• Pragerisms

    For a more comprehensive list of Pragerisms visit
    Dennis Prager Wisdom.

    • "The left is far more interested in gaining power than in creating wealth."
    • "Without wisdom, goodness is worthless."
    • "I prefer clarity to agreement."
    • "First tell the truth, then state your opinion."
    • "Being on the Left means never having to say you're sorry."
    • "If you don't fight evil, you fight gobal warming."
    • "There are things that are so dumb, you have to learn them."
  • Liberalism’s Seven Deadly Sins

    • Sexism
    • Intolerance
    • Xenophobia
    • Racism
    • Islamophobia
    • Bigotry
    • Homophobia

    A liberal need only accuse you of one of the above in order to end all discussion and excuse himself from further elucidation of his position.

  • Glenn’s Reading List for Die-Hard Pragerites

    • Bolton, John - Surrender is not an Option
    • Bruce, Tammy - The Thought Police; The New American Revolution; The Death of Right and Wrong
    • Charen, Mona - DoGooders:How Liberals Hurt Those They Claim to Help
    • Coulter, Ann - If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans; Slander
    • Dalrymple, Theodore - In Praise of Prejudice; Our Culture, What's Left of It
    • Doyle, William - Inside the Oval Office
    • Elder, Larry - Stupid Black Men: How to Play the Race Card--and Lose
    • Frankl, Victor - Man's Search for Meaning
    • Flynn, Daniel - Intellectual Morons
    • Fund, John - Stealing Elections
    • Friedman, George - America's Secret War
    • Goldberg, Bernard - Bias; Arrogance
    • Goldberg, Jonah - Liberal Fascism
    • Herson, James - Tales from the Left Coast
    • Horowitz, David - Left Illusions; The Professors
    • Klein, Edward - The Truth about Hillary
    • Mnookin, Seth - Hard News: Twenty-one Brutal Months at The New York Times and How They Changed the American Media
    • Morris, Dick - Because He Could; Rewriting History
    • O'Beirne, Kate - Women Who Make the World Worse
    • Olson, Barbara - The Final Days: The Last, Desperate Abuses of Power by the Clinton White House
    • O'Neill, John - Unfit For Command
    • Piereson, James - Camelot and the Cultural Revolution: How the Assassination of John F. Kennedy Shattered American Liberalism
    • Prager, Dennis - Think A Second Time
    • Sharansky, Natan - The Case for Democracy
    • Stein, Ben - Can America Survive? The Rage of the Left, the Truth, and What to Do About It
    • Steyn, Mark - America Alone
    • Stephanopolous, George - All Too Human
    • Thomas, Clarence - My Grandfather's Son
    • Timmerman, Kenneth - Shadow Warriors
    • Williams, Juan - Enough: The Phony Leaders, Dead-End Movements, and Culture of Failure That Are Undermining Black America--and What We Can Do About It
    • Wright, Lawrence - The Looming Tower

Sharing a Note from CJack

“Our nation has wasted precious time and treasure on its first ‘African-American’ president; but it has turned out to be a tragic comedy of incalculable proportions. We just wanted to be politically correct and look what has happened; our little house by the road is in terrible disrepair, in need of extensive renovations. But who will be the one to rebuild it?…I have a strong feeling the man called Trump, is the one. Yet Dr. K does not personally like him, eh?…I say, whoopee!…Go for it Mr. Trump, you have all the votes in my ranch!…Ten, that is.”…..from Cjack.

Cjack is a MN Prager Discussion Group reader who often supplies us with his thoughts regarding  the scenes and nightmares  which excite those of us who still believe in America rather than worship Islamic Obama and his   dictatorship fans emanating from the hot air United Nations center of   New York City.

Have You Seen “13 Hours” Yet?

I haven’t yet, and probably will avoid the film for old age reasons.   I have followed closely Megyn Kelly’s several  interviews on Fox with three terrific heroes who survived.

Americans need to know how terrifically UGLY, how corrupt our American Democrat of today, Hillary Roddham Clinton is.

I went active in the army almost sixty years ago…..in part from the effect the second world war had on me when I was being  schooled, and in part, I wondered what I would do if shot at…..

I was a fan….and still am…..of that terrific Englishman of my younger years, Winston Churchill.   I have never forgotten his pronouncement regarding that  certain excitement in life:


The guys at PowerLine have seen the film and report thusly:


the Donald’s Love for America is Infectious

Mr. Trump is 69 years old, a man raised in an America when America was truly great, in body and in soul.   It was still JudeoChristian at  its core, women were women, men, men, right was right, wrong, wrong.

The country, unlike in  our day, was  civilized.  Troubles did exist still in the Democrat Party racist South.  Yet, its white racist control over politics throughout  the South was at last being challenged and finally gradually became, at last, full American.

The country became a world power leading the world against the fascism of Soviet nuclear armed communists.   Learning knowledge to expose the unknown  was still the primary reason for schooling.   The cancers of feminism were on the horizon, however.   The disappearance of beauty in the arts and elsewhere  was already well established.

God existed among citizens who weren’t yet terribly fat and illiterate.   American females hadn’t yet begun their school lessons to worship themselves.   Democrats were already beginning to  enjoy the rewards from  bribing  their constituencies with taxpayer funded handouts.   President Lyndon Johnson made it more profitable for Negro mothers  throughout the country to  become  divorced and otherwise avoid marriage in order for their children to receive far greater  government financial handouts for their mothers,  unavailable to the married.

Mr. Trump’s Republican Party competitors have no feel for that time which nursed the Donald into college and adulthood.   His opponents on the left, one a disturbed feminist, the other an angry bitter New York Jew,  are Mr. Trump’s  equal in generation, but arise  from an entirely different, very sour angry anti- American  background….people devoted to hate, to get even with someone and someone’s  society with all of the weapons government is able to make available.

In the meantime, the maturing  Donald is gaining support, even love from traditional Americans.

The Hill,  noted for its leftist persuasions, if not cabals, presents the following article regarding the evolving Donald Trump campaign to become our 45th American president.


Donors changing tune on Trump

by Jonathan Swan at the Hill:


PowerLine Establishment Confused about “the Donald”

I follow the output at PowerLine, a conservative source of information from decent honest conservative guys, according to their output, led by a John Hinderaker.

They are a suffering lot at the moment…..like the establishment National Republican Party they are at sea regarding the Donald running for our nation’s presidency.    They don’t like him. He doesn’t fit their profile of what such  a person should think and say.    They fear he isn’t their kind of university adjusted  ‘conservative’ politician….probably of the lawyer variety they can feel closer to.

Donald didn’t graduate from Dartmouth as some at PowerLine have.  But, then he is sixty nine years old.     Back then during his college years the feminized Obamalings running our today’s   leftist grade school level of learnings at   current colleges and universities hadn’t been invented yet.    Donald hasn’t been a politician.  He doesn’t speak politician, sneak politician,  smile politician.    He is still an American, feels like an American, talks like an American, and seems to like himself a lot as an American, so he is political in that way, anyway.

Unlike today’s politicians, especially the Obamaling variety, the Donald has had to work things out rather critically throughout his business career.  He’s bragged quite honestly about it,   having to work out big deals  with people  who have had to trust him and whom he has had to trust…….which likely seems to have been one of the reasons the Donald is in the lead as Republican candidate for our America’s presidency.

Mr. Hinderaker and others at PowerLine have painted the Donald sour in nearly all flavors. In today’s article they list a few examples of his comments of the past  which they believe should condemn him to disappear from the Republican Party.  He said nice things about Barack Hussein Obama…..frump Hillary, and vilified GW Bush for the Iraq War which I myself then and today still feel was exactly what America should have done.

I admit I smelled the rat within  the American pretender,  Barack Obama very early on the 2008 calendar while he ran his slick campaign against the Hillary.    The “Hussein” made me curious.   The biography of his mother and his multi wifed father in Africa, as well as his love of American Socialist-communist, community organizer, Saul Alinsky, caught my attention.    Securing his college records  so no one could review anything from  his college communist associates alarmed me.    I had been in the Soviet Union, had  a graduate degree in Soviet Studies and spoke Russian fluently at that time, so I was fully aware of traditional Stalin-like tricks college commies used to employ  to hide their evil at our American universities in those days.   I saw the megalomania in the Obama.

And then there was Obama’s father figure of 22 years, the foul black racist preacher, Jeremiah Wright.

PowerLine folks are trying very hard to attach the Donald to Obama to prove he’s not a real,  their kind of conservative.

Of all of the candidates up for 2016 grabs, I find Donald the most natural American candidate of them all…..in personality, drive, charm, confidence, creativity, ability to work with others, a builder, expansioner, charmer, doer, dreamer, a succeeder   who wears love for his country on every inch of clothing he wears.

I adore this  kind of conservative guy.   That’s the kind of conservative guy America needs in our times of trouble most of all…..And there is no other guy of any and all sexes  now invented by the college  Left on the scene who competes well  with the Donald’s talents and successes.    Sorry, John Hinderaker and others at PowerLine, wake up!

How could our crippled America be so lucky?   Thank God  the Donald has the pride, ego, and ABILITY…..to return dumped on America, America the Beautiful again.

How about advising the Donald, converting him to your conservative strengths rather than smear him because when he was only a business man, he played the  field with business wisdom rather than with political scheme?

Please read what is sold at PowerLine regarding Donald Trump, January, 2016:



Hillary Is In Big Trouble!

HILLARY IS IN BIG TROUBLE,     by Fred Barnes  at the Wall Street Journal

(The following article by Fred Barnes doesn’t include  information now available,  the most recent revelations exposing   Ms. Clinton’s criminal activity and cover up regarding critical security violations   while illegally  conducting secret government business of the highest order via her cell phone.)

“Presidential races are about the future and Hillary Clinton is stuck in the past. That pretty much explains why her campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2016 has slumped.

Mrs. Clinton is not attuned to the political situation she faces. Her experience, family and fame aren’t much help. This year, angry voters have turned increasingly to populist, antiestablishment and future-oriented candidates. As a status quo candidate, she doesn’t fit the moment.

But her chief opponent, Sen. Bernie Sanders, has captured it, just as Donald Trump has in the Republican presidential race. Mr. Sanders, 74, is a socialist from Vermont with a Brooklyn accent. But more than his left-wing ideology, it is his persistent calls for a “revolution” upending conventional politics that has brought him neck-and-neck with Mrs. Clinton in Iowa and ahead in New Hampshire, the first states to vote in the fight for the Democratic nomination.

We saw the difference between the two in Sunday night’s Democratic debate. She talked about preserving President Obama’s health-care program and the Dodd-Frank crackdown on Wall Street—in other words, the past. Mr. Sanders spoke of a future in which health care is inexpensive and a right for everyone, a future in which the wealthy cannot control politics with their campaign contributions and elect their allies.

For months Mr. Sanders has attracted bigger crowds than Mrs. Clinton and stirred more excitement. She and her strategists underestimated Mr. Sanders’s appeal, the strength of his campaign and his ability to raise money. They also overestimated Mrs. Clinton’s skill as a candidate.

Michael Warren, my Weekly Standard colleague, summarized her visit to Iowa earlier this month: “There’s no other way to say it: Hillary Clinton is very boring. The Democratic presidential front-runner’s campaign stops are, too. The members of her traveling press corps look like they’d rather be anywhere else. So do some of the attendees, who shift in their seats starting around minute 10. Even the campaign staffers pace the back of the room or tap inattentively on their iPhones as Clinton drones on.”

