• Pragerisms

    For a more comprehensive list of Pragerisms visit
    Dennis Prager Wisdom.

    • "The left is far more interested in gaining power than in creating wealth."
    • "Without wisdom, goodness is worthless."
    • "I prefer clarity to agreement."
    • "First tell the truth, then state your opinion."
    • "Being on the Left means never having to say you're sorry."
    • "If you don't fight evil, you fight gobal warming."
    • "There are things that are so dumb, you have to learn them."
  • Liberalism’s Seven Deadly Sins

    • Sexism
    • Intolerance
    • Xenophobia
    • Racism
    • Islamophobia
    • Bigotry
    • Homophobia

    A liberal need only accuse you of one of the above in order to end all discussion and excuse himself from further elucidation of his position.

  • Glenn’s Reading List for Die-Hard Pragerites

    • Bolton, John - Surrender is not an Option
    • Bruce, Tammy - The Thought Police; The New American Revolution; The Death of Right and Wrong
    • Charen, Mona - DoGooders:How Liberals Hurt Those They Claim to Help
    • Coulter, Ann - If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans; Slander
    • Dalrymple, Theodore - In Praise of Prejudice; Our Culture, What's Left of It
    • Doyle, William - Inside the Oval Office
    • Elder, Larry - Stupid Black Men: How to Play the Race Card--and Lose
    • Frankl, Victor - Man's Search for Meaning
    • Flynn, Daniel - Intellectual Morons
    • Fund, John - Stealing Elections
    • Friedman, George - America's Secret War
    • Goldberg, Bernard - Bias; Arrogance
    • Goldberg, Jonah - Liberal Fascism
    • Herson, James - Tales from the Left Coast
    • Horowitz, David - Left Illusions; The Professors
    • Klein, Edward - The Truth about Hillary
    • Mnookin, Seth - Hard News: Twenty-one Brutal Months at The New York Times and How They Changed the American Media
    • Morris, Dick - Because He Could; Rewriting History
    • O'Beirne, Kate - Women Who Make the World Worse
    • Olson, Barbara - The Final Days: The Last, Desperate Abuses of Power by the Clinton White House
    • O'Neill, John - Unfit For Command
    • Piereson, James - Camelot and the Cultural Revolution: How the Assassination of John F. Kennedy Shattered American Liberalism
    • Prager, Dennis - Think A Second Time
    • Sharansky, Natan - The Case for Democracy
    • Stein, Ben - Can America Survive? The Rage of the Left, the Truth, and What to Do About It
    • Steyn, Mark - America Alone
    • Stephanopolous, George - All Too Human
    • Thomas, Clarence - My Grandfather's Son
    • Timmerman, Kenneth - Shadow Warriors
    • Williams, Juan - Enough: The Phony Leaders, Dead-End Movements, and Culture of Failure That Are Undermining Black America--and What We Can Do About It
    • Wright, Lawrence - The Looming Tower

A Reminder Regarding Our U.S. Electoral College

I had to suffer through a few hours watching CNN on television today.   They were suffering, at a loss, to explain the condition that their Crooked Hillary would not further corrupt her America by becoming its next president of the United States.

Upon whom or what would they blame for their Hillary’s failure to dictate one-party fascism in America for the foreseeable future?   What went wrong?

CNN leftist  enthusiasts, Wolf Blitzer,  Gloria Borger,  and David Gergen stuttered throughout an hour reaching for a cause of the Donald Trump victory…..Then Wolf came up with the idea  Hillary was a victim of the “outdated”  American Constitution’s “Electoral College” inferring it was something corrupt against the democratic process still remaining from  yesterday’s used books that needed to be made to disappear….for, at the end of the day, Hillary Roddham Clinton wound up with a two hundred thousand lead in the popular vote.

These Hillarys of the Left apparently  don’t care, or don’t know the essentials of our American past regarding the importance of developing the Electoral College ‘count’ to elect our nation’s presidents.  There are two basic reasons our forefathers chose  the Electoral College  count rather than the popular vote to determine the presidential winner.

At the end of the Revolutionary War with Mother England our forefathers were attempting to organize a single nation out of thirteen pre-Revolutionary War colonies and states to be established thereafter.  Virginia, I believe was then the most populous state with Massachusetts or New York colonies runner-ups.  The individual states weren’t interested in each becoming an independent nation.    To create a nation by uniting states, an agreement had to be made to recognize population as the major factor in number of a states’ national vote, but honor each state with at least a certain  degree of political power as a state when competing for ‘national’ elections.   Otherwise, the less populated states would likely be forever ignored forever more.

Political corruption in one of the major population  states could corrupt the entire nation’s democratic institutions, economy, and laws, especially the vote-count when electing presidents.  For example, one million illegal immigrants hidden in California who voted illegally for their favorite candidate  in that state would corrupt the  presidential voting tally ONLY IN CALIFORNIA, NOT IN THE  NATIONAL VOTING TOTALS.

Otherwise, why should the citizens of populous  Virginia bother worrying about rights, liberty, or the economy of folks living in Rhode Island or Delaware?   Why would any presidential candidate care to waste their precious time traveling to  states with small populations?  Whoever might win Virginia would become president.

As a compromise,  our early patriots  chose the Electoral College as the basis for determining presidential voting.  Each state by Constitutional Law  would have two members in the upper political body, the Senate,  and each state would have at least one member of the larger chamber, the House of Representatives but additional ‘Representative’ members base upon size of  population.   Those numbers, when added together would determine the number each state’s votes in the “Electoral College” when determining the nation’s President.    Each state would be granted 3 “Electoral College” votes.   The more populated states would be entitled more “Electoral College” votes based on their greater numbers of citizens.


One Response

  1. The folks at CNN and their left wing cohorts can’t bear the loss of their Queen of Sleaze. So terrible has been their loss they have started a propaganda campaign to do away with the “US Electoral College”…They keep saying: “but she won the popular vote!”…Heck, they may even entice Jane Fonda to run for governess of California; but the ‘guacamole’ wing (you know who I mean) of the “deplorable” Democrat party wants to secede from the Union. What say you?

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: