• Pragerisms

    For a more comprehensive list of Pragerisms visit
    Dennis Prager Wisdom.

    • "The left is far more interested in gaining power than in creating wealth."
    • "Without wisdom, goodness is worthless."
    • "I prefer clarity to agreement."
    • "First tell the truth, then state your opinion."
    • "Being on the Left means never having to say you're sorry."
    • "If you don't fight evil, you fight gobal warming."
    • "There are things that are so dumb, you have to learn them."
  • Liberalism’s Seven Deadly Sins

    • Sexism
    • Intolerance
    • Xenophobia
    • Racism
    • Islamophobia
    • Bigotry
    • Homophobia

    A liberal need only accuse you of one of the above in order to end all discussion and excuse himself from further elucidation of his position.

  • Glenn’s Reading List for Die-Hard Pragerites

    • Bolton, John - Surrender is not an Option
    • Bruce, Tammy - The Thought Police; The New American Revolution; The Death of Right and Wrong
    • Charen, Mona - DoGooders:How Liberals Hurt Those They Claim to Help
    • Coulter, Ann - If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans; Slander
    • Dalrymple, Theodore - In Praise of Prejudice; Our Culture, What's Left of It
    • Doyle, William - Inside the Oval Office
    • Elder, Larry - Stupid Black Men: How to Play the Race Card--and Lose
    • Frankl, Victor - Man's Search for Meaning
    • Flynn, Daniel - Intellectual Morons
    • Fund, John - Stealing Elections
    • Friedman, George - America's Secret War
    • Goldberg, Bernard - Bias; Arrogance
    • Goldberg, Jonah - Liberal Fascism
    • Herson, James - Tales from the Left Coast
    • Horowitz, David - Left Illusions; The Professors
    • Klein, Edward - The Truth about Hillary
    • Mnookin, Seth - Hard News: Twenty-one Brutal Months at The New York Times and How They Changed the American Media
    • Morris, Dick - Because He Could; Rewriting History
    • O'Beirne, Kate - Women Who Make the World Worse
    • Olson, Barbara - The Final Days: The Last, Desperate Abuses of Power by the Clinton White House
    • O'Neill, John - Unfit For Command
    • Piereson, James - Camelot and the Cultural Revolution: How the Assassination of John F. Kennedy Shattered American Liberalism
    • Prager, Dennis - Think A Second Time
    • Sharansky, Natan - The Case for Democracy
    • Stein, Ben - Can America Survive? The Rage of the Left, the Truth, and What to Do About It
    • Steyn, Mark - America Alone
    • Stephanopolous, George - All Too Human
    • Thomas, Clarence - My Grandfather's Son
    • Timmerman, Kenneth - Shadow Warriors
    • Williams, Juan - Enough: The Phony Leaders, Dead-End Movements, and Culture of Failure That Are Undermining Black America--and What We Can Do About It
    • Wright, Lawrence - The Looming Tower

Gowdy: “I am heatbroken for the victims.”

Epstein’s killer has already gotten away with murder

by Michael James  at  American Thinker:

 

The minute I read Trey Gowdy’s quote concerning Jeffrey Epstein’s suicide, I knew we will never get to the bottom of the irresponsible and unforgiveable actions of our government concerning the suicide of Epstein.

Gowdy, who never gets to the bottom of anything before retiring and cashing big checks, said, “I am heartbroken for the victims.”

Gowdy might as well have said, “Well, that’s that; we will never know the truth.  Too bad for all of those underage women.  I am sorry, but the secrets die with the man.”

No further curiosity needed; too bad for those girls.

Gowdy knows how things work around here.

According to Morgan Krakow, Hannah Knowles, and Marisa Lati at MSN, “Epstein was placed on suicide watch last month but then taken off within about a week, a person familiar with the matter who spoke on the condition of anonymity told the Washington Post.”

We should know right this minute who took Epstein off suicide watch.

But we don’t.

And I doubt we will ever know.

Whoever gave that order is the traitor in our midst.

So we begin another round of “investigation” that will lead to nowhere because pertinent questions will never be asked.

The Jeffrey Epstein suicide case begins with the person who ordered Epstein off suicide watch.  This person pulled the trigger, whether Epstein actually committed the act or someone else shoved Epstein’s neck into the noose.

Who lifted the suicide watch and pushed Jeffrey Epstein’s button?

It’s just one more thing we will never get to the bottom of.

And that’s more than a little heartbreaking.

 

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2019/08/epsteins_killer_has_already_gotten_away_with_murder.html

The Church in Today’s Turmoil America

Was There a Way for the Church to Avoid the Culture Wars?

Discipleship Ministry CCMV – a bilingual group of pro-life supporters – prays at the Amethyst Health Center for Women abortion clinic in 2014.

by Michael Brown    at the Stream:      (Article sent by Mark Waldeland.)

Was there a different course the Church in America could have taken to avoid the culture wars? A way to focus on the gospel and transcend controversial moral and political issues? Personally, I would much rather write about Torah than about Trump, about Christ than about culture, about the Holy Spirit than about homosexuality.

Is it possible that, as followers of Jesus, we could have bypassed today’s divisive social issues and simply concentrated on the gospel? Or is this making a false dichotomy between gospel and culture?

Without a doubt, our voice should be loudest and clearest when it comes to preaching Jesus as Savior and Lord. Our witness should be strongest when it comes to doing good and demonstrating our faith by our works.

But does that mean that we cannot be good witnesses while standing for justice and righteousness and equity?

Show Me The Scripture Where We’re Not Supposed to Be Helping Save Lives

Certainly, we must transcend partisan politics.

We cannot be pawns of a program or a party. We are God’s servants, with ultimate allegiance to Him, and all other allegiances must be secondary to that.

But does that mean that we remain silent when lives are being destroyed? That we simply pray when injustice takes place in front of our eyes? That we take no concrete steps to stop the concerted ideological attack against the younger generation?

To be totally candid, I have no problem dealing with controversy. I’m the son of a New York City, Jewish lawyer, and debating is in my blood. And as a Jewish follower of Jesus, I’ve known controversy since the first days of coming to faith in late 1971.

But I take no joy in being called a homophobe and bigot. I would rather be associated with Jesus than with a political position (as in, I oppose same-sex “marriage”). And I want to be known as a Bible teacher infinitely more than I want to be known as a Trump voter.

At the same time, I see no way that we, as disciples of Jesus, could have avoided — or should avoid — the culture wars.

After all, the culture wars include the slaughter of the unborn, better known as abortion.

Can anyone really give me Scripture that calls us not to get involved in the saving of innocent lives?

Can anyone give me verses from the New Testament that negate these from Proverbs? “Rescue those who are being taken away to death; hold back those who are stumbling to the slaughter. If you say, ‘Behold, we did not know this,’ does not he who weighs the heart perceive it? Does not he who keeps watch over your soul know it, and will he not repay man according to his work?’” (Proverbs 24:11–12)

Help us champion truth, freedom, limited government and human dignity. Support The Stream »

I’ve asked this question countless times, but it bears repeating: How do we look at Christians in pre-Civil War America who did nothing to oppose the institution of slavery? Worse still, how we do view those who participated in slavery, even if it was something they grew up and that was normal to them? And what about those who supported segregation as Christian leaders?

Do we say, “Well, as long as they preached Jesus, that’s what matters. No reason for them to get hands their soiled with the culture wars?”

I Could Do No Other

Again, to be totally candid, doing research for my first book on LGBT issues, A Queer Thing Happened to America, was difficult and painful. Much of the reading was dark, and it was a completely different world for me, especially when compared to writing a commentary on a book of the Bible or writing an inspirational book on revival.

But I could do no other.

Fifteen years ago, it was already clear to me that LGBT activism was the principle threat to our freedoms of conscience, speech, and religion.

Fifteen years ago, when I was first called to address these issues, it was already clear that an aggressive gay curriculum was flooding our schools.

Do we sit back idly when marriage is redefined? When male-female distinctives are being attacked? When our kids and grandkids come home from school in tears over the latest assault on their faith?

I hope all of us would agree that, if we were aware children were being sex-trafficked in our neighborhood, we would work together to combat it.

Why, then, should we shrink back from doing what is right if it means coming into conflict with the larger culture? Why, then, should we only stand for righteousness when there is societal consensus on the issue?

When the early Christians rescued abandon babies, they had to defy the authorities. But they did it because it was right, and as followers of Jesus, we are called to do what is right. And doing what is right means opposing what is wrong.

When it comes to our political involvement, I don’t plan to endorse a candidate again, having done so only once. And it’s not because of second thoughts on that candidate, Senator Ted Cruz. I’d love to see him as our president one day.

But for me, as a leader in the Body, my greatest calling is to be a voice. And the moment I endorsed Senator Cruz, people heard my voice in that context. Everything was now filtered.

Let Us Be Jesus to the Culture

Does that mean that I keep my voting habits private? One of my colleagues, born in Europe, believes that’s the wisest course of action. And I respect his views.

But our political leaders are supposed to carry out the will of the voters, which means that there is constant intersection between the culture, politics, and the gospel. And they often comment on the culture, which calls for our engagement.

Again, we must transcend partisan politics, and our focus must be on issues more than personalities and on the gospel more than culture.

But we deceive ourselves if we think that, in a country like America, we can just “stick to the gospel” without confronting the culture. Following Jesus closely will inevitably result in colliding with controversy.

Let us do our best, then, to do so with the love of God, with the truth of the gospel, and with the fullness of the Spirit.

In short, let us be Jesus to our society. We can’t go wrong with that.

 

Was There a Way for the Church to Avoid the Culture Wars?

Fascistic Hollywood Readies Soviet Kin Movie Encouraging Murder of Republican “DEPLORABLES”!

ON THE HUNT, TRUMP GETS RESULTS [UPDATED]

by  John Hinderaker   at PowerLine:

I wrote here about the bizarre movie The Hunt, in which liberal elites hunt and murder red state “deplorables.” Sort of a wish-fulfillment fantasy for the left. The film was to be released next month, even though advertising was pulled after the El Paso and Dayton shootings. But that was before President Trump weighed in on Twitter:

Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump

Liberal Hollywood is Racist at the highest level, and with great Anger and Hate! They like to call themselves “Elite,” but they are not Elite. In fact, it is often the people that they so strongly oppose that are actually the Elite. The movie coming out is made in order….

65.7K people are talking about this

Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump

Liberal Hollywood is Racist at the highest level, and with great Anger and Hate! They like to call themselves “Elite,” but they are not Elite. In fact, it is often the people that they so strongly oppose that are actually the Elite. The movie coming out is made in order….

Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump

….to inflame and cause chaos. They create their own violence, and then try to blame others. They are the true Racists, and are very bad for our Country!

53.5K people are talking about this

That was enough, apparently, to cause Universal Studios to wilt:

A controversial soon-to-be released movie trashed by President Trump on Twitter Friday has been canceled entirely, Universal Studios announced Saturday.
***
The backlash forced the studio to change its plans.

“We stand by our filmmakers and will continue to distribute films in partnership with bold and visionary creators, like those associated with this satirical social thriller,” the studio said in a statement to The Hill. “But we understand that now is not the right time to release this film.”

I will go out on a limb and guess that Universal executives shelved the movie because of Trump’s suggestion that film violence contributes to real violence, for which Hollywood liberals “then try to blame others.” The executives, I suspect, didn’t want to do anything that might compromise the Democrats’ ability to blame President Trump.

STEVE (maybe) dissents: Without actually seeing the movie, it is hard to know whether withdrawing the film isn’t a blunder. If it is true that the hunters are the bad guys—with an EU connection!!—and the hunted “deplorables” the good guys who win revenge in the end, then maybe this movie would have been slightly pro-Trump. It wouldn’t be the first time that a film or TV show made by liberals backfired on them. One thinks of All in the Family, where Norman Lear’s intention totally flopped, or Joss Whedon’s Firefly series and Serenity film. Although Wheedon is a big leftist, his TV show and movie are hugely popular with libertarians and conservatives generally.

It could be that Universal decided to shelve the movie because they figured out that they had blundered and might actually help Trump.

JOHN responds: I’ve wondered about that, too. Whatever would possess a group of liberals to make a film that shows liberals as the ultimate villains, hunting down and murdering innocent conservatives? It’s a puzzle. In any event, I don’t think it matters who made the film or which side gets a worse portrayal. I think it is totally inappropriate to make or release a film that depicts liberal and conservative Americans slaughtering one another. And calling it a “satire,” as Universal insistently does, doesn’t help. So I am glad Trump got the film killed, if that is what happened, or alternatively that Universal thought better of it, even if the company’s motives were political.

 

On The Hunt, Trump Gets Results [Updated]