The Suicidal GOP Ganging Up against the Donald

Both radio and network Republicans have lined up to smear the Donald. Last week Mr. Trump was excoriated for swearing in public by a popular conservative radio host. I tuned in to catch the event at which a recording of the cursing was made public. Apparently, it was at a minor event, one not crowded with fans, but nevertheless was recorded. The radio show host claimed the swearing was more evidence the Donald was unworthy of occupying the White House.

The czar of the show is a good man….a sincere, honest, usually a conveyor of things rational.

His dislike for the Donald isn’t new. He has expressed it in many ways, both subtle and direct in the past….but, true to his habits, his listings of Donald’s shortcomings were fair as observations of habits rather than soul.

I, a devoted Trump fan, also worry about Donald’s next verbal ‘surprise’, planned or no, for I am deeply fond of his presence in the 2016 election cycle for president. I happen to believe the country desperately needs the Donald’s leadership to free us from of the present cesspool in which it has been placed mostly by Democrats, but by the Republican establishment as well.

What a breath of fresh air Donald fans, even though some of his truths are rather like a tasty sweet roll too frosted with a delicious generalization made too ‘sweet’.

Trump’s radio host enemy didn’t include more personal recordings of the dozen or so other Republican candidates on the 2016 presidential race competitions……but, I’d wager several of the others curse, at least in private. The Donald does seem to be the ONLY CANDIDATE AMONG THE PRESENT GOP PRESIDENTIAL BUNCH who doesn’t hide behind the leftist noises and rules of politically correct speech. How refreshing!

The radio pundit concluded that any one running for the American presidency is  better fit to be president than the Donald.

I am not unfond of Marco Rubio as the nation’s president. He is unremarkable as a candidate, but has a remarkable, very American story to tell about his family’s background. However, the only reason he exudes energy over the past two months of politicking, has arisen from the Donald’s advice and example. Mr. Cruz tends to be even more a bore. Governor Bush should have retired from public life a decade ago….and there is nothing in the list of the other candidates that suggests drama in leadership and determination to rebuild America with a background to enforce as does the Donald.

Think of the nobody presidential candidates the Republican establishment has dumped on us Americans over the past two generations beyond the great eight years led by the exceptional Ronald Reagan…..(who also had to wrest his candidacy from the GOP establishment opposition). Vice President H.W. Bush, G.W. Bush, Barry Goldwater, substitute Gerald Ford, grumpy, touchy John McCain, nobody Bob Dole….and gentleman, nice guy, too polite, and out of it, Mitt Romney.

This radio enemy of divorced Donald Trump apparently hasn’t enough time, will, or energy to commit research for public consumption regarding what kind of family this Donald has managed into adulthood. This radio enemy of Donald’s also hasn’t made a useful list to identify what accomplishments, if any, his preferred candidates on the Republican ticket for president have achieved beyond the political. This enemy of divorced Donald doesn’t mention which of the dozen Republicans running for the chair in the Oval Office will best expose the feminism and its corruption of  Hillary; the evil she cannot avoid advertising even  by merely showing up.

Trump vs. Carson vs. Rubio?

Republicans May Face Three-Way Fight for Nomination

by Ronald Brownstein   at the National Journal:

As its coalition evolves, the GOP presidential nomination fight could fracture between more candidates than usual.

“In a meas­ure of the cross­winds buf­feting the party, more Re­pub­lic­an lead­ers are bra­cing for a uniquely frag­men­ted nom­in­at­ing con­test that di­vides the GOP among three vi­able can­did­ates well in­to 2016.

Pre­vi­ous GOP primary races have usu­ally con­sol­id­ated quickly in­to a two-per­son choice. In al­most every nom­in­a­tion fight since the mod­ern GOP pres­id­en­tial primary era began in 1976, only two can­did­ates gen­er­ated enough sup­port to carry more than just two states. The sole ex­cep­tions came in 1988 and 2008. And even then, the “third man” in the race (tel­ev­an­gel­ist Pat Robertson in 1988 and Mitt Rom­ney in 2008) fizzled quite short of vic­tory. Since 1976, the GOP has nev­er picked a nom­in­ee who didn’t win either Iowa or New Hamp­shire, the first two con­tests.

