• Pragerisms

    For a more comprehensive list of Pragerisms visit
    Dennis Prager Wisdom.

    • "The left is far more interested in gaining power than in creating wealth."
    • "Without wisdom, goodness is worthless."
    • "I prefer clarity to agreement."
    • "First tell the truth, then state your opinion."
    • "Being on the Left means never having to say you're sorry."
    • "If you don't fight evil, you fight gobal warming."
    • "There are things that are so dumb, you have to learn them."
  • Liberalism’s Seven Deadly Sins

    • Sexism
    • Intolerance
    • Xenophobia
    • Racism
    • Islamophobia
    • Bigotry
    • Homophobia

    A liberal need only accuse you of one of the above in order to end all discussion and excuse himself from further elucidation of his position.

  • Glenn’s Reading List for Die-Hard Pragerites

    • Bolton, John - Surrender is not an Option
    • Bruce, Tammy - The Thought Police; The New American Revolution; The Death of Right and Wrong
    • Charen, Mona - DoGooders:How Liberals Hurt Those They Claim to Help
    • Coulter, Ann - If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans; Slander
    • Dalrymple, Theodore - In Praise of Prejudice; Our Culture, What's Left of It
    • Doyle, William - Inside the Oval Office
    • Elder, Larry - Stupid Black Men: How to Play the Race Card--and Lose
    • Frankl, Victor - Man's Search for Meaning
    • Flynn, Daniel - Intellectual Morons
    • Fund, John - Stealing Elections
    • Friedman, George - America's Secret War
    • Goldberg, Bernard - Bias; Arrogance
    • Goldberg, Jonah - Liberal Fascism
    • Herson, James - Tales from the Left Coast
    • Horowitz, David - Left Illusions; The Professors
    • Klein, Edward - The Truth about Hillary
    • Mnookin, Seth - Hard News: Twenty-one Brutal Months at The New York Times and How They Changed the American Media
    • Morris, Dick - Because He Could; Rewriting History
    • O'Beirne, Kate - Women Who Make the World Worse
    • Olson, Barbara - The Final Days: The Last, Desperate Abuses of Power by the Clinton White House
    • O'Neill, John - Unfit For Command
    • Piereson, James - Camelot and the Cultural Revolution: How the Assassination of John F. Kennedy Shattered American Liberalism
    • Prager, Dennis - Think A Second Time
    • Sharansky, Natan - The Case for Democracy
    • Stein, Ben - Can America Survive? The Rage of the Left, the Truth, and What to Do About It
    • Steyn, Mark - America Alone
    • Stephanopolous, George - All Too Human
    • Thomas, Clarence - My Grandfather's Son
    • Timmerman, Kenneth - Shadow Warriors
    • Williams, Juan - Enough: The Phony Leaders, Dead-End Movements, and Culture of Failure That Are Undermining Black America--and What We Can Do About It
    • Wright, Lawrence - The Looming Tower

Today’s College Professors are Overwhelmingly Fascistic in the “Liberal” Arts……Yesterday’s German College Professors were Overwhelmingly Fascistic before Hitler Came to Power!

Nearly a decade before Adolph Hitler secured political dictatorship in mid-1930 Germany, that nation’s universities had already become Nazified openly preaching fascism for state dictatorship. Who will arise in America from the fascism now preached throughout classes once called “Liberal arts” learnings? Obama’s neodictatorship has already been established at the national government level and in California state government, colleges and universities, but what is tomorrow’s American tolerance picture going to look like when from coast to coast its students learn no subject unfiltered by rules of Obama-Hillary atheistic fascism?


by Damon Linker at The Week:

“College professors are overwhelmingly liberal. You know it. I know it. Everyone knows it.

Studies document it, anecdotes confirm it, and the right decries it. College campuses are places where the ideological gamut typically runs from liberal Democrat to Maoist, with a whole bunch of postmodern cynics in the middle and often not a single conservative in sight.

Well, okay, not all campuses — and not even all schools and departments at top research universities. Business schools and medical schools tend to be much more ideologically diverse and sometimes even slanted to the right. The same is sometimes true of engineering schools, and often economics departments, too. When people describe universities as homogeneously left-wing, they’re mainly talking about the humanities, most of the social sciences, and many (though not all) law schools.

But here’s my question: What’s behind the apparent bias? Is it merely a matter of leftists hiring the like-minded and excluding those who dissent from the party line? No doubt, that’s part of it. But I think the story is also far more complicated. And this complication makes it very unlikely that simple calls for hiring more conservatives on the grounds of fairness or diversity will make a meaningful difference in rectifying the ideological imbalance.

Consider this: The humanities and social sciences (the liberal arts) derive from two traditions — neither of which is straightforwardly compatible with the way many contemporary conservatives view higher education. The deepest source of the liberal arts is the medieval university, which was divided into distinct disciplines (or departments) of learning: theology, law, and medicine. This model was expanded into the rudiments of the modern university in the early 19th century by the Prussian philosopher Wilhelm von Humboldt, who championed academic freedom for scholars to conduct specialized research in a wide range of discrete fields. The aim of this research was both to expand the boundaries of knowledge and to disseminate it among the citizenry to create well-rounded, autonomous individuals.


Jason Riley: Liberals Don’t Want a Discussion about Race

Liberals Don’t Want a Discussion About Race

They’d rather blame white racism for racial disparities in America.

by Jason Riley  at the Wall Street Journal:

Television personalities Raven-Symoné andDon Lemon appear on ABC and CNN, respectively, but what they said last week about the high-school classroom confrontation between a disruptive black teenager and a white sheriff’s deputy in Columbia, S.C., is more commonly heard on Fox News.

The Oct. 26 incident, caught on video, shows the officer forcing a female student to the floor and arresting her after she refuses repeated requests to put away her phone and leave the classroom. After playing the footage on “The View,” Ms. Symoné, a co-host, remarked rather evenhandedly that “there’s no right or reason for him [the officer] to be doing this type of harm—that’s ridiculous—but at the same time you’ve got to follow the rules in school.” Mr. Lemon’s response on CNN was to caution against jumping to conclusions. “[The video] only shows a small slice of time, and I’d like to know more before passing judgment,” he said.

But liberals have no use for evenhandedness or caution when it comes to charged incidents involving blacks and whites, and they immediately took the commentators to task. Mr. Lemon had failed to acknowledge that the video was irrefutable evidence that our racist criminal-justice system targets blacks. And Ms. Symoné had invoked black personal responsibility, which is akin to a capital crime among progressive thinkers. Hence, petitions circulated at both networks calling for Ms. Symoné and Mr. Lemon to be fired.

Don’t expect the hubbub to die down anytime soon. South Carolina’s NAACP president said that “race is indeed a factor” in what happened. The Justice Department is now investigating, and the national media want to have yet another “discussion” about race and discipline in school. What this has meant in the past is a focus on effects rather than causes and the Obama administration cherry-picking data to push a political agenda. When convenient, racial disparities are presented as evidence of racial animus. When inconvenient, racial disparities are ignored.

The Justice Department report released in March on the Ferguson, Mo., police department noted that between 2012 and 2014 “African-Americans account for 85% of vehicle stops,” despite comprising only 67% of Ferguson’s population. But that doesn’t prove racism. It merely shows that different groups—races, ethnicities, ages, genders—have different driving habits.

Please read on:   http://www.wsj.com/article_email/liberals-dont-want-a-discussion-about-race-1446595382-lMyQjAxMTI1MzA4NDgwNjQ5Wj

A Note from America’s Neighbor, Ezra Levant, Who’s Fighting Fascism in Canada


A Toronto bureaucrat has banned a Christian choir from performing in a public square, because their songs include the words “praise the Lord” and “there’s no God like Jehovah.”

I wish I were kidding.

Voices of the Nations is a choir that has performed for five years in a row in Yonge & Dundas Square, in downtown Toronto. It’s a little bit like New York City’s Times Square, with concerts, buskers, demonstrations and events — everything from Hare Krishna chants to marijuana rallies to a permanent kiosk where Muslim men hand out Korans.

But when Voices of the Nations applied for a permit to sing Christian songs, they were turned down flat. And when they phoned Natalie Belman, the bureaucrat in charge of the city-owned property, the reason she gave them was shocking: they were banned because they were Christian.

Well, here we go again.

Just last year, a Christian pastor named Rev. David Lynn was charged by police with illegal “busking”, for singing Christian songs at Yonge & Dundas Square — not 50 feet from the Muslim Koran kiosk. We helped recruit a civil liberties lawyer to fight Rev. Lynn’s case, and we won.

Well, the anti-Christian censors are back. They’re not just going after Rev. Lynn — but a whole choir. Even though that choir has performed there for five years in a row.

Click here to watch my video on this outrageous censorship — including to listen to an audio recording of the phone call with Natalie Belman. You will be shocked.

We’ve got to do three things.

1. We’ve got to let people know that anti-Christian bigotry is alive and kicking in Toronto — and that it’s completely unashamed. Seriously — can you believe that bureaucrat didn’t even hesitate to say exactly why she was banning the choir? So, step one is: spread the word, by forwarding this e-mail, or asking people to visit our website at www.AntiChristian.ca.

2. We’ve got to get thousands of people to sign our petition to Natalie Belman, to tell her that anti-Christian bigotry is no better than anti-Jewish or anti-Black bigotry. Please click here to sign our petition.

3. And Voices of the Nations has hired a great civil liberties lawyer — our friend John Carpay, from the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms. I spoke with John today about his legal strategy. Click here to watch that video — and to join me in chipping in to his legal defence fund.

I have personally pledged $100 to help cover John’s legal expenses.

Will you help too?

Will you help level the playing field for Voices of the Nations, and help defend their freedom of speech and freedom of religion?

If we roll over, and let the bureaucracy crush this choir, it will confirm in the minds of Toronto politicians and bureaucrats that they can discriminate against Christians with impunity.

But if we win – if we help John fight the good fight, to make arguments about religion freedom and freedom of speech – then we set a different sort of precedent. A precedent for liberty. Literally, a precedent to allow Christians in the town square.

It will be a win for Voices of the Nations. But also for every other Christian in Toronto. And it will be a lesson to Toronto bureaucrats.

And hopefully, that legal precedent would be seen and heard in other Canadian cities, too. That’s how it works – one court ruling at a time.

What do you think? Will you help me, to help John to help the choir?

Thank you again for standing up for Canada.


Ezra Levant

Obama Orders Illinois School to Allow Boy to UNDRESS and SHOWER WITH GIRLS

Department of Education orders school to allow boys to use girls’ locker rooms, showers

by Jazz Shaw  at  HotAir:

“Well, it’s official. (Or at least as official as something can be before a single judge or jury has a chance to look it over.) The Obama Department of Education has ordered a school in Illinois to toe the line on “transgender students” or have their federal funding revoked. The short version of this is that if a boy declares himself to be a girl he will now be able to demand to share the locker room and shower with your daughter, not to mention competing on the girls’ sports teams. From the New York Times:

Federal education authorities, staking out their firmest position yet on an increasingly contentious issue, found Monday that an Illinois school district violated anti-discrimination laws when it did not allow a transgender student who identifies as a girl and participates on a girls’ sports team to change and shower in the girls’ locker room without restrictions.

Education officials said the decision was the first of its kind on the rights of transgender students, which are emerging as a new cultural battleground in public schools across the country. In previous cases, federal officials had been able to reach settlements giving access to transgender students in similar situations. But in this instance, the school district in Palatine, Ill., has not yet come to an agreement, prompting the federal government to threaten sanctions. The district, northwest of Chicago, has indicated a willingness to fight for its policy in court.

The Education Department gave 30 days to the officials of Township High School District 211 to reach a solution or face enforcement, which could include administrative law proceedings or a Justice Department court action. The district could lose some or all of its Title IX funding.

Some of the headlines running around regarding this story are a bit misleading. One Reuters article went with the header of, U.S. orders girls’ locker room access for transgender Illinois student. That’s technically true, but it gives the impression that there’s been some sort of judicial determination. Keep in mind that this was simply a decision handed down by a single office inside one cabinet level department, namely the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights. This decision came from Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights Catherine Lhamon and she wouldn’t have issued the order if the President wasn’t fully briefed and on board with the ruling.

Aside from the questions of propriety and privacy, this ruling also seems to codify the idea that “transgender students” can compete on the sports teams designated for the opposite gender rather than their own birth gender. This just brings back memories of Renee Richards, who “transitioned” from being a man to a woman and then proceeded to crush the competition in women’s professional tennis despite being a mediocre at best competitor in the men’s ranks. Following a successful lawsuit, Richards was actually allowed to play for a few years until retiring and was ranked as high as 20th in the world. Similar questions arose in 2010 with a transgender athlete on the basketball team at George Washington University.

There is no end to the problems which arise from this nonsense and Township High School District 211 may wind up being the one to go to court and obtain some sort of resolution. This debacle started when we began humoring people who were in denial of abject reality because as soon as you start telling someone they can simply be whichever gender they “feel like” that day you are on the path to lawsuits and demands for special treatment. That’s led us down the primrose path to this decision from Obama’s education department and now the parents and the students in any number of schools are going to be paying the price for it. Hopefully a court will restore some sanity to this situation, but I’m not holding my breath for that either.



The human female animal is born ditsy  sans curiosity and nature’s  drive to grasp space and discovery.   She seeks protection rather than freedom and  independence.  Emotion is her native weapon.  She is not born to be male.  Honesty is a value she naturally relies on when needed or convenient.   She is driven by nature to bear off spring to continue the existence of the  human species.

Leftist American females of all sexes, colors, shapes and sizes are now days  called feminists.   They have no interest in Truth beyond it being “a matter of speech.”  Truth, they claim, was invented by the human male and therefore discarded from cultural life.

Feminists  are by nature fascists.  They feel ‘peace’ and so, superior to the human male.  They  worship censorship and other controls over language to support and share their  feelings.

Most feminists of all sexes, colors, shapes and sizes are childless.

National Democrat Party Chairman Wasserman-Schultz is a prime example of this feminist human animal tribe.   She feels bad about people who find her mind empty, no matter how empty of rational thought it really is.

Please read her comments below.   I personally hope all America will be reflective of Donald Trump’s comments about Ms. Deb, for Truth in his statements cannot be overstated for she is a perfect specimen for truth of misogyny:

Wasserman Schultz: Trump’s “Misogynistic” Comments About Me “Reflective Of Entire Republican Party”