• Pragerisms

    For a more comprehensive list of Pragerisms visit
    Dennis Prager Wisdom.

    • "The left is far more interested in gaining power than in creating wealth."
    • "Without wisdom, goodness is worthless."
    • "I prefer clarity to agreement."
    • "First tell the truth, then state your opinion."
    • "Being on the Left means never having to say you're sorry."
    • "If you don't fight evil, you fight gobal warming."
    • "There are things that are so dumb, you have to learn them."
  • Liberalism’s Seven Deadly Sins

    • Sexism
    • Intolerance
    • Xenophobia
    • Racism
    • Islamophobia
    • Bigotry
    • Homophobia

    A liberal need only accuse you of one of the above in order to end all discussion and excuse himself from further elucidation of his position.

  • Glenn’s Reading List for Die-Hard Pragerites

    • Bolton, John - Surrender is not an Option
    • Bruce, Tammy - The Thought Police; The New American Revolution; The Death of Right and Wrong
    • Charen, Mona - DoGooders:How Liberals Hurt Those They Claim to Help
    • Coulter, Ann - If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans; Slander
    • Dalrymple, Theodore - In Praise of Prejudice; Our Culture, What's Left of It
    • Doyle, William - Inside the Oval Office
    • Elder, Larry - Stupid Black Men: How to Play the Race Card--and Lose
    • Frankl, Victor - Man's Search for Meaning
    • Flynn, Daniel - Intellectual Morons
    • Fund, John - Stealing Elections
    • Friedman, George - America's Secret War
    • Goldberg, Bernard - Bias; Arrogance
    • Goldberg, Jonah - Liberal Fascism
    • Herson, James - Tales from the Left Coast
    • Horowitz, David - Left Illusions; The Professors
    • Klein, Edward - The Truth about Hillary
    • Mnookin, Seth - Hard News: Twenty-one Brutal Months at The New York Times and How They Changed the American Media
    • Morris, Dick - Because He Could; Rewriting History
    • O'Beirne, Kate - Women Who Make the World Worse
    • Olson, Barbara - The Final Days: The Last, Desperate Abuses of Power by the Clinton White House
    • O'Neill, John - Unfit For Command
    • Piereson, James - Camelot and the Cultural Revolution: How the Assassination of John F. Kennedy Shattered American Liberalism
    • Prager, Dennis - Think A Second Time
    • Sharansky, Natan - The Case for Democracy
    • Stein, Ben - Can America Survive? The Rage of the Left, the Truth, and What to Do About It
    • Steyn, Mark - America Alone
    • Stephanopolous, George - All Too Human
    • Thomas, Clarence - My Grandfather's Son
    • Timmerman, Kenneth - Shadow Warriors
    • Williams, Juan - Enough: The Phony Leaders, Dead-End Movements, and Culture of Failure That Are Undermining Black America--and What We Can Do About It
    • Wright, Lawrence - The Looming Tower

Obama Democrats Crippled by “Projection”, a Common Mental Disorder among Lefties

Most racists per population and likely in absolute numbers are AfroAmericans…….yet Barack Hussein Obama and his armies project the disease on male whites.

Most  devious political activities, the kind cooked in the darkness of night or behind sound proof walls are performed by Democrat Party lefties…..Obama and Obamalings, such as  Nancy Pelosi  and Harry Reid as in the passage of Obamacare, the 2500 page monstrosity commanding future human health in America that had to be passed before the American citizenry would know what is in it.

The most dishonest, disingenuous, divisive, devious and dishonest major presidential contender in my lifetime is President Barack Hussein Obama running for re-election on November……yet he and obamabrain, David Axelrod deflect Obamasins  on others……nearly all of whom are as c;eam  as can be.

The most corrupt communities in America are nearly all of the nation’s Democrat Party controlled  black plantation settlements in its largest cities…….yet Obama and his political companies  condemn Wall Street  as a class, yet forgets to mention that well over half of Wall Street political funding goes to Obamalings.

And Obama calls competing  American businessmen greedy, no matter what the story, but is says nothing  about the millions of Obamalings young and old who are cheating about their need, getting free food, free care, free as much as Obama can provide at taxpayer expense, sending the nation into bankruptcy.

Most happy and  rational Americans  are conservatives.   Yet, Obamalings consider them evil, primitive,  unworthy of existence…..CLOWNS!”

For Example:

“What they’re trying to do, I imagine, is engage — you know, a large number of the folks who support President Obama but have been sitting on the sidelines,” Bill Burton of Priorities USA, the Super PAC backing Obama. Burton previously served as deputy press secretary at the White House under Barack Obama.

“They look at Mitt Romney and say, ‘Yeah, but is this clown really going to beat President Obama?’ and the answer is well, maybe, if he has four or five times as much money as the president, then yes,” Burton said on MSNBC’s “NOW with Alex Wagner.”

“He may well have a chance at winning in November and I think that that’s what Democrats have been trying to tell other Democrats. You know, there’s a lot of money that’s going to be involved here and Democrats need to come in off the sidelines and get engaged if they haven’t,” he said.

For a closer look click below to check out the clown:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/07/02/obama_super_pac_head_bill_burton_romney_a_clown.html

On the Minnesota U.S. Senate Front: A Note from Republican Challenger, Kurt Bills

Will the pinched people of the North Star State pinch Amy Klobuchar from her  Senate Seat?

Let us hope so.

Kurt Bills suggests the following regarding:

OBAMACARE
Folded, stapled, spindled, shredded, and then incinerated. Then the ashes can be swept into the dustbin of history, where all bad ideas eventually go to die. That’s what I plan to do to the Obamacare law once I get elected to the Senate……… After I vote to repeal it.

Obamacare started as a bad idea, and then got infinitely worse once the horse-trading started in Congress. And despite the thousands of pages of written law, hundreds of thousands more have yet to be written up by the bureaucrats who will administer this travesty.

Philip Klein of The American Spectator counted 700 references in Obamacare to the secretary “shall,” 200 to the secretary “may,” and 139 to the secretary “determines.” That secretary, by the way, is not the nice lady at the front desk, but Kathleen Sibelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services.

That is over 1000 shalls, mays, and determines for a bureaucrat to define.

Obamacare is one of the greatest assaults on American freedoms in modern history. When the British invaded Washington in 1814, they only burned the White House, Capitol, and a few other buildings then left.

With Obamacare, a bureaucrat will be occupying your doctor’s offices for the rest of your life; and not even have the good grace to leave after trashing the place. Unless we repeal it. Amy Klobuchar won’t; I will.

Last week’s Supreme Court decision was a travesty. I respect the Court and its decisions, but I am outraged that the Chief Justice decided to essentially rewrite the law in order to declare it constitutional. By declaring the mandate a tax, he abandoned judicial restraint and devalued the meaning of the Constitution.

But the decision does make one thing clear: not only did Amy Klobuchar vote to take away your health care freedom, she also voted for the most massive tax increase since the establishment of the income tax.

LIBERTY, FREEDOM and CONSTITUTION
You may have seen them already…the two additional buses that will be traveling throughout the state. We’ve had a great reaction to them. People have been posting photos on Twitter and Facebook as they see one of them rolling down the highway to its next parade or event.

Did you know that you can track the buses on our website? Just go to www.KurtBills.com and scroll down to “Where are the buses?” The buses check in as they arrive at each event across the state.

GET SOME BILLS GEAR
We’ve made some additional improvements to our website, including a button where you can request a bumper sticker, a yard sign or even a t-shirt with a minimum contribution. At www.KurtBills.com you can go to the Take Action section of any page and click on the GET SOME BILLS GEAR circle. Get yours now!

PARADES
We’re meeting many wonderful Minnesotans as we participate in parades large and small across the state. Would you like to join us? Sign up at www.KurtBills.com. Volunteer to participate, and you’ll be updated each week on the parade schedule and how to join the group.

SUPPORT YOUR LOCAL CANDIDATES
Everyone who is running for office this year is an important part of making Minnesota better. Please make it a point to find out about your candidates for the Minnesota House and Senate.

Last week I attended a fundraiser for Minnesota Senate candidate Rick Karschnia in District 65. You can learn about him at www.rickforstatesenate.org. I also spoke at an event for Jim Newberger, House District 15B candidate. His website is www.jimforminnesota.com.

As always, thank you for your continued support.

Sincerely,

Kurt Bills

Obama and His Marxist Universities Strive to Destroy the American Creed

 What Is the American Creed?

If we forget our basic ideals or shrug them off,

we no longer deserve to be great.

 

By DAVID GELERNTER    at the Wall Street Journal

Presidential elections are America’s season for serious chats around the national dinner table. The sick economy, health care and the scope of government are the main issues. But another is even more important. Who are we? What is the United States?

Recently Gov. Mitt Romney urged us to return to “the principles that made America, America.” But too many of us don’t know what those are, or think they can’t work.Yes, Americanism evolves, and by all means let’s change our minds when we ought to. We should always be marching toward the American ideals of freedom, equality and democracy, as we did when we ended slavery, granted women the right to vote, and finally buried Jim Crow. But if we forget our basic ideals or shrug them off, as we are doing today, we no longer deserve to be great. Without our history and culture, we have no identity.Almost no one believes that our public schools are doing a passable job of teaching American and Western civilization.

Modern humanities education starts from the bizarre premise that students must be cured of the Europe-centered, misogynist, bigoted ideas of the past. Many American children have never heard a good word for the United States, the West, Judaism or Christianity their whole lives.Who are we?

Dawdling time is over. We have failed a whole generation of children. As of fall 2012, let all public schools be charter schools, competing for each tax dollar and student with every other school in the country. Of course this is a local issue—but a president’s or would-be president’s job is to lead. There are wonderful teachers, principals and schools out there, and a new public-school system based on the American ideal of achievement will know how to value them.No principle is more American than equality.

Every generation has strained closer to the ideal. We have seen the near eradication of race prejudice in a mere two generations—an astounding achievement. We are a nation of equal citizens, not of races or privileged cliques. Affirmative action has always been a misfit in this country. A system that elevates individuals because of the color of their skin, their race or their sex has no place in America.

Yet a boy born yesterday is destined to atone (if he happens to be the wrong color) for prejudice against black women 50 years ago. Modern America is a world where a future Supreme Court justice, Sonia Sotomayor, can say publicly in 2001, “I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion [on the bench] than a white male who hasn’t lived that life.”

Once a justice has intuited, by dint of sheer racial brilliance, which party to a lawsuit is more simpatico and deserving, what then? Invite him to lunch? Friend him on Facebook? This is not justice as America knows it.

Next Independence Day let’s celebrate the long-overdue end of affirmative action, and our triumphant return to the American ideal of equality.Modern American culture is in the hands of intellectuals—unfortunates born with high IQ and low common sense. Witness ObamaCare, a health-care policy, now somehow deemed constitutional, that forces millions of Americans to buy something they don’t want.Bilingualism was the intellectuals’ response to one of the best breaks America ever got, a common language to unite its uncommon people. Resolved: The federal government will henceforth conduct its business and publish its statements in English, period. There is plenty of room in this country for new immigrants of all races and religions who want to learn America’s culture and be part of this people; none for those who dislike all things American except dollars. Resolved: The federal government will henceforth enforce its own immigration laws.America’s creed is blessedly simple. Freedom, equality, democracy and America as the promised land, the new Jerusalem. What Thomas Jefferson had in mind when he invoked “the favor of that Being in whose hands we are, who led our fathers, as Israel of old, from their native land and planted them in a country flowing with all the necessaries and comforts of life.”President Obama rejects this creed. He doesn’t buy the city-on-a-hill stuff. He sees particular nations as a blur; only the global community is big enough for him. He is at home on the exalted level of whole races and peoples and the vast, paternal power of central governments.The president has revealed no sense of America’s mission to move constantly forward “with malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right, as God gives us to see the right.” Lincoln’s sublime biblical English uses the parallel stanzas of ancient Hebrew poetry. That is who we are: a biblical republic, striving to live up to its creed. The dominion of ignorance will pass away like smoke and we will know and be ourselves again the moment we choose to be. Why not now?

Mr. Gelernter, a professor of computer science at Yale, is the author of “America-Lite,” out on July 4 by Encounter Books.

Mark Steyn Reviews Roberts’ Disgrace Passing Obama-Roberts Obamacare Legislation

Constitutional Contortions
A forlorn marker on a great nation’s descent into decline and decay.

By Mark Steyn                  at National Review Online

 “Three months ago, I quoted George Jonas on the 30th anniversary of Canada’s ghastly “Charter of Rights and Freedoms”: “There seems to be an inverse relationship between written instruments of freedom, such as a Charter, and freedom itself,” wrote Jonas. “It’s as if freedom were too fragile to be put into words: If you write down your rights and freedoms, you lose them.”

For longer than one might have expected, the U.S. Constitution was a happy exception to that general rule — until, that is, the contortions required to reconcile a republic of limited government with the ambitions of statism rendered U.S. constitutionalism increasingly absurd. As I also wrote three months ago (yes, yes, don’t worry, there’s a couple of sentences of new material in amongst all the I-told-you-so stuff), “The United States is the only Western nation in which our rulers invoke the Constitution for the purpose of overriding it — or, at any rate, torturing its language beyond repair.”

Thus, the Supreme Court’s Obamacare decision. No one could seriously argue that the Framers’ vision of the Constitution intended to provide philosophical license for a national government (“federal” hardly seems le mot juste) whose treasury could fine you for declining to make provision for a chest infection that meets the approval of the Commissar of Ailments. Yet on Thursday Chief Justice Roberts did just that. And conservatives are supposed to be encouraged that he did so by appeal to the Constitution’s taxing authority rather than by a massive expansion of the Commerce Clause. Indeed, several respected commentators portrayed the Chief Justice’s majority vote as a finely calibrated act of constitutional seemliness.

Great. That and $4.95 will get you a decaf macchiato in the Supreme Court snack bar. There’s nothing constitutionally seemly about a Court decision that says this law is only legal because the people’s representatives flat-out lied to the people when they passed it. Throughout the Obamacare debates, Democrats explicitly denied it was a massive tax hike: “You reject that it’s a tax increase?” George Stephanopoulos demanded to know on ABC. “I absolutely reject that notion,” replied the president. Yet “that notion” is the only one that would fly at the Supreme Court. The jurists found the individual mandate constitutional by declining to recognize it as a mandate at all. For Roberts’ defenders on the right, this is apparently a daring rout of Big Government: Like Nelson contemplating the Danish fleet at the Battle of Copenhagen, the chief justice held the telescope to his blind eye and declared, “I see no ships.” 

If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, but a handful of judges rule that it’s a rare breed of elk, then all’s well. The chief justice, on the other hand, looks, quacks, and walks like the Queen in Alice in Wonderland: “Sentence first — verdict afterwards.” The Obama administration sentences you to a $695 fine, and a couple of years later the queens of the Supreme Court explain what it is you’re guilty of. A. V. Dicey’s famous antipathy to written constitutions and preference for what he called (in a then largely unfamiliar coinage) the “rule of law” has never looked better.

Instead, constitutionalists argue that Chief Roberts has won a Nelson-like victory over the ever-expanding Commerce Clause. Big deal — for is his new, approved, enhanced taxing power not equally expandable? And, in attempting to pass off a confiscatory penalty as a legitimate tax, Roberts inflicts damage on the most basic legal principles.

Still, quibbling over whose pretzel argument is more ingeniously twisted — the government’s or the Court’s — is to debate, in Samuel Johnson’s words, the precedence between a louse and a flea. I have great respect for George Will, but his assertion that the Supreme Court decision is a “huge victory” that will “help revive a venerable tradition” of “viewing congressional actions with a skeptical constitutional squint” and lead to a “sharpening” of “many Americans’ constitutional consciousness” is sufficiently delusional that one trusts mental health is not grounds for priority check-in at the death panel. Back in the real world, it is a melancholy fact that tens of millions of Americans are far more European in their view of government than the nation’s self-mythologizing would suggest. Indeed, citizens of many Continental countries now have more — what’s the word? — libertyin matters of health care than Americans. That’s to say, they have genuinely universal government systems alongside genuinely private-system alternatives. Only in America does “health” “care” “reform” begin with the hiring of 16,500 new IRS agents tasked with determining whether your insurance policy merits a fine. It is the perverse genius of Obamacare that it will kill off what’s left of a truly private health sector without leading to a truly universal system. However, it will be catastrophically unaffordable, hideously bureaucratic, and ever more coercive. So what’s not to like?To give the Chief Justice Roberts’ argument more credit than it deserves, governments use taxes as a form of incentive. There is mortgage tax relief because the state feels home ownership is generally a good thing. Conversely, not buying health insurance is a bad thing, so such anti-social behavior should be liable to a kind of anti-social tax. But, as presently constituted, the Supreme Court’s new “tax” is a steal — $695 is cheaper than most annual health-insurance policies. Especially when, under Obamacare, you’re allowed to wait till you get ill to take out health insurance, and you can’t be turned down. Which is why the cost of insurance is already rising, and will rise higher still down the road. Which means that in a few years’ time paying the penalty will look even more of a bargain, at least until you fall off the roof or acquire an uncooperative polyp. Right now, many Americans are, by any rational measure, over-insured. That will be far less affordable in the future. Some are already downgrading to less lavish policies. Those with barebones policies might likewise find it makes more sense to downgrade to the $695 penalty. What Chief Justice Roberts sees as the Alternative Mandate Tax, millions of Americans will see as a de facto Alternative Minimum Health Plan.

