• Pragerisms

    For a more comprehensive list of Pragerisms visit
    Dennis Prager Wisdom.

    • "The left is far more interested in gaining power than in creating wealth."
    • "Without wisdom, goodness is worthless."
    • "I prefer clarity to agreement."
    • "First tell the truth, then state your opinion."
    • "Being on the Left means never having to say you're sorry."
    • "If you don't fight evil, you fight gobal warming."
    • "There are things that are so dumb, you have to learn them."
  • Liberalism’s Seven Deadly Sins

    • Sexism
    • Intolerance
    • Xenophobia
    • Racism
    • Islamophobia
    • Bigotry
    • Homophobia

    A liberal need only accuse you of one of the above in order to end all discussion and excuse himself from further elucidation of his position.

  • Glenn’s Reading List for Die-Hard Pragerites

    • Bolton, John - Surrender is not an Option
    • Bruce, Tammy - The Thought Police; The New American Revolution; The Death of Right and Wrong
    • Charen, Mona - DoGooders:How Liberals Hurt Those They Claim to Help
    • Coulter, Ann - If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans; Slander
    • Dalrymple, Theodore - In Praise of Prejudice; Our Culture, What's Left of It
    • Doyle, William - Inside the Oval Office
    • Elder, Larry - Stupid Black Men: How to Play the Race Card--and Lose
    • Frankl, Victor - Man's Search for Meaning
    • Flynn, Daniel - Intellectual Morons
    • Fund, John - Stealing Elections
    • Friedman, George - America's Secret War
    • Goldberg, Bernard - Bias; Arrogance
    • Goldberg, Jonah - Liberal Fascism
    • Herson, James - Tales from the Left Coast
    • Horowitz, David - Left Illusions; The Professors
    • Klein, Edward - The Truth about Hillary
    • Mnookin, Seth - Hard News: Twenty-one Brutal Months at The New York Times and How They Changed the American Media
    • Morris, Dick - Because He Could; Rewriting History
    • O'Beirne, Kate - Women Who Make the World Worse
    • Olson, Barbara - The Final Days: The Last, Desperate Abuses of Power by the Clinton White House
    • O'Neill, John - Unfit For Command
    • Piereson, James - Camelot and the Cultural Revolution: How the Assassination of John F. Kennedy Shattered American Liberalism
    • Prager, Dennis - Think A Second Time
    • Sharansky, Natan - The Case for Democracy
    • Stein, Ben - Can America Survive? The Rage of the Left, the Truth, and What to Do About It
    • Steyn, Mark - America Alone
    • Stephanopolous, George - All Too Human
    • Thomas, Clarence - My Grandfather's Son
    • Timmerman, Kenneth - Shadow Warriors
    • Williams, Juan - Enough: The Phony Leaders, Dead-End Movements, and Culture of Failure That Are Undermining Black America--and What We Can Do About It
    • Wright, Lawrence - The Looming Tower

Getting to Know the Outdoors Better

The Landscape Garden

“The garden has long been perceived as the highest, most perfect form of all art creations, the one closest to God and bearing the imagery of paradise itself. Indeed, the timeless quote, “One is closest to God in the garden,” has been the splendid pleasure driving countless generations to transform the land into garden. No matter how pleasurable, how physically and spiritually rewarding working the vegetable garden and nurturing the home orchard may be, however, the paradise of gardening is the creation and maintenance of a landscape garden. This is the garden of art, the garden of soul. A landscape garden is a plot of ground made beautiful by the arrangement and careful cultivation of plants. The art is called landscape gardening and its artist and cultivator a landscape gardener. Landscaping one’s home ground is the means by which most Minnesotans become acquainted with at least the fringes of the art of landscape gardening. When they dream of home it is a house in a setting, a setting of lovely trees and shrubs civilized with a carpet of lawn and an arrangement of beautiful flowers.

Landscape gardening is primarily a visual art form. Its beauty is first to be seen, but its purpose is to stimulate thought, to cause to dream, to effect memory, to inspire. The landscape garden is classically to be a place of quiet where the visitor, upon entering, finds a closer communion with the thoughts and feelings of all who have ever gardened this Earth than with the time and troubles of the day.

