• Pragerisms

    For a more comprehensive list of Pragerisms visit
    Dennis Prager Wisdom.

    • "The left is far more interested in gaining power than in creating wealth."
    • "Without wisdom, goodness is worthless."
    • "I prefer clarity to agreement."
    • "First tell the truth, then state your opinion."
    • "Being on the Left means never having to say you're sorry."
    • "If you don't fight evil, you fight gobal warming."
    • "There are things that are so dumb, you have to learn them."
  • Liberalism’s Seven Deadly Sins

    • Sexism
    • Intolerance
    • Xenophobia
    • Racism
    • Islamophobia
    • Bigotry
    • Homophobia

    A liberal need only accuse you of one of the above in order to end all discussion and excuse himself from further elucidation of his position.

  • Glenn’s Reading List for Die-Hard Pragerites

    • Bolton, John - Surrender is not an Option
    • Bruce, Tammy - The Thought Police; The New American Revolution; The Death of Right and Wrong
    • Charen, Mona - DoGooders:How Liberals Hurt Those They Claim to Help
    • Coulter, Ann - If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans; Slander
    • Dalrymple, Theodore - In Praise of Prejudice; Our Culture, What's Left of It
    • Doyle, William - Inside the Oval Office
    • Elder, Larry - Stupid Black Men: How to Play the Race Card--and Lose
    • Frankl, Victor - Man's Search for Meaning
    • Flynn, Daniel - Intellectual Morons
    • Fund, John - Stealing Elections
    • Friedman, George - America's Secret War
    • Goldberg, Bernard - Bias; Arrogance
    • Goldberg, Jonah - Liberal Fascism
    • Herson, James - Tales from the Left Coast
    • Horowitz, David - Left Illusions; The Professors
    • Klein, Edward - The Truth about Hillary
    • Mnookin, Seth - Hard News: Twenty-one Brutal Months at The New York Times and How They Changed the American Media
    • Morris, Dick - Because He Could; Rewriting History
    • O'Beirne, Kate - Women Who Make the World Worse
    • Olson, Barbara - The Final Days: The Last, Desperate Abuses of Power by the Clinton White House
    • O'Neill, John - Unfit For Command
    • Piereson, James - Camelot and the Cultural Revolution: How the Assassination of John F. Kennedy Shattered American Liberalism
    • Prager, Dennis - Think A Second Time
    • Sharansky, Natan - The Case for Democracy
    • Stein, Ben - Can America Survive? The Rage of the Left, the Truth, and What to Do About It
    • Steyn, Mark - America Alone
    • Stephanopolous, George - All Too Human
    • Thomas, Clarence - My Grandfather's Son
    • Timmerman, Kenneth - Shadow Warriors
    • Williams, Juan - Enough: The Phony Leaders, Dead-End Movements, and Culture of Failure That Are Undermining Black America--and What We Can Do About It
    • Wright, Lawrence - The Looming Tower

More Scandal Rocks the Climate “Change” White Man Made

CLIMATE “SCIENCE” ROCKED BY ANOTHER SCANDAL

by John Hinderaker   at PowerLine:

A just-retired scientist at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has blown the whistle on a scandal of epic proportions involving fake news ginned up by climate “scientists.” Dr. John Bates, who until the end of 2016 was one of NOAA’s top scientists, told the story to the Daily Mail:

The Mail on Sunday today reveals astonishing evidence that the organisation that is the world’s leading source of climate data rushed to publish a landmark paper that exaggerated global warming and was timed to influence the historic Paris Agreement on climate change.

A high-level whistleblower has told this newspaper that America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) breached its own rules on scientific integrity when it published the sensational but flawed report, aimed at making the maximum possible impact on world leaders including Barack Obama and David Cameron at the UN climate conference in Paris in 2015.

The report claimed that the ‘pause’ or ‘slowdown’ in global warming in the period since 1998 – revealed by UN scientists in 2013 – never existed, and that world temperatures had been rising faster than scientists expected. Launched by NOAA with a public relations fanfare, it was splashed across the world’s media, and cited repeatedly by politicians and policy makers.

But the whistleblower, Dr John Bates, a top NOAA scientist with an impeccable reputation, has shown The Mail on Sunday irrefutable evidence that the paper was based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data.

NOAA violated its own rules by publishing the report without subjecting it to required verification procedures–procedures that were designed by Dr. Bates himself.

His vehement objections to the publication of the faulty data were overridden by his NOAA superiors in what he describes as a ‘blatant attempt to intensify the impact’ of what became known as the Pausebuster paper.

Of all the “fake news” stories that emerged in the last two years, this is undoubtedly the most important. More:

NOAA’s 2015 ‘Pausebuster’ paper was based on two new temperature sets of data – one containing measurements of temperatures at the planet’s surface on land, the other at the surface of the seas.

Both datasets were flawed. This newspaper has learnt that NOAA has now decided that the sea dataset will have to be replaced and substantially revised just 18 months after it was issued, because it used unreliable methods which overstated the speed of warming. The revised data will show both lower temperatures and a slower rate in the recent warming trend.

The land temperature dataset used by the study was afflicted by devastating bugs in its software that rendered its findings ‘unstable’.

