• Pragerisms

    For a more comprehensive list of Pragerisms visit
    Dennis Prager Wisdom.

    • "The left is far more interested in gaining power than in creating wealth."
    • "Without wisdom, goodness is worthless."
    • "I prefer clarity to agreement."
    • "First tell the truth, then state your opinion."
    • "Being on the Left means never having to say you're sorry."
    • "If you don't fight evil, you fight gobal warming."
    • "There are things that are so dumb, you have to learn them."
  • Liberalism’s Seven Deadly Sins

    • Sexism
    • Intolerance
    • Xenophobia
    • Racism
    • Islamophobia
    • Bigotry
    • Homophobia

    A liberal need only accuse you of one of the above in order to end all discussion and excuse himself from further elucidation of his position.

  • Glenn’s Reading List for Die-Hard Pragerites

    • Bolton, John - Surrender is not an Option
    • Bruce, Tammy - The Thought Police; The New American Revolution; The Death of Right and Wrong
    • Charen, Mona - DoGooders:How Liberals Hurt Those They Claim to Help
    • Coulter, Ann - If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans; Slander
    • Dalrymple, Theodore - In Praise of Prejudice; Our Culture, What's Left of It
    • Doyle, William - Inside the Oval Office
    • Elder, Larry - Stupid Black Men: How to Play the Race Card--and Lose
    • Frankl, Victor - Man's Search for Meaning
    • Flynn, Daniel - Intellectual Morons
    • Fund, John - Stealing Elections
    • Friedman, George - America's Secret War
    • Goldberg, Bernard - Bias; Arrogance
    • Goldberg, Jonah - Liberal Fascism
    • Herson, James - Tales from the Left Coast
    • Horowitz, David - Left Illusions; The Professors
    • Klein, Edward - The Truth about Hillary
    • Mnookin, Seth - Hard News: Twenty-one Brutal Months at The New York Times and How They Changed the American Media
    • Morris, Dick - Because He Could; Rewriting History
    • O'Beirne, Kate - Women Who Make the World Worse
    • Olson, Barbara - The Final Days: The Last, Desperate Abuses of Power by the Clinton White House
    • O'Neill, John - Unfit For Command
    • Piereson, James - Camelot and the Cultural Revolution: How the Assassination of John F. Kennedy Shattered American Liberalism
    • Prager, Dennis - Think A Second Time
    • Sharansky, Natan - The Case for Democracy
    • Stein, Ben - Can America Survive? The Rage of the Left, the Truth, and What to Do About It
    • Steyn, Mark - America Alone
    • Stephanopolous, George - All Too Human
    • Thomas, Clarence - My Grandfather's Son
    • Timmerman, Kenneth - Shadow Warriors
    • Williams, Juan - Enough: The Phony Leaders, Dead-End Movements, and Culture of Failure That Are Undermining Black America--and What We Can Do About It
    • Wright, Lawrence - The Looming Tower

Sally Kohn at Daily Beast offers a Butch Response to Court Decision to Zap Marriage

Sally Kohn reports from Daily Beast: THE GOP MARRIAGE FREAK OUT …… It is wrong for public officials to defy the Supreme Court. Yet that’s what Republican presidential candidates have promised.

“Marriage equality has won at the Supreme Court, but the fight over gay marriage is far from over. Now we enter the Republican temper tantrum phase.

Even before the Supreme Court’s ruling, several prominent Republicans had pledged to disobey any high court ruling in favor of marriage equality—and had called on their fellow Republican leaders to do the same.

For instance, Republican presidential candidates Rick Santorum and Mike Huckabee have both signed a pledge that reads, “We will not honor any decision by the Supreme Court which will force us to violate a clear biblical understanding of marriage as solely the union of one man and one woman.”

Huckabee also challenged the authority of our nation’s highest court when he said, “The Supreme Court can’t overrule God.”

Republican Senator Ted Cruz and Representative Steve King also called for Congress and any future Republican president to flagrantly ignore such a Supreme Court ruling.

Let’s be clear: These are current and former officeholders, who have taken an oath to uphold the laws of our nation, literally pledging to violate those laws as interpreted by the Supreme Court.

In any reasonable political environment, this should be a disqualifier for elected office. Certainly, measures should be considered to charge those of them who hold office with violating their oath.

Republicans in Congress recently filed suit against President Obama for using his lawful executive authority to de-prioritize certain deportations of immigrants. Said Republicans were outraged! Now here we have Republicans treading far beyond the legal gray area, actually pledging to violate their duties and break the law.

I’d love to say such behavior is unimaginable. But unfortunately, it’s becoming predictable within the GOP.

“If the court tries to do this it will be rampant judicial activism,” Cruz said before the ruling. “It will be lawlessness.”

No, actually, saying that as a senator or as president you will disobey the ruling of the Supreme Court of the United States of America—that is the very definition of lawlessness.

“We will not honor any decision by the Supreme Court which will force us to violate a clear biblical understanding of marriage as solely the union of one man and one woman.”
Of course this attitude comes from the same party that after 60 failed votes to repeal Obamacare and two now failed legal challenges rising all the way up to the very same Supreme Court, still pledges to keep trying to undo the law. The modern Republican Party is operating less like a responsible partner in governance and more and more like an underground crime network—continually abusing and threatening the otherwise democratic process if it doesn’t get its way.

So far, in the aftermath of the decision, Republican candidates have offered statements affirming their opposition to the ruling and leaning on the new, more modest GOP chestnut that “religious freedom” must be protected.

