• Pragerisms

    For a more comprehensive list of Pragerisms visit
    Dennis Prager Wisdom.

    • "The left is far more interested in gaining power than in creating wealth."
    • "Without wisdom, goodness is worthless."
    • "I prefer clarity to agreement."
    • "First tell the truth, then state your opinion."
    • "Being on the Left means never having to say you're sorry."
    • "If you don't fight evil, you fight gobal warming."
    • "There are things that are so dumb, you have to learn them."
  • Liberalism’s Seven Deadly Sins

    • Sexism
    • Intolerance
    • Xenophobia
    • Racism
    • Islamophobia
    • Bigotry
    • Homophobia

    A liberal need only accuse you of one of the above in order to end all discussion and excuse himself from further elucidation of his position.

  • Glenn’s Reading List for Die-Hard Pragerites

    • Bolton, John - Surrender is not an Option
    • Bruce, Tammy - The Thought Police; The New American Revolution; The Death of Right and Wrong
    • Charen, Mona - DoGooders:How Liberals Hurt Those They Claim to Help
    • Coulter, Ann - If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans; Slander
    • Dalrymple, Theodore - In Praise of Prejudice; Our Culture, What's Left of It
    • Doyle, William - Inside the Oval Office
    • Elder, Larry - Stupid Black Men: How to Play the Race Card--and Lose
    • Frankl, Victor - Man's Search for Meaning
    • Flynn, Daniel - Intellectual Morons
    • Fund, John - Stealing Elections
    • Friedman, George - America's Secret War
    • Goldberg, Bernard - Bias; Arrogance
    • Goldberg, Jonah - Liberal Fascism
    • Herson, James - Tales from the Left Coast
    • Horowitz, David - Left Illusions; The Professors
    • Klein, Edward - The Truth about Hillary
    • Mnookin, Seth - Hard News: Twenty-one Brutal Months at The New York Times and How They Changed the American Media
    • Morris, Dick - Because He Could; Rewriting History
    • O'Beirne, Kate - Women Who Make the World Worse
    • Olson, Barbara - The Final Days: The Last, Desperate Abuses of Power by the Clinton White House
    • O'Neill, John - Unfit For Command
    • Piereson, James - Camelot and the Cultural Revolution: How the Assassination of John F. Kennedy Shattered American Liberalism
    • Prager, Dennis - Think A Second Time
    • Sharansky, Natan - The Case for Democracy
    • Stein, Ben - Can America Survive? The Rage of the Left, the Truth, and What to Do About It
    • Steyn, Mark - America Alone
    • Stephanopolous, George - All Too Human
    • Thomas, Clarence - My Grandfather's Son
    • Timmerman, Kenneth - Shadow Warriors
    • Williams, Juan - Enough: The Phony Leaders, Dead-End Movements, and Culture of Failure That Are Undermining Black America--and What We Can Do About It
    • Wright, Lawrence - The Looming Tower

Why Do Leftists Flunk Science?

Today’s American noisiest Leftists are collectively  overwhelmingly feminists, especially the angry ditsy male haters, mobish racist blacks, illegal immigrants, devoted fascists, anarchists, and anti- JudeoChristian Jews.

Most are feminized indoor people printing  their hate signs, organizing their  hates and dates to cause America trouble especially at the nation’s  schools, universities, and in the courts,  the streets and parks.

How Do Liberals Flunk Science? Let Us Count the Ways.

by Trevor Thomas  at American Thinker:




Craig Rucker, Director of the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow,  the major watchdog reporting on  the Al Gore man made global warming fraud claims  sent the following report:

Gore: Warming made it cold

Al Gore knew it all along.

Global warming would cause “bitter cold.”

Does anyone doubt for a second if the temperature was above average, Gore would claim that as proof of global warming as well?

The man has no shame.

CFACT’s Marc Morano has full details at Climate Depot.  His report is currently on Drudge!

Neither warm, nor cold days prove or disprove the theory of global warming.  They are weather, not climate.  What we do know for certain is that the climate computer models that predict global warming consistently project a warmer world than observations show. We also know that if the models were correct (they never have been), they reveal the solutions proposed by Gore and other warming campaigners to be ineffective, unfair and their benefits (if any) to not exceed their costs.

Marc Morano posted a “tweet” from climate scientist Roger Pielke, Sr. “For those who claim USA/Canada nor’easter is stronger because of ‘global warming’, they apparently do not realize that it’s so strong because of especially strong horizontal temperature gradient in troposphere. It ‘bombed’ because of usually cold air!”   Al Gore take note.

Marc reminds us in his report that scientists from team warming infamously predicted that snow would be a “thing of the past” by now.

You’d think if we are going to surrender our freedom and prosperity to these people, they’d get it right some time, wouldn’t you?……….

Glenn’s comment:   Outside of travels to discover Europe, Mexico, and our United States and my two years in military service, I, since birth, have lived in the north land here in Minnesota.   When in   third grade,  I did “by heart” and chalk, draw a map of the United States on teacher, Mrs. Jaeger’s blackboard, including the borders of all the states West of the Mississippi River.    I had already collected about 150 road maps from AAA, Texaco, Shell, Skelly,  Standard, Deep Rock, and more ‘filling stations’.   They were  free.   I still have them all.

It was the same year I learned that our Minnesota, once upon a time,  was covered deep….. under hundreds of feet of ice called “glaciers”.   I was told they came and went in three or four stages, the most recent sometime around 13,000 years ago.   It’s the cause why so much of  our left wing “goopher” land surface is covered with so much stone, including all those “uge” ones in and around our Duluth.


When studying geology while in college sixty years ago,  I was  reminded that until that cataclysmic disaster when that a much  “uger” piece of rock fell from outer space   into our Gulf of Mexico  some 65,000,000 years ago, killing all of the dinosaurs, including Tyranosaurus Rex,  and nearly everything else roaming around the Dakotas and the rest of the world for millions of years.

I doubt crooked Hillary, her feminist allies  and other leftist cohorts celebrating their  21st century crime time know much about real glaciers….or the outdoors in general.   So many of them are law graduates where  fascists are trained.


Our American Aristotle, Dennis Prager spent some time today discussing  our blessed American President’s tweets and global warming advertised by Al Gore, a once-upon-a-time vice president of our United States turned billionaire for selling the lie that our Earthy globe is warming lethally  due to American white man’s inventions, greed, and politics,  causing certain emissions at certain times at certain temperatures to poison us all,  and if you don’t vote LEFTISM our world is doomed.

In our today’s religiously fascistic  Democrat Party leftist America, 100%  of its followers must follow and sell this dogma or disappear from the scene.

I live in Minnesota, born in 1934.  I know something about it and its geography, geology, and  topography having taken university classes long before the arrival of  our era of fascistic Democrat Party Obamaling  know-nothing folks.

I used to be a senior high school teacher of Modern Problems in Minneapolis, BOE…Before Obama Era.   During a break from  scholastic tension….just for spreading knowledge sake, I’d ask some guy, usually a smart ass student, one with a sense of humor,  to  describe the outdoors of our Twin Cities about 13,000 years ago….(something I had learned in grade school around 1940).  “What did it look like out our doors back then?”

“Sunny?”  I remember one of them questioning.   Usually, there was utter silence  wondering why such a dumb question was asked!

“We’d be sitting under about 500 feet or more of glacial ice!” I reminded them….”Dead, of course!”  (I had studied geology in college.)   I’d then remind them of the geography, climate, and nature of   the Dakotas around 70,000,000 years ago, the ones to the West of our Minnesota…..the places where today’s folks sometimes find bones belonging to Tyranosaurus Rex.

Dennis also spent some time reviewing the Donald Trump habit, “tweeting” to our American republic to work around  the false news reporting by fascism’s   Obamaling inroads at CNN, PBS, CBS, NBC MSNBC, ABC as well as ordinary.

CNN twits reported thusly:  http://www.cnn.com/2018/01/02/politics/donald-trump-north-korea-nuclear/index.html

American President, Donald J. Trump’s  Tweet of the Day:

“North Korean Leader Kim Jong Un just stated that the ‘Nuclear Button is on his desk at all times.’ Will someone from his depleted and food starved regime please inform him that I too have a Nuclear Button, but it is a much bigger & more powerful one than his, and my Button works!” Trump tweeted.

CNN twits, claiming concern for safety,  reported thusly about this tweet by Trump:


How far more fascistic our America would become without the study and speech provided by  our blessed fellow countryman,  Dennis Prager!

May Truth ALWAYS Will Out!

Never Forget the Night of the Fall of our American “Fascistics”

Don’t Forget Those TV Leftist Adolescents Performances That “Morning In America…..2016!”

Don’t Forget That Evening Media Fascists Lost to Our Donald

Global Warming NOT Warming

(Perhaps the greatest racket of our life time is the corruption of the UN racketeers  and  western leftists and university charlatans selling the global warming scare, (blaming white man for its cause).  Billions of dollars  have been stolen from Uncle Sam from propagandists  relying on the ignorance  of the general population. ghr)

Study: No speed-up in global warming, Earth less sensitive to CO2

by Rick Moran  at American Thinker:

“Here is a setback for climate hysterics who say the Earth is warming catastrophically and drastic action is needed to save us.

A new study by the University of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH) shows that the planet is warming at a much slower rate than believed previously, and the atmosphere is less sensitive to rising levels of CO2 than predicted.

The exhaustive study indirectly confirms recent research that shows that a jump in the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere has had little effect on rising temperatures.  This contradicts climate models that predict that rising levels of CO2 lead directly to rising temps.

Anthony Watts:

Mathematically removing the natural but transient climatic effects of volcanoes and El Niño/La Niña Pacific Ocean warming and cooling events leaves an underlying climate trend, all or some part of which might be attributed to human causes – including enhanced greenhouse forcing caused by rising levels of CO2 and other manmade greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.

At present, however, there is no accepted tool or technique for confidently estimating how much of the warming in the past 38+ years might be due to natural causes.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change – the U.N. agency tasked with studying global warming – believes that 50% of warming is due to human industrial activity.  While some scientists claim there is an observable difference between naturally occurring CO2 and that generated by burning fossil fuels, those methods are in dispute, which makes any statement regarding how much of the rise in temps is due to humans unreliable.

The UAH paper destroys the models that predict rising temps that correlate with rising CO2 levels:

For the purposes of this research, we assumed the climate was stable during that time, that the natural climate trend would have been zero,” Christy said. “If the natural trend was zero, then the climate models say the atmosphere is more than twice as sensitive to CO2 as the data might suggest.

Of course, if the natural trend was greater than zero – if the natural climate was warming even a little bit – then the models have the atmospheric sensitivity to CO2 even further out of whack than that.

This has always been the skeptics’ chief complaint about using predictive climate and atmospheric models to develop public policy: the models’ gross inaccuracies.  How can a responsible government develop policies to address a problem that no one knows the extent of – or if it really exists?

Reliance by scientists on ground-based temperature data has always been questioned by skeptics.  This study shows why:

Other researchers have tried to calculate the climate’s sensitivity using temperature data collected at the Earth’s surface. But that data lacks complete global coverage, especially over the oceans. Changes in the character of the land surface near thermometers (such as paving and urban growth) and changes in the thermometer instruments over time also add uncertainty to the data.

“Additionally, surface temperatures used for tracking climate change use the average of daily maximum and minimum temperatures,” said McNider, a distinguished professor emeritus at UAH. “Those minimum nighttime temperatures reflect only the temperature of a shallow layer of air near the surface and not temperatures in the deep layer of the atmosphere.”

Not only are the conclusions being drawn by global warming hysterics wrong, but their methodology leaves a lot to be desired.  It should be no surprise, then, that if you put bad science in, bad science will come out.

If climate change were an ordinary field of science to study, this paper would be major news.  But the issue of global warming is so wrapped up in politics and business that any objective look at the claims made by other scientists is either dismissed out of hand or buried…”