• Pragerisms

    For a more comprehensive list of Pragerisms visit
    Dennis Prager Wisdom.

    • "The left is far more interested in gaining power than in creating wealth."
    • "Without wisdom, goodness is worthless."
    • "I prefer clarity to agreement."
    • "First tell the truth, then state your opinion."
    • "Being on the Left means never having to say you're sorry."
    • "If you don't fight evil, you fight gobal warming."
    • "There are things that are so dumb, you have to learn them."
  • Liberalism’s Seven Deadly Sins

    • Sexism
    • Intolerance
    • Xenophobia
    • Racism
    • Islamophobia
    • Bigotry
    • Homophobia

    A liberal need only accuse you of one of the above in order to end all discussion and excuse himself from further elucidation of his position.

  • Glenn’s Reading List for Die-Hard Pragerites

    • Bolton, John - Surrender is not an Option
    • Bruce, Tammy - The Thought Police; The New American Revolution; The Death of Right and Wrong
    • Charen, Mona - DoGooders:How Liberals Hurt Those They Claim to Help
    • Coulter, Ann - If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans; Slander
    • Dalrymple, Theodore - In Praise of Prejudice; Our Culture, What's Left of It
    • Doyle, William - Inside the Oval Office
    • Elder, Larry - Stupid Black Men: How to Play the Race Card--and Lose
    • Frankl, Victor - Man's Search for Meaning
    • Flynn, Daniel - Intellectual Morons
    • Fund, John - Stealing Elections
    • Friedman, George - America's Secret War
    • Goldberg, Bernard - Bias; Arrogance
    • Goldberg, Jonah - Liberal Fascism
    • Herson, James - Tales from the Left Coast
    • Horowitz, David - Left Illusions; The Professors
    • Klein, Edward - The Truth about Hillary
    • Mnookin, Seth - Hard News: Twenty-one Brutal Months at The New York Times and How They Changed the American Media
    • Morris, Dick - Because He Could; Rewriting History
    • O'Beirne, Kate - Women Who Make the World Worse
    • Olson, Barbara - The Final Days: The Last, Desperate Abuses of Power by the Clinton White House
    • O'Neill, John - Unfit For Command
    • Piereson, James - Camelot and the Cultural Revolution: How the Assassination of John F. Kennedy Shattered American Liberalism
    • Prager, Dennis - Think A Second Time
    • Sharansky, Natan - The Case for Democracy
    • Stein, Ben - Can America Survive? The Rage of the Left, the Truth, and What to Do About It
    • Steyn, Mark - America Alone
    • Stephanopolous, George - All Too Human
    • Thomas, Clarence - My Grandfather's Son
    • Timmerman, Kenneth - Shadow Warriors
    • Williams, Juan - Enough: The Phony Leaders, Dead-End Movements, and Culture of Failure That Are Undermining Black America--and What We Can Do About It
    • Wright, Lawrence - The Looming Tower

Yes, I’m Rooting for Roy Moore to Win in Alabama

“Our American democracy bears a concept that one is innocent until proved guilty….”beyond a shadow of doubt” some add on.

There is much noise these days from the feminist-feminazi circles of American politics.  Many, especially those who don’t crave for children,  claim female superiority to the human male.   Nearly all belong to leftists political gangs and groups of one kind or another.  Many hang inside and out of  schools, colleges, and universities doing what today’s  Democrats, fascists and communists do, make trouble and noise.  They program to disrupt our United States in any and every manner possible….in the name and doings of freedom by making it  disappear as a free nation.    Feminists need special care and allowance to do their feminist deeds.

Feminists need fascism to rule their way  to strengthen their day.    They are rallying for their revolution in Washington  to begin this December, with the election of the very leftist Democrat candidate………in order to elevate the devious, dishonest  Charles Schumer to rule the Senate to disrupt the people’s  election of Donald J. Trump as our nation’s President.

Roy Moore was recently accused  by leftist Democrats who collared a middle aged gal who claimed that 38 years ago  when she was 14,  a 32 year old man, Roy Moore, had been rather casual with her…..and now, but never before  even  when he was a judge, suddenly was directed to appear and cry on  television   to keep him, a conservative,  from going to Washington by helping creepy, deviate leftist,  Chuck Schumer gain control of the US Senate and begin proceedings to remove OUR DONALD from the White House. ”   ghr

Why I’m voting for Roy Moore

by Jon Guertin  at American Thinker

As a transplant to Alabama and the American South, I’m surprised when events here make their way into the national dialogue.  For reasons other than college football, the coastal media writes off Southerners and the culture here as too tinged with Confederate-inspired non-sophistication to be taken seriously.  For my part, I happily moved here from a blue state where everyone thinks he’s sophisticated, and I haven’t seriously looked back in nearly ten years.  We certainly have problems, but people here can spot phony, and they hate it.  The accusations against Roy Moore have a strong whiff of phoniness in their telling and retelling that will likely fail to block his election to the Senate next month.

With that said, Moore mismanaged this from his end.  He is an ideal candidate for hypocrisy-hunters and should have been ready for this attack.  It could have been anticipated with a planned set of talking points and an army of credible responders ready to pounce on the story when it came out.  The left is predictable in its tactics and willingness to launch a barrage of innuendo and nastiness if these will help the leftist candidate win.

Perhaps Moore’s portrayal of naïveté is one reason he’s a popular figure with many in this state.  I suspect that fair-minded people will have a hard time using accusations, especially concerning alleged behavior 40 years ago, as sufficiently compelling to switch their vote.

In my view, this election will likely come down to turnout.

Should he win, Moore’s election will test two important principles for Republicans.  The first is, who decides how voters in each state should chose their representatives in Congress, and the second is, how seriously does our elected leadership view the opportunities inherent in holding majorities in each chamber along with the White House?…….”    Please continue reading below:



“Ditsy Chick” Eliza Warren Charges “Pocahontas” A RACIAL SLUR!


by Paul Mirengoff  at PowerLine:

“Today, President Trump honored the “code talkers,” Native American soldiers who were deployed during the world wars to send messages between units in their native languages — an almost unbreakable code. During World War II, Navajo men were recruited and used for this purpose. Surviving Navajos came to the White House for the event in their honor.

After one of the code talkers gave a speech, Trump put aside his prepared remarks and spoke off the cuff. Here is the Washington Post’s account of what happened next:

“You were here long before any of us were here. Although we have a representative in Congress who they say was here a long time ago. They call her ‘Pocahontas,’” he said with a chuckle. “But you know what? I like you.” The audience was quiet.

The Post cut off Trump’s quote in mid-sentence. He said to the Indians, “I like you because you are special. You are special people.” (Emphasis added)

“Pocahontas” was not amused by Trump’s jab. Elizabeth Warren shot back, “It is deeply unfortunate that the president of the United States cannot even make it through a ceremony honoring these heroes without having to throw out a racial slur.”

I agree it’s unfortunate (though not “deeply” so) not to make it through a ceremony without taking a shot at a political enemy, even one as obnoxious as Elizabeth Warren. But is calling a fake Indian “Pocahontas” a racial slur or just a tired joke?

I say it’s the latter, but what I know? I couldn’t stay out of trouble with certain Indians, real or fake.

UPDATE: Warren also said: “Look, Donald Trump does this over and over, thinking somehow he’s going to shut me up with it. It hasn’t worked in the past. It is not going to work in the future.”

I’m pretty sure Trump doesn’t think he’s going to shut Warren up. He just knows a good punching bag when he sees one.

JOHN adds: I’ve gotten in trouble with lots of people over the years, but never (as far as I recall) with Indians. So I will just add this: the President’s comment was obviously not a racial slur. He mocked Elizabeth Warren not because she is an Indian–that would be a racial slur–but precisely because she is NOT Native American, contrary to her repeated claims and her affirmative action-fueled career. Warren has been exposed as a liar, and for her to defend herself by playing the race card is really beneath contempt…”



Crooked “Pocahontas” Elizabeth Warren Climbing Democrat

Note:  It is likely few of you know the name, Elizabeth Warren, an ambitious ditsy Democrat U.S. Representative from Massachusetts,  yesterday’s Lying Ted Kennedy’s home state.  I ‘bumped’ into her through something written in a magazine around  thirty  years ago before she was polishing her politics….the crooked communist-fascist fanatic feminist variety.

I don’t think she had a father in her family.

One day while conversing with her mother,  a female, a discussion arose regarding Eliza’s high cheek bones.  Eliza turned hysterically historical….announcing  that she must be of American Indian descent….and so, by the act of being female, she declared herself to be American Indian whereupon she could get cheaper prices when entering her lefty  Massachusetts schools of left wing learnings, enjoying the all of their financial benefits by  becoming another sleazy  Democrat some day owning public office.

John Hinderaker at PowerLine wrote the following piece on Elizabeth’s Pocahontas escapade through her intellectual life:


Earlier today, Paul wrote about Elizabeth Warren’s claim that President Trump’s referring to her as “Pocahontas” was a racial slur–a claim that I think is ridiculous, as I said when I added my two cents’ worth to Paul’s post. During today’s White House press briefing, several Democratic Party reporters tried to take up the cudgels on behalf of their party and Sen. “Fauxcahontas” Warren. Press Secretary Sarah Sanders responded admirably. Here are the exchanges:

Q Sarah, at the event that the President just did with the Navajo Code Talkers, he referred to “Pocahontas” being in the Senate. Why did he feel the need to say something as offensive to many people while honoring the Navajo Code Talkers — these genuine, American heroes?

MS. SANDERS: I think what most people find offensive is Senator Warren lying about her heritage to advance her career.

Q But she said it was a racial slur. She said it was a racial slur. What is your response to that?

MS. SANDERS: I think that’s a ridiculous response.

That should have put an end to it. But the Democratic Party reporters persisted:


Q If I could follow up with that, because the President was speaking at an event to honor members of the Greatest Generation — people who fought in World War II, who are in their eighties and nineties now. And the moment had many people online asking whether the President lacks decency. What’s your response to that notion?

I’m recalling all the times when reporters asked Barack Obama’s press secretaries to comment on whether President Obama lacked decency. Actually, I thought he did, but I never expected to hear it from the White House press corps.

MS. SANDERS: Look, I think the President certainly finds an extreme amount of value and respect for these individuals, which is why he brought them and invited them to come to the White House and spend time with them, recognizing them, and honoring them today.

So I think he is constantly showing ways to honor those individuals, and he invited them here at the White House today to meet with them and to also remind everybody about what the historic role that they played many years ago.


Q Why is it appropriate for the President to use a racial slur in any context?

This is known technically as begging the question.

MS. SANDERS: I don’t believe that it is appropriate for him to make a racial slur or anybody else.

Q Well, a lot of people feel as though this is a racial slur. So why is it appropriate for him to use that?

MS. SANDERS: Like I said, I don’t think that it is, and I don’t think that was — certainly not the President’s intent.

Q Sarah, does he see —

MS. SANDERS: I think, like I said, I think the more offensive — the most offensive thing —

Q Does he see political value in calling people out racially?

MS. SANDERS: I’m sorry?

Q Does he see political value in calling people out racially? Why use that (inaudible)?

Of course, President Trump didn’t call Warren out “racially,” he called her out as a liar. As Sanders explained:

MS. SANDERS: Look, I think that Senator Warren was very offensive when she lied about something specifically to advance her career. I don’t understand why no one is asking about that question and why that isn’t constantly covered.

The Democrats can whine all they want, but I think most people understand that Elizabeth Warren is a liar and a poseur who falsely claimed Indian heritage to jump on the affirmative action bandwagon. There are at least a couple of reasons why Democrats don’t want to acknowledge the real issue.