• Pragerisms

    For a more comprehensive list of Pragerisms visit
    Dennis Prager Wisdom.

    • "The left is far more interested in gaining power than in creating wealth."
    • "Without wisdom, goodness is worthless."
    • "I prefer clarity to agreement."
    • "First tell the truth, then state your opinion."
    • "Being on the Left means never having to say you're sorry."
    • "If you don't fight evil, you fight gobal warming."
    • "There are things that are so dumb, you have to learn them."
  • Liberalism’s Seven Deadly Sins

    • Sexism
    • Intolerance
    • Xenophobia
    • Racism
    • Islamophobia
    • Bigotry
    • Homophobia

    A liberal need only accuse you of one of the above in order to end all discussion and excuse himself from further elucidation of his position.

  • Glenn’s Reading List for Die-Hard Pragerites

    • Bolton, John - Surrender is not an Option
    • Bruce, Tammy - The Thought Police; The New American Revolution; The Death of Right and Wrong
    • Charen, Mona - DoGooders:How Liberals Hurt Those They Claim to Help
    • Coulter, Ann - If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans; Slander
    • Dalrymple, Theodore - In Praise of Prejudice; Our Culture, What's Left of It
    • Doyle, William - Inside the Oval Office
    • Elder, Larry - Stupid Black Men: How to Play the Race Card--and Lose
    • Frankl, Victor - Man's Search for Meaning
    • Flynn, Daniel - Intellectual Morons
    • Fund, John - Stealing Elections
    • Friedman, George - America's Secret War
    • Goldberg, Bernard - Bias; Arrogance
    • Goldberg, Jonah - Liberal Fascism
    • Herson, James - Tales from the Left Coast
    • Horowitz, David - Left Illusions; The Professors
    • Klein, Edward - The Truth about Hillary
    • Mnookin, Seth - Hard News: Twenty-one Brutal Months at The New York Times and How They Changed the American Media
    • Morris, Dick - Because He Could; Rewriting History
    • O'Beirne, Kate - Women Who Make the World Worse
    • Olson, Barbara - The Final Days: The Last, Desperate Abuses of Power by the Clinton White House
    • O'Neill, John - Unfit For Command
    • Piereson, James - Camelot and the Cultural Revolution: How the Assassination of John F. Kennedy Shattered American Liberalism
    • Prager, Dennis - Think A Second Time
    • Sharansky, Natan - The Case for Democracy
    • Stein, Ben - Can America Survive? The Rage of the Left, the Truth, and What to Do About It
    • Steyn, Mark - America Alone
    • Stephanopolous, George - All Too Human
    • Thomas, Clarence - My Grandfather's Son
    • Timmerman, Kenneth - Shadow Warriors
    • Williams, Juan - Enough: The Phony Leaders, Dead-End Movements, and Culture of Failure That Are Undermining Black America--and What We Can Do About It
    • Wright, Lawrence - The Looming Tower

California NAACP Victory over Sterling Distemper?

One would think the most important event of the century took place this past weekend with the amount of time, emotion, and verbal energy spent by today’s television news media disrobing, blasting, and burning billionaire Jewish owner of the basketball team, the Los Angeles Clippers, Donald Sterling.

He had been having some marital and girly problems in this his 80th year of human life. He has had a history of careless wordings and cursings in his past….and as owner of vast numbers of rented living quarters has allowed water to run and painting to peel a time or two…..

In a loud but private conversation with a girly causing him domestic trouble he chastised her audibly, loudly, and recorded for associating personally with blacks.

Interestingly gifted black athletes are a major group of performers who ‘work’ for Mr. Sterling’s team…..but they are guys playing basketball.

In my own old age I wasn’t aware so many of today’s professional basketball players were so tender and delicate to have become so easily devestated.

The private but recorded conversation was of a particularly low class of utterance for any person who could have been accused of pronouncing the words.

Mr. Sterling seemed to be behaving remarkably low class. But his words threatened no one nor any race. In my lifetime, many, perhaps a majority of Jews in my neighborhood would have spoken simarly about me as a nonJew, and a Christian to boot, if they had seen me over frequently, in their view, walking around with any of their daughters.

A recording made public similar to the one made by Mr. Sterling’s girly problem wouldn’t have made any noise at all. More civilized speaking people than Mr. Sterling among the allegedly abused would have gone on with their business rather than to behave as childishly as some of the well payed offended basketball players, team owners, sports announcers, folks on Lefty television, even almost all of the pundits and others at Fox cable televison.

The American adult mind had totally disappeared from televion today every time the subject of this momentous event, the content of the Sterling ‘tapes’ appeared in public….to be used most aggressively by those lefties who teach feminism and black racism at universities from coast to coast.

Yet there might be salvation yet in today’s modern lefty America….one group applying for American adulthood….representatives of the California NAACP……and, if they are sincere, may they be universally congratulated!!!

Read further:

NAACP Willing to ‘Forgive’ Clippers’ Donald Sterling After Yanking Award


Politically Correct Racism Explodes in Obama’s Fascist America

Donald Sterling did a no-no. This no-no threw this wealthy Jewish owner of the Los Angeles Clippers professional basketball team onto the cross of today’s Leftist university defined and led fascism of political correctness.

He spoke privately and apparently ‘ill’ of a certain group of Americans in Obama world’s fascist America:

What Mr. Sterling said was “caught” on tape distributed by the Leftist-racist press:


and the CNN response:


and an observation about the event by 80 year-old gh.ray:

I taught Russian and Social Studies in our Twin City area for about 15 years. Leftist racists in those days, nearly all seemingly meaning well, censored one and all words, sentences, paragraphs which in any manner might be construed even by the slightest shadow of a doubt negatively critical of the Twin City Negro community.

Trillions of dollars since World War II have been spent on attempts to bring the American urban black community into modern civilization, trillions in construction, government subsidized this and that, trillions in the hopes that this minority community might dollar by dollar be pushed into the new waves of what was then alleged as more modern America.

Instead, even though unintended, these trillions ruined the American Negro neighborhoods economically, spiritually, and culturally. They were herded into newly built monstrosities which became playgrounds for crimes of every kind that can grip human imagination.

The traditional Negro family in America’s urbana, civilized, religious, father-led families relying on family owned corner markets, repair services and shops disappeared. As a solution, lefties in that day’s government devised a policy which awarded payoffs (AFDC) to single minority females which exceeded any income their partners would receive if they remained or got married.

I am not certain if Black Racism Studies at today’s American universities from coast to coast mention such chapters as these in the leftist history texts and lectures they offer.

However, free speech is a freedom not allowed by Leftists in America today when their sacred cows mooing in Marxist political pastures are bumped. One must think only what Marxist preach from our university, news industry, and entertainment pulpits.

I am not a person of Mr. Sterlings tastes. But I am a person who supports Mr. Sterling’s right to speak to his intimates in the manner in which he has been made privately but has been recorded and used for political propaganda.

From Greatness to Whiteness: America’s Lefty Racism-Sexism on the March!


by Dennis Prager:

“When Americans over the age of, let us say, 45, look at any of the iconic paintings of America’s Founders — the signing of the Declaration of Independence, the signing of the Constitution, George Washington crossing the Delaware, any of the individual portraits the Founders — what do they see?

They see great men founding a great country.

If you ask recent graduates of almost any American university what they see when they look at these paintings, chances are that they see something entirely different.

They are apt to see rich, white males who are not great and who did not found a great country. And for many, it is worse than that. These men are not only not great; they are morally quite flawed in that they were slaveholders and/or founded a country that allowed slavery. Moreover, they were not only all racists; they were all sexists, who restricted the vote to males. And they were rich men who were primarily concerned with protecting their wealth, which is why they restricted the vote to landowners.

Please read on:


The Dishonest Obama also Lies about Voting Frauds?


by Robert D. Popper at the Wall Street Journal:

“The president’s selective statistics are red meat to supporters, but still bogus.

The Obama administration has been ramping up its rhetoric about the evil of voter identification as part of the run-up to the midterm elections. In January, Attorney General Eric Holder told MSNBC that voter fraud “simply does not exist to the extent that would warrant” voter ID laws, adding that many who favor such measures do so in order to “depress the vote.” Vice President Joe Biden claimed in February that new voter ID laws in North Carolina, Alabama and Texas were motivated by “hatred” and “zealotry.”

In an April 11 speech to Al Sharpton’s National Action Network, President Obama recited statistics purporting to show that voter fraud was extremely rare. The “real voter fraud,” he said, “is people who try to deny our rights by making bogus arguments about voter fraud.”

These arguments themselves are bogus. Consider the two studies from which Mr. Obama drew his statistics. The first, which he said “found only 10 cases of alleged in-person voter impersonation in 12 years,” is a 2012 report issued by News21, an Arizona State University project.”

Please Continue Reading:


The Piketty Marxist Book Turd Quickly Lures the Lefty Flies

This ‘ridiculously far-left’ economist is candy for liberals

by Kyle Smith at the New York Post:

The No. 1 bestselling book on Amazon last week wasn’t about plucky teen girls battling for humanity in a futuristic dystopia. It wasn’t about a boy wizard or a college student who likes to be tied up and spanked.

No, it’s a 700-page French economics tome. And on the Left it’s been received with such a case of the hot-and-heavies that you can think of it as “50 Shades of Grey” for the Acela-corridor professional intellectual statist. “Oooh, hit me with the income-inequality chart again, please!”

The book is “Capital in the Twenty-First Century,” by the ridiculously far-left French economist Thomas Piketty. As its title makes obvious, it’s an unabashed sequel/homage/reboot of “Capital,” Karl Marx’s logically challenged bible of income and wealth redistribution. Neo-Marxism is all Piketty is about.

That has made him the hero of the leading left-wing economics writers of the age, who are feeling momentarily emboldened to wave the red flag. Paul Krugman calls the book “magnificent, sweeping,” Vox’s Ezra Klein thrills to what he says is the book’s prophecy of a “doom loop of oligarchy” and the New Yorker’s John Cassidy says it’s “a book that nobody interested in a defining issue of our era can afford to ignore.”

Actually, you can afford to ignore it, even though Esquire calls it “the most important book of the twenty-first century,” with its breathless writer Stephen Marche adding, “If I were a Republican policy-maker, if I were the Koch brothers, if I worked for Goldman Sachs, ‘Capital in the Twenty-First Century’ would frighten me more than anything at Occupy Wall Street.”

Yes, Lloyd Blankfein is still biting his nails about those capitalism-endangering Occupy kids! He only made $23 million last year. It’s like saying, “I’d like to introduce you to my new friend Kermit … He’s even scarier than Elmo.”

The original “Capital” argued that it was unfair that owners of companies (like Karl’s layabout buddy Friedrich Engels, whose family owned the factories in northern England that generated the profits that Engels gave Marx, enabling “Capital” to be written in the first place) got rich doing nothing when factory workers were doing all the labor. Marx argued — this was scientific fact, in his imagination — that this imbalance was bound to be redressed someday. In fact, low-skilled labor was never valuable and will never be well paid.

You must read on to know more about what these fascists have in store for America: