• Pragerisms

    For a more comprehensive list of Pragerisms visit
    Dennis Prager Wisdom.

    • "The left is far more interested in gaining power than in creating wealth."
    • "Without wisdom, goodness is worthless."
    • "I prefer clarity to agreement."
    • "First tell the truth, then state your opinion."
    • "Being on the Left means never having to say you're sorry."
    • "If you don't fight evil, you fight gobal warming."
    • "There are things that are so dumb, you have to learn them."
  • Liberalism’s Seven Deadly Sins

    • Sexism
    • Intolerance
    • Xenophobia
    • Racism
    • Islamophobia
    • Bigotry
    • Homophobia

    A liberal need only accuse you of one of the above in order to end all discussion and excuse himself from further elucidation of his position.

  • Glenn’s Reading List for Die-Hard Pragerites

    • Bolton, John - Surrender is not an Option
    • Bruce, Tammy - The Thought Police; The New American Revolution; The Death of Right and Wrong
    • Charen, Mona - DoGooders:How Liberals Hurt Those They Claim to Help
    • Coulter, Ann - If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans; Slander
    • Dalrymple, Theodore - In Praise of Prejudice; Our Culture, What's Left of It
    • Doyle, William - Inside the Oval Office
    • Elder, Larry - Stupid Black Men: How to Play the Race Card--and Lose
    • Frankl, Victor - Man's Search for Meaning
    • Flynn, Daniel - Intellectual Morons
    • Fund, John - Stealing Elections
    • Friedman, George - America's Secret War
    • Goldberg, Bernard - Bias; Arrogance
    • Goldberg, Jonah - Liberal Fascism
    • Herson, James - Tales from the Left Coast
    • Horowitz, David - Left Illusions; The Professors
    • Klein, Edward - The Truth about Hillary
    • Mnookin, Seth - Hard News: Twenty-one Brutal Months at The New York Times and How They Changed the American Media
    • Morris, Dick - Because He Could; Rewriting History
    • O'Beirne, Kate - Women Who Make the World Worse
    • Olson, Barbara - The Final Days: The Last, Desperate Abuses of Power by the Clinton White House
    • O'Neill, John - Unfit For Command
    • Piereson, James - Camelot and the Cultural Revolution: How the Assassination of John F. Kennedy Shattered American Liberalism
    • Prager, Dennis - Think A Second Time
    • Sharansky, Natan - The Case for Democracy
    • Stein, Ben - Can America Survive? The Rage of the Left, the Truth, and What to Do About It
    • Steyn, Mark - America Alone
    • Stephanopolous, George - All Too Human
    • Thomas, Clarence - My Grandfather's Son
    • Timmerman, Kenneth - Shadow Warriors
    • Williams, Juan - Enough: The Phony Leaders, Dead-End Movements, and Culture of Failure That Are Undermining Black America--and What We Can Do About It
    • Wright, Lawrence - The Looming Tower


There may have been massive voter fraud in Virginia

By Andrea Widburg at American Thinker:

Everybody assumed that Trump would lose in Virginia, a state that has been aggressively Democrat starting with Obama in 2008.  When Virginia’s all-Democrat government enacted a slew of gun control laws, though, January saw huge Second Amendment protests in the state.  Then the Wuhan Virus came along, the protests ended, and Virginia seemingly fell back into the blue zone.  No one thought that it, too, might be one of the election fraud states — but that assumption may have been wrong.

We already got a tip-off last week (although we didn’t realize it) that Virginia was probably yet another state in which Biden got his electoral college votes through fraud.  On November 11, American Thinker published a post entitled, “Data analysis shows weird mail-in ballot anomalies in contested states.”

The analysis looked at the final ratio of Democrat to Republican presidential votes in all 50 states.  The norm for 40 of those 50 states was that, when counting mail-in ballots, they reflect the same ultimate ratio for the election as a whole.  Thus, if a Democrat ends by winning 2 to 1, the mail-in ballots will also reflect this ratio as they arrive and get counted.  That’s because they’ve been shuffled in the postal system so they don’t arrive as clumps of ballots from red or blue districts.  This ratio of red versus blue incoming ballots shows up as a constant straight line on a chart.

However, in ten states, nine of which Trump contests, the chart showed a huge and bizarre bounce right around 4 A.M.  That was after the fraud states abruptly stopped counting, only to resume a few hours later — and that was when the tide turned so dramatically in Biden’s direction that he completely wiped out Trump’s advantage.

There was one anomaly in this analysis, though:https://platform.twitter.com/embed/index.html?dnt=false&embedId=twitter-widget-0&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1325601359832506368&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.americanthinker.com%2Fblog%2F2020%2F11%2Fthere_may_have_been_massive_voter_fraud_in_virginia.html&siteScreenName=AmericanThinker&theme=light&widgetsVersion=ed20a2b%3A1601588405575&width=550px

Now in fairness, VA is the only state out of the 50 that has anomalies but has not had accusations of voter fraud, yet. I think this is the exception that proves the rule. Yet to figure out what causes this anomalous shift, but here it is so no one accuses me of holding it back.— CulturalHusbandry (@APhilosophae) November 9, 2020

It’s beginning to look as if Virginia was not an exception proving the rule.  Instead, Virginia proved the rule by being yet another Democrat-run state in which massive election fraud took place, shifting a true Trump victory to a fake Biden victory.  Joe Hoft looked at the New York Times’ election feed showing Virginia’s voting patterns and discovered some peculiar anomalies:

One oddity in the file noted immediately is that the results for votes are not in whole integers (e.g. 1, 2, 3…).  All of the entries have fractional amounts.  This makes no sense since ballots do not come in fractions in the US.  Each vote equals one vote.

The first 125 entries reported in the NYT data feed were basically reasonable.  The results varied in percentage of votes between Presidential candidates and appeared to be random with most votes going to President Trump.  Up through this time (11:03 Eastern), President Trump was leading 52% to Biden’s 46%.  At this time 3.3 million of the eventual 4.4 million votes had already been cast or about 75% of the vote was in.   This is when things went off the rails.

Eight entries totaling nearly (800,000) votes were removed from the database during this time.  This makes no sense. Each vote should be added to the vote totals not taken away.

Overall three entries of over 300,000 votes were posted in the data base to Biden’s vote total.  Two entries of over 300,000 votes were taken away.  The same happened to President Trump’s totals but in much smaller amounts.  Overall 851,000 votes were added to Biden’s totals and only 318,000 were awarded to President Trump between 11:14pm (Eastern) on November 3rd and 5:00am November 4th.  This resulted in over half a million more votes net going to Biden and 73% of the votes during this timeframe.

There’s more — including some interesting charts — but it all adds up to another Biden victory that defies common sense, statistics, mathematics, and the will of the people.

@AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

Obama, A Commie in College, Hasn’t Changed Much, Has He!

60 Minutes’ Scarily Ignorant Interview of Barack Obama

By Jack Cashill at American Thinker:

Interviewer Scott Pelley of 60 Minutes supplied the ignorance. He appears to have no more knowledge of what transpired during the past four years than does, say, a Whoopi Goldberg or a Kathy Griffin.

Barack Obama supplied the scare. His solution to make the right half of America as ignorant as the left would do Trotsky proud.

Pelley’s ignorance flared throughout the embarrassingly sycophantic interview, but it reached something of a crescendo with his and Obama’s elaborate discussion on the etiquette of presidential transitions.

While images played of the Obamas welcoming the Trumps to the White House, Obama blathered on about the “set of traditions” that presidents have always followed of instructing various agencies “to cooperate” with the incoming administration. The outgoing president, Obama pontificated, “owes the new president a chance to do their best.”

Pelley nodded approvingly, perhaps even unaware of what was going on behind the scenes while the always gracious Obama was greeting the brutish Donald Trump. On the very day at the very moment Trump was being inaugurated, National Security Advisor Rice sent to “self” a peculiar email. It read:

President Obama began the conversation by stressing his continued commitment to ensuring that every aspect of this issue is handled by the Intelligence and law enforcement communities “by the book.” The President stressed that he is not asking about, initiating or instructing anything from a law enforcement perspective. He reiterated that our law enforcement team needs to proceed as it normally would by the book.

Rice was trying to absolve Obama of signing off on the coup then underway to sabotage Trump’s presidency on the back of the Russia collusion hoax. Unfortunately for Obama, Rice proved to be just as clumsy and obvious as she was on the fateful Sunday after the terrorist assault on the Benghazi consulate when she served up the same “the video caused it” lie on five morning TV news shows.

Senators Charles Grassley and Lindsey Graham saw right through Rice’s smokescreen. “Despite your claim that President Obama repeatedly told Mr. Comey to proceed ‘by the book,’” the good senators responded to Rice upon discovering the email, “substantial questions have arisen about whether officials at the FBI, as well as at the Justice Department and the State Department, actually did proceed ‘by the book.’”

There is no “book” that justifies what the FBI’s Comey and pals did in the weeks immediately following this meeting while Obama was still president. The next day, January 6, 2017, the conspirators released the declassified version of the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA).

Commissioned a month earlier by Obama, the ICA was John Brennan’s way of welcoming the president-elect to Washington. Titled “Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections,” the report concluded that Putin “ordered” an influence campaign, the goal of which was “to undermine public faith in the US democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency.”

Many of the report’s assertions were made with evidence no more convincing than that which tied Putin to Trump, including some in bold face such as “Putin Ordered Campaign To Influence US Election” or the  “Influence Effort Was Boldest Yet in the US.” Lacking human intelligence in the Kremlin, the report writers had no idea what Putin did or did not order.

Neither did the media. Yet for the next three years they pounded this preposterous Hillary Clinton-DNC funded disinformation campaign as though it were real news. Watching Pelley, I am not sure he knows it wasn’t.  

Obama offered a solution to make sure all Americans remain as ignorant as the people like Pelly who produce the news. “We will have to work with media and tech companies to inform the public better and to bolster standards to separate truth from fiction.”

The timing of the 60 Minutes interview was felicitous. The day before I received a text from my friend Sundance at the influential Conservative Treehouse, saying, “Hi. We always knew there was a risk of being targeted if the left were successful. Yesterday I was notified that they [Word Press] are shutting down my website on December 2 due to ‘content.’”

“There is a sense that literally anything goes to get power,” said Obama of Trump. Unfortunately, this wasn’t a laugh line.

Jack Cashill’s new book, Unmasking Obama: The Fight to Tell the True Story of a Failed Presidency, is widely available. See also http://www.cashill.com.

@AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

And now for something different:

from Glenn H. Ray….

When I was raised in the 1930s and 1940s….. in a small house and yard in St. Paul, Minnesota, gardening was a cherished art form….

Fathers worked 48 or more hours on the job during the week, but Sunday morning was the time for Church service for family following Sunday school for us kids. Divorces were limited to Reno and the movie folk.

Mothers’ life and work were confined to home and neighborhood almost like a sorority gathering chatting, helping, sharing, problem solving.

With the exception of gas stations, city shops, businesses nearly everywhere were closed on Sundays….(with the exception of professional baseball as I remember).

Folks were outdoor people then. Many city folk, including some of my relatives were fresh from losing their farm due to the Depression. Nearly all of my and my older sister’s clothes were limited to hand-me-downs from cousins. Even before the WAR flower and vegetable gardens were standard occupiers of much of the back yard.

Front and side “yards” were always kept neat especially shrubs and conifers.

Of sixteen families on our block only four were somewhat aloof, private unto themselves. They were more in the grandparent age.

It was early May, 1942 when I became hooked raising vegetables in the wartime half acre Victory Garden I became in charge of in the empty lots across the alley where we lived…..which led to my private love of landscape gardening play in my neighbor’s sandbox for years until high school……and then to landscape gardening about thirty five years later as a business……

……when I designed and installed the “gardenette” picture above for a client who appreciated it very much in his front yard.

Life can be beautiful like it used to be folks!