• Pragerisms

    For a more comprehensive list of Pragerisms visit
    Dennis Prager Wisdom.

    • "The left is far more interested in gaining power than in creating wealth."
    • "Without wisdom, goodness is worthless."
    • "I prefer clarity to agreement."
    • "First tell the truth, then state your opinion."
    • "Being on the Left means never having to say you're sorry."
    • "If you don't fight evil, you fight gobal warming."
    • "There are things that are so dumb, you have to learn them."
  • Liberalism’s Seven Deadly Sins

    • Sexism
    • Intolerance
    • Xenophobia
    • Racism
    • Islamophobia
    • Bigotry
    • Homophobia

    A liberal need only accuse you of one of the above in order to end all discussion and excuse himself from further elucidation of his position.

  • Glenn’s Reading List for Die-Hard Pragerites

    • Bolton, John - Surrender is not an Option
    • Bruce, Tammy - The Thought Police; The New American Revolution; The Death of Right and Wrong
    • Charen, Mona - DoGooders:How Liberals Hurt Those They Claim to Help
    • Coulter, Ann - If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans; Slander
    • Dalrymple, Theodore - In Praise of Prejudice; Our Culture, What's Left of It
    • Doyle, William - Inside the Oval Office
    • Elder, Larry - Stupid Black Men: How to Play the Race Card--and Lose
    • Frankl, Victor - Man's Search for Meaning
    • Flynn, Daniel - Intellectual Morons
    • Fund, John - Stealing Elections
    • Friedman, George - America's Secret War
    • Goldberg, Bernard - Bias; Arrogance
    • Goldberg, Jonah - Liberal Fascism
    • Herson, James - Tales from the Left Coast
    • Horowitz, David - Left Illusions; The Professors
    • Klein, Edward - The Truth about Hillary
    • Mnookin, Seth - Hard News: Twenty-one Brutal Months at The New York Times and How They Changed the American Media
    • Morris, Dick - Because He Could; Rewriting History
    • O'Beirne, Kate - Women Who Make the World Worse
    • Olson, Barbara - The Final Days: The Last, Desperate Abuses of Power by the Clinton White House
    • O'Neill, John - Unfit For Command
    • Piereson, James - Camelot and the Cultural Revolution: How the Assassination of John F. Kennedy Shattered American Liberalism
    • Prager, Dennis - Think A Second Time
    • Sharansky, Natan - The Case for Democracy
    • Stein, Ben - Can America Survive? The Rage of the Left, the Truth, and What to Do About It
    • Steyn, Mark - America Alone
    • Stephanopolous, George - All Too Human
    • Thomas, Clarence - My Grandfather's Son
    • Timmerman, Kenneth - Shadow Warriors
    • Williams, Juan - Enough: The Phony Leaders, Dead-End Movements, and Culture of Failure That Are Undermining Black America--and What We Can Do About It
    • Wright, Lawrence - The Looming Tower

Climatologist Obama Ups His War on “Truth in Climate”

Another note from Craig Rucker regarding Barack Obama’s war against honest climate science:


When you think of national security threats, words like ISIS, North Korea, and Al Qaeda probably come to mind.

For President Obama, however, you can add another sinister term: “Climate denier.”

“Climate change constitutes a serious threat to global security, an immediate risk to our national security, and, make no mistake, it will impact how our military defends our country,” Obama told new Coast Guard officers at the Academy’s New London, Connecticut, campus yesterday.

“Denying it, or refusing to deal with it, endangers our national security and undermines the readiness of our forces,” he added.

Perhaps it shouldn’t be surprising that this President, whose lackluster foreign policy has come under much criticism, would seek to deflect that criticism by casting the public’s eye on a new villain – even one of his own creation. But choosing to go after climate scientists and others who simply disagree with Al Gore’s alarmism seems to be just a bit of a stretch … even for him.

Leave alone the fact that there’s been no increase in hurricanes, tornados, wildfires or other extreme weather events (not to mention no increase in global temperatures in over 18 years), the evidence that a warmer world leads to more conflict is not supported by either factual or historical evidence.

As CFACT’s Marc Morano has chronicled regarding this issue at ClimateDepot.com:
War-related casualties have fallen over the last half-century, even as temperatures have slightly risen.

Since the dawn of civilization, warmer eras have meant fewer wars.Peer-reviewed studies show the primary causes of civil war are political, not environmental.

Peer-reviewed studies show the primary causes of civil war are political, not environmental.

A chapter of the Fifth Assessment Report of the UN’s own IPCC published last year notes that “collectively the research does not conclude that there is a strong positive relationship between warming and armed conflicts.”

To be sure, the world is still awaiting its first climate refugee resulting from a conflict generated by alleged man-made global warming. This despite shrill warnings of impending doom going back years, one issued by the UN itself which said there would be 50 million such refugees by 2010. Of course, we saw none.

So it appears the President is not looking at the facts, but simply shilling for his friends in the Green movement.

Demonizing your political opponents does not make America stronger. It may be shrewd politically, but it’s doubtful to do much in the way of improving national security.

Let’s hope this effort to put climate skeptics in the camp of national security threats backfires.

It doesn’t deserve to be given any serious attention.

For nature and people too,

Craig Rucker
Executive Director”, Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow

7 Reasons Marco Rubio Should Get the Republican Nomination for President

from pjmedia Tatler, by Scott Ott:

The 7 Reasons Marco Rubio Should Get the Republican Nomination for President

“A child of immigrant parents, in the nation that invented the idea that your status at birth is no limitation on your ultimate altitude, Rubio never forgets America’s exceptionalism.”

“Do read the full article:”


‘Science’ Survey on Gay Marriage Opponents Converting to Approval in 20 Minute Conversation (or less) with a Gay is FRAUD


Last December Science magazine published the results of a survey that found people who had a conversation of as little as 20 minutes with a gay person changed their mind about gay marriage. You may well wonder why Science, usually concerned with settled scientific matters like global warming climate change, would jump on a research survey more suited for a public opinion or social science journal, and further you’d wonder why we’d want to rely on social science surveys to advance our judgment of this moral and legal controversy. (What next: open-office plans are really a sneaky gay plot to promote gay marriage, too? Because with no doors, no closets to hide in!)

The full article, “When contact changes minds: An experiment on transmission of support for gay equality,” is in the magazine’s closet behind the magazine’s paywall, but it isn’t very impressive. In fact it looks rather like a first-year graduate student survey project, and the conclusion has all of the usual tropes of such academic work today, including the phrase you see in almost all social science articles that prove a small and obvious point—“further research is needed”. (Do read more about lefty “science” advertising:)


Note to remember: Marxism is a religion in which truth has no meaning. ghr

Washington Post Snarks about Marco Rubio’s Lack of Money


Every morning the Washington Post sends out an email with links to its featured stories of the day. Today, the Post’s number one story was: Does Rubio Have a Spending Problem? The factual basis for the Post’s article was that according to his financial disclosure forms, Marco Rubio has withdrawn $68,000 from a retirement account:

Marco Rubio made $174,000 as a U.S. senator last year. He earned $52,000 from book royalties and a university teaching position, and at least $5,000 more from rental property. (please read further)


Is Hillary Already Wrapping up the Illegal Immigrant Vote for 2016?

Hillary relying on the illegal immigrant vote in 2016?

The following article is from the editors at The Nation:


Hillary Clinton’s evolution on immigration reform is a testament to the youthful movement that erupted during the Obama era.

“What a difference a disastrous midterm election makes. Before the 2014 vote, conventional wisdom in the Democratic Party still counseled political caution on immigration reform. Last summer, few were surprised when President Obama delayed announcing deportation relief until after the November vote; it was the kind of reluctant leadership the modern party has shown consistently on immigration. But less than a month into her campaign, Hillary Clinton struck a markedly different tone.

Clinton met with a group of undocumented students on May 5 and described an agenda that reflects just how much has changed since 2008. Young immigrants, in particular, are done waiting for politicians to catch up to the reality of their lives, and their rightful impatience fuels a movement that’s forcing the issue for Democrats and Republicans alike.”


Another Feminist Attempt at Thinking, Caring, Discovering her Swat

American universities today from coast to coast have become mammoth caves of the feminized newly-“learned” of mind, its content and sharing to shape a new American world free at last of anything dead white male.

Let’s take a peek at what these Obamalings chant when they gather together:


by Jessica Valenti at the Guardian

“Writer Polly Vernon, who has penned thought-provoking pieces such as “You hate me because I’m thin” and “Am I too old for cleavage?”, is writing a book about how feminists can be cool, fit “and maybe – just maybe – a little bit thinner.” Please read the entire article to discover the ‘things that matter in this leftier enclave of Obamaling America:


Hillary’s “Friend”, Sydney Blumenthal

RON FOURNIER, NATIONAL JOURNAL: Look, Sidney Blumenthal, for good reason was not allowed to work for the State Department, had business interests in Libya and was lobbying his friend in the State Department. That’s an obvious conflict of interest. And how does she answer it? She talks about this bubble and how she wants to reach out to people outside the bubble who were friends with her before she entered public office.

There’s more:

From the New York Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/19/us/politics/clinton-friends-libya-role-blurs-lines-of-politics-and-business.html?_r=1

The Malevolent, Lugubrious, Politial Mercenary Blumenthal: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2015/05/20/jonah_goldberg_malevolent_lugubrious_sidney_blumenthal_a_political_mercenary_fit_for_a_medici_prince.html

The Sid Viscious Sydney Blumenthal: http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2015/05/hillary-clinton-sid-vicious-and-libya.php


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 406 other followers