• Pragerisms

    For a more comprehensive list of Pragerisms visit
    Dennis Prager Wisdom.

    • "The left is far more interested in gaining power than in creating wealth."
    • "Without wisdom, goodness is worthless."
    • "I prefer clarity to agreement."
    • "First tell the truth, then state your opinion."
    • "Being on the Left means never having to say you're sorry."
    • "If you don't fight evil, you fight gobal warming."
    • "There are things that are so dumb, you have to learn them."
  • Liberalism’s Seven Deadly Sins

    • Sexism
    • Intolerance
    • Xenophobia
    • Racism
    • Islamophobia
    • Bigotry
    • Homophobia

    A liberal need only accuse you of one of the above in order to end all discussion and excuse himself from further elucidation of his position.

  • Glenn’s Reading List for Die-Hard Pragerites

    • Bolton, John - Surrender is not an Option
    • Bruce, Tammy - The Thought Police; The New American Revolution; The Death of Right and Wrong
    • Charen, Mona - DoGooders:How Liberals Hurt Those They Claim to Help
    • Coulter, Ann - If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans; Slander
    • Dalrymple, Theodore - In Praise of Prejudice; Our Culture, What's Left of It
    • Doyle, William - Inside the Oval Office
    • Elder, Larry - Stupid Black Men: How to Play the Race Card--and Lose
    • Frankl, Victor - Man's Search for Meaning
    • Flynn, Daniel - Intellectual Morons
    • Fund, John - Stealing Elections
    • Friedman, George - America's Secret War
    • Goldberg, Bernard - Bias; Arrogance
    • Goldberg, Jonah - Liberal Fascism
    • Herson, James - Tales from the Left Coast
    • Horowitz, David - Left Illusions; The Professors
    • Klein, Edward - The Truth about Hillary
    • Mnookin, Seth - Hard News: Twenty-one Brutal Months at The New York Times and How They Changed the American Media
    • Morris, Dick - Because He Could; Rewriting History
    • O'Beirne, Kate - Women Who Make the World Worse
    • Olson, Barbara - The Final Days: The Last, Desperate Abuses of Power by the Clinton White House
    • O'Neill, John - Unfit For Command
    • Piereson, James - Camelot and the Cultural Revolution: How the Assassination of John F. Kennedy Shattered American Liberalism
    • Prager, Dennis - Think A Second Time
    • Sharansky, Natan - The Case for Democracy
    • Stein, Ben - Can America Survive? The Rage of the Left, the Truth, and What to Do About It
    • Steyn, Mark - America Alone
    • Stephanopolous, George - All Too Human
    • Thomas, Clarence - My Grandfather's Son
    • Timmerman, Kenneth - Shadow Warriors
    • Williams, Juan - Enough: The Phony Leaders, Dead-End Movements, and Culture of Failure That Are Undermining Black America--and What We Can Do About It
    • Wright, Lawrence - The Looming Tower

Shame….For the War Beginning…or the War Losing?

“Never have I been so ashamed”: Russian diplomat resigns in protest over Ukraine war

ALLAHPUNDIT May 23, 2022

An act of moral courage deserves acclaim even when it’s unlikely to alter the course of the war.

Boris Bondarev is a mid-level Russian liaison at the UN’s mission in Geneva, Switzerland. His crisis of conscience isn’t as newsworthy as, say, Sergei Lavrov’s would be (in reality, Lavrov has no conscience) but it’s a shot in the arm for the Ukrainians ahead of a hard summer of war at a moment when the west’s commitment is beginning to sag. If Russian officials are tiring of the war, that’s a strong argument to Ukraine’s sponsors not to give up yet.

And some Russians clearly are tiring of it:


Hillel Neuer of UN Watch got a copy of Bondarev’s farewell statement. It’s a banger. And Lavrov’s name is mentioned.

“Bondarev should be invited to speak in Davos this week,” Neuer said afterward. That’s a fine idea. Zelensky addressed the World Economic Forum being held there this morning, pleading with the west’s movers and shakers for more aid and tighter sanctions on Russia. Having Russia’s newest dissident follow suit would turn up the moral pressure further.

He’s not the first Russian diplomat to quit in protest over the war, you may remember. Putin’s climate envoy, Anatoly Chubais, resigned and bugged out of the country in March. But Chubais said nothing when he departed, possibly hoping that keeping a low profile would ease Putin’s desire for revenge. Bondarev’s cri de coeur is designed to embarrass the Kremlin, by contrast, so now he has to watch his back. “Am I concerned about the possible reaction from Moscow? I have to be concerned about it,” he told the AP, adding that he’s not the only Russian official with misgivings. “Not all Russian diplomats are warmongering. They are reasonable, but they have to keep their mouths shut.”

Maybe Putin will let him slide, as he has more important things to worry about nowadays. And I don’t mean the war.


Ironically, Bondarev is leaving at the very moment Russia has finally begun to see some modest success on the battlefield. I wrote last week about their “breakthrough” in the village of Popasna, which has given them an opportunity to seal off the Ukrainian city of Sievierodonetsk. Ukraine has had control of Sievierodonetsk since 2014 despite gains by Russian separatists in other parts of the Donbas but the city is now at risk of falling. And even if it doesn’t fall, the Russian army’s proximity means that all that’ll be left of it when the battle is over is a pile of rubble. It’s Mariupol 2.0:

Because Russia lacks officers capable of leading effective offensives against Ukraine, they are trying to get such a victory in Severodonetsk by overwhelming the Ukrainians with firepower. Schmidt said the Russians are “bludgeoning their way through” in a way that could have dire consequences for civilians, as in Mariupol.

“They’re just pounding Ukrainians with artillery,” Schmidt said.

“Every day they are trying to break the line of defense,” Haidai said in a Ukrainian media interview that he posted to his Telegram channel Sunday. “Round-the-clock there is shelling, and unfortunately the Russian army chose the scorched earth tactic against the city of Severodonetsk: They are simply systematically destroying the city. Everywhere is being shelled constantly.”

One of Michael Weiss’s intelligence sources in eastern Europe believes the battle could have upsides for the Ukrainians. Their strategy for the next several months is simply to wear down Russia’s forces in the east ahead of an offensive this fall. They know that Putin is having trouble finding the manpower he needs to advance so they’re quite logically focused on exacerbating that problem. If the Russians are prepared to funnel troops into the effort to take Sievierodonetsk, the Ukrainians will be happy to turn them into targets:



The ferocity of the fight around Sievierodonetsk might lead you to assume that battles are raging all across the eastern front. Not so, writes Phillips O’Brien. If anything, the war has grown a bit calmer in the rest of the Donbas as the Ukrainians sit back and prepare for several months of artillery warfare. The key questions about the battle of Sievierodonetsk are (1) how much will it cost each side to assert themselves there, and (2) if the Russians succeed in taking the city, will Putin seize upon it as an off-ramp and offer a peace deal? I assume he’s eager to put Zelensky in the position of having to choose whether to continue the war or not, as divisions in the west on that topic might fracture the coalition supporting Ukraine.

I’ll leave you with Eva Braun here warning the world that if Russia doesn’t “win” in Ukraine then bad things are in store for the human race.


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: