• Pragerisms

    For a more comprehensive list of Pragerisms visit
    Dennis Prager Wisdom.

    • "The left is far more interested in gaining power than in creating wealth."
    • "Without wisdom, goodness is worthless."
    • "I prefer clarity to agreement."
    • "First tell the truth, then state your opinion."
    • "Being on the Left means never having to say you're sorry."
    • "If you don't fight evil, you fight gobal warming."
    • "There are things that are so dumb, you have to learn them."
  • Liberalism’s Seven Deadly Sins

    • Sexism
    • Intolerance
    • Xenophobia
    • Racism
    • Islamophobia
    • Bigotry
    • Homophobia

    A liberal need only accuse you of one of the above in order to end all discussion and excuse himself from further elucidation of his position.

  • Glenn’s Reading List for Die-Hard Pragerites

    • Bolton, John - Surrender is not an Option
    • Bruce, Tammy - The Thought Police; The New American Revolution; The Death of Right and Wrong
    • Charen, Mona - DoGooders:How Liberals Hurt Those They Claim to Help
    • Coulter, Ann - If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans; Slander
    • Dalrymple, Theodore - In Praise of Prejudice; Our Culture, What's Left of It
    • Doyle, William - Inside the Oval Office
    • Elder, Larry - Stupid Black Men: How to Play the Race Card--and Lose
    • Frankl, Victor - Man's Search for Meaning
    • Flynn, Daniel - Intellectual Morons
    • Fund, John - Stealing Elections
    • Friedman, George - America's Secret War
    • Goldberg, Bernard - Bias; Arrogance
    • Goldberg, Jonah - Liberal Fascism
    • Herson, James - Tales from the Left Coast
    • Horowitz, David - Left Illusions; The Professors
    • Klein, Edward - The Truth about Hillary
    • Mnookin, Seth - Hard News: Twenty-one Brutal Months at The New York Times and How They Changed the American Media
    • Morris, Dick - Because He Could; Rewriting History
    • O'Beirne, Kate - Women Who Make the World Worse
    • Olson, Barbara - The Final Days: The Last, Desperate Abuses of Power by the Clinton White House
    • O'Neill, John - Unfit For Command
    • Piereson, James - Camelot and the Cultural Revolution: How the Assassination of John F. Kennedy Shattered American Liberalism
    • Prager, Dennis - Think A Second Time
    • Sharansky, Natan - The Case for Democracy
    • Stein, Ben - Can America Survive? The Rage of the Left, the Truth, and What to Do About It
    • Steyn, Mark - America Alone
    • Stephanopolous, George - All Too Human
    • Thomas, Clarence - My Grandfather's Son
    • Timmerman, Kenneth - Shadow Warriors
    • Williams, Juan - Enough: The Phony Leaders, Dead-End Movements, and Culture of Failure That Are Undermining Black America--and What We Can Do About It
    • Wright, Lawrence - The Looming Tower

Should Political Candidates Have to Open Their Medical Records?

Commentary  by Twila Brase, President of Citizen’s Council for Health Freedom:

7 Reasons to Protect Candidate Privacy

Some people think presidential and other candidates should open their medical records. Here are seven reasons to think twice before agreeing:

First, the patient-doctor encounter must take place in confidence. Patients, regardless of who they are, need to feel safe revealing whatever they must reveal and having looked at whatever they need looked at to receive accurate and timely treatment.

Second, medical records can be inaccurate.Errors and flawed assessments may be included. Our office receives calls from people who look in their medical records and are shocked by what they find. They want the doctor’s statements or diagnoses deleted. The electronic medical record can add new errors and can make all of them more difficult to correct.

Third, medical records can’t tell you if a person will be a great president. Would Abraham Lincoln have become president if his bouts of depression had been discovered, analyzed and heralded in national news?

Fourth, medical records do not indicate the true health of the candidate. For example, we have no idea about conditions yet to be discovered or not properly diagnosed. Candidates could die shortly after election or months later from a condition not yet on the radar. In addition, there is no such thing as a single medical record. Records are scattered in hospitals, filing cabinets, EHRs, clinic basements and private warehouses.

Fifth, politicos may keep their medical life “off the books.” Are all the treatments, diagnoses, and counseling of our presidential candidates in an official medical record? Secrecy is common. Whatever records we’d get won’t likely tell the real or whole story.

Sixth, no one should fear their medical records. If released, our records could divulge secrets only told to a doctor; secrets not even the patient’s family knows; secrets that the candidate has moved beyond and should not be resurrected just because they’re running for office.

Seventh, political futures should not be tied to DNA. As genetic sequences of a patient’s DNA are increasingly entered into medical records, assessments – right or wrong – may be made about the candidate’s future, propensity for illness, length of life, and likelihood of criminality.

Peering into a candidate’s medical records won’t assure accuracy, longevity, truth, or health, but it will mean the doctor’s office can never be assumed safe for patients. Privacy is critical to medical excellence, ethical integrity, personal security, patient dignity, physician autonomy and timely care. Candidates deserve the medical privacy we want them to protect for the rest of us.

Twila Brase, RN, PHN
President and Co-founder

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: