• Pragerisms

    For a more comprehensive list of Pragerisms visit
    Dennis Prager Wisdom.

    • "The left is far more interested in gaining power than in creating wealth."
    • "Without wisdom, goodness is worthless."
    • "I prefer clarity to agreement."
    • "First tell the truth, then state your opinion."
    • "Being on the Left means never having to say you're sorry."
    • "If you don't fight evil, you fight gobal warming."
    • "There are things that are so dumb, you have to learn them."
  • Liberalism’s Seven Deadly Sins

    • Sexism
    • Intolerance
    • Xenophobia
    • Racism
    • Islamophobia
    • Bigotry
    • Homophobia

    A liberal need only accuse you of one of the above in order to end all discussion and excuse himself from further elucidation of his position.

  • Glenn’s Reading List for Die-Hard Pragerites

    • Bolton, John - Surrender is not an Option
    • Bruce, Tammy - The Thought Police; The New American Revolution; The Death of Right and Wrong
    • Charen, Mona - DoGooders:How Liberals Hurt Those They Claim to Help
    • Coulter, Ann - If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans; Slander
    • Dalrymple, Theodore - In Praise of Prejudice; Our Culture, What's Left of It
    • Doyle, William - Inside the Oval Office
    • Elder, Larry - Stupid Black Men: How to Play the Race Card--and Lose
    • Frankl, Victor - Man's Search for Meaning
    • Flynn, Daniel - Intellectual Morons
    • Fund, John - Stealing Elections
    • Friedman, George - America's Secret War
    • Goldberg, Bernard - Bias; Arrogance
    • Goldberg, Jonah - Liberal Fascism
    • Herson, James - Tales from the Left Coast
    • Horowitz, David - Left Illusions; The Professors
    • Klein, Edward - The Truth about Hillary
    • Mnookin, Seth - Hard News: Twenty-one Brutal Months at The New York Times and How They Changed the American Media
    • Morris, Dick - Because He Could; Rewriting History
    • O'Beirne, Kate - Women Who Make the World Worse
    • Olson, Barbara - The Final Days: The Last, Desperate Abuses of Power by the Clinton White House
    • O'Neill, John - Unfit For Command
    • Piereson, James - Camelot and the Cultural Revolution: How the Assassination of John F. Kennedy Shattered American Liberalism
    • Prager, Dennis - Think A Second Time
    • Sharansky, Natan - The Case for Democracy
    • Stein, Ben - Can America Survive? The Rage of the Left, the Truth, and What to Do About It
    • Steyn, Mark - America Alone
    • Stephanopolous, George - All Too Human
    • Thomas, Clarence - My Grandfather's Son
    • Timmerman, Kenneth - Shadow Warriors
    • Williams, Juan - Enough: The Phony Leaders, Dead-End Movements, and Culture of Failure That Are Undermining Black America--and What We Can Do About It
    • Wright, Lawrence - The Looming Tower

Did the Obama Left Manage to Make Memorial Service a Political Rally?

Yes, is my answer.  But I admit this is my  guess from the distance I have managed to keep myself from the Obama promotion campaign.   I smell a Marxist rat among those who program the president’s agenda, whether that is a political speech in which he recommends Democrats to bring guns to offset his claim Republicans have knives or at a funeral or any gathering that should NOT be political.   I am wondering……..

Was there political cheering at the event last evening?  If so, for what….for whom?

A Memorial gathering is a solemn event, not a political rally.

Did political figures strangely show up on the listings of those allowed to be honored at the  “Memorial” gathering, figures to suggest that the event was a political rally?   “Strangely” meaning showing up for no particular reason except to show their political bodies.

Did the political figures appear to persuade the public, those in attendance and those viewing from television sets that their appearance and any presentation made was from sincere conviction of gravity  of the tragedy which had occurred or simply speechified?

Did the Memorial event become a political rally?

All this is for you to decide.  I have included some videos from HotAir, a conservative site, about the Memorial.

Dennis Prager gives the President good marks for his presentation at the “Memorial” .    He is less approving of the political cheering.

Check out what you think by clicking on to the videos here: 

http://hotair.com/archives/2011/01/12/open-thread-obamas-speech-in-arizona/

http://hotair.com/archives/2011/01/12/obamas-speech-the-truth-is-that-none-of-us-can-know-exactly-what-triggered-this-vicious-attack/

http://hotair.com/archives/2011/01/13/presidentism-of-the-day/

Will President Obama Forget About the “Hussein” and Become An American Tomorrow?

I did not watch  last evening’s Barack Obama performance in Arizona.  I chose not to, not because I dislike the president….which is true, but no matter how stellar he might be in  his performance, he could not rise above the cheap politician class.    It is possible that the setting would be a downer for any president to bloviate.

I believe he is a ‘cheap’ politician…….one who deceives the public by performance………rather than being forthright and honest in advancing his beliefs and intentions so that in our democracy, the public can make a realistic comparison with the ideas and policies of  those who oppose. 

That is what the American political scene should be about.

Mr. Obama is deceitful, dishonest, disingenuous, and intellectually dishonorable.  He is a representative of those who write and make news about the nation, E. J. Dionne, Paul Krugman, Al Franken, Barney Frank, Chuck Schumer,  and countless tens of thousands  more.    He does not have a charm, wit, sweetness or beauty and depth to his vocabulary.   He has style and is clean-cut in appearance and a mind possessed of a goal.

I believe he has deservedly earned the word “charlaton” to describe his political, speaking and leadership skills.   He has earned it.    He has loved television performances.   His performances prove  my charge.  His reporters shore him up and cover for him and his Progress toward a Marxist state.

He is the graduate of Jeremiah “Goddamn America” Wright’s Temple of Racism in Chicago.   He is the graduate of “Leftwing Studies” at whatever university he has attended.   He is a student and scholar of Saul Alinsky’s street Marxism, its racism, its antiAmerican bigotry, not that these Alinsky learnings aren’t valuable for study of  real issues in the American story.    The crime of the president here is not the learning of the Alinsky  story in the American democratic struggle for human dignity and opportunity, it is from the bigot he allowed himself to become by not measuring it fairly with the countless chapters of  the nation’s  cultural achievements….the ones that have made so much in America an ideal throughout the world.

Obama  is the softer, kinder, more peaceful, yet more dangerous side of the Bill Ayers’ generation of violence against the American dream.   For he is a salesman of  their dream, Marxism.

President Obama is front and center of the Civil War of our 21st Century…..the War Between the Ideologies, Marxism versus Representative Democracy.

After his performance last night he will return to the White House and continute his Marxism salsemanship with not a blink-of-the-eye change in his goals.   He will spew the same sweet words with devious motives…..that same  teleprompter will display the same “Marxist” rhetoric, but with the taste of sugar.

Yet, at the bottom of Pandora’s Box, history reminds us stirs the only true positive  for man…..HOPE. 

What if Barack Hussein Obama discovers the America of its traditional values?    What if he begins to note that his Marxist dictatorship, the inevitable end of the Progressive’s drive  for  Progress might be the Soviet Marxist end to our American light, the light that shined upon him to become the nation’s president?

We shall learn from the president himself.   He is what he is through deed, not his words.

Most Americans will not listen carefully to his words.   Think of all of these college graduates which run the American communication systems, receiving high position with  bountiful salaries, who have joined the Obama parade toward Marxism…..people who should know better, who should have accumulated enough knowledge to, as we say, ‘step back’ and review from time to time  what they wrought.

Most Americans will not listen because they were not taught to listen.    They were not taught to think as Americans….as family members of an exceptional  democratic nation, as I was taught.   They were not taught its nobility and the nature of its human struggle, and that goodness needs to be learned if humans are ever to rise above the animal. 

Americans were made vacant of knowledge but fat with hate…….of America.    Know-nothings began to teach Women’s Studies, Black Studies, Gay and Lesbian Studies and Marxism 101 throughout the country.   Bigotry  became united by a  bond of self-hate…..and  now taught as a new religion on the American street, atheistic Marxism to replace “the oppression” of Christianity.

Barack Hussein Obama was and still is a child of that incubation.

Yet…..and, yet……there is hope, even at my 76 years, I believe in hope.

Will Barack Obama lay out his Marxist plan for America’s future in the open?   Will he make a point by point defense of his beliefs for our Marxist “democratic” future for public scrutiny?    Will his religion of atheistic Marxism sell well in Peoria and Hayslip’s Corners is he does?    We know it will sell well in San Francisco and New York City.

Will the president change his tunes? 

Whom are we kidding?……but, wait…..there is still HOPE.  One doesn’t even know today, much less tomorrow.  One can only guess.

Will Barack Obama forget about the “Hussein” and dare to join us as an American?   Will he allow the nation to regain its wealth from energy and productivity, yet protect America’s nature because both are vital to the nation?   Will he recognize the TRUTH and “NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH”, that THE BIGGER THE GOVERNMENT THE SMALLER THE CITIZEN is what his conservative opponents fear most about his duplicitous Marxist policies?

My case against President Obama is that he is the purveyor of antiAmericanism.

Zach Oster, Last Close Friend of Jared Loughner, Describes Jared’s Politics

I found at PowerLine this powerful interview of a high school friend of Jared Loughner, the 22 year old accused of the shooting last Saturday in Tucson, Arizona.   The friend’s name is Zach Oster…….who explains brightly, succinctly, and likely very, very accurately the  impulses and reflections of the troubled Jared.  

“He wasn’t shooting at people.  He was shooting at the world!     He had no politics.   I just forgot about him.   I should have tried to get him help.    I wish there was something I could have done to help him!”  Jared’s friend Zach said, choking up.”

Click on the view this powerful interview of this young man, Zach Oster.

http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/jared-loughners-friend-says-suspect-did-not-watch-tv-disliked-the-news_b48040

“I am a Jew.” Hezbollah Demands I Be Herded to Israel So It Doesn’t Have to Go Around the World to Kill Jews. Are You For It?

and the answer by a student at the University of California at San Diego replied she was “for” it.

The speaker was David Horowitz.

David Horowitz is a tough, strident, humorless, bright, evangelical-democrat, America-loving  Jew.  As I remember,  he is from New York City.  As I know for certain, he was a child born into a strident, bright, evangelical Marxist-Communist, anti-American family. 

In my more leftist days in and after college I’d read his work as I read anything by Christopher Hitchens on the market today.  Certain people have more interesting things to say than others……Sorry, you foolish, MarxoDemocrats.  Not everyone is born equal and should not be forced to be equal.  

In those days reading Horowitz  encouraged me to love and to protect my America more profoundly from folks who believed as he did….in Marxism’s basic demand that the people should be forced into some kind of government managed equality.   He was strident, single-purposed, devoted, but WRONG on nearly every assumption, claim and conclusion.  He buoyed my faith in what I believed, that America was special and should never become Marxist.

Eventually, I matured, for the most part.   Better yet, David Horowitz met his epiphany.   It occurred  during the bloody riots and murders during the Black Panther violence chapters of the anti-American cultural revolution in California in the 1970s.   He re-evaluated and retooled. 

Today, David Horowitz is still humorless. He is still bright.   He is still strident.  He is still a Jew.   

 He is also an American HERO of the first class having become a pathfinder to defend  conservative thought and student rights on America’s Marxist university campuses. 

Our America we love is being subverted at university, in general, today a Marxist  institution of conformity as isolated from  and hostile to democracy as any madrassa from the demented Muslim world in the Near East. 

Almost alone David Horowitz has carried the flag to restore some raindrops of free expression and other democratic refreshing breezes in a hurricane of Leftwing totalitarianism, intolerance  and ignorance.

In this video below David Horowitz is confronted by a ‘student’ advertising the Muslim Students Association, a nation wide Muslim group at the “not quite terrorist level as yet” fever.   This student is very, very proud of herself.  I, for one, appreciate her honesty.  

From the lecturn David Horowitz interrupts the ‘student’s’  soliloquy on MSA and confronts her with a question about the terrorist groups, Hamas and Hezbollah, devoted to the liquidation of the Jewish population.

Learn more about modern American university life and thought:   Click onto the video:

http://www.examiner.com/conservative-in-los-angeles/david-horowitz-battles-campus-jihadism

To learn more about this Crusader for Americn Values, David Horowitz….please click on below:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3LE84SxTUI

Transgender Demand for Serving in the Military? You knew it was coming!

A transsexual is in the news now.  She-he  is ‘Autumn’ Sandeen and protests in public……recently attached to the White House fence.   Well, one person doesn’t a movement make……or doesn’t one?

What about Karl Marx?   He made a movement over a century ago and it has moved into  the American White House. 

It might make sense to organized brigades according to a host of specific particular sexual pleasures peculiar or otherwise.   Foot fetish  folks could have a division all of their own.   Nudists can sign up for duty  for summers only or be transfered to Fiji during the northern winters and then back to Iraq or Afghanistan during  the heat of the summer.  That will shock them. 

 Females who prefer blonds  and others brunets could bivouac together while ‘protecting’ innocents in the Central African wars as relief to the UN forces there.  Gays could be assigned  to battalions where size is matters.