Governor Huckabee took to Twitter after the ruling, saying that the Supreme Court could no more overrule “God’s nature” than overrule gravity. But alas, just as it has in fights for justice and equality throughout history, the Supreme Court has done its job—interpreting the Constitution of our nation and applying it equally to all Americans.”

(Please continue reading more of the joyous Sally Kohn’s celebrations regarding rights given the American gay community to destroy the ancient institution of civilized peoples, nearly universally considered sacred, marriage, that is a union between a man and woman to form the most natural institution for the raising of offspring to adulthood, the human family.)

COMMENT: The homosexual world is not the ideal community upon which to base standards of future behaviors connected to the raising of a culture’s off-spring. Marriage equality in the gay and Marxist definition of ‘equality’ seems to suggest there are no differences between male and male or female and female ‘bonding’ marriages and THE NATURAL UNION BETWEEN HUMAN MALE AND HUMAN FEMALE.

Neither gays or leftists have been historically noted for their honesty.




ObamaCare is a Wreck Despite Robert’s Convoluting

Roberts Makes Key Factual Mistake At The Start Of His ObamaCare Decision

OBAMACARE IN TROUBLE DESPITE SCOTUS….from the Investor’s Business Daily:

“TRAIN WRECK: From the tone of his Obama-Care opinion, Chief Justice Roberts seems to believe he’s spared a law that’s working just fine. Wrong. With or without the court’s help, ObamaCare is in desperate shape.
On the very first page of Robert’s King v. Burwell opinion is a glaring mistake about ObamaCare. The chief justice explains how states that tried ObamaCare-like market changes — called “guaranteed issue” and “community rating” — saw their insurance markets caught in a death spiral as young and healthy dropped coverage and premiums shot up.
Roberts then claims that in 2006 “Massachusetts discovered a way to make the guaranteed issue and community rating requirements work” by adding an individual mandate and premium subsidies…..” Please continue reading below:


Supreme Court: Same Sex Couples Can Marry in All 50 States

Please examine and remember the stupidity of the statement made by supreme court justice, Anthony Kennedy who wrote the majority opinion, just as he did in the court’s previous three major gay rights cases dating back to 1996.

“No union is more profound than marriage,” Kennedy wrote, joined by the court’s four more liberal justices. He continued: “Under the Constitution, same-sex couples seek in marriage the same legal treatment as opposite-sex couples, and it would disparage their choices and diminish their personhood to deny them this right.”

One expects such good feeling statements overwhelming the emotions paralyzing the thought process of rational thinking from the three feminists representing their sex on this nation’s supreme court of our day.

The court’s five to four decision announces the reality of the rapid decaying process of a culture already in collapse; the corrupting of a people’s being in which the wilds and ignorance of the animal are being served with the reverence, with the right, the tools, the purpose, the religion to avenge all the requirements of the best of traditional western European culture founded on a state’s population trained by learnings for the sake of amassing knowledge to become civilized animals seeking Truth, Justice, certain basic Rights and ever more Knowledge to pass greater Good and Truth onto future generations.

To make a legal bond of male and male, or female and female “marriage” equal to civilized human kind’s age-old rites and celebrations of marriage between female and male…..for the sake of bearing and rearing off spring, DESTROYS the natural human bond …..a bond already damaged and crippled by the disrespect leftist American culture already celebrates in its drive toward freer animal rights for the human animal of whatever sex, whatever mood. By the STATE destroying the family, the Marxist STATE will ever more profoundly become parenting dictators of the forever enslaved. The human female animal may find comfort and security from this Marxist state of life, but most human male animals are neither built nor act readily to state slavery.

“No union is more profound than marriage” is a true statement for a nation whose population is religiously civilized, active, respected, practiced by its population, now long absent among leftist rulers and followers of our America today. In truth, marriage between male and male, female and female only is almost non-existent in the real world of American gay sexual exercise. Marriage, will cease to exist except for perhaps leftist tax breaks.

For cultural recovery Christians will win the marriage war only if they make being Christian more worth while again by teaching Truth by endlessly seeking Truth through the JudeoChristian tradition of searching for and finding Godliness as the foundation for success in ones life. But is not likely to happen when emotional feminists run the religion show. They prefer Marxism to dictate and police equality.

The following is a Fox News report on the Supreme Court dictate to destroy marriage:

Supreme Court: Same-sex couples can marry in all 50 states


The Supreme Court ruled Friday that same-sex couples have a right to marry nationwide, in a historic decision that invalidates gay marriage bans in more than a dozen states.

Gay and lesbian couples already can marry in 36 states and the District of Columbia. But in a 5-4 ruling, the court held that the 14th Amendment requires states to issue marriage licenses for same-sex couples and to recognize such marriages performed in other states.

The ruling means the remaining 14 states that did not allow such unions, in the South and Midwest, will have to stop enforcing their bans. Already, gay marriages were underway Friday in several states where they had been banned. A court in Atlanta issued marriage licenses to three same-sex couples Friday morning, soon after the decision. Other licenses reportedly were issued in Arkansas and Texas — where Gov. Greg Abbott also issued a memo directing state agency heads to protect religious liberties.

Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote the majority opinion, just as he did in the court’s previous three major gay rights cases dating back to 1996.

“No union is more profound than marriage,” Kennedy wrote, joined by the court’s four more liberal justices. He continued: “Under the Constitution, same-sex couples seek in marriage the same legal treatment as opposite-sex couples, and it would disparage their choices and diminish their personhood to deny them this right.”

The outcome is the culmination of two decades of Supreme Court litigation over marriage, and gay rights generally. Cheers broke out outside the Supreme Court when the decision was announced. (Read on, there’s a lot more.)