Islamist Barack Hussein Obama’s War against America by Purging its Military

Our California Prager ally, Lisa Rich, send the following article compiled by General Paul Lallely this past March.   Source:  Rense.com

Here is the list of our military elite who have been purged or fired under Obama:
Commanding Generals fired:

https://jhaines6.wordpress.com/2014/11/14/list-of-military-elite-purged-and-fired-under-obama-compiled-by-general-paul-vallely-3-17-14/

Racketeering at Today’s American University and College

The ideal culture according to the Godfearing  western culture  liberal male of the past five or six centuries was based of discovering truth amidst chaos of ignorance, disease, war,  and evil.

The goal was to achieve greater knowledge of the unknown…..curiosity genetically being  a natural drive of the human male animal.   The greater the understanding, the better the chance for local and general human survival in a violent world.

Eventually, seeking knowledge in the West became married  to a specific  religion, JudeoChristianity, primarily through its Biblical renderings.   Not alone in the spiritual world of the day, JudeoChristian mankind discovered…..”THERE IS NEITHER GOOD, NOR BAD………….ONLY THINKING MAKE IT SO”, therefore placing discoveries from the unknown as a paramount goal in the religious duties of thinking man…..besides aiding in his survival in this violent world.

That human male drive to explore, discover, and “harness” the unknown became his engine of separation from  of other primates, leading his nature-given, God-given, drive to survive as a species as a thinking animal as protector and provider for the species.

By the early seventeenth  century settlers in  the newly discovered (by these JudeoChristian Europeans)  America, as we have known HER,  continued to expand   the concepts  of  and need for, greater shared human equality and freedom in this sparsely populated empty land mass  “New World”  resulting in  greater social and economic communion of  citizens of equal needs for  status  and survival as well as spiritual purpose in a hostile geography.   It’s religious leaders began to organize the American college throughout its colonial states…..to become closer to God by accumulating more knowledge and understanding  eventually exploring  further all known  parts of the unknown.

From this knowledge arrived our Nuclear Age, the good and its bad…..

And along with it the rise of today’s American university crippled by  mindless,  hysterical, political feminist   corruption of the Liberal Mind replacing the search for and understanding of Truth, (God), with the genetic-driven female emotion and mood  needed for  the moment.

It has become a trillion and a half dollar industry.

Please read the following Atlantic article,  THE CODDLING OF THE AMERICAN MIND:

http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/09/the-coddling-of-the-american-mind/399356/

 

John Kerry a Disgrace to America for nearly 50 Years

For nearly a half a century this liar, this con-artist of extraordinary left wing ability, this traitor to his country on so many fronts, cherished by the most devious among the modern Democrat kind, totally oblivious to Truth, a worshiper of extreme wealth, so greedily rich and able in stealth of the greasiest kind, this John Kerry, elevated into his talents for fame by by the citizens of Massachusetts as Senator, and his head piece’s strand of phony hair distance from becoming the nation’s 44th president in 2004 and has since abetted the real 44th American president, the foreigner Obama, the American decline since 2008 falling into the cesspool in which it now bathes.

Have enough Americans smelled the ObamaTime stench to regain decency in life, or have their colleges, schools, and universities, their communications and Big Business industries bribed enough of the voting country with the cancers of feminism’s dependency on Marxist dictatorship to replace honesty, personal creativity, civility and shared respect so long our country’s struggle based upon its traditional JudeoChristian ideals?

JOHN KERRY IS A DISGRACE by Charles C. Cooke at the National Review:

Ladies and gentleman, your Secretary of State, Mr. John Kerry: In the last days, obviously, that has been particularly put to the test. There’s something different about what happened from Charlie Hebdo, and I think everybody would feel that. There was a sort of particularized focus and perhaps even a legitimacy in terms of – not a legitimacy, but a rationale that you could attach yourself to somehow and say, okay, they’re really angry because of this and that.

This Friday was absolutely indiscriminate. It wasn’t to aggrieve one particular sense of wrong. It was to terrorize people. It was to attack everything that we do stand for. That’s not an exaggeration. It was to assault all sense of nationhood and nation-state and rule of law and decency, dignity, and just put fear into the community and say, “Here we are.” And for what? What’s the platform? What’s the grievance? That we’re not who they are?

They kill people because of who they are and they kill people because of what they believe. And it’s indiscriminate. When I first saw the key line here — “there was a sort of particularized focus and perhaps even a legitimacy in terms of – not a legitimacy, but a rationale” — I thought that Kerry had likely been misquoted. Alas, he had not. In fact, his words are even worse in context. There really is no way of reading these comments other than as a craven ranking of outrages.

Forget Kerry’s brief flirtation with the word “legitimacy” and assume that he said “rationale” from the start. That changes precisely nothing. The top diplomat in the United States just publicly argued that because the victims at Charlie Hebdo had spoken risqué words but the victims at the Bataclan had not, the violence against the former was more comprehensible than the violence against the latter. Has he lost his mind? Even if Kerry’s assumptions were all correct, the moral problem here would be obvious. We hear a great deal about “blaming the victim” in our domestic debates, especially as it relates to sexual assault. Does this not apply to other realms?

