Hillary Will Be Indicted, Says Former U.S. Attorney

Mark Waldeland sent the following article:

HILLARY WILL BE INDICTED, SAYS FORMER U.S. ATTORNEY

by Mark Topscott at the Stream:

“A former U.S. Attorney predicts a Watergate-style showdown in the Department of Justice if Attorney General Loretta Lynch overrules a potential FBI recommendation to indict Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

“The [FBI] has so much information about criminal conduct by her and her staff that there is no way that they walk away from this,” Joseph diGenova, formerly the District of Columbia’s U.S. Attorney, told Laura Ingraham in a Tuesday radio interview. “They are going to make a recommendation that people be charged and then Loretta Lynch is going to have the decision of a lifetime.

“I believe that the evidence that the FBI is compiling will be so compelling that, unless [Lynch] agrees to the charges, there will be a massive revolt inside the FBI, which she will not be able to survive as an attorney general. It will be like Watergate. It will be unbelievable.”

DiGenova is referring to the Watergate scandal’s “Saturday Night Massacre” Oct. 20, 1973, when President Richard Nixon sacked Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox and Attorney General Elliot Richardson and Deputy Attorney General William Ruckelshaus resigned in protest.

DiGenova is well-sourced throughout the law enforcement community and his assessment has to be taken seriously. But interviews with other knowledgeable Washington insiders present a somewhat less concrete scenario developing around the former secretary of state.

At the center of Clinton’s difficulties is her use of a private email account and a home-brew server located in her New York home to conduct official business while serving as America’s chief diplomat between 2009 and 2013. Several of her closest aides also used the private server.

Clinton clearly didn’t abide by federal regulations requiring officials like her to use government computers and email accounts to conduct official business and take all of the necessary steps to preserve all such correspondence concerning official business.

As first reported by The Daily Caller News Foundation, Clinton emailed Center for American Progress President Neera Tanden Sept. 7, 2010, asking for advice on what she, President Barack Obama and Democratic campaign officials should do to prevent a Republican victory in the upcoming congressional elections.

“Do you and CAP have any ideas as to how to change the dynamic before it’s too late? Losing the House would be a disaster in every way,” Clinton told Tanden. The CAP chief responded at length with clearly partisan recommendations, noted her supposedly non-partisan think tank’s polling efforts to identify winning themes for Democrats and described her conversations relaying her advice to Obama and other senior White House officials.

On its face, the Sept. 7 Clinton email appears to be a violation of the Hatch Act, which bars partisan political activities by officials using government property while on official duty. But Clinton found a clever way to get around the law, according to a senior non-profit official with extensive experience investigating such activities. The official spoke on condition of anonymity.

First, that official said, by not preserving her email records until after she resigned as secretary of state, Clinton avoided an investigation by the Office of Special Counsel (OSC), which handles Hatch Act violations. The reason is simple — OSC has no authority over former federal employees in Hatch Act matters.

Second, by refusing to comply “with Federal Records Act requirements to use an approved system for preserving records, [Clinton] arguably did not engage in political activities while on official duty or while using federal resources because she communicated with a personal computer,” the official said.”

There’s more…..please read on:   https://stream.org/hillary-will-indicted-says-former-us-attorney/

The Radical Feminists’ Gay Wars in St. Paul

The following article was sent by Mark Waldeland:

Title IX & Gender Identity on Tuesday, January 12th at 6:30PM Nova Classical Academy Gymnasium 1455 Victoria Way St. Paul, MN 55102   Nova Classical Academy is a public charter school that has prided itself on its rigorous classical academic curriculum.   Now it seems the school is being pressured to include political agendas in its pedagogy. Activist groups like OutFront Minnesota (our state’s largest LGBT organization) and Gender Justice, along with political pressure from the Obama Administration, are behind the push at Nova Classical Academy to see St. Paul Public Schools’ radical transgender policy adopted at Nova. The transgender policy for St. Paul Public Schools is so radical that it requires schools to permit boys and girls to disrobe and bathroom together, and ensures full compliance with Minnesota State High School League’s transgender athlete policy that permits biological boys to participate on girls’ sports teams. Nova recently cited Title IX, the federal law that made sure female students would have equal access to public education, and Minnesota’s recent statewide “anti-bullying law” as their reason for including transgender material in grades as young as Kindergarten, permitting students to wear uniforms of the opposite sex, and caving to demands of the activists. Nova parents, however, are not sitting by quietly as the school puts their children at risk. Nearly 400 parents have signed a petition opposing mixed-sex bathrooms, and a leadership group organized this event so that their side & concerns could be heard. Several parents have pulled their students out of Nova or off the waiting list. Join these parents and many more on Tuesday, January 12th, in Nova gymnasium to learn what Title IX & Minnesota state law require. Autumn Leva, Minnesota Family Council’s Director of Policy & Communication, will also provide an overview of what’s happening with transgender activism nationwide as well as here in Minnesota, the true impact of transgender activism on kids, and helpful steps to empower parents.   Title IX & Gender Identity When:  Tuesday, January 12th Time:  6:30PM-8:30PM Where:  Nova Classical Academy Gymnasium, 1455 Victoria Way, St. Paul $5 for general public **This is not a Nova-sponsored event. This event is hosted by concerned Nova parents and sponsored by Minnesota Family Council.**   For more on transgender activism in schools, check out what’s happening in Illinois. Female students are standing up for their privacy rights…when their parents are ignored and their school won’t listen. Why These High School Girls Don’t Want a Transgender Student in Their Locker Room “Speaking out, they knew, could make them the public face of a very private issue. It could lead their classmates to call them “bigots,” “insensitive,” and “homophobes.” But after seeing their high school back down to threats that the U.S. Department of Education would strip away federal funding, and watching school officials overrule their parents, a group of six high school girls in Cook County, Ill., decided to speak out.”   Minnesota Family Council’s Vision is strong families, communities and culture, through Christ. We believe Minnesota thrives when religious liberties flourish, life is cherished at all stages, and God’s design for marriage and family is honored and lived.

The Socialist School Posh “Analyze” the Donald, Me, and You

(The following article  is today’s typical   chatter among  the Academic Socialist American ‘elite’  of today…..a gang of leftist arrogants near-clones of the German Nazi academic leftists of mid to late 1920s Hitlerites.)

PURITY, DISGUST, AND DONALD TRUMP

by Thomas B. Edsall:

“What has Donald Trump tapped into that other Republican candidates are missing? I posed this question to some of my best sources.

Jonathan Haidt, the author of “The Righteous Mind,” emailed me his response.

Many American voters, Haidt wrote,

perceive that the moral order is falling apart, the country is losing its coherence and cohesiveness, diversity is rising, and our leadership seems to be suspect or not up to the needs of the hour. It’s as though a button is pushed on their forehead that says “in case of moral threat, lock down the borders, kick out those who are different, and punish those who are morally deviant.”

Haidt, a professor at N.Y.U.’s Stern School of Business, argues that Trump

is not a conservative, and is not appealing to classical conservative ideas. He is an authoritarian, who is profiting from the chaos in Washington, Syria, Paris, San Bernardino, and even the chaos on campuses, which are creating a more authoritarian electorate in the Republican primaries.

In other words, the segment of the electorate drawn to Trump is especially receptive to mobilization at times of perceived disorder — of a belief in looming external threats, from the Islamic State to Syrian refugees to illegal immigration from Latin America.

Noting that conservatives are preoccupied with notions of purity anddisgust, Haidt also offers an explanation of some of the more remarkable oddities of Trump’s political approach in an online posting:

If morality is about how we treat each other, then why did so many ancient texts devote so much space to rules about menstruation, who can eat what, and who can have sex with whom? There is no rational or health-related way to explain these laws. The emotion of disgust seemed to me like a more promising explanatory principle. The book of Leviticus makes a lot more sense when you think of ancient lawgivers first sorting everything into two categories: “disgusts me” (gay male sex, menstruation, pigs, swarming insects) and “disgusts me less” (gay female sex, urination, cows, grasshoppers).

Please read on….Americans must learn to understand the dangers which lie ahead inherent in societies whose Socialist dictators  bankrupt in every manner the populations  over whom they dictate…..Your United States of America is already  $19,000,000,000,000 in debt primarily caused by the Obama administration  spending $12,000,000,000,000 of it to open our borders to foreigners, to provide handouts to tens of millions of dependent citizens,  buying  votes to prepare traditional working  American citizens for our dictatorial Marxist future:

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/06/opinion/campaign-stops/purity-disgust-and-donald-trump.html?ref=opinion&_r=0

“Full of Mouth, Short on Truth”, Hillary, Refuses to Define a Socialist

Democrat Party television  news commentator, Chris Matthews,  quizzed the full-of-mouth and scant-of- truth neoDemocrat Party  presidential candidate, Hillary Roddham Clinton about what a socialist was.

She refused.

Democrat Matthews asked again.

“Full of mouth and scant of truth” refused to answer again and again.

Socialists newly elected  in Canada are dictating the state’s unionization of labor whereby leftist government will forever replace popular discourse.

Hugo Chavez was a Socialist dictating Venezuela until recently. The once healthiest democratic government south of the Rio Grande became a police state and financially bankrupt within a decade. Socialist Josef V. Stalin was dictator of the UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS for a quarter century, noted for his freedoms to starve 10,000,000 Ukrainian kulaks during the 1930s to readjust the rural economic conditions in the break basket zones of the country.

Bernie Sanders of Vermont is a bragging Socialist running for president representing the Socialist wing of the Democrat Party.

Adolph Hitler was a Socialist in Germany…..a founder of the NATIONAL SOCIALIST WORKERS’ PARTY in Germany, members popularly called NAZIS.

(Is it any wonder why “full of mouth, short on truth” Hillary refused to answer?”

Chris Matthews Stumps Hillary Clinton on Difference Between A Democrat And A Socialist: “I’m Not One”….(as her Pinocchio nose grew a foot or two).   Please check out the video below of   this  Hillary performance:

Chris Matthews interviews Democratic presidential frontrunner Hillary Clinton on Tuesday’s broadcast of MSNBC’s Hardball:

CHRIS MATTHEWS: OK, last question, we’re running out of time. I want to try to help you for this audience tonight, our audience, locate yourself politically in this country. Now we have Trump out there, and we have Bernie out here. Now Bernie calls himself a Socialist. Nobody uses a derogatory term any more. It’s his — he loves to have that label. He’s never run as a Democrat, he runs against Democrats up there in Vermont. You’re a Democrat. I’d say you’re a pretty typical Democrat, in the tradition of the Democratic Party. And Humphrey and the rest of them. (Scoop) — not even (Scoop), I’d say Mondale. You’re somewhere in there. What’s the difference between a Socialist and a Democrat?

HILLARY CLINTON: Well…

MATTHEWS: Is that a question you want to answer, or would you rather not?

CLINTON: Well, you know, I — you’d have to ask…

MATTHEWS: Well, see, I’m asking you. You’re a Democrat, he’s a Socialist. You — would you like someone to call you a Socialist? I wouldn’t like someone calling me a Socialist.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/01/05/chris_matthews_stumps_hillary_clinton_on_difference_between_a_democrat_and_a_socialist_im_not_one.html

Note……It is an insult to both Minnesota Senator Fritz Mondale and American Vice President from Minnesota Hubert H. Humphrey to be associated with  “big in mouth, short on truth”  lying frump, Clinton.