But many Re­pub­lic­an strategists now see a path­way for three can­did­ates to ad­vance deep in­to the pro­cess, each draw­ing from dis­tinct pools of voters. “His­tor­ic­ally we have had two lanes: a cen­ter-right lane and an ideo­lo­gic­ally right lane,” said Tom Rath, a long­time New Hamp­shire-based GOP strategist.  “Now, we seem to have a third lane: the angry, non­tra­di­tion­al lane.”……”  Please read on:

http://www.nationaljournal.com/next-america/newsdesk/gop-nomination-trump-carson-rubio

CFACT: A Bad Day in Paris for Obama

From the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow:

A BAD DAY FOR THE PRESIDENT, A GOOD DAY FOR CFACT

“Day one at the COP 21 meeting in Paris has now concluded.  And the result?  A good one for CFACT.  A bad one for the President.

First the President.

Obama’s speech before the main plenary was not exactly a barnburner.  As is his custom, he began by apologizing for his nation’s misdeeds – this time against the environment:

“I’ve come here personally, as the leader of the world’s largest economy and the second-largest emitter, to say that the United States of America not only recognizes our responsibility in creating this problem, we embrace our responsibility to do something about it,” Obama told the summit.

Then, after going through a litany of alarmist hype ranging from “abandoned cities” and “submerged countries” to rapidly rising temperatures and new conflicts being caused by global warming, he pledged to throw money to the UN to make sure “resources flow to the countries that need help” dealing with these things.

Perhaps the most memorable thing about the President’s speech was that it went too long – so much so that UN staff gave up trying to get him off-stage.

Obama was just one of 147 world leaders given three minutes to talk at the event. After he more than nearly tripled his allotment, three beeps were given by organizers to try and dissuade him from continuing – to no avail.  The president just plowed on.  In the end, Obama spoke for nearly 14 minutes, something which even befuddled NBC news which noted that if everyone was as long-winded as the U.S. President the addresses would have lasted more than 33 hours.

In addition to making his marathon speech at COP 21, the President slipped off to dine with President Francois Hollande at one of the finest dining restaurants in the world, L’Ambroisie. The lavish 17^th century-style restaurant located in the secluded Place des Vosges (where an average dinner costs $380 a person), caught the attention of several newspapers as a somewhat opulent place to meet at a time when the president is talking about dire consequences of global warming to the developing world and calling on citizens to make sacrifices to save the planet.

CFACT, on the other hand, had a much better start to COP 21.

Recognized as the leading voice of skepticism to the UN global warming program at these conferences, several major media outlets sought out CFACT’s unique perspective on developments as they unfolded.  Marc Morano, in particular, has become the go-to source for many outlets on all things related to climate change.

USA Today invited Marc to publish an opposing view to the COP 21 proceedings in its editorial page, and he was also featured prominently on the Drudge Report announcing the premiere of CFACT’s new movie Climate Hustle being debut next week in Paris.  Sean Hannity then invited Marc to visit his studio in New York as a special guest on his nationally syndicated radio program, and he rounded off his Monday with an appearance before Neil Cavuto’s program on Fox News.  The impact: Our ClimateDepot.com website has already received well over 300,000 unique views in less than 24 hours and that number continues to grow by the minute.

All in all, a pretty solid start for CFACT’s Truth Squad efforts covering Paris!

CFACT will, of course, be continuing to cover events as they develop, and will report them to you in the coming days ahead.  Stay tuned!”

The University is NOT A DAY CARE CENTER!

Oh, yes it is……at least in the majority of today’s institutions of feminist indoctrination in the ‘year of our Lord’, 2015.

The president of Oklahoma Wesleyan University  referred to below is speaking ‘masculine’, a language disappearing from the American English of our ObamaDay…..

Being a human male animal, the HE of the species, Homo sapiens,  this HE was born to be curious, to snoop around for Truth,  to defend his kind, yet  to rise above the animal he is born to be, and think out his course of life beyond being a killer.

The human female animal was never born to be his equal to that described above…..Seeking Truth has never been high on the feminist scale of discourse, neither verbal nor institutional.  The ‘She’ is an animal of feelings first and forever.

The ‘She’ of all sexes, shapes, colors and sizes, now dominate the American ‘learning’ world.

Hysteria now rules the American waves!   Be extra careful what you think, say, and/or write.  The ‘Shes’  are listening, watching, rebelling…..and at the American university demanding a change in the campus weather to freeze thinking forever.   The ‘Shes’ demand equality……of thought and deed!

Day Care, not  University is our American feminized future despite the lonely article from yesterday’s America below…..Beware, the words you  are about to read  are overwhelmed by TRUTH:

This is Not a Day Care. It’s a University!

Dr. Everett Piper, President

Oklahoma Wesleyan University

This past week, I actually had a student come forward after a university chapel service and complain because he felt “victimized” by a sermon on the topic of 1 Corinthians 13. It appears that this young scholar felt offended because a homily on love made him feel bad for not showing love. In his mind, the speaker was wrong for making him, and his peers, feel uncomfortable.

I’m not making this up. Our culture has actually taught our kids to be this self-absorbed and narcissistic. Any time their feelings are hurt, they are the victims. Anyone who dares challenge them and, thus, makes them “feel bad” about themselves, is a “hater,” a “bigot,” an “oppressor,” and a “victimizer.”

I have a message for this young man and all others who care to listen. That feeling of discomfort you have after listening to a sermon is called a conscience. An altar call is supposed to make you feel bad. It is supposed to make you feel guilty. The goal of many a good sermon is to get you to confess your sins—not coddle you in your selfishness. The primary objective of the Church and the Christian faith is your confession, not your self-actualization.

So here’s my advice:

If you want the chaplain to tell you you’re a victim rather than tell you that you need virtue, this may not be the university you’re looking for. If you want to complain about a sermon that makes you feel less than loving for not showing love, this might be the wrong place.

(Please continue…)

http://www.okwu.edu/blog/2015/11/this-is-not-a-day-care-its-a-university/

(Earlier this morning while watching ‘news’ according to Fox, a standard Democrat feminazi at the station, Leslie Marshall,  used by the station’s sales people to sell their brand of “fair and   balanced” thought the remarks above were offensive for he wasn’t listening to the ‘needs’ of the students’ uprising.

While the human male animal is born a sexual predator and natural born killer, the human female animal is born ditsy, void of imagination and imagination’s weapon, curiosity.  Both must be trained, taught to become civilized.

The majority of today’s American college social science arena’s are dominated by emoting feminists void of interest in truth and the practice  of  rational thinking…..after all, fish don’t ride bicycles.

Millenials Not for Sleaze Hillary?

I’m a millennial and I’ll never vote for Hillary Clinton

by Walker Bragman at Salon…(believe it or not!)

“I am a 27-year-old, politically active, progressive millennial voter. I am a political junkie; my background is political science and American history. However, if Hillary Clinton gets the nomination (a big “if”), I will likely not vote for her, and will instead write in “Bernie Sanders” … and I encourage my readers to do so as well.

 I never thought I would be encouraging people to not vote for the Democratic nominee for president. Looking at 2012, history illustrates that the only way to change politics is through primary elections: If you want change, vote for the party aligned most closely to that change, and participate in primaries, but when it comes to the general, select the “lesser of two evils.” However, I am disgusted with how the Democratic Party is resisting that process.

The DNC’s actions regarding the number of debates, the scheduling of those debates and the treatment of the candidates is disgraceful, and undemocratic. Debbie Wasserman Schultz has disappointed me as a young, active Democrat. The second debate was on a Saturday night, and the viewership was predictably small. In fact, three of the seven debates are scheduled for Saturdays. The DNC’s leadership has seemingly aligned itself with Hillary Clinton, someone who, in my opinion, is an unqualified candidate for the following reasons:

1) Hillary’s personality repels me (and many others).”    

(Please continue reading the list.)

http://www.salon.com/2015/11/30/more_like_reagan_than_fdr_im_a_millennial_and_ill_never_vote_for_hillary_clinton/