 

Who knows? Chances are I’m wrong, and the justices are wrong, and the government’s wrong, and the consequences of Obamacare will be of a nature none of us has foreseen. But we already know Obama’s been wrong about pretty much everything — you can keep your own doc, your premiums won’t go up, it’s not a tax, etc. — and in the Republic of Paperwork multi-trillion-dollar cost overruns and ever greater bureaucratic sclerosis seem the very least you can bet on. It should also be a given that this decision is a forlorn marker on a great nation’s descent into steep decline and decay. Granted the dysfunctionalism of Canadian health care, there’s at least the consolation of an equality of crappiness for all except cabinet ministers and NHL players. Here, it’s 2,800 unread pages of opt-outs, favors, cronyism, and a $695 fine for those guilty of no crime except wanting to live their lives without putting their bladder under the jurisdiction of Commissar Sebelius. And the Constitution is apparently cool with all that.

So be it. It’s down to the people now — as it should be. But, meanwhile, a little less deference to judges wouldn’t go amiss. The U.S. Supreme Court is starting to look like Britain’s National Health Service — you wait two years to get in, and then they tell you there’s nothing wrong. And you can’t get a second opinion.

 Mark Steyn, a National Review columnist, is the author of After America: Get Ready for Armageddon. © 2012 Mark Steyn

Cost of Complying with Lefty Government Regulations is $1,000,000,000,000 since 2005

Washington’s Ten Thousand Commandments

from the National Center for Policy Analysis:

Deficits, taxes and spending are the defining issues of the 2012 campaign, but regulation deserves a seat at the table, too.  The current regulatory environment places an enormous burden on the American economy by crushing small businesses with nonsensical rules and making the United States a toxic country in which to locate a business, say Ryan Young and Wayne Crews of the Competitive Enterprise Institute.

Of course, efforts have been made to check this growing problem.  The Obama administration recently targeted five regulations for elimination that will save $6 billion over the next five years.  However, $1.2 billion per year is a drop in a bucket compared to the overall impact of these regulations.

  • According to the Small Business Administration (SBA), the annual cost of complying with federal regulations has exceeded $1 trillion since around 2005.
  • Last year alone, 3,807 new final rules were published in the Federal Register — more than 10 per day.
  • During that same period, Congress passed only 81 new laws.
  • Furthermore, of the new rules, 212 are classified as “economically significant,” which means they cost more than $100 million per year.

These regulations have a grossly distortionary impact on private markets.  For example, their aggregate impact favors large businesses over small ones, undermining politicians’ claims that they care greatly for the needs of undersized operations.

  • Big businesses with more than 500 employees pay about $7,755 per employee to comply with federal rules each year, according to the SBA.
  • But small businesses with fewer than 20 employees pay $10,585 per employee per year — that’s a built-in competitive advantage for big business of nearly $3,000 per employee.
  • Consequently, a recent Kauffman Foundation-Thumbtack.com survey of 6,000 small businesses found that “small businesses care almost twice as much about licensing regulations as they do about tax rates when rating the business-friendliness of their state or local government.”

There is now a bill, however, that would do much to address this problem.  By requiring Congress to vote on all economically significant rules, the Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny (REINS) Act would lighten the regulatory burden.  It has passed the House, but is stalled in the Senate.

Source: Ryan Young and Wayne Crews, “Washington’s Ten Thousand Commandments,” American Spectator, June 5, 2012.

For text:

http://spectator.org/archives/2012/06/05/washingtons-ten-thousand-comma

Note:   The Democrat Party has controlled the Senate since January,  2007, the presidency snce January, 2009, and the House from January, 2007  to January, 2011.

For more on Government Issues:

http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_Category=33

Mychal Messie: Will Obama Crack before November?

When will Obama crack in public?
By Mychal Massie          June 6, 2012.
 
At a time when many Americans can barely afford Burger King and a movie, Obama boasts of spending a billion dollars on his re-election campaign. Questioned at a recent appearance about the spiraling fuel costs, Obama said, “Get used to it” – and with an insouciant grin and chortle, he told another person at the event, who complained about the effect high fuel prices were having on his family, to “get a more fuel-efficient car.” The Obamas behave as if they were sharecroppers living in a trailer and hit the Powerball, but instead of getting new tires for their trailer and a new pickup truck, they moved to Washington . And instead of making possum pie, with goats and chickens in the front yard, they’re spending and living large at taxpayer expense – opulent vacations, gala balls, resplendent dinners and exclusive command performances at the White House, grand date nights, golf, basketball, more golf, exclusive resorts and still more golf. In the 1950’s they called it acting NIGGER RICH.

Expensive, ill-fitting and ill-chosen wigs and fashions hardly befit the first lady of the United States .. The Obamas have behaved in every way but presidential – which is why it’s so offensive when we hear Obama say, in order “to restore fiscal responsibility, we all need to share in the sacrifice – but we don’t have to sacrifice the America we believe in.” 

The American people have been sacrificing; it is he and his family who are behaving as if they’ve never had two nickels to rub together – and now, having hit the mother lode, they’re going to spend away their feelings of inadequacy at the taxpayers’ expense. 

Obama continues to exhibit behavior that, at best, can be described as mobocratic and, at worst, reveals a deeply damaged individual. In a February 2010 column, I asked, “Is Obama unraveling? “I wrote that it was beginning to appear the growing mistrust of him and contempt for his policies was beginning to have a destabilizing effect on him. 

At that time, I wrote that not having things go one’s way can be a bitter pill, but reasonable people don’t behave as he was behaving. He had insulted Republicans at their luncheon, where he had been an invited guest. I had speculated that was, in part, what had led him to falsely accuse Supreme Court justices before Congress, the nation and the world, during the 2010 State of the Union address. 

It appeared, at that time, as if he were “fraying around the emotional edges.” That behavior has not abated – it has become more pronounced. While addressing the nation, after being forced to explain the validity of his unilateral aggression with Libya , America witnessed a petulant individual scowling and scolding the public for daring to insist he explain his actions. 

But during an afternoon speech to address the budget/debt, he took his scornful, unstable despotic behavior to depths that should give the nation cause for concern. Displaying a dark psychopathy more representative of an episode of “The Tudors” television series, he invited Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., to sit in the front row during his speech and then proceeded to berate both Ryan and Ryan’s budget-cutting plan. Even liberal Democrats were put off by the act. MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough questioned the sanity of Obama’s actions. 

Today, criticism is coming from all sides. A senior Democrat lawmaker said, “I have been very disappointed in [Obama], to the point where I’m embarrassed that I endorsed him. It’s so bad that some of us are thinking, is there some way we can replace him? How do you get rid of this guy?” (“Democrats’ Disgust with Obama,” The Daily Beast, April 15, 2011) 

Steve McCann wrote: Obama’s speech “was chock full of lies, deceit and crass fear-mongering. It must be said that [he] is the most dishonest, deceitful and mendacious person in a position of power I have ever witnessed” (“The Mendacity of Barack Obama,”AmericanThinker.com , April 15, 2011). 

McCann continued: “[His] performance was the culmination of four years of outright lies and narcissism that have been largely ignored by the media, including some in the conservative press and political class who are loath to call [him] what he is in the bluntest of terms: a liar and a fraud. That he relies on his skin color to intimidate, either outright or by insinuation [against] those who oppose his radical agenda only add to his audacity. It is apparent that he has gotten away with his character flaws his entire life, aided and abetted by sycophants around him. …” 

With these being among the kinder rebukes being directed at Obama, and with people becoming less intimidated by his willingness to use race as a bludgeon, with falling poll numbers in every meaningful category and an increasingly aggressive tea-party opposition – how much longer before he cracks completely? 

The coming months of political life are not going to be pleasant for Obama. Possessed by a self-perceived palatine mindset, that in his mind places him above criticism, how long before he cracks in public? Can America risk a man with a documented track record of lying and misrepresenting truth as a basic way of life, who is becoming increasingly more contumelious?

Hope you forward this to everyone in your address book as we are going to need every vote we can get to remove Obama. The liberals are just unable to absorb what he is doing to our country and will continue to vote for him. Just imagine what he will do to America if he gets another term!

 
Arlene Taber sent the above article by Mychal Messie.