In essence, the American Secretary of State just announced before the world that he could grasp why the woman in the short skirt was raped but that he had been left scratching his head by the attack on the woman in the pantsuit and the overcoat. “Sure,” he said, “I get why they knocked off the hate speakers, but why would they go after progressive kids at a concert? Now things are really serious.” In and of itself, this assessment is abhorrent. But he also screwed up the facts. Implicit in Kerry’s reasoning is the assumption that the perpetrators of the attacks against Charlie Hebdo had a clear purpose whereas the perpetrators of last week’s abomination did not. Or, as he put it, that in one case the killers were “really angry because of this and that,” but that in the other they were not. But this isn’t true. In fact, both set of attackers gave reasons. With Charlie Hebdo, the killers’ purported motive was revenge against ”blasphemous” expression; in Paris last week, it was disgust at Paris’s reputation for “obscenity.” In consequence, there are only two choices here: Option 1) That John Kerry believes that killing people for speaking rudely is more understandable than killing them for being secular; or Option 2) That John Kerry doesn’t actually know what the most recent attackers used as their justification (and also doesn’t remember that at the same time as the Charlie Hebdo assassinations, associated gunmen targeted a market simply because its owners were Jews).

Despicable!”

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/427222/john-kerry-disgrace-charles-c-w-cooke

This traitor to civilized humanity, this John F. Kerry should be studied from his birth throughout his magnificently dishonest, fraudulent, decadent life, as a beginning chapter to a tome titled, “The Fall of the House of America.”

Terrorist Fish Swimming in a Refugee Tide, by the PROFESSOR

Terrorist Fish Swimming in a Refugee Tide ….by the Professor:

“One of the most revealing, and bizarre, aspects of the Paris aftermath is the frenzied attempt to explain away the reports that a Syrian passport had been found near the pieces of one of the suicide bombers. This would raise the possibility that terrorists were infiltrating Europe under the cover of the flood of refugees. This would pose a serious challenge to those invested in the grandiose humanitarian gesture of opening Europe’s borders.

The straw that most of the rationalizers grasped was that the passport was evidently forged, and not well.

How this somehow undercuts the possibility that a terrorist made his way from Syria is beyond me. All that matters is whether the passport was used to secure entry into Europe. And apparently it was. Greek officials verify that the passport was so used. Indeed, the Greeks now report that it is likely that a second attacker passed through Greece.

If a terrorist used a (bad) forgery to obtain entry to Europe, that would make things worse, not better. It would mean that European borders can be breached by amateur counterfeiters.

One of the most risible attempts to deny the possibility that a Syrian cell infiltrated Paris was made by the appalling Anne Applebaum. Applebaum argues-in all seriousness, apparently-that terrorists couldn’t have come from outside, because they knew Paris too well.

Um, it’s known that hundreds, and perhaps thousands, of French Muslims have traveled to Syria, many to fight with the Islamic State. Many of these would be from Paris, and know the city quite well, thank you. Francophone fighters familiar with Paris trained in the heart of darkness of Syria would be the perfect perpetrators of mass terror in the City of Light.

And how the hell were they supposed to get back to France? Flying Air France on their French passports (likely known to French authorities)? No, obviously. But submerging themselves in the tide of migrants and traveling on false documents would be the perfect way to move from Syria to France.

What’s more, having a core team move from Syria would reduce the amount of communication needed to carry out the operation. All the planning could be done in the security of Raqqa, and those coming from Syria could confer face-to-face with their collaborators in France once they arrived. Much reduced need to send orders or plans over communication channels that could be monitored by the DGSE or NSA or GCHQ.

There have been warnings for months about the risks posed by returning jihadis. Those risks have apparently been realized, and it is just disgusting that those invested with accommodating the refugee flood refuse to accept that reality, because their unicorn dreams are so much more important.

This is not to say that all of the attackers came from abroad. Several were apparently French and Belgian. The irony that the Arab neighborhoods of Brussels are out of control of the authorities is too rich (though sick). As if on cue, European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker said (presumably between drinks), that EU immigration policy would not change as a result of Paris.

So Brussels, the capital of the nanny superstate that claims competence over the most minute aspects of human existence is incapable of performing the most basic function of a state: securing the physical security of its residents. And it is unwilling to admit its failures, and indeed, is committed to compounding them.

Merkel is doubling down too, despite a swelling rebellion in her own party, and Germany at large. Yet another example of the complete disconnect between the European “elites” and the hoi polloi they deign to rule.

Yes. There is a humanitarian catastrophe in Syria. But there are well known ways of addressing it that do not involve throwing open Europe to all comers, terrorists included. Refugee camps could be expanded in Turkey, Lebanon and Jordan. They could be funded much more liberally.

And here’s a wild idea. Why not force the Gulf state oil ticks, the Saudis, Emiratis, Kuwaitis, and Qataris, to (a) pay to support refugees, and (b) actually take in refugees, something they have adamantly refused to do?

They are pouring money into Syria to arm fighters. They should spend even more money to deal with the fallout of their actions.

And it is not just Europe that is willing to take on huge numbers of refugees. The US is as well. Speaking through the appalling incompetent throne-sniffer and toady Ben Rhodes, the administration says it is not reconsidering plans to admit 10,000 refugees from Syria.

“We have very robust vetting procedures for those refugees. It involves our intelligence community, our national counter-terrorism center, extensive interviews, vetting them against all information.”

“What we need to be able to do, frankly, is sort out that foreign fighter flow, those who have gone into Syria and come out and want to launch attacks or those who have connections with ISIL in Syria,” Rhodes said. “We need to be able to have the intelligence base to identify and target those people.”

Why should we have the slightest confidence that the US government will have the ability to do this? It only takes a few errors by the magical intelligence sorting hat to create a Paris-like disaster here in the US.

Europe (and the US) can deal with the way things are, or the way they wish they could be. Grasping at straws about forged passports would mean they are doing the latter. Keep that up, and there will be many more Parises to come.”