Although picturesque, the landscape garden is not a painting, it is a performance. Its artist is not a painter but a choreographer arranging not fixed colors and forms on a canvas, but directing exits and entrances of living members of Earth’s realm, plants bearing color and form, lines and textures which, especially in our northland, are constantly changing. Yesterday’s garden as yesterday’s ballet will never again be performed. Yet the skilled landscaper garden artist, by tailoring shrubs and trees to a particular style or by using annual flowers for sweeps of color, can slow change in the garden to give the impression of permanence.

The landscape garden is to be entered, as one enters a cathedral or library. In English literature one “retires” to or “withdraws” into the library, presumably to consult or escape with some thought, some dream, some memory, some inspiration in print. To aid withdrawal there must be border. The gardened place must be defined so the eye and mind cannot wander; so thoughts and dreams cannot be interrupted. With no borders the landscape garden is no garden at all, but a field.

The arrangement of plants is to the landscape gardener what the arrangement of chords is to the pianist. Although it is possible for a novice pianist to find a pleasing chord, one chord does not make a composition. Likewise, a novice gardener may plant a pleasing combination of flowers and shrubbery, but a landscape garden this does not make. “Composers” of the successful landscape garden know their plants. They know plants’ shapes and sizes and how these can be tailored to style. They know plant colors and textures and when and how they change. Garden artists know the sun and shadow of the garden and how to introduce or exclude either. They know plant preferences for shade, soil, and moisture. They gain their knowledge primarily from the experience of working with plants, from years of planting and replacing until the right combination suits the eye.

Not only must the successful landscape garden be designed and planted, it must be given time to mature. Gardens, like people, gain character with age. It may take years, decades before a landscape garden performs its best. Trees cannot yet be manufactured. And the garden must be groomed, regularly tended by caring, experienced hands, the hands of an artist, the hands of a worker. And even when all this is done well, what is achieved is an arrangement of living plants each and all subject to Nature’s mood and dictate, to stand or fall as Nature sees fit. A garden as planned is a garden never achieved.”

Recently, American hero, Dennis Prager, while listing a number of devotions occupying his time, admitted that he wasn’t into “the Garden”.  Yet, he is a very religious man, devoted to the Books of Moses.

The human soul has limited time to practice God’s  devotions in one lifetime.   Dennis Prager is urban, New York City tar and pavement whose parents were neither dependent upon, nor inspired by the power and beauty of vegetative seeds….seeds upon which the human animal of all sexes, shapes, colors, and sizes relies on for food, protection, inspiration,  and exquisite beauty.

The beautiful landscape garden in its finest forms, inspires the human soul, imagination, and devotion to the power of visual living matter.

There is not much time in our  human life’s calendar to do all things good and inspiring arising from ones soul……

I am a regular Dennis Prager fan and have been for more than a decade.  Being a Brooklyner, perhaps he is too urban, perhaps too urbane as well, to recognize the value of gardening the human soul with God’s Biblical  Truth and Beauty of   mind  and  behavior arises from the Garden of Eden…..and the touch and feel, that ONE IS CLOSEST TO GOD IN THE GARDEN.

Think of all the flowers, shrubs, and trees of the human  mind you are tending every day you share your sermons whether political, social, or religious.

 

Science and Capitalism Dancing Together……

The science behind capitalism

By John Conlin at American Thinker:

 

“The economic system called capitalism has been described in many ways, but at its core, it is quite simply free people freely interacting with other free people.  Capitalism has transformed the world by producing more wealth than any other economic system in the history of civilization.

But how does it produce such wealth?  Some have said freedom is the magic potion – that left to their own devices, free people will outperform any other economic system.

That is true, but the ultimate reason is deeper and firmly based in science and fact.  In the past few decades, a great deal of research has been done on what is called swarm intelligence.  Swarm intelligence attempts to explain and understand the collective behavior of group animals.  Think of honeybees, schools of fish, herds of bison, flocks of birds, etc.

The intelligence of the swarm is a significant multiplier.  Rather than relying solely on individual intelligence, these groups create a collective intelligence that is orders of magnitudes beyond that of any individual member.

They do so without any leader, with no management of any sort, with no one “seeing the big picture.”  In fact, having no one in charge is a key ingredient to swarm intelligence.  This incredible increase in intelligence is driven by countless interactions among individual members, with each following simple rules of thumb and reacting to their local environment and those members around them.  That’s it.

Perhaps counterintuitively, if an individual member did attempt to become a leader, the group intelligence would drop precipitously.  And although it may be difficult to grasp, this self-organizing behavior has no cause and effect.  It simply is.

Think of the intelligence of one of the members of these swarms versus the intelligence of the group.  We are talking about not adding a few group I.Q. points, but rather increases in intelligence by orders of magnitude.

My hypothesis is this same process is the scientific basis for the success of capitalism, and in fact the success of the human race.  This swarm intelligence has always been at work, but with our highly developed communication skills and the ability to record and store knowledge our collective swarm intelligence is truly astounding.  Just like the honeybee, our swarm is orders of magnitude more intelligent than even the brightest among us.

And thus capitalism, which is just individual freedom as expressed in an economic system, is absolutely certain to “work.”  It is a scientific fact just as certain as gravity.  And just like the swarm, it does so with no leader, no management, and no one seeing the big picture – no cause and effect.  It just is.

And just like the swarm, when we attempt to place leaders in this process, the collective intelligence plummets.  This explains why governments and their activities are always going to be far stupider than free individuals going about their daily lives.  This isn’t a political statement, but a factual one.

Again, we aren’t talking about knocking off a couple group I.Q. points, but rather magnitudinal increases in stupidity.  This stupidity multiplier isn’t restricted to governments; it applies to all organizations, the larger the worse…..”  Please read on:

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2017/03/the_science_behind_capitalism.html

The Fraud in “Climate Change”

THE FRAUD IN “CLIMATE CHANGE”…..

“Billions and billions of dollars throughout the world  have been wasted by world governments  over the past generation selling  the political leftwing anti-American  world of “Climate Change Science”….that 1) our globe’s Climate is changing…and we know that to be true, for it is always changing,  and that 2) Climate Change  IS life-threatening to the human and other animal (and plant) world….and we know that to be  true eventually,  for life on Earth exists on borrowed SUN time……but, there is a third clause caused by our Obamaling world of communist/socialist/feminist and racial fascism, a political one…..that our “Mother Earth” is heating up….AND  WHITE MAN has caused this  grave climate change threat to the human race and the nature of the plants and bunnies around us.   If he hadn’t invented all of these terrible things over the past six hundred years of his learnings, discoveries,  and inventions…… automobiles, air-conditioning and heating systems, marijuana, Hillary, submarines, tanks, rockets, and planes, suits and dresses, houses and sky scrapers, and that Titanic…..

Is it all a trillion dollar fraud?

The western, that is the guilt-ridden white world,  led by American politician, now professional  science hooker, the former  Vice President and noted Presidential loser, Democrat Al Gore, has led the charge to save world’s womankind by spending  white man’s   money  selling climate change through the United Nations over the past decade and two.  Yes, most likely if truth were allowed to be told.

Please read he following:

EDITORIALS

Is Global Warming Science Just A Fraud?

by Will Happer at  Investor’s Business Daily:

 

“Climate Change: We’re often told by advocates of climate change that the “science is settled.” But in fact, “science” itself is in a deep crisis over making claims it can’t back up, especially about climate.

As BBC News Science Correspondent Tom Feilden noted last week, “Science is facing a ‘reproducibility crisis’ where more than two-thirds of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce another scientist’s experiments, research suggests.” This isn’t just his journalistic opinion, but the conclusion of the University of Virginia’s Center for Open Science, which estimates that roughly 70% of all studies can’t be reproduced.

And this includes the field of climate change, by the way. It’s a disaster. Being able to reproduce others’ experiments or findings from models is at the very heart of science. Yet, radical climate change advocates would have us spend 2% of global GDP, or roughly $1.5 trillion a year, to forestall a minuscule amount of anticipated warming based on dubious modeling and experiments.

Meanwhile, the federal government spends literally billions of dollars a year on climate change, with virtually none of the money funding scientists who doubt the climate change threat. There is no serious debate. This is a problem for all of science.

Worse, our government’s own science fraud is a big problem. Dr. John Bates, a former top scientist at National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, recently detailed how a government paper that called into question the 18-year “pause” in global warming was based on “experimental” data and politicized. That “paper” was used to justify President Obama’s signing of the Paris climate agreement.

Meanwhile, Georgia Institute of Technology climatologist Judith Curry recently retired, blaming the “CRAZINESS (her emphasis) in the field of climate science.”

Even so, mythical claims of a “consensus” among scientists about climate change continue in an effort to shut up critics. Those who dissent, and literally thousands of scientists and engineers do, are shouted down and harassed.

As Princeton University physicist Will Happer told the left-wing British newspaper the Guardian earlier this week: “There’s a whole area of climate so-called science that is really more like a cult. … It will potentially harm the image of all science.”

It’s time for some science Glasnost. New EPA Director Scott Pruitt has called for an open debate on climate science, rather than the name-calling and outright dishonesty of the past. Real science has nothing to fear from more openness and discussion, but everything to fear from more politicized dishonesty……”

RELATED:

Global Warming And Climate Change: Facts & Fiction

If Global Warming Is Real, Why Do Government Scientists Have To Keep Cheating?

Global Warming Alarmists Claim A Scalp, Drive Skeptical Scientist From University

Craig Rucker from CFACT: The Advance of the “Fascist Greens”

         VIRGINIA’S GREEN EMPIRE STRIKES BACK

“CFACT readers have been following Virginia farmer Martha Boneta’s battle to protect her property rights against intrusion by the Piedmont Environmental Council (PEC) and other Green groups.

The PEC wants to prevent Boneta, you may recall, from engaging in such egregious practices as selling vegetables and throwing birthday parties on her farm.

To the Greens’ consternation, however, Martha Boneta is no pushover.  She has fought for her right to farm by successfully inspiring legislative action.  She has also resorted to the courts.

Imagine Martha’s surprise when Fauquier Circuit Court Judge Jeffrey W. Parker denied Martha her day in court against the PEC while permitting her case against neighboring landowners to go forward.

Senior policy analyst Bonner Cohen has details at CFACT.org:

“How impartial was Judge Parker? Months before the PEC case was even heard, Judge Parker proclaimed from the bench that he ‘didn’t believe the PEC was guilty of wrongdoing.’ This bizarre statement foreshadowed how Parker would rule when the case and the evidence were finally before him nearly a year later. For her part, Boneta plans to appeal the ruling and has separate suit pending against the PEC.”

The right to farm in freedom is what inspired a multitude to leave Europe and settle in America.  Property rights are an essential American liberty that must be protected.

How much more difficult to secure our freedoms if we cannot look to the courts?

Reform is overdue.”    from Craig Rucker at CFACT….

Animal Farm’s New Commandments

America as Animal Farm — Again

by Victor Davis Hanson   at National Review:

“New commandments replace the old ones on the barn wall.

The socialist essayist and novelist George Orwell by 1944 grew depressed that as a cost for the defeat of the Axis Powers the Allies had empowered an equally nightmarish monster in the Soviet Union. Since his days fighting for the loyalists during the Spanish Civil War, the left-wing Orwell had become an increasingly outspoken enemy of Communism. After the defeat of Nazi Germany, when Stalin renounced all his wartime assurances and steamrolled Eastern Europe, Orwell came to see state socialism under authoritarian auspices as the greatest threat to human freedom. It was not as if right-wing dictators were not equally lethal, but the inclusion of the words “socialist” and “republic” in a left-wing tyrant’s official lexicon tended to fool millions. Indeed, it was precisely the leftist totalitarians’ habit of embroidering their murderous pursuit of power with professions of “equality,” “fairness,” and “egalitarianism” that so often allowed them to employ any means necessary to achieve their supposedly exalted ends. In sum, in Orwell’s eyes, the radical Left’s erasure of historical memory and its distortion of reality through the manipulation of language were the chief threat of the 20th century.

His 1945 novella Animal Farm — initially difficult for Orwell to publish and deeply hated by Western leftists — was an allegorical warning to liberals of the dangers of left-wing propaganda. Words and phrases changed their meanings — again and again — to serve a tyrannical agenda. The assorted creatures of Orwell’s fictional barnyard frequently wake up to new commandments posted on the barn wall by their Stalinesque pig leaders, with yesterday’s edicts crossed out or modified — and soon to be forgotten.

