Fascists Oppose Dennis Prager Speaking at University of Wyoming

Our Dennis Prager is scheduled to speak at the University of Wyoming this evening.

These days there is a wave of fascism covering American universities from coast to coast, the vast majority led by feminists of all sexes, colors, shapes and sizes.  “It is our day to run the American show”,  they chant.   Like most fascist movements, truth has no meaning beyond expediency  especially these days of  feminist movements now dominating the political scene the American social science  and “education” studies at university these days.

Learning about  American and World History  is  no longer available in our schools.  It was taught “too male” and by males  in those old days of masculine domination at university, feminists devine.

I attended school throughout the World War II years, the years of the advance of Soviet, Chinese and Cuban Communism, the Mother years of America as a world power, the time  I call the zenith of America soul and culture, when children had real mothers and real fathers, families had close relatives and knew their neighbors, and our people knew well, the differences between right and wrong.

Our teachers and professors of that time were very, very well educated, devoted to learning and teaching knowledge and deeply believed in an American soul based on JudeoChristianity in which the undivorced family was the “glue”, and the church,  synagogue, and school,   the “cover”  of  the books of knowledge the collection of which, if studied,  would make each citizen, and therefore, the nation,  closer to God’s Truth.

It led to the rise of the  Martin Luther King movement.

There is a major war in our American schools  today…. where preaching “feelings”  rather than seeking Truth, by accumulating  knowledge seems to be nurtured, even flourishing  at our American school and university from coast to coast.   Much of it spouts from  a feminist movement to replace the male, and therefore the ancient male drive   to  expand learnings, accumulating   knowledge, and seeking  truth for survival in a better world in the name of EQUALITY to replace both Truth and Knowledge.  It will make populations  feel better.

This fascist movement at the University of Wyoming  forbidding our Dennis Prager to speak openly and freely was led, apparently, by feminist Hunter MacFarland.  She declined to speak with Dennis about her reasons for the ban.   Instead, Austin Morgan took her place.

Fascism is alive and well at today’s feminized university and public schools.

Dennis interviews Austin Morgan to discover why his presence at the University of Wyoming should be banned:

 

 

 

 

What’s a POPULIST These Days?

Eek, I’m a Populist!

by Roger L. Simon  at PJMedia:

“When I first heard the word “populist” bandied about in the early days of election 2016, my immediate reaction was “Ugh!”– back we go to Father Coughlin and a bunch of guys with pitchforks.  Not promising.

Then, when I began to support Donald Trump, first grudgingly and then more enthusiastically, I discovered that I might therefore be a “populist.” Heaven help me.

According  to Daniel Hannan — British member of the European Parliament and contributor to the forthcoming (November 28) anthology Vox Populi: The Perils & Promises of Populism — that assignation is not likely to make me popular, at least in, er, Belgium (and undoubtedly in a lot of other places).  Hannan writes:

The vilest slur in Brussels, the insult to end all insults, is “populist.”  Eurocrats spit out, rather in the manner of a teenager at a party who mistakenly takes a swing from a beer can that was being used as an ashtray.  Yet, monstrous as the word is an a Eurocrat’s vocabulary, he is surprisingly vague about its meaning.

Now I have little sympathy for those tedious elitists known as Eurocrats, but I must say the guy has a point.  I’m rather vague about the meaning myself (though I suspect in his case it may equal “Trump supporter” or, lately, supporter of those “boorish” renegades now leading Poland, Hungary and, most recently, the Czech Republic and Austria).”

Even historian George H. Nash, after beginning the above-referenced essay collection with a brilliant tour d’horizon of the conservative movement, seems a little confused by what this new populism really is.  Some of the other contributors, however — notably James Piereson, Roger Scruton, Victor Hanson, Andrew McCarthy and Conrad Black — have more precise theories.

I will leave them to the reader of the anthology, which I suspect will be a touchstone for a necessary discussion as conservatism moves into the future, and try to come to grips with the question for myself.  What in the Sam Hill do I think, or maybe hope, this populism is?

But before I do, let me say that political terminology in general does not turn me on.  On one level I think it’s all a bunch of hooey. Following in the tradition of E. M. Forster, who only gave two cheers for democracy, I only give two cheers for ideology, sympathetic as I may be to some.  As was expressed so well in My Fair Lady, “Sing me no song, read me no rhyme/ Don’t waste my time, show me.”   (Please read on:)

 

https://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/eek-im-populist/