• Pragerisms

    For a more comprehensive list of Pragerisms visit
    Dennis Prager Wisdom.

    • "The left is far more interested in gaining power than in creating wealth."
    • "Without wisdom, goodness is worthless."
    • "I prefer clarity to agreement."
    • "First tell the truth, then state your opinion."
    • "Being on the Left means never having to say you're sorry."
    • "If you don't fight evil, you fight gobal warming."
    • "There are things that are so dumb, you have to learn them."
  • Liberalism’s Seven Deadly Sins

    • Sexism
    • Intolerance
    • Xenophobia
    • Racism
    • Islamophobia
    • Bigotry
    • Homophobia

    A liberal need only accuse you of one of the above in order to end all discussion and excuse himself from further elucidation of his position.

  • Glenn’s Reading List for Die-Hard Pragerites

    • Bolton, John - Surrender is not an Option
    • Bruce, Tammy - The Thought Police; The New American Revolution; The Death of Right and Wrong
    • Charen, Mona - DoGooders:How Liberals Hurt Those They Claim to Help
    • Coulter, Ann - If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans; Slander
    • Dalrymple, Theodore - In Praise of Prejudice; Our Culture, What's Left of It
    • Doyle, William - Inside the Oval Office
    • Elder, Larry - Stupid Black Men: How to Play the Race Card--and Lose
    • Frankl, Victor - Man's Search for Meaning
    • Flynn, Daniel - Intellectual Morons
    • Fund, John - Stealing Elections
    • Friedman, George - America's Secret War
    • Goldberg, Bernard - Bias; Arrogance
    • Goldberg, Jonah - Liberal Fascism
    • Herson, James - Tales from the Left Coast
    • Horowitz, David - Left Illusions; The Professors
    • Klein, Edward - The Truth about Hillary
    • Mnookin, Seth - Hard News: Twenty-one Brutal Months at The New York Times and How They Changed the American Media
    • Morris, Dick - Because He Could; Rewriting History
    • O'Beirne, Kate - Women Who Make the World Worse
    • Olson, Barbara - The Final Days: The Last, Desperate Abuses of Power by the Clinton White House
    • O'Neill, John - Unfit For Command
    • Piereson, James - Camelot and the Cultural Revolution: How the Assassination of John F. Kennedy Shattered American Liberalism
    • Prager, Dennis - Think A Second Time
    • Sharansky, Natan - The Case for Democracy
    • Stein, Ben - Can America Survive? The Rage of the Left, the Truth, and What to Do About It
    • Steyn, Mark - America Alone
    • Stephanopolous, George - All Too Human
    • Thomas, Clarence - My Grandfather's Son
    • Timmerman, Kenneth - Shadow Warriors
    • Williams, Juan - Enough: The Phony Leaders, Dead-End Movements, and Culture of Failure That Are Undermining Black America--and What We Can Do About It
    • Wright, Lawrence - The Looming Tower

The Morality and Character of the Modern Liberal……Elizabeth Warren Fraud Expands

Warren found listed as a minority professor

at second law school

By Josh Lederman –
Elizabeth Warren was listed as a minority professor by a second law school in a report detailing the school’s progress in creating a diverse faculty.

In addition to Harvard University, where Warren is on faculty, the University of Pennsylvania Law School also touted Warren as a minority, according to an April 2005 document obtained by The Hill.

Warren taught at the Philadelphia school in the 1980s and 1990s. The diversity report, published after Warren had already resigned, said she had received the award in 2004. It was unclear what information led to her being listed as a minority.

“At every law school where Elizabeth was recruited to teach, it has been made absolutely clear she was hired based on merit, on her accomplishments and ability,” said Warren spokeswoman Alethea Harney. “Documents from the college and law school from which she graduated show that Elizabeth did not seek special treatment by acknowledging her Native American heritage.”

The revelation that a second school listed Warren as a minority raised further questions about her claim to Native American heritage and whether it was reasonable for her to represent herself as a minority. Republicans, including Sen. Scott Brown’s (R-Mass.) campaign, have questioned whether Warren used the claim to further her career — an allegation Warren has repeatedly denied.

Warren has said she was unaware that Harvard had named her as a minority when promoting its faculty’s diversity, and said she never brought up her heritage when looking for jobs at Harvard or elsewhere. Warren said she had listed her heritage in faculty directories more than 15 years ago in hopes of meeting others with similar backgrounds.

In a University of Pennsylvania “minority equity report,” published in April 2005, Warren is listed as a recipient of the Lindback Award for distinguished teaching. Warren’s name is bolded and in italics, which a legend on the report says indicates faculty members who are minorities.

The question of whether Warren’s claim to Native American heritage is legitimate has become a major focal point in her Senate race against Brown. Democrats are eager to reclaim the seat they lost to Brown in a 2010 special election, and the race’s outcome could determine the balance of power in a closely divided Senate.

Warren grew up in Oklahoma, where many residents have Native American ancestry. Pressed by reporters on the issue last week, Warren said being part Native American had always been part of her family lore, pointing to the high cheekbones of her grandfather as a reason her family believed it had Native American blood.

Warren has been unable to independently substantiate her claim to the heritage, and does not claim membership in a tribe. A genealogist told the Boston Herald that Warren’s great-great-great-grandmother may have been Cherokee, which would make her 1/32 Native American.

In an attempt to debunk any speculation that she gained an advantage from being listed as a minority, Warren’s campaign has circulated statements from faculty members and deans from universities where she taught attesting to the fact that she was hired solely based on her academic merits.

“Her appointment was based on the excellence of her scholarship and teaching,” read a statement from Stephen Burbank, a former dean at the Penn Law, who was involved in recruiting Warren to join the faculty. “I do not know whether members of the faculty were even aware of her ancestry, but I am confident that it played no role whatsoever in her appointment.”

At the University of Texas School of Law, where Warren taught in the 1980s, an electronic personnel record shows that Warren listed herself as white, and did not check a box indicating she was also Native American. In addition, Warren did not apply for admission to Rutgers Law School under a program for minority students, according to the Associated Press.

Brown’s campaign has called on Warren to “come clean” about her motivations for listing herself as a minority. Earlier in the week, Brown called for the Democrat to release her personnel files and her law school applications, adding that the issue had cast doubt on her credibility.

“As candidates for high public office, we have a duty to be transparent and open and not hide behind a wall of silence in the midst of public controversy,” said Brown.

Warren’s campaign said Brown is feeding “an ugly story and with nasty insinuations” in an attempt to distract from his voting record, his wealth and his contributions from Wall Street.

“The people of Massachusetts deserve better and that’s why Elizabeth is focused on what matters to help middle class families get ahead,” said Warren’s spokeswoman.”

Comment:   What do you  learn in school today, dear little girl  of crime.  

Bill O’Reilly, like the blowhard Democrats, Isn’t looking ahead for the Gay Marriage trouble

Bombastic O’Reilly bloviates about his correct positions on all political and social issues.   Few public figures are so pleased with themselves, except for Barry Obama who stands in a line alone by himself.

Why bother with marriage at all if guys can marry guys and gals gals.    The purpose throughout our Biblical past is to provied a culture with the best child rearing arrangement fit for the thinking ape.

The male thinking ape is orn a sexual predator and a natural born killer.    The female requires these ‘talents’ in order to provide safe delivery of her off spring to continue the species……….or else the species dies, which is one of the basic rules of life whether animal or vegetable.

Liberals and other Obama Marxists have become amoral indoor people of a bisexual persuasion and tolerance, believing that all of natural existence radiates from their university education.   This is the new religion of the Western world…….but in the East and Muslim world there is developing a retro  human animal, one more interested in the expressions and conditions more apelike relying on alpha males to run the human system.

Liberals have already managed to damage, even destroy in many cities the family unit.   Fatherlessness has become a major disease.   The female is producing more and more off spring.   Either the elderly are trying to care for the young or no one is.   

In other communities off spring are shipped out during the day where they may or may not be in the care of an adult.   Their world is overwhelmingly one without their natural study and development of social habits by copying what they see and hear from adult, caring, loving, and devoted parents, especially in the earlier years from the Mother.

With the destruction of the American family already in the geography, gay marriages, it is said can’t cause anyone any trouble.

You have to be kidding.

Already ignorant but caring  nursery attendants called ‘teachers’ from kindergarten to senior high school are concerned about the feelings of their professional product.   Paramount among these touchy touchies are those preaching self esteem and those hunting for who might be gay.

I am sure there are some adult gays in the western world besides my self.  

No one in the world knows how another human feels, thinks, is or is not attracted to another human being whether male or female or something very modern, the inbetween.      We are each unique in other ways, as well.   How can we measure up to other folks regarding any of our tastes.

Why do I like Beethoven and pass on Hayden?    As we do not know how others are stimulated by what they see or hear, think or read, by God NO ONE KNOWS ANYONE ELSE’S SEXUAL FORMULAS.   

We live in a carnal world of sexual experiment.    We have become far more carnal oriented socially, politically, and artistically.    Our Liberal world celebrates the carnal and the carnal is reflected in its art and politics.

Marriage is the sacred bond between the human female and male to produce not just another animal, but a thinking animal some craving  concepts of  moral  significance and consequence…..an idea that is no longer popular at university at present…..expecially among those who believe there is no difference between the human male and human female except for those caused by socialization.

How do we raise our children when the sexual division politically, that is legally and socially,  are destroyed, whether by Marxists or the Bill O’Reilly blowhards.

How do we see our children raised?   taught privately?  taught privately?    Who is to fill the role of problem solver, protector, inventor, the curious, the soother?

If the male and female were remarkably undifferent one from another, there would be little to defend the rites of traditional marriage.   Polygamy of the most feral should certainly become popular……kind of a return to the alpha male competitions of thousands of years ago.

I am not in favor of returning to the primitive as we, in this age of Obama Marxism, are descending .   

In a civilized society the children should never be allowed to establish the rules of family structure.    But then, where in Obama’s era is there much interest in wisdom?

In our democratic culture there should be opportunities for unions of folks of similar sexual persuasion……but it should NEVER become the equal of the value expected from the ideals of the union of human male and female.

Click on below to hear the words of  the blowhard in person:


Trolling for Dirt for a Dirty President……the Gay Secret Police in Operation

Here’s what happens when the president of the United States publicly targets a private citizen for the crime of supporting his opponent.

Frank VanderSloot is the CEO of Melaleuca Inc. The 63-year-old has run that wellness-products company for 26 years out of tiny Idaho Falls, Idaho. Last August, Mr. VanderSloot gave $1 million to Restore Our Future, the Super PAC that supports Mitt Romney.

Three weeks ago, an Obama campaign website, “Keeping GOP Honest,” took the extraordinary step of publicly naming and assailing eight private citizens backing Mr. Romney. Titled “Behind the curtain: a brief history of Romney’s donors,” the post accused the eight of being “wealthy individuals with less-than-reputable records.” Mr. VanderSloot was one of the eight, smeared particularly as being “litigious, combative and a bitter foe of the gay rights movement.”

.About a week after that post, a man named Michael Wolf contacted the Bonneville County Courthouse in Idaho Falls in search of court records regarding Mr. VanderSloot. Specifically, Mr. Wolf wanted all the documents dealing with Mr. VanderSloot’s divorces, as well as a case involving a dispute with a former Melaleuca employee.

Mr. Wolf sent a fax to the clerk’s office—which I have obtained—listing four cases he was after. He would later send a second fax, asking for three further court cases dealing with either Melaleuca or Mr. VanderSloot. Mr. Wolf listed only his name and a private cellphone number.

Some digging revealed that Mr. Wolf was, until a few months ago, a law clerk on the Democratic side of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. He’s found new work. The ID written out at the top of his faxes identified them as coming from “Glenn Simpson.” That’s the name of a former Wall Street Journal reporter who in 2009 founded a D.C. company that performs private investigative work.

The website for that company, Fusion GPS, describes itself as providing “strategic intelligence,” with expertise in areas like “politics.” That’s a polite way of saying “opposition research.”

When I called Fusion’s main number and asked to speak to Michael Wolf, a man said Mr. Wolf wasn’t in the office that day but he’d be in this coming Monday. When I reached Mr. Wolf on his private cell, he confirmed he had until recently worked at the Senate.

When I asked what his interest was in Mr. VanderSloot’s divorce records, he hesitated, then said he didn’t want to talk about that. When I asked what his relationship was with Fusion, he hesitated again and said he had “no comment.” “It’s a legal thing,” he added.

Fusion dodged my calls, so I couldn’t ask who was paying it to troll through Mr. VanderSloot’s divorce records. Mr. Simpson finally sent an email stating: “Frank VanderSloot is a figure of interest in the debate over civil rights for gay Americans. As his own record on gay issues amply demonstrates, he is a legitimate subject of public records research into his lengthy history of legal disputes.”

.A look through Federal Election Commission records did not show any payments to Fusion or Mr. Wolf from political players, such as the Democratic National Committee, the Obama campaign or liberal Super PACs. Then again, when political grops want to hire researchers, it is not uncommon to hire a less controversial third party, which then hires the researchers.

This is not the first attack on Mr. VanderSloot. While the executive has been a force in Idaho politics and has helped Mr. Romney raise money, he’s not what most would consider a national political power player. Through 2011, nearly every mention of Mr. VanderSloot appeared in Idaho or Washington state newspapers, often in reference to his business.

That changed in January, with the first Super PAC disclosures. Liberal bloggers and media have since dug into his past, dredging up long-ago Idaho controversies that touched on gay issues. His detractors have spiraled these into accusations that Mr. VanderSloot is a “gay bashing thug.” He’s become a national political focus of attention, aided by the likes of partisan Salon blogger Glenn Greenwald and MSNBC host Rachel Maddow. Bloggers have harassed his children, visiting their social media accounts and asking for interviews and information.

Mr. VanderSloot has said his attackers have misconstrued facts and made false allegations. In February he wrote a long reply, publicly stating that he has “many gay friends whom I love and respect” who should “have the same freedoms and rights as any other individual.” The Obama campaign’s response, in April, was to single out Mr. VanderSloot and repeat the slurs.

Political donations don’t come with a right to privacy, and Mr. VanderSloot might have expected a spotlight. Then again, President Obama, in the wake of the Gabby Giffords shooting, gave a national address calling for “civility” in politics. Yet rather than condemn those demeaning his opponent’s donors, Mr. Obama—the nation’s most powerful man—instead publicly named individuals, egging on the attacks. What has followed is the slimy trolling into a citizen’s private life.

Mr. VanderSloot acknowledges that “when I first learned that President Obama’s campaign had singled me out on his ‘enemies list,’ I knew it was like taping a target on my back.” But the more he’s thought it through, “the public beatings and false accusations that followed are no deterrent. These tactics will not work in America.” He’s even “contemplating a second donation.”

Still. If details about Mr. VanderSloot’s life become public, and if this hurts his business or those who work for him, Mr. Obama will bear responsibility. This is what happens when the president makes a list.

Comment: The American public should know that the American Gay poitical community is experienced as Gestapo agents in gathering dirt both false and less false, exposing their social competitors and enemies. For nearly tweo decades they unleashed the “Act Up” campaign to expose and extort to advance their political-social agenda.

No American should be proud of this despicable crowd now gathering dirt for the American president, above all the Gay community.
Knowing our president better after three and a half years of his astute dishonesty, his Party reflects its leader……and the garbage collection it masters.

The Mitt Romney You will Not likely know from Mainstream Marxism

Mitt Romney — life after high school

by Paul Mirengoff at Powerline:

What kind of man – not teenager, but man – is Mitt Romney? Consider this episode, recounted by Boston Globe reporters Michael Kranish and Scott Helman in their book The Real Romney:

It was shaping up to be a hard Christmas for Mark and Sheryl Nixon. They had recently moved their family to the Boston area. . .and didn’t know many people. And then. . .they got the kind of phone call every parent dreads. [Their sons] Rob and Reed had been driving back from a youth gathering at the Mormon meeting house. . .Shortly after leaving the parking lot, Reed lost control of the red Oldsmobile minivan. The car sideswiped a utility pole, struck two trees, and. . .flipped over. . . .In a flash, the two Nixon boys, standouts on the high school cross-country team, became quadriplegics. . . .

The family suddenly needed a major addition to their house. They needed a special van to transport their sons. Their financial and emotional burdens were vast. Shortly before the holidays. . .Mark Nixon, a professor of accounting at Bentley University outside Boston, got a call at his office. It was Mitt Romney. He said he wanted to help. Would they be home on Christmas eve?

That morning. . .the Nixons opened their door to find not just Mitt but Ann Romney and their sons. They held large boxes. Inside were a massive stereo system for Rob. . .and a VCR for Reed. They’d also brought Reed a check, not knowing what else to get him. The Romneys stayed for a while. Their sons helped set up Rob’s new stereo. “What a Christmas surprise for the boys,” Sheryl wrote in her journal at the time.

The Nixons were floored. They shared a faith with Romney but didn’t really know him – they weren’t strangers, but neither were they friends. At that point, Romney held no formal leadership position in the Mormon church. He bore no direct ecclesiastical obligation to help. . . .What impressed the Nixons more than anything was that Mitt and Ann, despite their own packed holiday calendars, made a point of delivering the gifts themselves, spending time with family, and, by bringing their children with them, leading by example. . . .

That wasn’t all. Romney had also told Mark not to worry about Rob’s or Reed’s college education; he would pay for it. The Nixons, in the end, didn’t need to help. But Romney continued to quietly lend his hand. He participated in a 5K road race and fund-raiser for Rob and Reed at Bentley the next spring. He contributed substantial financial gifts toward golf tournament fund-raisers in subsequent years. Then, in 2007, when Reed graduated from Bentley with a degree in finance. . .Romney sent him a Bentley desk clock engraved with a special message of congratulation. “It wasn’t, Mark said, a onetime thing.”