• Pragerisms

    For a more comprehensive list of Pragerisms visit
    Dennis Prager Wisdom.

    • "The left is far more interested in gaining power than in creating wealth."
    • "Without wisdom, goodness is worthless."
    • "I prefer clarity to agreement."
    • "First tell the truth, then state your opinion."
    • "Being on the Left means never having to say you're sorry."
    • "If you don't fight evil, you fight gobal warming."
    • "There are things that are so dumb, you have to learn them."
  • Liberalism’s Seven Deadly Sins

    • Sexism
    • Intolerance
    • Xenophobia
    • Racism
    • Islamophobia
    • Bigotry
    • Homophobia

    A liberal need only accuse you of one of the above in order to end all discussion and excuse himself from further elucidation of his position.

  • Glenn’s Reading List for Die-Hard Pragerites

    • Bolton, John - Surrender is not an Option
    • Bruce, Tammy - The Thought Police; The New American Revolution; The Death of Right and Wrong
    • Charen, Mona - DoGooders:How Liberals Hurt Those They Claim to Help
    • Coulter, Ann - If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans; Slander
    • Dalrymple, Theodore - In Praise of Prejudice; Our Culture, What's Left of It
    • Doyle, William - Inside the Oval Office
    • Elder, Larry - Stupid Black Men: How to Play the Race Card--and Lose
    • Frankl, Victor - Man's Search for Meaning
    • Flynn, Daniel - Intellectual Morons
    • Fund, John - Stealing Elections
    • Friedman, George - America's Secret War
    • Goldberg, Bernard - Bias; Arrogance
    • Goldberg, Jonah - Liberal Fascism
    • Herson, James - Tales from the Left Coast
    • Horowitz, David - Left Illusions; The Professors
    • Klein, Edward - The Truth about Hillary
    • Mnookin, Seth - Hard News: Twenty-one Brutal Months at The New York Times and How They Changed the American Media
    • Morris, Dick - Because He Could; Rewriting History
    • O'Beirne, Kate - Women Who Make the World Worse
    • Olson, Barbara - The Final Days: The Last, Desperate Abuses of Power by the Clinton White House
    • O'Neill, John - Unfit For Command
    • Piereson, James - Camelot and the Cultural Revolution: How the Assassination of John F. Kennedy Shattered American Liberalism
    • Prager, Dennis - Think A Second Time
    • Sharansky, Natan - The Case for Democracy
    • Stein, Ben - Can America Survive? The Rage of the Left, the Truth, and What to Do About It
    • Steyn, Mark - America Alone
    • Stephanopolous, George - All Too Human
    • Thomas, Clarence - My Grandfather's Son
    • Timmerman, Kenneth - Shadow Warriors
    • Williams, Juan - Enough: The Phony Leaders, Dead-End Movements, and Culture of Failure That Are Undermining Black America--and What We Can Do About It
    • Wright, Lawrence - The Looming Tower

Why Should The FBI Remain A Leftist Institution?

Abolish the FBI

By Bill Hansmann at American Thinker:

My wife, who has an excellent sense of what is going right and wrong in our country, but who is reluctant to write her thoughts down, has insisted to me for some time that the FBI should be abolished.  I, being not shy about expressing my thoughts in written form but more skeptical about such a seemingly rash move, have always answered, Yes, but what do we replace it with?  Lately, I have come to believe that no replacement might well be better than either retaining the agency as is or replacing it.

Steve Baldwin’s article from the American Spectator of November 20, 2017, titled “Should the FBI Be Abolished?,” makes an excellent case for doing just that, as well as offering cogent suggestions on how to fill the resultant void.

The FBI has become a left-leaning, self-serving, mean-spirited organization.  Nowhere is it likely to be viewed as a humble, hardworking group of law enforcement individuals, though there well may be many fine agents in the ranks.

Baldwin cites numerous examples of the bureau’s heavy-handed actions: Ruby Ridge, Waco, and other massacres, as well as the the horrible lack of action, even though fueled with intelligence.  The Ft. Hood shooter, Nidal Hasan, who murdered thirteen U.S. military personnel, and the Tsarnaev brothers who planted bombs at the Bostom Marathon, killing three pedestrians and injuring hundreds, were known to the FBI, but the intelligence was not acted upon.  We have also become accustomed to the bureau’s political interference in such matters as the Trump/Russia collusion nonsense and the James Comey/Hillary Clinton email farce.

Much as the world of advertising flourishes by creating unnecessary problems that can be solved only by using a newly invented product or service, this power-crazed organization has gone so far as to designate or create over three thousand laws defined as federal statutes, thus requiring the FBI to enforce them.  Every state in the union has law enforcement agencies capable of handling these illegalities.  The individual states seem more likely to cooperate with one another in battling crime than they are to work with a federal agency intent on its own glorification to the exclusion of the state agencies.  There are federal organizations such as the Treasury Department, the Secret Service, the Drug Enforcement Agency, and others that can manage crimes that require a centralized approach, but we can live without the FBI.

A grassroots effort is needed to eliminate an organization that is now doing more harm than good.  Let’s get that ball rolling.  It will make my wife smile.

Image: National Archives.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: