• Pragerisms

    For a more comprehensive list of Pragerisms visit
    Dennis Prager Wisdom.

    • "The left is far more interested in gaining power than in creating wealth."
    • "Without wisdom, goodness is worthless."
    • "I prefer clarity to agreement."
    • "First tell the truth, then state your opinion."
    • "Being on the Left means never having to say you're sorry."
    • "If you don't fight evil, you fight gobal warming."
    • "There are things that are so dumb, you have to learn them."
  • Liberalism’s Seven Deadly Sins

    • Sexism
    • Intolerance
    • Xenophobia
    • Racism
    • Islamophobia
    • Bigotry
    • Homophobia

    A liberal need only accuse you of one of the above in order to end all discussion and excuse himself from further elucidation of his position.

  • Glenn’s Reading List for Die-Hard Pragerites

    • Bolton, John - Surrender is not an Option
    • Bruce, Tammy - The Thought Police; The New American Revolution; The Death of Right and Wrong
    • Charen, Mona - DoGooders:How Liberals Hurt Those They Claim to Help
    • Coulter, Ann - If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans; Slander
    • Dalrymple, Theodore - In Praise of Prejudice; Our Culture, What's Left of It
    • Doyle, William - Inside the Oval Office
    • Elder, Larry - Stupid Black Men: How to Play the Race Card--and Lose
    • Frankl, Victor - Man's Search for Meaning
    • Flynn, Daniel - Intellectual Morons
    • Fund, John - Stealing Elections
    • Friedman, George - America's Secret War
    • Goldberg, Bernard - Bias; Arrogance
    • Goldberg, Jonah - Liberal Fascism
    • Herson, James - Tales from the Left Coast
    • Horowitz, David - Left Illusions; The Professors
    • Klein, Edward - The Truth about Hillary
    • Mnookin, Seth - Hard News: Twenty-one Brutal Months at The New York Times and How They Changed the American Media
    • Morris, Dick - Because He Could; Rewriting History
    • O'Beirne, Kate - Women Who Make the World Worse
    • Olson, Barbara - The Final Days: The Last, Desperate Abuses of Power by the Clinton White House
    • O'Neill, John - Unfit For Command
    • Piereson, James - Camelot and the Cultural Revolution: How the Assassination of John F. Kennedy Shattered American Liberalism
    • Prager, Dennis - Think A Second Time
    • Sharansky, Natan - The Case for Democracy
    • Stein, Ben - Can America Survive? The Rage of the Left, the Truth, and What to Do About It
    • Steyn, Mark - America Alone
    • Stephanopolous, George - All Too Human
    • Thomas, Clarence - My Grandfather's Son
    • Timmerman, Kenneth - Shadow Warriors
    • Williams, Juan - Enough: The Phony Leaders, Dead-End Movements, and Culture of Failure That Are Undermining Black America--and What We Can Do About It
    • Wright, Lawrence - The Looming Tower

What Are The Childless Fascist Fems at the Nation up to These Days?

We Are Living Through the Moment When Women Unleash Decades of Pent-Up Anger

Let’s hope there’s no going back.

(Please continue reading more from the Nation below:”

https://www.thenation.com/article/we-are-living-through-the-moment-when-women-unleash-decades-of-pent-up-anger/

Advertisements

PHANTOM OF THE OPRAH

Phantom of the Oprah

by Daniel John Sobieski  at American Thinker:

“There was Oprah Winfrey at the Golden Globes, with her big glasses and 2020 visions of a presidential run, speaking to the greatest collection of sexual predators and their enablers pontificating about the rights of women in an industry where not long ago these same people, led by the pompous and condescending Meryl Streep, gave a standing ovation and an award to director Roman Polanski, child rapist.

Oprah didn’t mention Polanski, or Harvey Weinstein, or Bill Clinton, or why she didn’t use the show that made her rich and famous to condemn predators such as these and the Hollywood culture that demeans women and exploits them for fun and profit.  If Oprah wants to run for president as a champion of women, she has a lot of explaining to do.

Triggered by remarks made by Oprah Winfrey at the Golden Globes in which she pontificated to women who have been sexually harassed or abused, “You get a voice.  You get a voice.  Everybody gets a voice,” Juanita Broaddrick, who was allegedly raped by former president Bill Clinton when he was governor of Arkansas, and is only now being believed by leftists who were doubtful before, fired back with a blistering pair of tweets.

Oprah was quite willing to shill for Bill Clinton; she gave him time on her show to brag how he and Hillary saw a therapist to work out their marital difficulties and also interviewed him for Oprah Magazine in 2004, asking him about how the Monica Lewinsky affair affected him but never asking about the rampant harassment and abuse, not to mention alleged rape, of which he had been accused.

Juanita Broaddrick was never a guest on Oprah’s show and noted that Oprah was a willing participant in the “nothing to see here” Clinton cover-up.  She also promoted the presidential candidacy of Bill Clinton’s enabler, Hillary Clinton, who ignored his predatory activities and covered up his “bimbo eruptions” as she rode his stained coattails to political prominence:

Clinton, who was forced to settle a sexual harassment case with Paula Jones and has been accused of everything from harassment to assault by no fewer than eight women, has a very good friend indeed in Winfrey.  Her gauzy interview with Clinton in 2004 was not only an attempt to rehabilitate his image; Winfrey also set up the idea of his chief[] enabler, wife Hillary Clinton, running for president.

Worse still, as the Daily Wire points out, the only questions Winfrey asked about Clinton’s countless scandals focused on Monica Lewinsky and sounded like this: “What was the most difficult part of that time for you?”

Nothing was asked about Broaddrick, Jones, Kathleen Willey, or the near[] half[-]dozen others[.] …

Included with a photo of a chummy Bill and Oprah together, Broaddrick wondered, “Remember this @Oprah You’ve had so many opportunities to bring up my allegations, which have never been discredited. Why??”

Good question.  The Daily Wire’s Ben Shapiro told Fox News on Monday night about Oprah’s sham fight for abused women, especially as it applies to the Hollywood elites, who condemned Bill Clinton’s crimes and Hillary Clinton’s enabling only when the Clintons were no longer power-brokers:

Shapiro told Fox News'[s] Martha MacCallum: “She was standing in front of an entire town filled with sexual abusers and harassers.  She said nothing about it for 20 years; she was being cheered by people who said nothing about it for 20 years, and there she is pretending that she’s leading the fight.”

Oprah did not lead the fight against the culture of sexual misconduct in Hollywood, and she cannot use the excuse of “I was afraid of what it might do to my career,” because she is one of the biggest people in media – she has little to fear.

Shapiro continued, “Well, I was under the impression that most of us agreed with that stuff when this stuff first broke and she lauded the Hollywood Foreign Press Association.  Where were they reporting on the sexual harassment and abuse scandal for the last 20 years?  It was literally their job to cover Hollywood and yet it took The New Yorker and Ronan Farrow to uncover all this stuff.  Where was the Hollywood Press Association that was receiving such plaudits at the hands of Oprah Winfrey, again, a woman who was good friends with Harvey Weinstein, being cheered by Meryl Streep, a woman who gave a standing ovation to Roman Polanski?”

Oprah has had a chummy relationship with predator Harvey Weinstein over the years, being his guest at a number of awards shows and ceremonies.  She attended numerous Weinstein Company events and also starred in Weinstein’s movies, notably The Butler, about a longtime White House staff member.  Yet she counts herself among the Hollywood elites who say they had no idea what Weinstein was up to.  Her silence made her one of Weinstein’s enablers, as she was with Bill Clinton.

At least one of Weinstein’s accusers, Kadian Noble, claims that Oprah was more than that:

An aspiring actress says Harvey Weinstein used Oprah Winfrey and Naomi Campbell to dupe her into thinking he would help her with her career – only to use her for sex.

British actress Kadian Noble said Tuesday she was head-over-heels impressed when she first met Weinstein at an event in London because he was hanging out with model Campbell and had megastar Oprah “swinging off his arm.”

“I thought, obviously, this man has something amazing in store for me,” she said during a teary-eyed press conference in Manhattan to discuss the sex trafficking lawsuit she filed a day earlier against Weinstein in Manhattan federal court.

If she runs for president thinking she can ride recent events in Hollywood and politics as a champion of women, Oprah will have to explain why such a powerful and self-made woman at least sat in stony silence as people like Bill Clinton and Harvey Weinstein preyed on the very women she claims to champion.

 

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/01/phantom_of_the_oprah.html

Ben Shapiro Reviews Politico Star of our Century’s Left, Oprah Winfrey

OPRAH WINFREY UBER ALLES!  Learn How to Speak YOUR Truth….To Hell with real Truth!

 

 

Bill Kristol….A Champion Judas of Today’s Democratic America

Follow the American  Brat our conservative  Judas Bill Kristol, as he bullies his noise entertaining the nations neofascists :

 

Why Do Leftists Flunk Science?

Today’s American noisiest Leftists are collectively  overwhelmingly feminists, especially the angry ditsy male haters, mobish racist blacks, illegal immigrants, devoted fascists, anarchists, and anti- JudeoChristian Jews.

Most are feminized indoor people printing  their hate signs, organizing their  hates and dates to cause America trouble especially at the nation’s  schools, universities, and in the courts,  the streets and parks.

How Do Liberals Flunk Science? Let Us Count the Ways.

by Trevor Thomas  at American Thinker:

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/01/how_do_liberals_flunk_science_let_us_count_the_ways.html

Why is the GOP Senate Abetting Fascist Schumer’s Sabotaging Trump’s DOJ Appointments?

SCHUMER SUCCEEDS IN OBSTRUCTING KEY DOJ NOMINEES

by Paul Mirengoff  at PowerLine:

The Washington Post reports that “nearly a year into President Trump’s administration, the Justice Department lacks Senate-confirmed appointees in leadership posts running the national security, criminal, civil rights and other key divisions.” “The problem shows no sign of abating anytime soon,” the Post adds.

The Post is correct. Not only are key leadership posts vacant, but it now appears they will remain vacant until at least the Spring.

Moreover, this creates a serious problem. William Barr, a former Attorney General told the Post that “anyone who has worked in an administration knows how damaging it is” not to have key leadership positions filled.

As the Post’s Matt Zapotosky notes, Republicans control the Senate. So why are these nominations languishing?

The primary reason is obstruction by Senate Democrats. They have used procedural tactics to delay the confirmation of President Trump’s nominees. Chuck Schumer admitted as much to the Post, defending his obstruction by pointing to “substantive concerns,” as if Republicans had no substantive concerns with Obama nominees who were confirmed more swiftly.

Schumer says there is no department that needs more scrutiny than the DOJ. Arguably. But when a nominee who name the president put forward many months ago has received a hearing and a committee vote, the Democrats have had a full opportunity scrutinize him.

Yet, a number of such nominees apparently are months away from confirmation. Why? As I understand it, the reason is because Majority Leader McConnell agreed with Schumer that nominees who cleared committee, without Democratic support must be voted out of committee again — surely, a pointless exercise. Since Democrats declined to vote for most of President Trump’s key DOJ nominees when they were approved by he Senate Judiciary Committee, this means more delay.

Schumer told the Post “there is bipartisan opposition to many of the nominees due to the lack of independence that many of the nominees and appointees have demonstrated.” Rubbish. Most of these nominees cleared committee on a straight party line vote. These nominees are being held up not because of “bipartisan opposition,” but because Schumer has succeeded in stalling the process.

Meanwhile, Chai Feldblum, the main architect of President Obama’s radical LGBT policy, apparently is on the fast track to confirmation for a third term as EEOC commissioner. Naturally, she encountered no Democratic opposition and, I gather, no Republican on the Health Education, Labor & Pensions Committee has opposed her, either.

Thus, as I understand it, Feldblum’s nomination can proceed to the Senate floor without delay. Indeed, she is sufficiently confident about her prospects for prompt confirmation to have removed the obligatory picture of President Trump from her office.

It seems inconceivable that, with a Republican in the White House and a GOP majority in the Senate, a left-wing LBGT activist could be sailing towards confirmation as EEOC commissioner, while a host of Republican nominees to vital positions at the DOJ are cooling their heels, waiting to get through committee a second time with no full Senate vote in sight. Yet, that appears to be the situation.

Chuck Schumer is earning his pay. Senate Republicans, not so much.

Rip off at the Wall Street Journal

The HATE TRUMP WALL STREET JOURNAL

I haven’t monkeyed with the Stock Market since its collapse in 2007 I think it was.   I have never liked things Wall Street.  It’s a world that doesn’t give a damn about cultural freedom, private enterprise, and   free people.   It has destroyed much of our American middle class by destroying free enterprise by selling global profits for the rich.

In my lifetime where I lived here in Minnesota’s Twin Cities, Negro Americans in the North, if not  the segregated South, owned  nearly all of the corner shoe shops, grocery stores, tailor shops, liquor stores, bakeries,  bars, barber shops, dime stores, and such in the communities where they lived.  (I’m not sure about drugstores!)

Big Business’s “private enterprise” of corporate America destroyed all of that by  the 1990s.

Children had mothers and fathers.   Nearly every family went to Church on Sundays! ……..and no one cursed in school or in public!   (Until about 1950 ladies usually wore spiffy clothing and hats with veils when they went downtown to shop.)

Big Business,  Big Left, and Big University destroyed all of that by the turn of the century.  Americans got fatter big time, slobbier of dress and language, and more ignorant of knowledge ever since.   Feminism and fascism began to replace Americana……and more recently black racism and California’s Sanctuary State.

During this collapse of America the civilized, I became a Reagan Republican after a quarter century of voting and volunteering for the once  civilized Hubert Humphrey Democrat Party.   Being male, not female, I was and still am, a devotee of freedom, truth,  free enterprise, and especially  schooling based upon seeking truth through knowledge, a concept quite obtuse among today’s fascist Dem feminists.

Newspapers began to fall apart both in truth-telling, number of independents,  and size.   As in Communist Soviet Union, leftists infiltrated to sell their poisons.  In our Trump time, communication in our America is overwhelmingly One Party Leftism led by the overwhelming majority of Democrats and about only 2/3rds of the Wall Street Journal editors……Collectively, they all hate Our America’s 45th President, Donald J. Trump.

A human creep, noted leftist Michael Wolff of pen and greed, “was allowed to lurk around the White House for something like six months, presumably because someone in the first days of Donald Trump’s administration thought he would write a sympathetic account.”…….according to Barton Swaim in his Bookshelf article, “The Hour of the Wolff” in today’s Wall Street Journal.  He writes, “in one sense, Fire and Fury is a typical piece of “access journalism” as it’s known, like many titles by Bob Woodward or, on the more gossipy side, like the “Game Change” books by Mark Halperin and John Heilemann.   Mr. Wolff takes the genre to another level, and perhaps a lower level.  If he has employed objective criteria for deciding what to include or exclude, it’s no clear what those criteria are.  By  the looks of it, he included any story, so long as it was juicy.  We’re told, for instance, of Mr. Trump’s  supposed method of bedding other men’s wives in his prepresidential days…..” and so on……

Swaim repeats the lists of garbage Wolff scatters like Spring seed to remind Trump haters the lists of evils the President is supposed to have committed ala the Jeb Bush family and others.

I started reading newspapers that June of the Battle of Midway.   I was seriously dyslexic, but back then no one knew what that was.  I couldn’t read novels beyond two paragraphs, but  I could already read newspapers, especially the war headlines, maps, photos,  cutlines and even articles of the St. Paul Pioneer Press  Sunday  rotogravure sections covering the war.   I remember  bombing my toy ships with my Christmas present  B-24  in the our  half acre Victory Garden across the alley I was in charge of.  Two cousins had  already joined the Navy.   I knew they were in the Pacific front somewhere.

After the war when I entered college,  I learned that President Roosevelt had enjoyed the comfort of a mistress rather than with Eleanor, the mother of his several children.  He and she were wealthy, very wealthy, and from New York.  In April of 1945, he died in her arms….or something close to that…as it was never announced for public interest until decades later.   Apparently, among the Roosevelt class, Democrat and Republican, except for Hollywood folks as today,  such male behavior was taboo.  Only very, very wealthy, usually well known gals, would fly off to Reno for a divorce.

Where I lived in St. Paul  from age two in  1936 to 1954, of the 28 families living on both sides  of the street, all but two households had children still at home….about 30 altogether.   Twenty eight  were practicing Christian families;  two Jewish.

No one swore in public.   No one swore beyond “darn” whether at home or in public.   (I went to a mixed white-Negro high school from grade nine to graduation as a senior.  Swearing in public was unheard of at that school or on its grounds.

Folks respected a concept of God, of goodness, then.   We lived in  a neighborhood.

Barton Swaim’s article would never have hit the streets including  the news stands.

Republicans, news folks of any Party, a reporter from any newspaper,  couldn’t, didn’t bribe Franklin Delano Roosevelt or anyone else for “infidelities”.   The country was “God-fearing” then.

To what length did Republicans attack John F. Kennedy for this weekly sessions with Mafioso females for “pain relief”?   And he was civilized unlike so many, if not all Democrats in Congress today!