When did American citizens ever vote for Leftist Madame Hillary’s OPEN BORDERS project?
When they elected foreign Barack Hussein Obama president in 2008 without knowing it. This Hussein Obama has allowed over 15 million invaders to settle and hence has already begun the complete destruction of our once democratic-republican United States of America forever. Welcome the Hillary Party of Newspeak and Oceania, its ONE PARTY CONTROL of control of communications, learnings, and thought.
How many millions of illegal alien voters has Hillary bribed to guarantee becoming the first Madame DeFarge to command the Oval Office?
The Elites and Open Borders
by E.M. Cadwaladr at American Thinker:
“No one wants to leave his or her own family unprotected. There is no such thing as a true proponent of open borders. It is only a question of what the borders look like — and whom they are designed to protect.
When almost everyone believed in nationalism, or what we used to simply think of as patriotism, borders got drawn around the country as a whole. Nobody questioned it, or even thought about it. The border was defended by the military and the border patrol. America, the “national family” in the public mind, was defined by the people whom the border protected — the citizens of the United States. In the current, post-nationalist way of thinking that is the brainchild of progressives, the elites who advocate for open borders certainly don’t intend to let American riffraff into their neighborhoods — let alone the great unwashed of foreign shores. Their borders are the gated community, the homeowner’s association, the local police or private security, and, in the case of high government officials, the Secret Service. The polity are the political, media, and academic elites and their retainers. To them, what it is important to protect is no longer the nation, but rather the class.
This modern conception of borders is, in some ways, a throwback to the Middle Ages, when the landed aristocracy lived in castles with retinues of armed men, and had a deeper sense of kinship with the nobility of other nations than they had with their own peasants. In some ways, unfortunately, the current state of affairs is worse than medieval. In the Middle Ages, a large population meant both military power and economic wealth. The nobleman might look down upon the humble peasant, but he had a vested interest in protecting him. Now, in an age in which both wars and industry are increasingly the province of machines, most of the populace yields very little benefit to the people who rule over them. When people vote in line with the aristocracy’s wishes, they retain some marginal……..please continue reading this sordid Hillary drama review below: