporters in the media. This echoes a comment House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer made on CBS’s “Face the Nation” Sunday:

One of the things that you and I have discussed, Bob [Schieffer, the host], when–when you and I grew up, we grew up listening to a set of three major news outlets–NBC, ABC, and, of course, CBS. Most of the people like Walter Cronkite and Eric Sevareid, Huntley-Brinkley and they saw their job as to inform us of the facts and we would make a conclusion. Far too many broadcasts now and so many outlets have the intent of inciting–of inciting people to opposition, to anger, to thinking the other side is less than moral.

The campaign of vilification against the right, led by the New York Times, is really about competition in the media industry–not commercial competition but competition for authority. When Bob Schieffer and Steny Hoyer were growing up, the New York Times had unrivaled authority to set the media’s agenda, with the three major TV networks following its lead.

The ensuing decades have seen a proliferation of alternative media outlets, most notably talk radio and Fox News Channel, and a corresponding diminution of the so-called mainstream media’s ability to set the boundaries of political debate.

Its authority dwindling, the New York Times is resorting to authoritarian tactics–slandering its competitors in the hope of tearing them down. Hoyer is right. Too many news outlets are busy “inciting people . . . to anger, to thinking the other side is less than moral.” The worst offender, because it is the leader, is the New York Times. Decent people of whatever political stripe must say enough is enough.”


Rober Kimball: “Another Stupid Idea from the Donkey Side of the Aisle”

It’s Representative Robert Brady from  the Donkey Side of the Aisle offering this stupid idea about which Roger  Kimball is writing at Pajamas Media today:

“Should someone send Robert Brady a copy of the First Amendment?

According to The Hill,  the Democratic lawmaker “plans to introduce legislation that would make it a federal crime to use language or symbols that could be perceived as threatening or inciting violence against a federal official or member of Congress.”

Let’s think about that for a moment. “A federal crime”: that’s a serious matter, right?  And for what? For using “language or symbols that could be perceived as threatening or inciting violence against a federal official or member of Congress.” My emphasis.

“Could be perceived as . . .” Rep. Brady (who is, by the way, up for reelection again in two years) singled out  the now-famous target map on Sarah Palin’s Facebook page: “You can’t put bull’s-eyes or crosshairs on a United States congressman or a federal official,” said Brady.

Really? You Dems do it  all the time. And bully for you. “Targeted,” “Crosshairs,” Bull’s eye”: they’re called figures of speech, Bob. Just as when you “campaign” for your seat, it’s a figure drawn from the world of military activity.  The president of the United States advises his acolytes to follow “The Chicago Way”: “If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun.” What d’ya think, Bob, is that an incitement to violence? Does it foster a “climate of hate”? Or is it figurative speech in a political context and understood to be so by all mentally competent adults?

Occasionally you hear about some innocent yokel who is taken to see a play by Shakespeare. All goes swimmingly until the Desdemona is throttled by Othello. Then the fellow leaps on to the stage to avenge the heroine.

Is our friend Bob, public servant  from Pennsylvania, like that yokel?

For those of you who prefer a more personal view of Representative Brady on the Donkey Side of the Aisle, click on below for the video of  his interview by Megan Kelly of Fox News:


I am so impressed how  those on the Donkey Side of the Aisle  interpret  freedom of speech for non-Marxists.

“If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun”…..Said Obama While Campaigning against Conservatives!

“If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun.”  advised president Barach Hussein Obama in a speech to his rabid followers last year.    The gun was to be waged against his   conservative opposition.    Dear American Marxists and other loonies, you  at the New York Times, Newsweek, MSNBC, Los Angeles Times and so one ad nauseum, what do YOU think  the president meant with that caustic message?    What newspapers, Republican pundits and appologists came ranting on the air ways hysterically accusing the man of criminal intent?  They didn’t because  they honestly knew the president meant no one any harm.

Name  one conservative who charged at the president as the vast network of the Leftwing media charged at Sarah Palin and the Tea Party!……Yet , these same news institutions house a banquet full of Lefties who attack Sarah Palin as being responsible …..well for anything and everything violent  including the tragedy at Tucson for taking aim at all those Soft House of Representative Districts which vote in Democrats rather than Republicans on November 2, 2010……and as rational people knew and some others learned today that Democrats use the same maps, with the same word, ‘target’, when referring to their political opposition as political parties have done for a long time…..without  being accused of assassinations.

Republicans even kept silent in 2006 when President George W. Bush and the American citizen had a chance to view the LEFTWING ATTACK MOVIE, “The Death of a President” put on the market in wishful hope that this mock murder of  President Bush himself,  might be carried out in reality.   No one seemed to protest even the Republican tag-a-longs.  

I would have banned the movie as I would ban the same movie if it starred a president named Barack Hussein Obama.   Its producers and writers would be charged with conspiracy to cause harm to a public official. 

There are limits to free speech when  threats are made on  ones life. 


Reason.tv presents offers  reason in video:  “5 Rules for Coping with Tragedy”…..referring to  community tragedy:


And then we have the truly irrational…..Voices of the Left……A video of Lefty news entertainer,  Chris Matthews of MSNBC intrviewsing Lefty Howard Fineman, a  Specialist First Class Expert of  things  Palin; what makes her think and  ‘tick’:  


Aussie P.M. Julia Gilliard Rising Star of Brilliance in a Dark Western Sky

Something is going on in Australia which should be fashionable here in America…..the defense of democratic  culture of free peoples against the horrors of tyrannical  Islam Sharia invasions.

Prime Minister Julia Gillard –  Australia  is the person of note here.   She has explained  to her nation this past week:

“Muslims who want to live under Islamic Sharia law were told on Wednesday to get out of Australia , as the  government targeted radicals in a bid to head off  potential terror attacks.

Separately, Gillard angered some Australian Muslims on Wednesday by saying she supported spy agencies monitoring the nation’s mosques.


“I am tired of this nation worrying about whether we are offending some individual or their culture. Since the terrorist attacks on Bali , we have experienced a surge in patriotism by the majority of Australians.  ‘This culture has been developed over two centuries of struggles, trials and victories by millions of men and women who have sought freedom’   We speak mainly ENGLISH, not Spanish,  Lebanese, Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, Russian, or any other language. Therefore, if you wish to become part of  our society . Learn the language!’

‘Most Australians believe in God.  This is not some Christian, right wing, political push, but a fact, because  Christian men and women, on Christian principles, founded this nation, and this is clearly documented It is certainly appropriate to display it on the walls of our schools.  If God offends you, then I suggest you consider another part of the world as your new home, because God is part of our culture.  ‘We will accept your beliefs, and will not question why.  All we ask is that you accept ours, and live in harmony and  peaceful enjoyment with us.’

‘This is OUR COUNTRY, OUR LAND, and OUR LIFESTYLE, and we will allow you every opportunity to enjoy all this.  But once you are done complaining, whining, and griping about Our Flag, Our Pledge, Our Christian beliefs, or Our Way of Life, I highly encourage you take advantage of one other great Australian freedom, ‘THE  RIGHT TO LEAVE‘.’

‘If you aren’t happy here then LEAVE.   We didn’t force you to come here.   You asked to be here.   So accept the country  YOU accepted.’

Good job madame …”   article by Brigitte Gabriel   at Silents Speech

Arlene Taber sent in  this article.

Strident Democrat, Clarence Dupnik Attacks Rush Limbaugh, Tea Party for Speaking

On  Saturday,  January 8, as we were watching the events of the tragedy aftermath in Tucson, Pima County Sheriff, Clarence Dupnik, a Democrat,  made abrasive and offensive attacks against the “vitriole” is his state and inferred that the cause of this vitriole arose from conservatives Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck and others.    Click here for video of Sheriff Dubnik expressing his own vitrolic:


These attacks by the Sheriff could be forgiven when shouted as an emotional reponse during the chaos and  horror of  tragedy,  no matter how partisan,  unfair, and  dangerous they were to utter.   Worse, however, the shoutings were a lie.   Still, one needs patience remembering that Sheriff  Dupnik knew the Representative, Gabrielle Giffords personally.   Yet , is the sheriff just another Democrat who believes “free speech is for me, not for thee”?

But when Sheriff Dupnik later in the evening was interviewed , he repeated his strident, unfounded, unfair, and untrue charges against his ‘foes’……with malice in tone…..against ” people who make a living off of anger.”

This article was written by Allahpundit at HotAir.    Click on below to view the interview of Sheriff Dupnik:

“Jared Loughner has been making death threats by phone to many people in Pima County including staff of Pima Community College, radio personalities and local bloggers. When Pima County Sheriff’s Office was informed, his deputies assured the victims that he was being well managed by the mental health system. It was also suggested that further pressing of charges would be unnecessary and probably cause more problems than it solved as Jared Loughner has a family member that works for Pima County. Amy Loughner is a Natural Resource specialist for the Pima County Parks and Recreation. My sympathies and my heart goes out to her and the rest of Mr. Loughner’s family. This tragedy must be tearing them up inside wondering if they had done the right things in trying to manage Jared’s obvious mental instability.

Every victim of his threats previously must also be wondering if this tragedy could have been prevented if they had been more aggressive in pursuing charges against Mr. Loughner. Perhaps with a felony conviction he would never have been able to lawfully by the Glock 9mm Model 19 that he used to strike down the lives of six people and decimate 14 more.

I can understand classmates not wanting to risk Loughner’s wrath by reporting him, but if — if — Dupnik knew he was disturbed, why didn’t he? Worth thinking about — but first, let’s get back to blaming Sarah Palin. Click the image to watch.”


Jerome Loughner was registered as an Independent and did not vote in 2008.   Click on here to learn more about this alleged attacker in Tucson:


Certain unexpected and startling events of the day expose some politicians for their strengths and others for their weaknesses, and/or their  stupidity.   

This one tragedy since Jim Jones shot the California member of the House of Representatives twenty or so years ago.  Yet we hear that our elected troops must be protected by troops.   Even Charles Krauthammer suggested today that perhaps the Federal government could cover the costs of providing a couple ‘guards’ for these events.

In a democracy we must act democratic, be democratic in a democratic enviornment.      Our America must never need POLICE, secret or otherwise, TROOPS, secret or otherwise, to hang around and decide which phrase might be considered too extreme when our government representatives speak and listen to the people.

One attack allegedly by a likely true nut case…..the first among thousands and thousands and thousands of personal appearances in pubic by American politicians over the past 20 years and we hear nonsense about the need to police our public.  NO  NO NO NO……think, fellow Americans…think past this tragedy and  its crisis.

 Avoid this screaming hysteria and pass on into reality of the norm.   Click here for a video interview with a Democrat from Pennsylvania who is offering  legislation as a result of this tragedy to control speech:


“It is difficult to find rational Democrats in Congress these days”….I, Glenn Ray truly believe.    What should my punishment  be if that is my thought and I place that thought in writing?

James S. Robbins: “Gitmo Belongs to Obama Now”

“What began with a bang ended with a whimper. The new Defense Authorization bill contains provisions barring the president from spending any money to bring terrorist detainees held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the United States, or to release them to foreign countries unless they meet a rigorous security threshold. President Obama reluctantly signed the bill this week, saying he will “work with the Congress to seek repeal of these restrictions.” Given the shift in power in the new Congress, it’s likely his vision for closing the Guantanamo terrorist detention facility is in ashes.”

This is offered as a change of pace from the distrubing events of this psst weekend.   Good for Obama.  Now he has Gitmo to worry about each night he hits the sack.