Mikado’ is denounced in US as racist. Next step, a ban? – See more at: http://slippedisc.com/2014/07/mikado-is-denounced-in-us-as-racist-next-step-a-ban/#sthash.I8YlWufV.MQvvWGYv.dpuf
(Feminism has been gathering rotting teeth recently with nothing to chew on. Sharon Pian Chan apparently is bored not hitting a high enough lefty batting average. She is investigation the degree of density of the modern lefty American mind……those human animals between 12 and 54. Although the Mikado is a wonderful spoof of humor, lyrics and music in Japanese costume, making fun at British Victorianism, an insulted Ms Chan with Chinese, not Japanese-like name, will have none of it. Her feminist appetite is stirred in Seattle, the seat of lefty sexist ignorance north of San Francisco. She demands reparations against white males in general and a 19th English composer and his musical playwright in particular all happening here in ObamaLand where noses are easily pinched by such bigots and bores these days . Feminism in mouth is at political play again.)
Please read the following:
The Gilbert and Sullivan send-up of Europe’s late 19th century mania for Japanese culture has run into heavy waters in Seattle.
Sharon Pian Chan, an op-ed editor of the Seattle Times, calls it ‘yellowface, in your face’.
Needless to say, she hasn’t seen the show. But her column is widely read and Sharon has taken to the airwaves to promote her view that Mikado should only be performed, if at all, by Asian Americans like herself.
– See more at: http://slippedisc.com/2014/07/mikado-is-denounced-in-us-as-racist-next-step-a-ban/#sthash.I8YlWufV.MQvvWGYv.dpuf
Peter A Klein has written to the paper’s editor, as follows:
“The Mikado” is not about any real Japan, it’s a satire on 19th-Century British society, dressed up in a fictionalized exotic locale to “gild the philosophic pill,” as Gilbert put it in another of his operettas.
I do wish Ms. Chan would learn the difference between affectionate satire, fairy tales, clumsy ignorance and actual bigotry. Such discernment would be worthy of a person who helps guide the editorial voice of a great city’s newspaper. Banning, censoring or bowdlerizing art is a grim pastime. “Presentism”–the idea that all older works of art and literature must conform to today’s sensibilities and sensitivities or be subject to censorship–is a present-day curse. It would deprive us of great works of art like Puccini’s “Madame Butterfly” and “Turandot,” sparkling music, humor and wordplay like Gilbert and Sullivan’s, and even works that actually plead for inter-ethnic understanding, such as Mark Twain’s “Huckleberry Finn” or Rodgers and Hammerstein’s “South Pacific.”
Such censorship can backfire. In 1907, Japanese Prince Fushimi visited Britain. The Lord Chamberlain banned performances of “The Mikado” in London to avoid offending the Prince. The Prince was offended, all right–he wanted very much to see the show, and was very upset that he could not. The Daily Mail dispatched a native Japanese newspaper critic to a provincial performance, far from the Prince. Mr. K. Sugimura wrote: “I came to Sheffield expecting to discover real insults to my countrymen. I find bright music and much fun, but I could not find the insults.”
His letter has not yet been published.
alternative send-up
– See more at: http://slippedisc.com/2014/07/mikado-is-denounced-in-us-as-racist-next-step-a-ban/#sthash.I8YlWufV.dpuf
Filed under: American Culture, Arts and Entertainment, Feminism, Marxism, Racial disorder, The Press | Leave a comment »