Mrs. Clinton’s past was expected to be a great benefit to her campaign. It hasn’t been. To begin with, her husband, former President Bill Clinton, has turned into an albatross. In an interview with the Des Moines Register just before Christmas, Mrs. Clinton said Donald Trump has “demonstrated a penchant for sexism.”

Mr. Trump answered on Twitter: “Hillary, when you complain about a ‘penchant for sexism,’ who are you referring to? BE CAREFUL.” He followed by recalling her husband’s history of womanizing, accusing him of “a terrible record of women abuse.” Mr. Trump warned her against using the “woman’s card” against him.

When she ran for the Senate from New York in 2000, her husband’s infidelity created sympathy for her. Not this time. Mr. Trump “has a point about Clinton playing the ‘woman’s card,’ and about the male behavior that is more concerning: her husband’s,” Washington Post columnist Ruth Marcus wrote on Dec. 28. A few days later, in USA Today, Kirsten Powers wrote that there is now “a blessedly lower tolerance for sexual assault and harassment. . . . This is good news for America, but bad news for the Clintons.”

Similarly, Mrs. Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state was supposed to be an asset in the presidential race. On the contrary, her use of a private email system on which classified information was transmitted is under FBI investigation. And the State Department has been forced to release a monthly stream of her emails. On CNN’s “State of the Union” on Sunday, she was asked if she has been interviewed yet by FBI agents. Her terse answer: “No.” That may change. On Tuesday Fox News published a Jan. 14 letter from the inspector general of the intelligence community to senior lawmakers stating that a review by intelligence agencies found “several dozen emails” containing “classified” and “top secret” information in Mrs. Clinton’s unsecured server.

The new movie “13 Hours” is another detriment. The film depicts the hours in Benghazi, Libya, in 2012 when American Ambassador Chris Stevens, a foreign-service officer, and two CIA contract employees were killed by terrorists. Mrs. Clinton is not mentioned by name. It is clear, however, that security for Mr. Stevens was woefully inadequate (despite his many requests for more guards) and that no help was dispatched when he and the American consulate were under attack.

A year ago, polls revealed that Mrs. Clinton’s honesty and trustworthiness are doubted by many Americans. In a Fox News survey last April, 51% said they didn’t feel she is honest and trustworthy. This month that number rose to 62%. Only 32% said they trust her.

Numerous false statements Mrs. Clinton made about her email system have led to speculation about what she was hiding. Parents of two CIA employees killed in Benghazi insist that she told them that an anti-Islam video had prompted the attack. In truth, she knew it was an attack planned and carried out by terrorists. Mrs. Clinton denies that she blamed a video.

A series of Mrs. Clinton’s flip-flops aimed at neutralizing positions taken by Mr. Sanders have played a part in her troubles. She once called the Trans-Pacific Partnership the “gold standard” for trade treaties, then joined him in opposing it. Like Mr. Sanders, she came out last year against the Keystone XL oil pipeline from Canada that her State Department had cleared. Soon after he proposed free college, she backed debt-free college.

Her relationship with Wall Street is also a source of doubts. As a senator, she “took a mostly hands-off approach to Wall Street regulation,” the Boston Globe noted on Sunday. According to public sources cited by the Intercept, she reaped more than $2.9 million in speaking fees from “Wall Street banks, private equity firms, and other financial corporations” from 2013-15. Yet in Sunday’s debate, she acted unfriendly to Wall Street—again echoing Mr. Sanders—by vowing to pay for social programs out “of the pockets of people in the financial service industry.”

Presidential candidates normally offer a raft of new ideas. Even Mr. Sanders, though bound by his 19th-century ideology, has a few. Mrs. Clinton has zero.

This shortcoming was apparent when, in a speech last July, she proposed raising the capital-gains tax rate. She argued that doing so was needed to curb “short-termism” and promote long-term investment instead. To justify the tax increase, Mrs. Clinton cited a short-term investment problem that no longer exists.”