Given the political sympathies and self-interest of the present mainstream media and cultural elite, when the Obama administration came into power in 2009, we crossed out prior, out-of-power edicts and wrote new establishment versions in their place — as if no one would ever quite know the difference, or would soon forget if he did. Many of us at the time wrote about the nearly Orwellian change in liberal mentality required to accommodate Obama’s many contradictions. Rich people were suddenly not all bad blue-stocking Republicans, but also hip, valuable Silicon Valley progressives in flip-flops who, with some reluctance, outsourced and off-shored. In our past eight years of historical revisionism, huge political contributions — like the hundreds of millions of dollars in subsidies given by multi-billionaire financial speculator George Soros — were now helpful for democracy if only they were given to left-wing causes……”  Please read on:

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/442989/trumps-america-george-orwells-animal-farm-new-commandments

Dennis Prager, Despite His Own Stench, Will Vote For Our Donald!

I have been a devoted radio  fan of Dennis Prager since October, 2004 when I first heard his voice describing the empty suited, presidential candidate of the Left,  John F. Kerry.

Dennis’ vocabulary exposing his vast knowledge describing this phony Democrat sans suit plus an emotion which came from both heart and body was worth some kind of a world championship medal.

No one I have ever known has so matched my thinking, political, social, religious, cultural than this Dennis Prager……..until the arrival of guess who???

Our Donald……

Not that I hadn’t thought ill of our Donald over the 30 or more years I have known the man via television and newsprint.   His culture, religion,  language,  and wealth were certainly not mine, yet  I only had read about him in papers and knew he performed occasionally on television.

I actually prefer the company of the fellow artist- laborers in our landscape garden company.    They are as talented in their outdoor field of art, construction,  and creativity  as Dennis and his talk-alikes  are in their  indoor field of political  cultural persuasion  and preachment….but I can’t imagine Dennis and associates could really understand  the meaning of my statement.   Nor would decent Jonah Goldberg, and the other conservatives on Dennis’ hate Trump list.  These are indoor preachers,  teams teeming  in today’s  indoor culture who  make their fortunes telling listeners how to live, think, and vote.

They claim to be the real conservative.   They have despised Mr. Trump, almost brain-dead since the man entered the  2016 presidential contest as a Republican.

Mr. Trump didn’t match Pragerpeople standards…… These snob superior GOP railed  over this flamboyant, in ones face business man, who as it turns out, likes to tell things as he actually sees and feels about them.   But, the elite shouted, “He’s not even a conservative”….and “He doesn’t even have a foreign policy”…..and worse, Mr. Trump mouthed in public  what he (and countless others) saw in Fiorina’s new  face….plastic rather than character.   How modern!

It turned out there was something terribly plastic about almost all of the 17 or so Republican candidates vying for the White House life.   Only our Donald was pricelessly different, actually unique.   I especially noticed that on the evening of August 6, when arrogant Fox gal,  Megyn Kelly,  introduced herself to our Donald attacking him to advance her own reputation as a feminist ‘tough’ quoting from comments made about some women he’s known in the past.

Dennis never interviewed our Donald on his radio show.      Never to shame his own self esteem, our Dennis,  now that Mr. Trump is the winning GOP candidate to face dame Hillary, although still   ‘despises’ our Donald, but despises him  less than he despises Mrs. Clinton’s leftist fascists he so correctly describes as tyrants coming to roost if Mr. Trump doesn’t win in November.

I do confess, I have come to love our Donald with all his faults Dennis snarls about, even more than the respect I have had all  these twelve years of knowing our Dennis.  My country’s future is in Mr. Trump’s mind and hands.  That does please me very much!

From that very August 6th evening when assaulted by feminist Kelly our Donald first answered “Only Rosie O’Donnell” referring to remarks about mouth-ugly  women,  I knew this guy was not  just another boring GOP automaton mouthing words with more words loser.   He was a business man, a builder not a political hack, a real guy American who reeked personality and seemed as profoundly pissed at what has become of the country’s business, beliefs,  and ignorance as I was.

I loved his language and tone……at last someone is poking holes into the leftist wall of political correctness.  I love his tempo,  humor, his personality.  He’s winsome!!

And he is NOT a hack politician, but a conservative business man who knows what he wants…..TO MAKE AMERICA  GREAT AGAIN!!  Where can I sign up!

Poor, lonely, misguided, isolated, indoorman, Dennis Prager…..hasn’t a clue, yet!

It might conversion painful, but he’ll get there when the real battle begins.

The following Prager confession is about the best Dennis  can do at present, to write something less nasty, less bigoted  than his daily assaults on our Donald almost to this very day.

Well, as the old saying goes:  “Halitosis is better than no breath at all!”

A Response to My Conservative #NeverTrump Friends

Dennis Prager

5/24/2016 12:01:00 AM – Dennis Prager

When you differ from people you admire, you have to question yourself. After all, what is the purpose of admiring people if they aren’t capable of influencing you?

So, I have had to challenge my position — stated since the outset of the Republican presidential debates — that if Donald Trump wins the Republican nomination, I will vote for him over Hillary Clinton, or any Democrat for that matter.

I devoted many hours of radio and many columns to criticizing Trump. His virtually assured nomination has therefore caused me grief as an American, a Republican and a conservative. That his character defects, gaps in knowledge on some important issues, and lack of identifiably conservative principles came to mean little to so many Republican voters is quite troubling. (Though, I might add, it is even more troubling that virtually all Democrats ignore the even worse character of Hillary Clinton, as well as the idiotic socialist ideas of Sen. Bernie Sanders.)

#NeverTrump conservatives, such as (in alphabetical order) Jonah Goldberg, Bill Kristol, Ben Shapiro, Bret Stephens and George Will are not merely people I admire — they are friends and colleagues. Goldberg, Stephens and Will have made multiple videos for Prager University, which receive millions of views. Shapiro and I have spent Shabbat together. I have had the privilege of writing for Kristol’s The Weekly Standard and having him on my show many times. And I have enthusiastically promoted their books. These individuals are special to me not only as thinkers, but as people.

However, in the final analysis, I do not find their arguments compelling.

Take the “conscience” argument that one can sleep with a clear conscience by not voting for Trump. I don’t find it compelling because it means that your conscience is clear after making it possible for Clinton or any other Democrat to win.

In fact, the “conscience” argument is so weak that Goldberg — to his credit — published a column two days ago titled “Sorry, I Still Won’t Ever Vote for Trump.” He wrote, “If the election were a perfect tie, and the vote fell to me and me alone, I’d probably vote for none other than Donald Trump.”

Shouldn’t all Americans vote as if their vote were the deciding vote? Including those whose votes “don’t count” because they live in states that are so left-wing they would still vote Democrat if Vladimir Lenin headed the Democratic ticket?

The choice this November is tragic. As it often happens in life, this choice is between bad and worse, not bad and good.

But America has made that choice before. When forced to choose between bad and worse, we supported Joseph Stalin against Adolf Hitler, and we supported right-wing authoritarians against Communist totalitarians.

It seems to me that the #NeverTrump conservatives want to remain morally pure. I understand that temptation. I am tempted, too. But if you wish to vanquish the bad, it is not possible — at least not on this side of the afterlife — to remain pure.

The most moving interview of my 33 years in radio was with Irene Opdyke, a Polish Catholic woman. Opdyke became the mistress of a married Nazi officer in order to save the lives of 12 Jews. She hid them in the cellar of the officer’s house in Warsaw. There were some Christians who called my show to say that Opdyke’s actions were wrong, that she had in fact sinned because she knowingly committed a mortal sin. In their view, she compromised Catholic/Christian doctrine.

In my view — and, I believe, the view of most Catholics and other Christians — she brought glory to her God and her faith. Why? Because (SET ITAL) circumstances almost always determine what is moral (END ITAL), even for religious people like myself who believe in moral absolutes. That’s why the act of dropping atom bombs on Japan was moral. The circumstances (ending a war that would otherwise continue taking millions of lives) made moral what under other circumstances would be immoral.

In the 2016 presidential race, I am not interested in moral purity. I am interested in defeating the left and its party, the Democratic Party. The notion (expressed by virtually every #NeverTrump advocate) that we can live with another four years of a Democratic president is, forgive me, mind-boggling. To that end, with at least one, and probably multiple, additional leftists on the Supreme Court, a Republican presidential victory in 2020 would mean little. All the left needs is the judicial branch, especially the Supreme Court. Left-wing judges pass so many left-wing laws that they render those who control Congress, and even the White House, almost irrelevant.

Here, then, are nine reasons (there are more) why a conservative should prefer a Trump presidency to a Democrat presidency:

–Prevent a left-wing Supreme Court.

–Increase the defense budget.

–Repeal, or at least modify, the Dodd-Frank act.

–Prevent Washington, D.C. from becoming a state and giving the Democrats another two permanent senators.

–Repeal Obamacare.

–Curtail illegal immigration, a goal that doesn’t necessarily have anything to do with xenophobia or nativism (just look at Western Europe).

–Reduce job-killing regulations on large and small businesses.

–Lower the corporate income tax and bring back hundreds of billions of offshore dollars to the United States.

–Continue fracking, which the left, in its science-rejecting hysteria, opposes.

For these reasons, I, unlike my friends, could not live with my conscience if I voted to help the America-destroying left win the presidency in any way.

I just don’t understand how anyone who understands the threat the left and the Democrats pose on America will refuse to vote for the only person who can stop them.

 

Jewish View on Donald…..All from the Same Brain?

Whether leftists or those who claim to be conservative in some fashion or another, this day’s American Jew in the news  is united in its  irrational, nearly universal  “trumped up” hate for Donald Trump…..at least those who appear some way  in public.

Some play prude…. Others play mouth….claiming…..

Mr. Trump is unworthy:  he  isn’t an attorney, doesn’t convey, doesn’t play  the con-artistry of the usual competitive candidates, hiding  behind cliches playing   chic with language and gesture.   Worse, Donald Trump    is independent of hundreds of millions of dollars paid by political and economic powerhouses who hope  to control the candidate and his campaign programs.

Worse yet, Donald Trump isn’t controlled by feminist, black, atheist, Jewish, latino and other special interest -dictated rules of  political correctness, and their vast censorship  preachments  invented and distributed by the unintellectual ‘elite’, the American hating   who dictate detachment from all of our  yesterday’s of learnedness and discoveries, particularly from those listed in  our own American guide, the Supreme Law of the land,   our Federal Constitution.

Yes, Mr. Trump is new on the American political scene.   Yes, he IS a conservative by business, by his values  teaching off spring and setting fine examples for those who work under him in his business empire.   Thank GOD he is NOT an attorney with attorney’s games of corruption…..the most dishonest line of employment in America and  throughout the world.

I cannot think of a single Jewish writer, telecaster, who has not automatically smeared Donald Trump from the very first moment  Mr. Trump rose on the presidential possibility list this past summer.    Charles Krauthammer, Dennis Prager, John Hinderaker,  Bernie Goldberg,  Bill Kristol,  Ruth Marcus, Michael Medved,  Mark Levin,  John Podhoretz,  Ben Stein,  Jonah Goldberg,  et alia, et alia,  all turned  directly to bigotry-selling even before any so called debates were organized,  because the man was their hated Donald Trump, an intelligent somebody very different from the common or the snotty, someone with a different, but honorable American story to tell other than conning,  gabbing and selling their prejudices to gain favor with  the  public.

Most of  the intolerant whose names were  offered above sell  themselves as being conservative, but obviously  the intolerant kind who gather to expunge our Donald from presidential competitions by smearing.

Donald’s best speech of his political season was at AIPAC a month or so ago….was the best by far of the lot who  paraded on the AIPAC  stage…..and the best speech Mr. Trump presented during his entire quite successful campaign……actually, his only great speech of his campaign, I admit.

From my business, social,  and academic experience, I claim Donald Trump is hated by those Jews with influence, for his attachment to the more common folk,  those Americans, the people who really work rather than talk, write, propagandize  for a living,  the folks  unlawyered, the unjournalists, the non academe,  those who do not judge   Jews and others of  today’s business, academic,  and government class, as they, especially Jews  judge them.

It is a class-hate disease……particularly common among  indoor folks.

Let’s see what the folks at Jewish Bloomberg have to say about Donald’s present political ride:

http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2016-04-08/trump-s-path-gets-a-lot-rockier