• Pragerisms

    For a more comprehensive list of Pragerisms visit
    Dennis Prager Wisdom.

    • "The left is far more interested in gaining power than in creating wealth."
    • "Without wisdom, goodness is worthless."
    • "I prefer clarity to agreement."
    • "First tell the truth, then state your opinion."
    • "Being on the Left means never having to say you're sorry."
    • "If you don't fight evil, you fight gobal warming."
    • "There are things that are so dumb, you have to learn them."
  • Liberalism’s Seven Deadly Sins

    • Sexism
    • Intolerance
    • Xenophobia
    • Racism
    • Islamophobia
    • Bigotry
    • Homophobia

    A liberal need only accuse you of one of the above in order to end all discussion and excuse himself from further elucidation of his position.

  • Glenn’s Reading List for Die-Hard Pragerites

    • Bolton, John - Surrender is not an Option
    • Bruce, Tammy - The Thought Police; The New American Revolution; The Death of Right and Wrong
    • Charen, Mona - DoGooders:How Liberals Hurt Those They Claim to Help
    • Coulter, Ann - If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans; Slander
    • Dalrymple, Theodore - In Praise of Prejudice; Our Culture, What's Left of It
    • Doyle, William - Inside the Oval Office
    • Elder, Larry - Stupid Black Men: How to Play the Race Card--and Lose
    • Frankl, Victor - Man's Search for Meaning
    • Flynn, Daniel - Intellectual Morons
    • Fund, John - Stealing Elections
    • Friedman, George - America's Secret War
    • Goldberg, Bernard - Bias; Arrogance
    • Goldberg, Jonah - Liberal Fascism
    • Herson, James - Tales from the Left Coast
    • Horowitz, David - Left Illusions; The Professors
    • Klein, Edward - The Truth about Hillary
    • Mnookin, Seth - Hard News: Twenty-one Brutal Months at The New York Times and How They Changed the American Media
    • Morris, Dick - Because He Could; Rewriting History
    • O'Beirne, Kate - Women Who Make the World Worse
    • Olson, Barbara - The Final Days: The Last, Desperate Abuses of Power by the Clinton White House
    • O'Neill, John - Unfit For Command
    • Piereson, James - Camelot and the Cultural Revolution: How the Assassination of John F. Kennedy Shattered American Liberalism
    • Prager, Dennis - Think A Second Time
    • Sharansky, Natan - The Case for Democracy
    • Stein, Ben - Can America Survive? The Rage of the Left, the Truth, and What to Do About It
    • Steyn, Mark - America Alone
    • Stephanopolous, George - All Too Human
    • Thomas, Clarence - My Grandfather's Son
    • Timmerman, Kenneth - Shadow Warriors
    • Williams, Juan - Enough: The Phony Leaders, Dead-End Movements, and Culture of Failure That Are Undermining Black America--and What We Can Do About It
    • Wright, Lawrence - The Looming Tower

Jewish Leftist Senator Feinstein Allergic to Roman Catholics, Christians in the Judiciary?

Feinstein was born Dianne Emiel Goldman in San Francisco, to Betty (née Rosenburg), a former model, and Leon Goldman, a surgeon. Feinstein’s paternal grandparents were Jewishimmigrants from Poland. Her maternal grandparents, the Rosenburg family, were from Saint Petersburg, Russia.

2 Democrat Senators Show Hostility to Religion in Questions for Judicial Nominee

article by Tiffany Bates at the Daily Signal:        (article sent by Lisa Rich)

“Do you consider yourself an orthodox Catholic?” is an unusual and inappropriate question for a senator to ask a judicial nominee. In fact, the Constitution forbids it.

But that didn’t stop Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., from probing Notre Dame Law professor Amy Coney Barrett about her faith. Sen. Dianne Feinstein. D-Calif., also chided Barrett for being a practicing Catholic, proclaiming, “The dogma lives loudly within you, and that’s of concern.”

Both senators appear to have forgotten Article VI’s admonition that “no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Officer or public Trust under the United States.”

The senators’ hostility to religion was loudly on display as Barrett and Michigan Supreme Court Justice Joan Larsen appeared before the Senate Judiciary Committee Wednesday, having been nominated by the president to fill two federal appellate vacancies.

Americans need an alternative to the mainstream media. But this can’t be done alone. Find out more >>

President Donald Trump nominated Larsen for the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Michigan and Barrett for the 7th Circuit in Indiana. Both women have faced bitter scrutiny from the left. This makes sense, as both are brilliant, young, conservative, and female, making them serious contenders for a future Supreme Court vacancy.

After a delay, Democratic senators from both Michigan and Indiana have returned the nominees’ blue slips, allowing their nominations to move forward.

But just who are Larsen and Barrett?

Joan Larsen

It came as no surprise when Trump tapped Larsen for a seat on the 6th Circuit. She was one of 21 individuals on the list of judicial rock stars he used to fill the last Supreme Court vacancy.

A graduate of Northwestern University Law School, Larsen clerked for Judge David Sentelle on the D.C. Circuit and for Justice Antonin Scalia on the Supreme Court. When asked what it was like to be a woman clerking for Scalia, she has often quipped, “Much like being a man clerking for him.”

In 1998, Larsen became an adjunct professor at the University of Michigan Law School, where she taught constitutional law, criminal procedure, presidential power, and statutory interpretation.

Her academic career was interrupted by brief stints in private practice and as a deputy assistant attorney general in the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel.

In September 2015, Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder appointed her to the state Supreme Court. Although Larsen has a relatively thin judicial record due to her short tenure on the court, she has made her views about judging very clear.

When Snyder appointed her, she stated, “I believe in enforcing the laws as written by the legislature and signed by the governor. I don’t think judges are a policy-making branch of the government.”

This is right in line with how her former boss, Scalia, viewed judging. Shortly after Scalia’s death, she penned an op-ed for The New York Times in which she wrote: “Justice Scalia believed in one simple principle: That law came to the court as an is not an ought. Statutes, cases, and the Constitution were to be read for what they said, not for what the judges wished they would say.”

In her 2016 retention election, she again made her views clear, writing:

Judges are supposed to interpret the laws; they are not supposed to make them. The separation of powers, enshrined in both our national and state constitutions, protects the people’s right to self-governance by allowing the elected representatives of the people to make the laws. Judges, like everyone else, are bound by those laws and must faithfully interpret them rather than re-writing them from the bench. Judges, after all, are the public’s servants, not the public’s masters.

Larsen has received an outpouring of support for her nomination, including endorsement letters from 32 University of Michigan law professors and former colleagues and 29 former government officials and colleagues.

During the hearing, she faced questions about her time at the Department of Justice and about a controversial memo that set forth a justification for enhanced interrogation techniques, including waterboarding. But Larsen was not involved in researching or drafting that memo.

She also faced questions from senators about the role of legal precedents, as well as a 2004 law review article in which she criticized the use of foreign and international law in interpreting our Constitution.

Amy Coney Barrett

Like Larsen, Barrett has a sterling resume. After graduating from Rhodes College and Notre Dame Law School, Barrett clerked for Judge Laurence Silberman on the D.C. Circuit and for Scalia on the Supreme Court.

She then worked in private practice (where she was part of the team that represented George W. Bush in Bush v. Gore) before starting her career in academia, teaching briefly at George Washington University and the University of Virginia before joining the Notre Dame Law faculty in 2002.

She teaches constitutional law, federal courts, statutory interpretation, civil procedure, and evidence. Notre Dame twice recognized her as distinguished professor of the year.

Barrett is also a prolific writer, having published in leading law reviews across the country on topics including originalism, federal court jurisdiction, and the supervisory power of the Supreme Court.

In 2010, Chief Justice John Roberts appointed her to the Advisory Committee for the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, where she served for six years.

Barrett has robust bipartisan support from the legal community. Shortly after her nomination, endorsement letters poured in to the Judiciary Committee from lawyers across the political spectrum, including 450 former students49 Notre Dame law colleagues, and every fellow Supreme Court clerk that served with her.

The Judiciary Committee also received an endorsement letter from 73 law professors from across the country who called Barrett’s qualifications “first-rate,” including Neal Katyal, a prominent liberal who served as President Barack Obama’s acting solicitor general.

Barrett faced numerous questions about her writings, including her criticism of stare decisis or the role of precedent in judicial decision-making in certain circumstances.

For example, she has questioned the practice of judges relying on precedent when it conflicts with the original meaning of the Constitution’s text. Justice Clarence Thomas has also questioned the role of precedent in these circumstances.

She assured the committee, however, that as an appellate judge, she would follow all Supreme Court precedents, which are binding upon all lower court judges.

She also faced questions about a 1998 article that she co-authored as a law student, discussing Catholic judges participating in death penalty cases. In that article she considered situations in which the law and a judge’s religious faith conflict.

Senate Democrats attempted to distort her article, claiming she would put religious beliefs above the law. But in fact, she wrote, “The legal system has a solution for this dilemma—it allows (indeed it requires) the recusal of judges whose convictions keep them from doing their job.”

Barrett is not the first to broach this subject. Many Catholic judges have considered and written on this issue, including Judge William Pryor, who sits on the 11th Circuit, and Scalia.

Despite the tough questions they received, these two polished and accomplished women answered intelligently and gracefully. They both subscribed to the view that judges should not, under the guise of statutory or constitutional interpretation, impose their own policy preferences on the rest of society.

To date, the Senate has confirmed only six of Trump’s judicial nominees (including Justice Neil Gorsuch). But hearings are starting to pick up. Counting Larsen and Barrett, the Senate Judiciary Committee will hold hearings for six nominees this week.

With a stunning 162 current and known future vacancies and 32 nominees pending, let’s hope the Senate keeps it up.

http://dailysignal.com/2017/09/06/two-democrat-senators-show-hostility-to-religion-in-questions-for-judicial-nominee/?utm_source=TDS_Email

Advertisements

CFACT: President Trump Ends ObamaWar on Coal

Trump’s energy E.O.Glenn,

President Trump signed an executive order yesterday at EPA headquarters that begins the process of reforming President Obama’s global warming policy and ends the war on coal.

The executive order takes aim at Obama EPA’s Orwellian-named “Clean Power Plan” and also reopens some federal lands for energy production.

You can read President Trump’s full energy executive order and his full remarks at CFACT.org.

While this is encouraging news for American coal miners and those who get their electricity from existing coal plants, changing federal rules is a drawn-out process that will take months – and in some cases years. This order simply gets the process started.

In the meantime, this policy shift will assuredly not go unchallenged. Extremist environmental pressure groups are already chomping at the bit to take this latest executive action to court.

Their argument, though wrong-headed, is straightforward and simple: Because carbon dioxide is still considered a “pollutant” – courtesy of the EPA’s endangerment finding – government still has an obligation to curb it to protect public health. This, in addition to the fact the UN has garnered international support for global CO2 reductions, courtesy of the Paris accord, will likely score points with liberal justices.

That’s why it is crucial two other policy changes also be made to effectively reverse the damage caused by Obama’s global warming alarmist actions:

  1. Overturn the endangerment finding.
  2. Pull out of the Paris Agreement and end U.S. participation in UN climate negotiations.

America needs abundant, affordable energy to maintain domestic prosperity and for our industry to compete. Our competitors are not encumbering themselves by gutting their use of fossil fuels.

India is currently betting its economic growth on new coal power, Germany and Japan are investing heavily in coal as they (foolishly) move away from nuclear, with wind and solar too inefficient to fill the gap.  China continues to bring a coal plant on line every week.

The President’s decision was a good one for U.S. workers, consumers and even for the environment. Let’s keep the pressure on until a bright energy future for America is assured.
For nature and people too,
from Craig Rucker, Executive Director, CFACT

 

Clinton-Trump Debate Restaged but Gender-Swapped! Results Were Surprising!

Academics swapped gender of Trump, Clinton for restaged presidential debate and the results surprised them

by John Sexton   at HotAir:

“This is fascinating. A professor of economics named Maria Guadalupe was watching the presidential debates last year and had a thought. What if Trump were a woman and Hillary were a man? How would that change people’s perceptions of the exchanges in the debates?

With the help of Joe Salvatore, a professor who specializes in something called ethnodrama, Guadalupe set up a recreation of sections of the original debates using actors to play the roles of Trump, Clinton and the moderator. All the words the actors spoke were taken from transcripts. The candidates’ body language and delivery were studied and the actors did their best to match it moment-to-moment to video feeds from the actual debates. The only difference was that Donald Trump was now a woman renamed Brenda King while Hillary was now a man dubbed Jonathan Gordon.

Initially, both Guadalupe and Salvatore had little doubt what the experiment would reveal, i.e. Trump’s behavior would never be tolerated coming from a woman while Clinton’s competence would be even more obvious coming from a man. But as rehearsals for the performance of the reimagined debates went on, Guadalupe and Salvatore were surprised by what they were feeling about the two candidates. It turned out the woman version of Trump seemed more likable than they had imagined. Salvatore told Guadalupe during rehearsals, “I kind of want to have a beer with her!”

…….Please continue reading below:

http://hotair.com/archives/2017/03/07/academics-swapped-gender-of-trump-clinton-for-restaged-presidential-debate-and-the-results-surprised-them/

The Two Greatest American Frauds of My Lifetime: Today’s Democrat Party and Al Gore’s Global Warming Deception

Today  some sixty Democrat Congress people, mostly black racists of all colors, sexes, shapes, and sizes, have attempted to cleanse their social disorders by announcing they will not attend the Inauguration ceremonies this Friday congratulating the duly elected President, Donald J. Trump.    The ceremony has been important throughout American history….but today’s Americans under age 50 wouldn’t know anything about that.

Today’s Americans under age 25 don’t know where Canada is, what the supreme law of our land is, and what “tolerance” means.   They have been programmed by billionaires,  black racists, fanatic feminists,  socialists, anarchists, and an immigrant industry  to believe the country where they live is the source of all evil.     Ignorance is bliss, knowledge is not, has always been noise for  evil.

Until the end of World War II, Americans believed in God, a JudeoChristian one of a rather important Protestant flavor….”Ye shall be known by your Deeds”, meaning work hard, be honest, and “Do unto others as you’d have them do unto you”……and, above all, “There is no escaping from God.”   The nation was quite united in these matters.  It was a safe time to live in ones neighborhood.

And then, neighbors disappeared……classic learnings regarding right and wrong, truth and untruth, and knowing our past truthfully  began to disappear from schools.   Accomplishment was defeated by equality, Truth and knowledge by feelings, conservatives by leftists.   Sex meant male and female.

I live in Minnesota…..These days its winter season runs from November through March.  When I was young, back during the second World War, living in St. Paul at the time, winters ran from November through April….a truth of our matter of topic.

The Democratic Party was honorable then.   It was  more Roman Catholic than Protestant in those days, overwhelmingly  Jewish, and  usually the Party which collected the most recent immigrants.   Yet, regarding matters moral and  American, the two major parties  were on the same page.    No one born with six toes on one foot was elevated to Senate or House so they could represent  millions of the “misfit” for the Party.

Minnesotans were aware of glaciers then.   By fifth grade I knew….with pride, because the southern states couldn’t brag about glaciers….that where I lived in  Minnesota the Earth’s surface was more than 1,000 feet under ice around 12,000 years ago….and deeper many thousands of years before that phenomenon.

When in college I learned dinosaurs, including Tyrannosaurus Rex were running around the Dakotas and then some.    Fern trees were 150 feet tall.   CO2 was ten or more times higher then than it ‘runs’ today.

Today’s Democrats and other con-artists don’t believe in God anymore.   They believe in the gods of Global Warming Calamity…. that WHITE MEN, especially English speaking men and their inventions have caused this warming, a death to us all, if Americans don’t get rid of fossil fuels, a major cause in CO2 increase….

Democrat leftists  these days are indoor con-artists.   They don’t work outdoors.  It’s beneath their dignity.   They invade churches, schools, government offices, universities, the press and imprison their black voters to live in leftist  urban ghettos financed by leftists in trade for their vote come election day.

In the 18th century or so, the Baltic Sea froze up for awhile.   ConArtist Global Warming sleeze, Al Gore and his Democrat Party scam folks, hadn’t been born yet.   Locomotives hadn’t been borne yet either.

What knowledge  has been borne since then, however, is the discovery  that there has been a major war between Earth’s cold and heat about every ten thousand years,  less major wars between Earth’s cold and heat among centuries, and even moods of climatic changes within centuries.

That there are parts of this beautiful Earth in disarray due to human waste and carelessness are facts of life.   That  human male and female animals should be concerned about their contributions to Earth’s  disasters….OF COURSE!

That there has been a minor spike in global temperatures over the past half century is true.   It is also true that according to temperature records in Siberia, experts in these territories are forecasting dropping temperatures for at least a couple of human generations.

Democrats started their ‘leaving  the American way of things’ about a generation ago….coming up with the idea and politic of total open borders dependent upon their guile and  nurturing so that they would get lifetime credit and therefore political vote in their drive toward TOTALITARIANISM, when they wouldn’t have to worry ever again about the quality of representative or government in vogue.   They almost made it with Hillary this past November 8, 2016.    Thus far these people are making political success with the global warming lie, however.

Black man John Lewis earned hero worship fifty years ago in the struggle for a freer Alabama.  He was elevated to the American House of Representatives for his achievement and got fat, more  racist Democrat, and unAmerican in 1981 and again this year,  both times announcing the Republican Presidents weren’t worthy enough for the office in  his taste.

In 1981 he gathered no fellow racist companions.    Today, he has gathered around 60.

Again, ignorance is victorious here.   Democracy is a contentious, delicate, frail  kind of government behavior especially during a presidential season.   The Inauguration of the President has been an essential event to celebrate the future of  Democracy for the nation. People, not guns, decide the outcome of political battle no matter how bruising the political battle.   PEACE AND RECONCILIATION WOULD BE CELEBRATED BY CONGRESSMEN OF BOTH PARTIES  ATTENDING  THE INAUGURATION OF THE WINNING PARTY’S PRESIDENT.

I believe the racist organization, The Black Congressional Caucus is 100%  in favor of ‘banning’ global warming, with the ‘warming’ a result of  evil white Republicans doing evil things. Please learn all you can about the Truth of global warming….not the tyrannical left’s sale of it.

 

The Arrogance of the Hopeless Charles Krauthammer Clones

I used to be a loyal fan of Charles Krauthammer.   I used to view his performances on Fox and writings whereever, as a newsman seeking and selling Truth.    Arrogance always appeared to be a shadow surrounding  his verbal wisdom, but I cherished his observations nevertheless.

Charles Krauthammer, the preacher,  the PURE,  considers himself far superior to such an American citizen as Donald J. Trump, perhaps  learned from  his own Jewish upbringing or his intellectual isolation  pontificating in writings and starring on television marred and isolated from the realities of American life.

Our Donald J. Trump entered this most important election in my lifetime of 82 years, a former teacher of  social studies classes titled “Modern Problems” and of the Russian language.    I have followed American presidential elections closely since the Dewey loss to President Harry S. Truman in 1948.    I visited European USSR on two occasions, August, 1966 and October, 1990 when in command of the Russian  language and   have been a democrat all of my life.

Being a teacher of such and being taught to be a devoted democrat, by Church, school and university early in  my lifetime, all three seemingly in their death throes today, I learned from my experience teaching,  preaching  the ideals of a civilized and free society  does not come from THE  PURITY OF ONES PERSONAL MOODS and DOGMA,  as this arrogant, “Charles the Perfect”, so proudly  advertises himself.

I admit I was a Krauthammer clone about Our Donald until August 6, 2015 when Mr. Trump came under attack by the boring talk-alike Krauthammer clones running  the Republican debates this political season as well as running for the presidency of the nation.

Tolerant folks come in all colors, shapes, and sizes…..but not from feminists and fascists   who are driven to intolerance  by training  to make their unfollowers disappear forever by whatever means seems necessary.  In the beginning, lying is their most powerful weapon.

Hillary Roddham Clinton has been and has ripened in old age better than ever, to become the most evil, dishonest, conniving, lying  human animal ever to reach command from the nation’s Oval Office.   It is true Our Donald is not a politician having learned the preachings and deceits of leftists, the best liars in the political business and their conservative wannabees.

The nation is in crisis…..It’s religious character has already been made to disappear via our Hillary’s  “Democrat” George Soroses of the Democrat Party and the fascist social scientists  preaching hate-JudeoChristians and the like in social science departments and “studies” at  university.

“Charles, the Very Proud” has  announced it is beneath his pants to vote for Donald J. Trump, because…….?   He deems Hillary and Our Donald are clones of evil.

Paul Mirengoff at PowerLine has also been consistently “anti to nonTrump” in his resumes of those candidates running for our nation’s presidency as Republicans.

Please read the following article regarding Trump as a “conventional thinker”:

Is Donald Trump a conventional thinker?

It’s the Same Donald Trump Who Loves His Country, but Better Organized

Ross Kaminsky of the American Spectator has written the following paragraphs below this commentary  with the title “Where Has This Trump Been?”

This Trump has been the same American Donald Trump all along since announcing his candidacy for the US presidency last summer…..as a noted  and very successful American citizen worried about the Obama-Hillary befouled condition of his country…a REAL AMERICAN profoundly worried about the terrible condition of our Obama country TODAY and horrified by the likelihood  corrupt, criminal, crook, the cold, the sleazy snake, Feminist Hillary might follow that most antiAmerican ever to sit in the Oval Office, foreigner Barrack Hussein Obama.

Mr. Trump, never a programmed politician, needed a bit of verbal and content  practice to present  policy together with his humor, honesty, determination, with order and command as if he were building another Trump Tower, but  informing the American public  step by step of the nature and purpose of his  reconstruction plan  to MAKE  AMERICA GREAT AGAIN so all could be clearly  understood by the voting public.

Donald J. Trump is a very, very winsome and intelligent successful business American, if one bothers to think and judge a candidate beyond a political party  establishment’s  habits  and dictate, when that  American political party is presenting the totally dishonorable Hillary Roddham Clinton as their candidate  to replace  once freedom-loving America with its  single party dictatorship union of feminazis, black racists, illegal immigrants, internationalist, greenies, druggies, sociopaths, socialists and communists  .

Please read the following American Spectator article by Ross Kaminsky about the Donald so many of us love and trust to be our America’s 45th President, the only candidate with the abilities to make American great again:

Where Has THIS Trump Been?

Are 50% of Mexicanos in America Bigots Toward Anglos?

What percentage of Latino invaders of the United States of America are bigots….toward Americanos?    Millions have been allowed to invade the country over the past decade.  It’s good for big business,  and for Obama’s Racist Democrats to fatten their voting kitty for the future, securing  their particular kind of dictatorship over the country that used to be the United States of America.

50%?….70%?…..23.5%?    How many have been trained to be racists by the Obama-Hillary political machine and their universities  to secure  Hilliarism forever?

How many are criminals?

Most lawyers in America are leftists….bigots themselves who have been programmed to destroy the  JudeoChristian concepts which have founded and developed this once unique institution based upon “E Pluribus Unum”, “Liberty”, and “In God We Trust”…

America’s judges are lawyers…..Ever think about the consequences of that fact?

I am in my 80s…..When in my life time were American citizens allowed to vote in favor of Latino invasions to destroy our American triune dream pushed by big business and leftist Democrats?….and that the American tax payer would pay billions to aid the invaders?

Presidential candidate Donald Trump has challenged Gonzalo Curiel, a judge of Mexican background connected with a bag full of Latino political and social organizations while overseeing  a court case designed by Democrat lawyers to challenge Mr. Trump’s integrity through a controversial suit against one of his enterprises, Trump University.

Numb brained Republican child-like GOP “big shot”,  Paul Ryan, joins the Democrat Latino crows cawing ‘white racism’ for the Trump mere mention that his court case, in his view,  is a politically ‘trumped’ up one because of the candidate’s policy to build a wall to stop Latino and Islamic invasions from the Mexicano border.   What could be more rational?

LEFT WING DEMOCRATIC PARTY, UNIVERSITY CREATED, NATIONAL CONTROL OF OUR NATION’S LANGUAGE CALLED POLITICAL CORRECTNESS MUST BE PUT TO AN END.

PLEASE DONALD….CONTINUE TELLING IT LIKE IT IS…..THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WAS SUPPOSED TO BE A NATION WHERE FREE SPEECH WAS PERMITTED.   THAT FREEDOM HAS LONG AGO BEEN LOST.

Please, readers,  do what you can to follow the attacks on Trump by the vast well-organized  left wing conspiracies which run today’s press, universities, Democrat Party’s feminists, black racists, atheists, our legal world and much, probably most American businesses and banks called BIG.

Do some research of your own….IS THE JUDGE OVERSEEING THE TRUMP UNIVERSITY CASE, WITH A MEXICAN BACKGROUND, A BIGOT TOWARD NON-MEXICAN IMMIGRANT AMERICANS?  Do some reading!  Begin with the following article at Fox:

http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/politics/2016/05/31/trump-spokeswoman-defends-candidate-after-called-mexican-judge-hater/