• Pragerisms

    For a more comprehensive list of Pragerisms visit
    Dennis Prager Wisdom.

    • "The left is far more interested in gaining power than in creating wealth."
    • "Without wisdom, goodness is worthless."
    • "I prefer clarity to agreement."
    • "First tell the truth, then state your opinion."
    • "Being on the Left means never having to say you're sorry."
    • "If you don't fight evil, you fight gobal warming."
    • "There are things that are so dumb, you have to learn them."
  • Liberalism’s Seven Deadly Sins

    • Sexism
    • Intolerance
    • Xenophobia
    • Racism
    • Islamophobia
    • Bigotry
    • Homophobia

    A liberal need only accuse you of one of the above in order to end all discussion and excuse himself from further elucidation of his position.

  • Glenn’s Reading List for Die-Hard Pragerites

    • Bolton, John - Surrender is not an Option
    • Bruce, Tammy - The Thought Police; The New American Revolution; The Death of Right and Wrong
    • Charen, Mona - DoGooders:How Liberals Hurt Those They Claim to Help
    • Coulter, Ann - If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans; Slander
    • Dalrymple, Theodore - In Praise of Prejudice; Our Culture, What's Left of It
    • Doyle, William - Inside the Oval Office
    • Elder, Larry - Stupid Black Men: How to Play the Race Card--and Lose
    • Frankl, Victor - Man's Search for Meaning
    • Flynn, Daniel - Intellectual Morons
    • Fund, John - Stealing Elections
    • Friedman, George - America's Secret War
    • Goldberg, Bernard - Bias; Arrogance
    • Goldberg, Jonah - Liberal Fascism
    • Herson, James - Tales from the Left Coast
    • Horowitz, David - Left Illusions; The Professors
    • Klein, Edward - The Truth about Hillary
    • Mnookin, Seth - Hard News: Twenty-one Brutal Months at The New York Times and How They Changed the American Media
    • Morris, Dick - Because He Could; Rewriting History
    • O'Beirne, Kate - Women Who Make the World Worse
    • Olson, Barbara - The Final Days: The Last, Desperate Abuses of Power by the Clinton White House
    • O'Neill, John - Unfit For Command
    • Piereson, James - Camelot and the Cultural Revolution: How the Assassination of John F. Kennedy Shattered American Liberalism
    • Prager, Dennis - Think A Second Time
    • Sharansky, Natan - The Case for Democracy
    • Stein, Ben - Can America Survive? The Rage of the Left, the Truth, and What to Do About It
    • Steyn, Mark - America Alone
    • Stephanopolous, George - All Too Human
    • Thomas, Clarence - My Grandfather's Son
    • Timmerman, Kenneth - Shadow Warriors
    • Williams, Juan - Enough: The Phony Leaders, Dead-End Movements, and Culture of Failure That Are Undermining Black America--and What We Can Do About It
    • Wright, Lawrence - The Looming Tower

Donald’s Real Statement about GW and 9/11, the one BLOATED BY COMPETITOR JEB and the LEFT

Geoff Earle at the New York Post wrote the following in contrast to the headline attached to the Post article and the bloating of the Trump remark reported by the left:

“While speaking about national emergencies, Trump said that he would be a better president than his rival candidates or earlier presidents.

“I think I’m much more competent than all of them. I mean, say what you want, the World Trade Center came down during his time,” Trump said on Bloomberg Television.

“He was president, OK? . . . Blame him, or don’t blame him, but he was president. The World Trade Center came down during his reign.”

Presidential candidate Jeb Bush rushed to social media to defend his big brother and slam the GOP front-runner……”  Please read the entire article:


The Leftist Daily Mail sells a different story: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3276186/Trump-blames-George-W-Bush-9-11-Say-want-World-Trade-Center-came-time-Jeb-calls-attack-brother-pathetic.html

Americans Fleeing Obama States

Americans Still Voting With Their Feet, Fleeing Blue States

by  Stephen Moore at TownHall:

“So-called progressives love to talk about how their policies will create a workers’ paradise. Why is it, then, day after day, month after month, year after year, people are fleeing liberal blue states for conservative red states?

New census data on where we live and where we moved to in 2014 shows that the top seven states with the biggest percentage increases in inbound migration from other states are, in order: North Dakota, Nevada, South Carolina, Colorado, Florida, Arizona and Texas. All of these states are politically red, except Colorado, which is purple.

Meanwhile, the leading exodus states, in percentage terms, are: Alaska, New York, Illinois, Connecticut, New Mexico, New Jersey and Kansas. These states, except Alaska and Kansas, are blue.

The latest “Rich States, Poor States” document (which I co-author), published by the American Legislative Exchange Council, finds that nearly a net 1,000 people each day are leaving blue states and entering red states. This migration is changing the economic center of gravity in America — shifting it relentlessly to the South and West.

Travis Brown, author of the indispensable book “How Money Walks,” shows that two of the leading factors behind this movement of human capital are: 1) whether a state has a right-to-work law (half the states do), and 2) how high the top state income tax rate is. Nine states have no income tax, and they are creating jobs at twice the pace as high income-tax states.

 Data from the Internal Revenue Service show a similar trend……”   Please read on:


Islamic Fascists Colluding with Lefts in Canada to Topple Government?

(The Rebel is a conservative source covering the collapse of democratic institutions in Canada.   The Islamic invasion threatening  our neighbor  is more visciously fascistic, bolder,  and successful in spreading its bigotries than here, south of the border.   It is closely allied with and protected by the nation’s leftist voting  establishment.

“To keep you going until then, here are some of the top stories on the Rebel from the past week:

We sent David Menzies to vote while wearing a full face-obscuring Muslim niqab. Canadians across the country were outraged when Elections Canada actually allowed David to vote without showing his identity. All they required was that David make a pinky swear saying he was who he said he was under the mask. That’s crazy!

Well, our friends at CIJNews couldn’t believe it either. They sent Ilana Shneider to wear a niqab and go to vote too. But this time it was even worse than when David did it! Click below to watch Ezra’s take on the shocking footage.

Have you felt like the election campaign has been going on forever? Well Brian Lilley reported on the possibility of a Liberal and NDP coalition government that could send us back to the polls within weeks of election day. Justin Trudeau and Thomas Mulcair could get together in the event of a Conservative minority and force another vote almost immediately.

Finally, our new Alberta bureau chief Sheila Gunn Reid interviewed a Liberal candidate named Tariq Chaudary. Chaudary was involved with attempting to bring a radical Islamic hate preacher to Canada. When pushed on the issue, Chaudary accused Sheila of racism. What irony!”

Despite Hillary Mouth at CNN, FBI Remains Around Her Corner

Why FBI Agents Were Reportedly Angered by Obama’s Comments on Hillary Clinton’s Email Scandal on ’60 Minutes’

President Barack Obama downplayed the significance of Hillary Clinton’s email scandal as the FBI continues to look into whether the former secretary of state’s private setup endangered any sensitive government information, prompting anger from some within the agency who say it was inappropriate for the president to weigh in.
“I don’t think it posed a national security problem,” Obama said in an interview aired on CBS’ “60 Minutes” last weekend. “This is not a situation in which America’s national security was endangered.”
In this Jan. 25, 2013 file image taken from video and provided by CBS, President Barack Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton speak during
In this Jan. 25, 2013 file image taken from video and provided by CBS, President Barack Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton speak during “60 Minutes” segment in Washington. (AP)
That insistent comment ahead of a formal conclusion by the FBI has angered those who say it was inappropriate for the president to “suggest what side of the investigation he is on” before the inquiry is even complete, the New York Times reported.
“Injecting politics into what is supposed to be a fact-finding inquiry leaves a foul taste in the FBI’s mouth and makes them fear that no matter what they find, the Justice Department will take the president’s signal and not bring a case,” Ron Hosko, a former senior FBI official and president of the Law Enforcement Legal Defense Fund, told the Times.
White House press secretary Josh Earnest defended Obama’s comments on Thursday, saying that national security experts are still debating how or whether sections of information contained in Clinton’s emails should be classified.
The White House spokesman further asserted that there is “no evidence” to indicate that the information contained in the emails endangered national security. But as the Times noted, Obama’s comments about Clinton’s emails ahead of the FBI’s findings echo remarks he made in 2012 about former CIA Director David Petraeus, who ultimately pleaded guilty to giving classified material to his biographer, whom he also had an affair with.
“I have no evidence at this point, from what I’ve seen, that classified information was disclosed that in any way would have had a negative impact on our national security,” Obama said of Petraeus’ case in 2012 before the FBI had completed its investigation. Petraeus was sentenced in April to two years of probation plus a $100,000 fine.
(The above article was sent by Lisa Rich in California.)