Think of these possibilities to increase the American military presence  throughout the world!   Polygamists could gain purpose for existence  in modern American society by joining  the marriage crowd.   They could occupy a complete base of any number of combat units.   Democrat-Marxists and Marxist-Democrats from Hollywood  might be  thrilled to join up since they have already great experience in  professsional polygamy and will feel right at home.

And now, to the article…..

 Transgender People Also Demand Right to Serve in Military
By Lisa Leff, Associated Press

San Francisco (AP) – Before handcuffing herself to the White House fence, former Petty Officer First Class Autumn Sandeen carefully pinned three rows of Navy ribbons to her chest. Her regulation dress blue skirt, fitted jacket, hat and black pumps were new — fitting for a woman who spent two decades serving her country as a man.

Sandeen was the only transgender person among the six veterans arrested in April while protesting the military’s ban on openly gay troops. But when she watched President Barack Obama last month sign the hard-fought bill allowing for the ban’s repeal, melancholy tinged her satisfaction.

“This is another bridesmaid moment for the transgender community,” the 51-year-old San Diego resident said.

The “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy now heading toward history does not apply to transgender recruits, who are automatically disqualified as unfit for service. But the military’s long-standing posture on gender-identity has not prevented transgender citizens from signing up before they come out, or from obtaining psychological counseling, hormones and routine health care through the Department of Veterans Affairs once they return to civilian life.

So as the Pentagon prepares to welcome openly gay, lesbian and bisexual service members for the first time, Sandeen is not alone in hoping the United States will one day join the seven other nations — Canada, the United Kingdom, Spain, Israel, the Czech Republic, Thailand and Australia — that allow transgender troops.

“There is really no question, it’s just a matter of when,” said former Army Capt. Allyson Robinson, 40, a 1994 West Point graduate who has spoken to sociology classes at the alma mater she attended as a male cadet. “There are active-duty, as well as reserve and national guard transgender service members, serving today.”

No one knows how many transgender people are serving or have served. Neither the Department of Defense nor the VA keep statistics on how many service members have been discharged or treated for transgender conditions or conduct.

The Transgender American Veterans Association, an advocacy group founded in 2003, estimates there could be as many as 300,000 transgender people among the nation’s 26 million veterans.

When 50 TAVA members laid a wreath at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier six years ago, representatives from every U.S. conflict since World War II were there, said former Navy Machinist Mate First Class Monica Helms, the group’s co-founder and president.

Most had spent years, if not decades, as veterans before they could acknowledge the mismatches between their brains and their bodies. Helms, 59, spent four years in the engine room of a nuclear submarine during the Vietnam War, but did not start living as Monica until 1997.

Military regulations state that men and women who identify with or present a gender different from their sex at birth have mental conditions that make them ineligible to serve. Those who have undergone genital surgery are listed as having physical abnormalities. Service members caught cross-dressing on base have been court-martialed for interfering with “good order and discipline,” according to the National Center for Transgender Equality.

Until the American Psychiatric Association removes Gender Identity Disorder from its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, as it did for homosexuality in 1973, that’s likely to remain the case, Sandeen said.

The very diagnosis that keeps transgender Americans out of uniform has enabled some to obtain transition-related medical care and other services when they become veterans.

Federal law prohibits Veterans Health Administration (VA) facilities from performing or paying for sex-change surgeries. But some VA medical centers provide psychological counseling, sex hormones, speech therapy and other medical treatment short of gender reassignment surgery.

Sandeen said the VA hospital in San Diego made it possible for her to start living as a woman once she retired from the Navy a decade ago.

“As soon as I got an appointment with the psychiatry department, the first thing I said to them is, ‘I have gender issues. I don’t know if I’m a transvestite or a transsexual or if I’m something in between, but I need to work this out with a therapist,'” she recalled.

She eventually received a recommendation to see a VA doctor who could prescribe estrogen to help her grow breasts and hips and diminish body and facial hair. The endocrinologist told her she first would have to try presenting herself as a woman for two-and-half-months.

Sandeen, already classified as a disabled vet with bipolar disorder, had lined up a work-study job at the hospital’s patient health library.

“February 6, 2003, my first day of being publicly female, I was working for $10 an hour at the VA helping other vets with health care needs,” she said. “The VA is the organization that helped me work this out.”

The attention Sandeen received as a veteran is not unusual, but not universal, transgender advocates say. In response to complaints that some transgender veterans have been treated disrespectfully or denied care at VA facilities, Helms’ group has lobbied the Veterans Affairs department to issue guidelines on services to which transgender patients are entitled.

San Diego resident Zander Keig, who was a woman during a two-year stint with the Coast Guard, had been on testosterone for a year when he wanted his prescription transferred from a suburban VA clinic. But veterans are not allowed to change their names on discharge papers so he was directed to the women’s VA clinic in San Francisco.

Keig, 44, said a senior physician there “grilled me with questions. Why are you taking T? Do you know what it’s doing to your body? How are you eligible for these services?”

“I said, ‘I established my eligibility for VA services in 1988, I have every reason to be here. Am I going to get my shots or not?'” Keig recalled. He did get his injections.

In 2007, the VA complex in Boston became the first veterans’ medical provider to draft a policy designed to assure transgender veterans received consistent and sensitive care.

Department of Veterans Affairs spokeswoman Katie Roberts said the VA is reviewing the Boston policy and others, hoping to create a formal directive in the “near future.”

“As all veterans served this nation with the same expectation of honor and excellence, VA strives to provide all veterans equitable treatment respecting their honor by providing medical services with excellence,” she said.

Even with the enormous changes in their lives, many transgender veterans maintain connections with their military service. Sandeen still shops at a Navy commissary and grabs her military identification when she goes walking. Robinson considers her four years as a West Point cadet the best of her life, although she feared being caught with women’s clothes in her trunk.

“I love this country and I felt a personal calling to express that love of America through my willingness to sacrifice,” she said.

But when Robinson made her triumphant return to the academy for her speaking engagement, along with the congratulations, came comments that she was unworthy to be part of the “Long Gray Line.”

“It was as though the service I had rendered was suddenly worthless,” she said.

Former Air Force Sgt. Nicole Shounder, 52, who underwent sex reassignment surgery in 1999, has spent the last four years wearing a uniform at sea, first with the Coast Guard auxiliary and now, as a civil service mariner nurse aboard the USNS Robert E Perry, which recently supplied deployments in the Mediterranean.

Shounder considers it a privilege to wear Navy-issued collar brass and shoulder boards.

“Given my circumstances, it really is,” she said. “Essentially until someone can say otherwise, I am probably the only out and open post-op transsexual in uniform for the Navy, or as close as you can be.”

Obama Administration Replaces “Mother”, “Father” on Passports with “Parent 1”, and “Parent 2”

“The words in the old form were ‘mother’ and ‘father,’” said Brenda Sprague, deputy assistant Secretary of State for Passport Services. “They are now ‘parent one’ and ‘parent two.’”…

Sprague said the decision to remove the traditional parenting names was not an act of political correctness.

“We find that with changes in medical science and reproductive technology that we are confronting situations now that we would not have anticipated 10 or 15 years ago,” she said…

“Only in the topsy-turvy world of left-wing political correctness could it be considered an ‘improvement’ for a birth-related document to provide less information about the circumstances of that birth,” Family Research Council president Tony Perkins wrote in a statement to Fox News Radio. “This is clearly designed to advance the causes of same-sex ‘marriage’ and homosexual parenting without statutory authority.”

Sprague said the decision to remove the traditional parenting names was not an act of political correctness. 

“We find that with changes in medical science and reproductive technology that we are confronting situations now that we would not have anticipated 10 or 15 years ago,” she said. 

Gay rights groups are applauding the decision.  

“Changing the term mother and father to the more global term of parent allows many different types of families to be able to go and apply for a passport for their child without feeling like the government doesn’t recognize their family,” said Jennifer Chrisler, executive director of Family Equality Council. 

Her organization lobbied the government for several years to remove the words from passport applications. 

“Our government needs to recognize that the family structure is changing,” Chrisler said. “The best thing that we can do is support people who are raising kids in loving, stable families.”

But some conservative Christians are outraged over the decision. 

“Only in the topsy-turvy world of left-wing political correctness could it be considered an ‘improvement’ for a birth-related document to provide less information about the circumstances of that birth,” Family Research Council president Tony Perkins wrote in a statement to Fox News Radio. “This is clearly designed to advance the causes of same-sex ‘marriage’ and homosexual parenting without statutory authority, and violates the spirit if not the letter of the Defense of Marriage Act.” 

Robert Jeffress, pastor of the First Baptist Church in Dallas, agreed. “It’s part of an overall attempt at political correctness to diminish the distinction between men and women and to somehow suggest you don’t need both a father and a mother to raise a child successfully,” said Jeffress. “(This decision) was made to make homosexual couples feel more comfortable in rearing children.” 

Chrisler recounted the day she and her female partner tried to get her twin sons passports. 

“Even though my partner was their legal mother, had adopted them after I gave birth to them, she still had to put her name in the father field, and that is both discriminatory and makes us feel like second-class citizens,” she said. 

Sprague said she would not use the word discriminatory to describe the old passport form. 

“I would prefer to use the word imprecise,” she said. “It just didn’t capture the reality of their situation. Clearly, we want to be sensitive to the feelings of other people, but we are also very conscious of our need to introduce the greatest degree of precision to the process.” 

Perkins, meanwhile, accused the State Department of disrespecting the law and called on Congress to “take their oversight rule very seriously and intervene in both these circumstances.” 

The new gender-neutral passport application will be rolled out in February.”

The above article was found at FoxNews.

Bill O’Reilly Bloviates: Something ‘Must Be Done’ in Response to Shootings

The excitable, tempermental, and noisy Bill O’Reilly at Fox News insisted something must be done  to provide greater safety for public officials…….a typical knee-jerk reaction when something untoward suddently shows up.   He claims chaos reigns.

John Stossel apparently agrees.   I did not view the ‘debate’ between the two this evening.   Let’s admit it.  Bill O’Reilly bullies when he goes hysterical.   I am not fond of his style.  

The following article was found at Wednesday’s  Stossel blog site at FoxBusiness.

“Tonight I will fight with Bill O’Reilly about “what must be done” in response to the shooting in Arizona.

O’Reilly says, “new laws that provide greater safety for public officials should be considered.  We simply cannot have chaos at this level.”

But we don’t have “chaos.” America is safer than ever.  Crime is down.  Political assassinations are rare.  They were once much more common.  Presidents Lincoln, Garfield, McKinley and Kennedy were murdered.  So were Senators James Hinds, Huey Long, Robert Kennedy and Rep. Ryan Leo. The shooting of Congresswoman Giffords was the first such incident in more than thirty years.  There is little that can be done to stop a crazy person from committing a crazy act.

Bill is right to complain about the hysteria from the left.  Jane Fonda said “Palin holds responsibility.”

Michael Daly of NY Daily News said,  “Gabrielle Giffords’ blood is on Sarah Palin’s hands.”   This is nonsense.

But Bill is wrong to say that congress needs more security. Our imperial political class already spends too much on security.  I was once on a CNBC talk show with Treasury Secretary John Snow.  The Secretary was accompanied to the NYC studio by four secret service men who officiously ordered us about, demanding we leave each room that the Secretary entered.  This self-importance is  nonsense too.  Few people in NY even knew who John Snow was.  I bet more people want to kill me.

This week’s endless media coverage of the Arizona shooting implies that members of Congress are more important than “ordinary” citizens.  They are not.  All lives are equally valuable.

This past year there were two more deadly shootings.  In Connecticut, a man killed 9 co-workers. A Virginia man killed his sister and seven others.

Those shootings got so much less media attention.  The political class, which includes the media, treats politicians as special. Now Rep. John King (R-NY) want to make it illegal to bring a gun within 1,000 feet of a government official. 1,000 feet?  No more hunting photo-ops!  I guess that would make all guns illegal in Washington D.C. again.

And The Hill reports:

 Rep. Robert Brady (D-Pa.) reportedly plans to intro legislation that would make it a federal crime to use language or symbols that could be perceived as threatening or inciting violence against a federal official or member of Congress.

 That would include the target symbols used in Palin’s map.

The Arizona shooting is a terrible tragedy.  Overreacting to it would be a tragedy too.”

We don’t need  police running around at political events except those which include the President and Vice President.   Wouldn’t that be a dandy atmosphere of free speech for cops to be on hand for the Huey Long-type thug politician to finger those in the audience who might ask embarrassing questions and have them “bruised”  up a bit or put away for the evening or the week.

Americans seem to forget that for every law there is passed, there is another opportunity for police to cause trouble…..where neede or not.

For those of you who prefer dignity, intelligence, respect, wisdom in the American political and ethical scene  all wrapped up in  one person, we  recommend you listen to Dennis Prager   on Salem radio during the week.   Look him up at Townhall.com. …..and listen to his programs via internet.