This is just one of the tricks the NOAA “scientists” employed to exaggerate warming:

The sea dataset used by Thomas Karl and his colleagues – known as Extended Reconstructed Sea Surface Temperatures version 4, or ERSSTv4, tripled the warming trend over the sea during the years 2000 to 2014 from just 0.036C per decade – as stated in version 3 – to 0.099C per decade. Individual measurements in some parts of the globe had increased by about 0.1C and this resulted in the dramatic increase of the overall global trend published by the Pausebuster paper. But Dr Bates said this increase in temperatures was achieved by dubious means. Its key error was an upwards ‘adjustment’ of readings from fixed and floating buoys, which are generally reliable, to bring them into line with readings from a much more doubtful source – water taken in by ships. This, Dr Bates explained, has long been known to be questionable: ships are themselves sources of heat, readings will vary from ship to ship, and the depth of water intake will vary according to how heavily a ship is laden – so affecting temperature readings.

Dr Bates said: ‘They had good data from buoys. And they threw it out and “corrected” it by using the bad data from ships. You never change good data to agree with bad, but that’s what they did – so as to make it look as if the sea was warmer.’

The Earth’s surface temperature record has been so hopelessly corrupted by “adjustments” made for political purposes by NOAA and other agencies that it likely can never be accurately reconstructed. This is a great loss to science. The Mail story suggests that evidence may have been destroyed to cover the tracks of NOAA’s activists:

Then came the final bombshell. Dr Bates said: ‘I learned that the computer used to process the software had suffered a complete failure.’

The reason for the failure is unknown, but it means the Pausebuster paper can never be replicated or verified by other scientists.

Sounds like they borrowed the computer from the IRS.

NOAA is a rogue, politicized agency, like so many others. It has defied a Congressional committee’s subpoena, and apparently lied to the committee:

NOAA not only failed, but it effectively mounted a cover-up when challenged over its data. After the paper was published, the US House of Representatives Science Committee launched an inquiry into its Pausebuster claims. NOAA refused to comply with subpoenas demanding internal emails from the committee chairman, the Texas Republican Lamar Smith, and falsely claimed that no one had raised concerns about the paper internally.

Heads need to roll. Donald Trump has his work cut out for him, to put it mildly.

Advertisements

2 Responses

  1. —Be on the watch, lots of Hocus-Pocus in the Liberal Looney Farms—

    Oh yes, we must be vigilant against the fake ‘Dr.’ Al Gore—that infamous founder of the hocus-pocus institute of climate change—and his gang of cuckoos coercing our insane tenured left wing academicians in the liberal Ivy League Circuit, about adding another worthless degree: BS in Global Warming Science. It would be quite interesting to see what the core and elective courses would be. And I would enjoy registering for their classes, just to giggle and chuckle over their demented ‘climate change’ theories hammered into the unsuspecting freshmen, baffled about the meter of snow in the Sahara, the world’s most beautiful cotton growing in the Uzbekistan desert, and that almost week-long heavy snow fall in Istanbul.

    And after spending a fortune to brag about their offspring’s academic accomplishment, to see their child scrambling for job interviews while driving a cab in the big city because the only jobs available for ‘global science’ graduates are at the United Nations Organization—that insane asylum of banana republics, fake and failed nations. Where salvation from starvation would be an employment opportunity as ‘assistant’ to the minister of economic development in the section of grants, in places like the disappearing minuscule island-nation of Vanuatu where a Harvard-trained ‘global warming’ expert can present its ‘dire’ case for ‘beaucoup’ American relief assistance to save its inhabitants fish-taro, and coconuts diet.

    By the way, I recommend a cruise to Vanuatu in a sailboat. Make inquiries in Hawaii about sailing to that remote island, others tiny inhabited coral reefs in the vast Pacific–(sailboat for 8 passengers, captain & cook). But don’t go if you are afraid of the sea. The Pacific is a cold, awesome and unpredictable ocean. You may prefer a cruise ship. But do it, before Gabriel calls your number up yonder.

    Note: We are hopeful that once the honorable judge Neil Gorsuch is confirmed, he’ll proceed to reestablish some conservative sanity in the SCOTUS.

    The US Constitution is quite clear about the responsibility and power of our government’s legislative branch, and the constitutional powers and rights of our first executive, the president of the United States. Judge James Robart is out of his jurisdiction and has no legal ground to stand on against the executive order of the president to temporarily halt, for proper vetting for security reasons, the influx of immigrants and refugees from the seven failed Muslim-majority nations in question. The appeal court in the ninth district has wasted its time in upholding the suspension of the president’s temporary halt of immigrants and refugees seeking to enter the US from the cited seven Muslim-majority failed states. These folks neither have the right to enter the US nor the right to due process under our laws.

    Moreover, even anyone from any other nation who has been granted a visa to enter the US, can have that visa revoked by our government. A US visa is a privilege, not a right. The devious liberal judge, James Robart, is politically positioning himself for a nomination to the SCOTUS in a Democrat presidency.

    Good night, ghr. Stay on the watch. The safety, security, and sovereignty of our nation must be defended. The United States of America is not under the jurisdiction of the United Nations Organization—as the anti-Americans Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and George Soros advocate.

    CJack, February 10, 2017, Lighthouse Gazette on the Gulf

  2. And their parents spending a fortune to brag about their offspring’s academic accomplishment, to see their child scrambling for job interviews while driving a cab in the big city because the only jobs available for ‘global science’ graduates are at the United Nations Organization—that insane asylum of banana republics, fake and failed nations. Where salvation from starvation would be an employment opportunity as ‘assistant’ to the minister of economic development in the section of grants, in places like the disappearing minuscule island-nation of Vanuatu where a Harvard-trained ‘global warming’ expert can present its ‘dire’ case for ‘beaucoup’ American relief assistance to save its inhabitants fish, taro, and coconuts diet.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: