Trump and the Return of Freedom of Speech to America

In just six months presidential contender, Donald Trump, has challenged and damaged a half century of left wing Americana’s censorship  laws of ever-expanding speech control, laws, written and unwritten,  devised to make holy certain tribes of leftist  thinkings, leftist  writings, speakings,  and other doings to  sanctify the tender feelings  of  Marxist lord queens  of all sexes, those known and those yet uninvented  so feminist mankind will forever be made equal to man.

These controls of speech called “political correctness” are formed, taught,  and dictated at the nation’s feminized universities from  the Atlantic to  the Pacific in the leftist name of peace and equality in order to make victims feel better.

From the  pages of the usually leftist Washington Post appears  the following  wayward article by  Karen Tumulty, and Jenna Johnson….

WHY TRUMP MAY BE WINNING THE WAR ON POLITICAL CORRECTNESS!

“Cathy Cuthbertson once worked at what might be thought of as a command post of political correctness — the campus of a prestigious liberal arts college in Ohio.

“You know, I couldn’t say ‘Merry Christmas.’ And when we wrote things, we couldn’t even say ‘he’ or ‘she,’ because we had transgender. People of color. I mean, we had to watch every word that came out of our mouth, because we were afraid of offending someone, but nobody’s afraid of offending me,” the former administrator said.

All of which helps explain why the 63-year-old grandmother showed up at a recent Donald Trump rally in Hilton Head Island, S.C., where she moved when she retired a year ago.

The Republican front-runner is “saying what a lot of Americans are thinking but are afraid to say because they don’t think that it’s politically correct,” she said. “But we’re tired of just standing back and letting everyone else dictate what we’re supposed to think and do.”

In the 2016 Republican presidential primary season, “political correctness” has become the all-purpose enemy. The candidates have suggested that it is the explanation for seemingly every threat that confronts the country: terrorism, illegal immigration, an economic recovery that is leaving many behind, to name just a few…..”  More ahead:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/why-trump-may-be-winning-the-war-on-political-correctness/2016/01/04/098cf832-afda-11e5-b711-1998289ffcea_story.html

The State’s Bureaucratic Dictatorship Challenged in Oregon

Relative to the nation’s population, fewer and fewer of our  masses sustain their  lives rural, away from cement and concrete.   More and more  foreigners illegally   cross our borders  seeking  an Obamaling government provided  pot to pee in, sheltered in cities to  expand  Marxist or Islamic orders for the future.

Fewer and fewer non-cement and concrete people work the soil;   work to feed the nation’s population or even know what a plant is.   Fewer and fewer Americans know where a tomato comes from, much less even know how or why to grow petunias or sweet potatoes.

Today’s Americans among the cement and concrete prefer pot in order to remain forever childish and collect welfare for their vote.

Fewer and fewer people know American  life beyond the street corner especially if they graduate from college.  Fewer and fewer American people among the cement and concrete know a father.

Fewer and fewer numbers of rural American families, especially the productive kind,  exist to  vote to defend their  and others’ rights to make a living while  ever more  cement and concrete people dictate rural life from Marxist bureaus,   today’s Barack Hussein Obama’s Washington cement and concrete offices near the Potomac and others at state capitals who know little beyond cement and concrete rules of existence whether lawful  or not.

Yet, there still are American citizens today, however few, who yearn to be free Americans even in these days of Obama’s bureaus, universities of popular control of citizen word, thought, and deed. Please read the following article by David French at the National Review:

THE CASE FOR CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE

“Watching the news yesterday, a person could be forgiven for thinking that a small group of Americans had literally lost their minds. Militias are marching through Oregon on behalf of convicted arsonists? A small band of armed men has taken over a federal building? The story practically writes itself. Or does it? Deranged militiamen spoiling for a fight against the federal government make for good copy, but what if they’re right?

What if the government viciously and unjustly prosecuted a rancher family so as to drive them from their land? Then protest, including civil disobedience, would be not just understandable but moral, and maybe even necessary. Ignore for a moment the #OregonUnderAttack hashtag — a rallying cry for leftists accusing the protesters of terrorism — and the liberal media’s self-satisfied cackling. Read the court documents in the case that triggered the protest, and the accounts of sympathetic ranchers.

What emerges is a picture of a federal agency that will use any means necessary, including abusing federal anti-terrorism statutes, to increase government landholdings. The story as told by the protesters begins not with the federal criminal case against Steven and Dwight Hammond but many years earlier, with the creation and expansion of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge, a tract of federal land set aside by President Theodore Roosevelt as “a preserve and breeding-ground for native birds.” The federal government has since expanded the preserve in part by buying adjacent private land.”     There’s more…….
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/429214/oregon-rancher-protests-civil-disobedience-justified

The World Purchasing the Clinton’s Drive for and Rule in the White House

$8 MILLION OF BILL CLINTON SPEAKING CASH SPEAKS FOR ITSELF

by Paul Mirengoff  at PowerLine:

“The Wall Street Journal reports that more than two dozen companies and groups and one foreign government paid former President Bill Clinton a total of more than $8 million to give speeches around the time they also had matters before Hillary Clinton’s State Department. In addition, fifteen of these companies/groups donated a total of between $5 million and $15 million to the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation.

In some of these instances, according to the Journal, Hillary’s State Department subsequently took action favorable to the outfit that paid Bill to speak:

Mr. Clinton, for example, collected $1 million for two appearances sponsored by the Abu Dhabi government that were arranged while Mrs. Clinton was secretary of state. His speeches there came during and after the State Department and the Department of Homeland Security were involved in discussions about a plan to open a U.S. facility in the Abu Dhabi airport to ease visa processing for travel to the U.S.

The State Department supported the facility in the face of substantial opposition from unions, members of Congress and others.

Here are some of the companies that paid the former president to speak while they had business pending before Hillary’s State Department:

UBS: $1,015,000
Ericsson: $750,000
Goldman Sachs Group: $600,000
Oracle: $500,000
Abu Dhabi Global Environmental Data Initiative: $500,000
World Travel and Tourism Council: $500,000
Renaissance Capital: $500,000
Samsung Electronics: $450,000
Aflac: $300,000
Dell Computer: $300,000
Salesforce.com: $258,000

Please read on:

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2016/01/8-million-in-bill-clintons-speaking-cash-speaks-for-itself.php#comments