• Pragerisms

    For a more comprehensive list of Pragerisms visit
    Dennis Prager Wisdom.

    • "The left is far more interested in gaining power than in creating wealth."
    • "Without wisdom, goodness is worthless."
    • "I prefer clarity to agreement."
    • "First tell the truth, then state your opinion."
    • "Being on the Left means never having to say you're sorry."
    • "If you don't fight evil, you fight gobal warming."
    • "There are things that are so dumb, you have to learn them."
  • Liberalism’s Seven Deadly Sins

    • Sexism
    • Intolerance
    • Xenophobia
    • Racism
    • Islamophobia
    • Bigotry
    • Homophobia

    A liberal need only accuse you of one of the above in order to end all discussion and excuse himself from further elucidation of his position.

  • Glenn’s Reading List for Die-Hard Pragerites

    • Bolton, John - Surrender is not an Option
    • Bruce, Tammy - The Thought Police; The New American Revolution; The Death of Right and Wrong
    • Charen, Mona - DoGooders:How Liberals Hurt Those They Claim to Help
    • Coulter, Ann - If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans; Slander
    • Dalrymple, Theodore - In Praise of Prejudice; Our Culture, What's Left of It
    • Doyle, William - Inside the Oval Office
    • Elder, Larry - Stupid Black Men: How to Play the Race Card--and Lose
    • Frankl, Victor - Man's Search for Meaning
    • Flynn, Daniel - Intellectual Morons
    • Fund, John - Stealing Elections
    • Friedman, George - America's Secret War
    • Goldberg, Bernard - Bias; Arrogance
    • Goldberg, Jonah - Liberal Fascism
    • Herson, James - Tales from the Left Coast
    • Horowitz, David - Left Illusions; The Professors
    • Klein, Edward - The Truth about Hillary
    • Mnookin, Seth - Hard News: Twenty-one Brutal Months at The New York Times and How They Changed the American Media
    • Morris, Dick - Because He Could; Rewriting History
    • O'Beirne, Kate - Women Who Make the World Worse
    • Olson, Barbara - The Final Days: The Last, Desperate Abuses of Power by the Clinton White House
    • O'Neill, John - Unfit For Command
    • Piereson, James - Camelot and the Cultural Revolution: How the Assassination of John F. Kennedy Shattered American Liberalism
    • Prager, Dennis - Think A Second Time
    • Sharansky, Natan - The Case for Democracy
    • Stein, Ben - Can America Survive? The Rage of the Left, the Truth, and What to Do About It
    • Steyn, Mark - America Alone
    • Stephanopolous, George - All Too Human
    • Thomas, Clarence - My Grandfather's Son
    • Timmerman, Kenneth - Shadow Warriors
    • Williams, Juan - Enough: The Phony Leaders, Dead-End Movements, and Culture of Failure That Are Undermining Black America--and What We Can Do About It
    • Wright, Lawrence - The Looming Tower

Hillary’s Deplorables! Get to Know America’s FASCISTIC “Democrat” Party BETTER!

HAPPY NEW YEAR!

“Wikipedia”     It first should be note that despite its leftists’ claims, Wikipedia is a left wing propaganda “station” from “stark” to mild, from landslide to swamp.

Why?      Wikipedia is an indoor class,  a remote  Hillary class of our America….a very narrow minded, inexperienced,  and school programmed  bunch of   fanatics who disparage humans who “aren’t up to knowing  “Hillary” stuff and snuff.   In today’s Wikiepedia America this stuff and snuff  appear in all sorts of costumes, shapes, colors, sexes, and Godless sizes selling Fascism, Marxism, Leftism, Atheism, Communism, and Feminism of all shapes and sizes, sexes and colors at school, university, on television and throughout your daily newspaper often conveying  Washington Post, Los Angeles,  and New York Times fake news.

Please read the Wikileaks report below regarding the “Hillary” review of those of us who dare to offend Hillary’s deplorable elites….

Hillary Speaks from Wikileaks:

“But the “other” basket — the other basket — and I know because I look at this crowd I see friends from all over America here: I see friends from Florida and Georgia and South Carolina and Texas and — as well as, you know, New York and California — but that “other” basket of people are people who feel the government has let them down, the economy has let them down, nobody cares about them, nobody worries about what happens to their lives and their futures; and they’re just desperate for change. It doesn’t really even matter where it comes from. They don’t buy everything he says, but — he seems to hold out some hope that their lives will be different. They won’t wake up and see their jobs disappear, lose a kid to heroin, feel like they’re in a dead-end. Those are people we have to understand and empathize with as well.

— Hillary Clinton, [9]

also from Wikileaks:

Basket of deplorables” is a phrase from a 2016 presidential election campaign speech delivered by Democraticnominee Hillary Clinton on September 9, 2016, at a campaign fundraising event, which Clinton used to describe a faction of supporters of her general election opponent, Republican nominee Donald Trump. Clinton later said that she “regrets saying half [of Trump’s supporters]”, and the Trump campaign repeatedly used the phrase against her during and after the 2016 presidential election. Many Trump supporters adopted the “Deplorable” moniker for themselves. After Clinton’s loss, some journalists and political analysts questioned whether or not the speech played a role in the election’s outcome; Clinton herself wrote in her book What Happened that it was one of the factors for her loss.

Background[edit]

Throughout her presidential campaign, Hillary Clinton expressed her concerns regarding Donald Trump and his supporters. The New York Times and CNN cited Clinton’s earlier articulation of similar ideas to the phrase in her August 25, 2016 campaign speech at a rally in Reno, Nevada.[1][2] In that speech, Clinton had criticized Trump’s campaign for using “racist lies” and allowing the alt-right to gain prominence, claiming that Trump was “taking hate groups mainstream and helping a radical fringe take over the Republican Party”.[2][3] Clinton also criticized Trump for choosing Steve Bannon as his chief executive officer, especially given Bannon’s role as the executive chair of the conservative news website, Breitbart News.[4] Clinton read various headlines from the site including: “Would You Rather Your Child Had Feminism or Cancer?”, and “Hoist It High And Proud: The Confederate Flag Proclaims A Glorious Heritage.”[5] On that same day, Clinton posted a video on Twitter depicting white supremacists supporting Donald Trump. Within the video is a CNNinterview wherein Trump initially declined to disavow white nationalist David Duke.[4]

During campaign fundraisers in August 2016, Clinton reportedly explained her divide and conquer approach to courting Republican voters by putting Trump supporters into two “baskets”: everyday Republicans whom she would target, and the alt-right crowd.[6] During a September 8, 2016 interview on Israel’s Channel 2, Clinton said: “You can take Trump supporters and put them in two big baskets. There are what I would call the deplorables—you know, the racists and the haters, and the people who are drawn because they think somehow he’s going to restore an America that no longer exists.”[7]

At an LGBT campaign fundraising event in New York City on September 9, Clinton gave a speech and said the following:[8]

I know there are only 60 days left to make our case — and don’t get complacent; don’t see the latest outrageous, offensive, inappropriate comment and think, “Well, he’s done this time.” We are living in a volatile political environment.

You know, to just be grossly generalistic, you could put half of Trump’s supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables(Laughter/applause)Right? (Laughter/applause) They’re racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic — Islamophobic — you name it. And unfortunately, there are people like that. And he has lifted them up. He has given voice to their websites that used to only have 11,000 people — now have 11 million. He tweets and retweets their offensive hateful mean-spirited rhetoric. Now, some of those folks — they are irredeemable, but thankfully, they are not America.

But the “other” basket — the other basket — and I know because I look at this crowd I see friends from all over America here: I see friends from Florida and Georgia and South Carolina and Texas and — as well as, you know, New York and California — but that “other” basket of people are people who feel the government has let them down, the economy has let them down, nobody cares about them, nobody worries about what happens to their lives and their futures; and they’re just desperate for change. It doesn’t really even matter where it comes from. They don’t buy everything he says, but — he seems to hold out some hope that their lives will be different. They won’t wake up and see their jobs disappear, lose a kid to heroin, feel like they’re in a dead-end. Those are people we have to understand and empathize with as well.

— Hillary Clinton, [9]
Advertisements

America’s Rogues at MSNBC, 2017…..where People are Not Okay!

WORST OF MSNBC 2017

by Scott Johnson at PowerLine:

Washington Free Beacon managing editor David Rutz looks back on 2017 at MSNBC in the supercuts video below. He presents it as his fifth annual nod to the worst MSNBC had to offer this year (in only three minutes?). It ends with a bang, so to speak.

“In 2017,” he writes, “the poor folks at the left-leaning cable affiliate had to lean forward into covering undivided Republican government for the first time in more than a decade. Ratings were up, for sure, but so was the heat level of the takes leveled from morning to night.”

I’m filing this one under Laughter is the Best Medicine.

(Please click below for a good look and hearing at Leftist America’s   Auld Lang Syne studio of screwball characters drunk on fascism:)

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2017/12/worst-of-msnbc-2017.php

Troubles at the Fascistic Washington Post

PANIC AT THE WASHINGTON POST

by Paul Mirengoff   at PowerLine:

“The Washington Post is worried. The lead headline in today’s paper edition reads: “Mueller criticism grows to a clamor — FBI Conspiracy Claim Takes Hold — Driven by activists, GOP lawmakers, Trump tweets.”

Turnabout is fair play. Last year around this time, an honest newspaper could easily have written: “Trump criticism grows to a clamor — Russia Collusion Takes Hold — Driven by activists, Democratic lawmakers, leaks.”

A year ago, an honest newspaper could not have written that the Trump collusion criticism was driven by the FBI. The facts supporting such a headline were not known. Now we have good reason to suspect that the FBI was, in fact, advancing the collusion claim.

The FBI reportedly offered money to Christoper Steele to continue his work on the anti-Trump dossier (in testimony before Congress Rod Rosenstein refused to say whether the FBI paid or offered to pay for the dossier). The FBI may well have used information in the dossier to secure approval of surveillance efforts from the FISA court.

The FBI also helped push the dossier into the public’s consciousness. Its general counsel, James Baker, reportedly told reporter David Corn about the dossier, thus enabling Corn to write about it just before the election. And FBI director Comey briefed president-elect Trump on the dossier, which led to publication of its contents by BuzzFeed.

We also know about the quest of Peter Strzok, a high-level FBI man, for an “insurance policy” against a Trump presidency.

But let’s return to the Washington Post’s story about growing criticism of Mueller. The three distressed Post writers are less than fully open when it comes to informing readers what — other than activists, GOP lawmakers, and Trump tweets — is causing criticism of Mueller to grow to a clamor.

They acknowledge that it has something to do with Strzok’s role as Mueller’s former top investigator. However, they do their best to make Strzok seem innocuous.

The story introduces him by noting that he called Trump an “idiot” and predicted that Hillary Clinton would win the election in a landslide — statements that don’t distinguish him from tens of thousands of government employees and millions of other Americans. They also quote a former colleague of Strzok who says:

To think Pete could not do his job objectively shows no understanding of the organization. We have Democrats, we have Republicans, we have conservatives and liberals. . . . Having personal views doesn’t prevent us from independently following the facts.

The problem with peddling this happy narrative is that it ignores Strzok’s anti-Trump zeal, his obvious desire to impress his mistress, and his damning statement about the need for an “insurance policy” against Trump becoming president. The Post, in fact, never mentions that statement.

The Post also manages to ignore the hyper-partisan nature of Mueller’s staff, even excluding Strzok, whom he reassigned. There is a passing reference to Andrew Weissmann’s gushing note to Sally Yates praising her for her resistance to Trump, but no discussion of the ideologically one-sided composition of Team Mueller — a marked contrast to Ken Starr’s balanced staff.

Even with that diverse staff, Starr was successfully portrayed as spearheading a “vast right-wing conspiracy.” It’s not surprising that as more and more evidence emerges of bias within Mueller’s team, criticism mounts and takes hold.

Mueller himself is a Republican. But he is also a friend of James Comey, another fact the Post ignores. The steady stream of evidence of Comey’s anti-Trump animus and manipulative conduct has contributed to declining faith in Mueller.

And then, there’s the fact that Mueller appears to have come up empty so far on “collusion” by Trump. A prosecutor investigating a president is bound to lose credibility if, after an extended period of time, he neither produces evidence against the president nor exonerates him of the set of crimes that supposedly underlie the investigation.

A prosecutor who cannot credibly be accused of bias — either personal or within his team — buys himself time and patience from the public. Mueller is not that prosecutor.

In sum, the Post’s account of how Mueller lost the “near-universal support” he enjoyed earlier is shallow.

The Post’s story is significant, nonetheless. Clearly, the Post is concerned that, as it states, the growing criticism of Mueller “threatens to shadow his investigation’s eventual findings.”

It does, indeed. A recent Harvard poll found that 54 percent of voters believe that “as the former head of the FBI and a friend of James Comey,” Mueller has a conflict of interest in the proceedings. Meanwhile, only 35 percent believe that evidence of collusion between Trump and Russia has been found.

I’m sure Mueller believes his own press-clippings, but the public no longer does. The press, it seems, is beginning to realize this.”

America’s Mobs of Leftists Attack Bible Museum

People are Mad the Museum of the Bible Represents ‘Only a Judeo-Christian Perspective’

Apparently they miss that it’s called the Museum of the Bible.

(Article sent by Mark Waldeland:)

Apparently they miss that it’s called the Museum of the Bible.

Life sized sculptures of Galileo, right, and George Washington Carver, center, at an exhibit showing biblical influence on science at the Museum of the Bible which opens to the public today on November, 18, 2017 in Washington, DC.

By   (Article sent by Mark Waldeland:)

Some people have voiced frustration with the fact that the Museum of the Bible only represents a “Judeo-Christian” perspective and leaves out other religions Friday.

These critics say the Museum of the Bible, within walking distance from the National Mall in Washington, D.C., doesn’t reflect other religious point of views, such as an Islamic one, and also singularly focuses on American Protestantism, reports The New York Times. One professor also critiqued the museum for not telling viewers which areas in the Bible are historically accurate or not.

“There are a number of prominent omissions that make it clear that it’s not a museum of the Bible as one might imagine it from a secular perspective. They don’t do a good job of talking about whether parts of the Bible are historically accurate,” Joel S. Baden, Yale University’s professor of the Hebrew Bible, told the outlet. Baden also disagreed with the lack of representation of Islam and Mormonism in the Museum of the Bible.

Help us champion truth, freedom, limited government and human dignity.Support The Stream »

The Museum of the Bible, with six floors of religious pieces, opened Saturday to the public. Described as a “must see” museum of 2017 by the Smithsonian Institute, the museum offers viewers the opportunity to see some of the earliest Bibles made in the United States, as well as witnessing an Israeli scribe working on a Torah and parts of the Dead Sea Scrolls. Hobby Lobby CEO Steven Green founded the museum and set up the foundation that would fund the $500 million project.

Please read on:

https://stream.org/people-mad-bible-museum-represents-judeo-christian-perspective/

Democrats Lie as a Habit! After all, They are Fascist Socialists Now

What is an Obama and/or Post Obama Democrat title these days of Leftism and it Black racist, Feminazi, Open Borders, and atheistic,   New York Times’ “University” America?

In “TRUTH”,  Truth is not a highly valued virtue among our contemporary American feminist of all sexes, races, shapes and sizes.    Please read Kirsten Gillibrand “change of heart”, now that that pair of  Clinton creeps of endless descriptions have become losers.    Do read anything Hillary….or watch her every move or listen to her noise at nearly anytime.   What about Hillary’s New York residue in the U.S. Senate up to these days?

KIRSTEN GILLIBRAND’S INTELLECTUAL DISHONESTY [UPDATED]

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, who holds the seat formerly occupied by Hillary Clinton, said today that Bill Clinton should have resigned the presidency after his inappropriate relationship with Monica Lewinsky came to light. That’s mighty enlightened of her.

But what took her so long to reach, or articulate, this view? The answer is, it took the fall of Clintons plus a crucial Senate race in which the Republican is being accused of serious sexual misconduct.

We know that Gillibrand would never have called out Bill Clinton if he still wielded influence. We know this because she didn’t when he did. To the contrary, just last year, she wrote: “I. . .was truly honored that President Bill Clinton campaigned for me in my first run for Congress in 2006.”

Attempting to explain her alleged change of heart about Clinton, Gillibrand said: “Things have changed today, and I think under those circumstances there should be a very different reaction.” This dodge is unpersuasive, as I argued at length here.”

(There’s more.  Please read on below!)

 

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2017/11/kristen-gillibrands-intellectual-dishonesty.php

The Disappearance of the American Woman

My girl friend and I got married “last” May 25, 1957.  She was a wonderful young American woman who had a brain.

I had long been worried about ‘love’.  My own parents were married August 21, 1929.  No such couple could have surpassed my dad’s adoration of my Mother, and my Mothers’ love for my dad.   They met during the ballroom dancing competition craze of the early 1920s, at first as competitors and then dance partners.

Mother was also a competitive speed skater.  Dad played competitive softball until he was in his upper 50s.   Middle and upper class women displayed elegance in those days, dressing up to go shopping, wearing beautiful hats “in public”….and never displayed fat.  Americans went to Church in those days.   They reached adulthood at about age 17….and married by age 21…..Divorces were unheard of until after the War was well over.

No one swore in public.  Well learned  adult women, nearly all old maids, were in charge of elementary schools, K through 8th grade in St. Paul, Minnesota where I lived in those days.   The Second World War had just ended.   Edwin Stull and Milton John, survivors of the  front of World War II battle were the first male teachers in our public school.   They were awkward in class,  no match as teachers.   They had only 3 years to study “learnings”  under the GI Bill to help battle front warriors return to real life and earn a living.

At age twelve after my daily afternoon paper route starting in May I began to explore the wider world around my neighborhood.   Real slums existed then in a part of downtown St. Paul.   White families with kids lived along crowded  blocks South of the State Capitol;  Negro families along  crowded blocks East of the same State Capitol.   I was born to explore the world around me.

My path to these communities was the same each time, in all about 20 ‘visits’ that Spring and Summer.  I NEVER was accosted, even worried for a second, never approached by anyone even when I was the only white animal to be seen for blocks.  Fear never entered my mind….After all, I lived in a JudeoChristian country, of the Ten Commandments  I was taught.

I was a boy.  I wanted to explore.  My only worry was to return home before my Mother arrived from work.

Mother worked at my dad’s drug store every day  until 6:30 PM.  I’d finish my afternoon  paper route by four and take a Randolph-Hazel Park streetcar downtown to begin my trek…..walking up Wabasha Avenue to the Capitol, explore the Capitol, and then move on through the Capitol basement to the East exit, where I entered   a different country……an entirely Negro community around Mechanic Arts High School.  For these  twenty visits  that Spring and Summer I explored each time on a dime and “transfer” streetcar fee  for an hour and a half visit and return home before Mom got off work.  (I never got caught!

The culture  was civilized then.  People believed in God and knew the consequences of performing evil.

Eleven years later, I got married to the  valedictorian of her high school, a classmate I met at the University of Minnesota, where she graduated with honors.

Feminism hadn’t been born yet.  There was no Betty Friedan or Gloria Steinem then.   Women, even the young ones, behaved civilized, spoke in high school  like classic  women, not like ditsy broads with their today’s puberty child  giggles performing television news, weather, whatever.  No one wore jeans in school.  Girls wore dresses and weren’t fat slobs.  They studied hard in the same classes as I, got better grades because they were better disciplined.  No one swore yet.   Cheating occurred rarely,  and even then,  almost only among a particular, very competitive group of students and a few girls.   We all learned respect for elders and ‘each other’, or else.

Most importantly we were taught KNOWLEDGE, then.  We were also taught how to be better Americans now living in a world with atomic weapons.

My wife had gone to a similar school system, but in Minneapolis.

We had three wonderful children and then feminism arrived.   We divorced civilly  in our 34th year when the culture began to fall apart.   We both fell apart from each other…..each at fault, alone unto ourselves…..I, an American, she as a feminist.

Feminism is a disorder, a social and sexual disease culturally  come to replace Truth and JudeoChristianity.   Today’s American irreligious  human seems to have slipped back into a more animalistic mass where learning knowledge has been   replaced by feminists’ feelings and moods and TREMENDOUS LOSS OF RESPECT.

Think of all the “women”, the human female animals, American and otherwise, who have claimed sexual “disrespect” from male animals  like Harvey Weinstein to hang around and pretend it was all ‘put upon’…..or the names of six women who 38 years after their claimed event of a males mishandling,  have been awakened by leftist political agents hoping to use them to win elections…A VERY, VERY MODERN DAY, DEMOCRAT PARTY MANEUVER.

The worst mass sexist aggressor in the known American political world is a man named William Jefferson Clinton from Hope, Arkansas, the husband of feminist Hillary, the HERO of the American feminazi movement wing of the Modern American Socialist-Marxist Party recently run by Marxist, black racist political man,  Barack Hussein Obama…..and the overwhelmingly Leftist American press led by PBS, NBC, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, the nation’s universities.

Where am I wrong, folks.   Where are the women worth defending and dying for as a class?   any in your neighborhood?….as teachers teaching  in your local elementary and secondary school?…..or at the University of Missouri, at Harvard, at Yale, at California at Berkeley?….. the dozens of  reporters even a Fox who preach feminazi and other extreme rules of fascist future, and those  who act like Howard Kurtz?

Fascists Oppose Dennis Prager Speaking at University of Wyoming

Our Dennis Prager is scheduled to speak at the University of Wyoming this evening.

These days there is a wave of fascism covering American universities from coast to coast, the vast majority led by feminists of all sexes, colors, shapes and sizes.  “It is our day to run the American show”,  they chant.   Like most fascist movements, truth has no meaning beyond expediency  especially these days of  feminist movements now dominating the political scene the American social science  and “education” studies at university these days.

Learning about  American and World History  is  no longer available in our schools.  It was taught “too male” and by males  in those old days of masculine domination at university, feminists devine.

I attended school throughout the World War II years, the years of the advance of Soviet, Chinese and Cuban Communism, the Mother years of America as a world power, the time  I call the zenith of America soul and culture, when children had real mothers and real fathers, families had close relatives and knew their neighbors, and our people knew well, the differences between right and wrong.

Our teachers and professors of that time were very, very well educated, devoted to learning and teaching knowledge and deeply believed in an American soul based on JudeoChristianity in which the undivorced family was the “glue”, and the church,  synagogue, and school,   the “cover”  of  the books of knowledge the collection of which, if studied,  would make each citizen, and therefore, the nation,  closer to God’s Truth.

It led to the rise of the  Martin Luther King movement.

There is a major war in our American schools  today…. where preaching “feelings”  rather than seeking Truth, by accumulating  knowledge seems to be nurtured, even flourishing  at our American school and university from coast to coast.   Much of it spouts from  a feminist movement to replace the male, and therefore the ancient male drive   to  expand learnings, accumulating   knowledge, and seeking  truth for survival in a better world in the name of EQUALITY to replace both Truth and Knowledge.  It will make populations  feel better.

This fascist movement at the University of Wyoming  forbidding our Dennis Prager to speak openly and freely was led, apparently, by feminist Hunter MacFarland.  She declined to speak with Dennis about her reasons for the ban.   Instead, Austin Morgan took her place.

Fascism is alive and well at today’s feminized university and public schools.

Dennis interviews Austin Morgan to discover why his presence at the University of Wyoming should be banned: