• Pragerisms

    For a more comprehensive list of Pragerisms visit
    Dennis Prager Wisdom.

    • "The left is far more interested in gaining power than in creating wealth."
    • "Without wisdom, goodness is worthless."
    • "I prefer clarity to agreement."
    • "First tell the truth, then state your opinion."
    • "Being on the Left means never having to say you're sorry."
    • "If you don't fight evil, you fight gobal warming."
    • "There are things that are so dumb, you have to learn them."
  • Liberalism’s Seven Deadly Sins

    • Sexism
    • Intolerance
    • Xenophobia
    • Racism
    • Islamophobia
    • Bigotry
    • Homophobia

    A liberal need only accuse you of one of the above in order to end all discussion and excuse himself from further elucidation of his position.

  • Glenn’s Reading List for Die-Hard Pragerites

    • Bolton, John - Surrender is not an Option
    • Bruce, Tammy - The Thought Police; The New American Revolution; The Death of Right and Wrong
    • Charen, Mona - DoGooders:How Liberals Hurt Those They Claim to Help
    • Coulter, Ann - If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans; Slander
    • Dalrymple, Theodore - In Praise of Prejudice; Our Culture, What's Left of It
    • Doyle, William - Inside the Oval Office
    • Elder, Larry - Stupid Black Men: How to Play the Race Card--and Lose
    • Frankl, Victor - Man's Search for Meaning
    • Flynn, Daniel - Intellectual Morons
    • Fund, John - Stealing Elections
    • Friedman, George - America's Secret War
    • Goldberg, Bernard - Bias; Arrogance
    • Goldberg, Jonah - Liberal Fascism
    • Herson, James - Tales from the Left Coast
    • Horowitz, David - Left Illusions; The Professors
    • Klein, Edward - The Truth about Hillary
    • Mnookin, Seth - Hard News: Twenty-one Brutal Months at The New York Times and How They Changed the American Media
    • Morris, Dick - Because He Could; Rewriting History
    • O'Beirne, Kate - Women Who Make the World Worse
    • Olson, Barbara - The Final Days: The Last, Desperate Abuses of Power by the Clinton White House
    • O'Neill, John - Unfit For Command
    • Piereson, James - Camelot and the Cultural Revolution: How the Assassination of John F. Kennedy Shattered American Liberalism
    • Prager, Dennis - Think A Second Time
    • Sharansky, Natan - The Case for Democracy
    • Stein, Ben - Can America Survive? The Rage of the Left, the Truth, and What to Do About It
    • Steyn, Mark - America Alone
    • Stephanopolous, George - All Too Human
    • Thomas, Clarence - My Grandfather's Son
    • Timmerman, Kenneth - Shadow Warriors
    • Williams, Juan - Enough: The Phony Leaders, Dead-End Movements, and Culture of Failure That Are Undermining Black America--and What We Can Do About It
    • Wright, Lawrence - The Looming Tower
  • Advertisements

Mueller’s FBI Rot Beginning to Smell…..BIG TIME!


by John Hinderaker  at  PowerLine:

President Trump is on a roll. Earlier today, he tweeted this:

As the House Intelligence Committee has concluded, there was no collusion between Russia and the Trump Campaign. As many are now finding out, however, there was tremendous leaking, lying and corruption at the highest levels of the FBI, Justice & State.

And this:

The Fake News is beside themselves that McCabe was caught, called out and fired. How many hundreds of thousands of dollars was given to wife’s campaign by Crooked H friend, Terry M, who was also under investigation? How many lies? How many leaks? Comey knew it all, and much more.

Less than an hour ago, he tweeted this:

The Fake News is beside themselves that McCabe was caught, called out and fired. How many hundreds of thousands of dollars was given to wife’s campaign by Crooked H friend, Terry M, who was also under investigation? How many lies? How many leaks? Comey knew it all, and much more!

The Mueller probe should never have been started in that there was no collusion and there was no crime. It was based on fraudulent activities and a Fake Dossier paid for by Crooked Hillary and the DNC, and improperly used in FISA COURT for surveillance of my campaign. WITCH HUNT!

He’s right. As we and many others have pointed out many times, there is no proper predicate for Mueller’s purported investigation. There was never a crime in the first place. Mueller was improperly given a general mandate to poke around and see if he could find someone to indict, for anything, or worse yet, trick someone into committing an indictable offense. The Mueller investigation is a final insult to the rule of law that was bequeathed to us, in effect, by the outgoing, corrupt Obama administration.

If anything needs to be investigated, it is the multiple crimes and improper actions of the the Hillary Clinton campaign and the DNC, including but not limited to their collusion with Russians to sway the 2016 presidential election–an effort that, happily, failed.

If Mueller had any integrity, he would announce that his team of rabid pro-Democrat partisans has not been able to find a hint of any collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia–which was the point of his investigation, to the extent that it had any coherent basis–and shut his investigation down. He won’t do that, of course. The time has not yet come to fire Mueller, perhaps, but the president is right to call him out.


More Obama’s FBI Corruption Afoot!?

Bombshell: New Text Messages Suggest FBI Agents Colluded To “Cover” Secret Meeting

by Jon Street   at  REDSTATE:

“Holy. Crap.

FBI agent Peter Strzock and his mistress, Lisa Page, both of whom faced scrutiny for their unethical and possibly illegal behavior while doing everything in their power to prevent Donald Trump from being elected president, now face even more scrutiny for text messages they allegedly sent to each other about what appears to be intent to collude with a federal surveillance judge.

Text messages obtained by the Federalist and earlier reported by Townhall’s Matt Vespa show Strzock and Page’s disturbing back and forth, in which they discussed plans for a “cocktail party” with multiple people to help “cover” their interactions with FISA judge Rudolph Contreras.

Contreras was the FISA judge who presided over former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn’s case. You’ll remember that, before Trump became president, the Obama administration obtained a FISA order for communications from foreign actors that incidentally included Flynn.

On July 25, 2016, Page texted Strzock: “Rudy is on the [Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court]! Did you know that? Just appointed two months ago.”

Strzock replied to the text by saying, “I did. I need to get together with him.”

“[He] said he’d gotten on a month or two ago at a graduation party we were both at,” Page wrote.

Later, the two discussed arrangements in which to meet the judge to “cover for action.”

“[REDACTED] suggested a social setting with others would probably be better than a one on one meeting,” Strzok texted Page.

“I’m sorry, I’m just going to have to invite you to that cocktail party,” Page replied.

“Have to come up with some other work people cover for action,” Strzok wrote back.

Strzock questioned, “Why more?” “Six is a perfectly fine dinner party.”

These most recently uncovered text messages add more credence to the narrative that some within the FBI colluded against Trump and his campaign. Keep in mind this happened on the backdrop of Trump’s oppenent, Hillary Clinton, having been cleared of any criminal wrongdoing in her controversial email investigation, despite the fact that former FBI Director James Comey admitted she sent classified information to people without the proper clearances.

Meanwhile, the mainstream media still wants you to believe there’s nothing to see here, and that the only collusion. that occurred during the 2016 presidential campaign happened between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Here’s a novel concept, though: Maybe, just maybe, both could be true.”


Civilized Americans Need the Second Amendment Now More Than Ever

Why We Need the Second Amendment More than Ever

by Roger Simon  at  PJMedia:

While executives at Delta, United, Avis, etc. are virtue signaling as loudly as they can to assure us they want nothing to do with those supposed gun nuts in the National Rifle Association and are ending discounts (such as they were) for members of that organization, a real-world observation of what went on in the Parkland tragedy, not to mention other key contemporary events, might yield a radically different conclusion.

To wit: The Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution has much to recommend it. Indeed, we may need it more than ever.

Let’s start with Parkland.  It’s evident now, no matter what you think of current gun laws, that a myriad of governmental bureaucracies and police departments — from school authorities to social workers to the FBI to the Broward County Sheriff’s Office — screwed up on a level that borders on the incomprehensible. Blinded by a mutually reinforcing cocktail of political correctness and organizational stupidity and ineptitude, they were clueless about the near constant acting out of Nikolas Cruz.

He could have flown across the country in a hot air ballon, dropping buckets of blood and guts and trailing a banner reading “I’m Gonna Shoot Up a School,” and these clowns wouldn’t have done anything.  When Cruz actually started shooting, they behaved like the most execrable cowards, the police hiding behind cars while students and teachers were dying.  That their boss, Sheriff Scott Israel, still has his job is the most incomprehensible development of all.

Would anybody in his right mind trust these people with his own security, let alone those of his children?

Is it any surprise that when President Trump asked his CPAC audience Friday which was more important to them — the Second Amendment or tax reform — they chose the right to bear arms?


Trump Democrat Guy Beats Trump’s Republican Guy by “a hair” in Pennsylvania

Democrats Win by Running as Trump, not Clinton

by Brian C. Joondeph     at American Thinker:

“One of the few beneficial legacies of the Barack Obama presidency is the  electoral decimation of the Democratic Party.  Over a thousand seats, national and statewide, flipped from Democrat to Republican control during the fundamental transformation of America from 2009-2016.

Democrats are pinning their hopes on the 2018 midterms.  If they can win the House, they may be able to impeach President Trump.  If they control the Senate, too, they might be able to remove him from office.  This is their last option to stop the Trump train now that the Russian collusion story is going up in smoke.

It’s a tall order for Democrats to win either the House or the Senate, much less both, and an even higher hurdle for them to gather enough votes for impeachment.  Let them try.  Impeaching Trump over nonsense is the surest path for Democrats to lose control of Congress in 2020 and all but guarantee Trump’s re-election.  If they don’t try to impeach him or fail in their efforts, their unhinged far-left base will go insane and chase Nancy Pelosi and her leadership team with torches and pitchforks.  Either way it’s good for Trump.

Democrats are giddy after winning this week’s special election in Pennsylvania.  Democrat Conor Lamb defeated Republican Rick Saccone by a fraction of a percent, despite a Monmouth poll predicting Lamb by 6 points.  It seems polling hasn’t improved much since the not so long ago days when Hillary Clinton was supposed to win the presidency by a landslide.

Pollsters frequently oversample Democrat voters and can’t seem to find many Republican voters willing to speak to pollsters, hence the inaccurate predictions.  But that’s a separate issue.

How did a Democrat win a district that Trump won by 20 points just 16 months ago?  Simple.  By pretending to be Donald Trump.  Sure, Trump’s personality and charisma helped propel him to victory, but don’t forget the issues.

Whom does this sound like?  “My first priority is to get things moving again.  I will work with anyone to protect our people and bring good jobs here.”  Or this: “I’ll never forget that the only people I work for are right here at home.”  Trump or Lamb?

That was all from Conor Lamb’s website.  He went farther: “I understand the responsibility of carrying the mantle and I will never ever let you down.”  No, just kidding on the last one, which was Trump in 2016, but notice the similarities?

Where are the typical Democrat bromides?  You didn’t hear anything like this from Conor Lamb: “And his whole campaign, Make America Great Again, was looking backwards.  You don’t like black people getting rights, you don’t like women getting jobs, you don’t want to see that Indian-American succeeding more than you are, whatever that problem is, I am going to solve it.”

That’s the sore loser Hillary Clinton, still in denial, and the current face of the Democratic Party.  If Lamb spoke like that, he would have lost, just as Clinton did.  So he got smart and asked, “What would Donald do?” and spoke accordingly.

What else did the Donald wannabe say?

“We need modern airports, roads, and bridges, locks, and dams – to move people and goods into and out of our region, to attract new businesses, and to create jobs.”  On the House leader: “I don’t support Nancy Pelosi.”

On guns, Lamb called for a stronger system of background checks but no new gun restrictions.  He supports President Trump’s steel and aluminum tariffs.  He personally opposes abortion.  Lamb supports “robust and responsible energy development.”

Even more Trumpism.  He proudly stands for the pledge of allegiance and supports more funding for border security.

Lamb’s professed conservatism paid off, although barely.  And his term is only until the midterms in a few months, when his district disappears into the whimsical imaginations of the black robes on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.

Whether he stands up to his far-left party leadership as he says or becomes Nancy Pelosi’s boy-toy, toeing the party line, remains to be seen.  He can run as a Trumpster, but the reality is that the heart and soul of the Democratic Party is clearly Clinton and Obama – with faithful stooges Pelosi, Schumer, Waters, and Schiff.

This strategy may work in a purple district, or even in a red one if the GOP runs a weak candidate.  But nationally, it won’t work.  The left-wing media won’t support it, and neither will the Democrat donors and hardcore base.  Yet for select elections, it might work.

It looks as though the Democrats have found a winning formula.  Run youthful, energetic candidates who sound like Donald Trump.  Rather than a Roy Moore, with a dodgy past dragging him down.  Or a Rick Saccone: a good guy and solid on the issues, but who looks more like a department manager at the local Sears and Roebuck store than a rising political star.

Looks and optics matter.  JFK versus Nixon.  Trump versus Low Energy Jeb or Crooked Hillary. Obama versus McCain.  Democrats seem to understand this better than Republicans, at least until Trump came along – a TV reality show star who understands optics and marketing inside and out.

Trump is the winning formula.  Be like The Donald and win.  Run as a far-left loon and good luck, unless you are running in a safe deep blue district.  Run as a NeverTrump in a district Trump won, and your GOP voters will stay home.

It’s not complicated.  Republicans can easily maintain control of the House and Senate if they try and if they want to.  Both are necessary.  Many NeverTrumps may be happy to cede control of Congress and their majority if it means damaging or removing President Trump from the White House.

Hopefully the Republicans pay attention and campaign to win.  Pick the right candidate who is solid on the issues.  It’s not that hard.



JUSTICE IS SERVED! Corrupt FBI Director McCabe Fired!

You’re Fired: Deputy FBI Director McCabe Axed 24 Hours Before Retirement




“Recently, the Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee released a memo officially stating that there is no evidence of any collusion between Donald Trump and Russian intelligence during the 2016 presidential election. Of course, you might not have heard this news if you have been punishing yourself by watching or reading any of the mainstream news. For its part, the mainstream media continues to prop up the improbable narrative that Donald Trump is a Russian agent of influence who is out to corrupt our democracy in Vladimir Putin’s name.

Not only is the mainstream media dutifully covering the ongoing Robert Mueller special investigation, but the media is also transfixed on the continuing drama that is the “porn star and the president.” While the former story of Trump being a Manchurian Candidate is, frankly, absurd, given the president’s history of skirt chasing, claims that Trump paid hush money to an adult film star he had an 11-month affair with in 2006 are entirely believable. In fact, MSNBC is insisting that Trump be charged with obstruction of justice for having paid $130,000 to the adult film star, known as “Stormy Daniels,” on the eve of his unlikely 2016 election victory.

Many of my fellow Rightists continue demanding, “Who cares?” However, we should care about what the Democrats and their cronies in the media believe. After all, a sizable portion of the country does listen to the mainstream media. More importantly, the people who run the country — the elected representatives and their advisers living in Washington, D.C. — listen to what Joe Scarborough and Jake Tapper broadcast every day. While they need us plebes to vote for them, our political leaders (particularly those in the GOP establishment) live in Washington, D.C. and therefore crave the approval of people like Chuck Todd (which will never come).

Besides, the special prosecutor’s investigation into claims of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia in the 2016 election is weakening the Trump Administration with each day (not because there is anything to the investigation, but because the investigation itself complicates the already-herculean task of governing). Like all special investigations, former FBI director Robert Mueller’s probe is a virtually limitless inquiry into the president and his top advisers. Given that career federal prosecutors, like Mueller, are conditioned to get a conviction — any conviction — by the end of the investigation, do not doubt that Robert Mueller will find whatever he can to try to hang around the president’s neck.”

There’s something more also: Mueller is now deep-diving into the Trump Organization’s financial records (as well as Jared Kushner’s financial dealings). Should there be any impropriety — no matter how innocuous — in the Trump financial records, Mueller will have all that he needs to try to take Trump down.

Remember, Donald Trump is not — and never has been — a part of the elite, corporate political class that rules our country (the “permanent bipartisan fusion party,” as Michael Walsh calls it). No matter how much money Trump had, he could never fully be embraced as one of the elite, whether as a Democrat or a Republican. Trump’s stunning (for the elite) election to the presidency in 2016 offended every sensibility and taste of the Davoisie.

Trump was a clear threat to the Democrats because he upended their plans to finally realize James Carville’s 2009 declaration that the Democrats would rule for another 40 years. Trump’s rhetoric of draining the swamp made him an enemy of the so-called “deep state” which operates Washington, D.C. Moreover, Trump — and the people who voted for Trump — threatened the little fiefdom that the Bill Kristols, David Brookses, and Mitch McConnells of the GOP had in Washington, D.C. and New York. Like Caesar, Trump is “surrounded by enemies, and something is underway, but it has no face, yet everybody in the loop knows.”

The continual prospect of Mueller recommending impeachment for President Trump is aligning nicely with the 2018 midterms. If the 2018 midterms were happening under normal circumstances, it is likely that the Republicans would have little concern. Think about it: from a policy standpoint, President Trump has been the most effective Republican president since Ronald Reagan. Yet, these are anything but normal circumstances.

While I continue to believe that the House Republicans will fare well in the 2018 midterms, the fact of the matter is that the Democrats just need two seats to retake control of the Senate. With that majority, a Democratic-led Senate can further complicate the Trump Administration’s ability to govern by drowning it in more inquiries and investigations. As we’ve seen in the last two years of American politics, anything can happen. It’s conceivable that the Democrats could achieve this two-seat victory in the Senate (especially with their base as riled up as it has been). On the House side, the Democrats have a more difficult challenge: they need to win 21 of the 24 contested House seats in 2018. If they can accomplish that task, the Democrats will have a majority. Even without capturing the House, should they win the Senate back, the Democrats can further damage Trump heading into 2020.

Should Mueller find some financial impropriety, or should he determine that Trump obstructed justice with his $130,000 payout to Stormy Daniels, Mueller can recommend impeachment. Even if the Democrats are unable to flip the House, it is likely that Trump’s enemies in the Republican Party establishment will smell weakness, and take advantage. The Democrats would probably call for impeachment, but it would be the establishment Republicans who ultimately allowed for Trump’s takedown. This would be key because impeachment is not a legal process. Rather, it is a political one.

And, just like that, the old, tired, political narrative would be restored: the “true” conservatives, as led by Pence, would be facing a younger, resurgent Democratic candidate — like Julián Castro — and permanent Democratic Party control would be affirmed. Meanwhile, the Republican establishment’s members-only fiefdom would be secured. It’s a win-win for everyone in Washington. Meanwhile, we, the people get hosed.

The 2018 midterm election is the most important election of this century. It could quite seriously determine the fate of Trump’s presidency and the course of American history. The vipers in Washington are slithering forward, hoping for any excuse to expel Trump from the White House, and return things to the way they used to be. The GOP and President Trump need to fight for each and every seat in 2018, lest the Democrats do a complete end-run around the Right, and ensure that the United States becomes just another banana republic, with one-party rule; sham democracy; and oodles of debt. If the GOP can keep its majorities in 2018, then the Right can continue its much-needed counterrevolution against the radical Left.


The Feminization of the American Male…..”Men seem to be becoming less male!”

K-12: The War on Boys and Men

by Bruce Deitrick Price at American Thinker:

“Fox News just announced an upcoming series about the plight of Men in America.

“Men seem to be becoming less male,” Tucker Carlson said.  “Something ominous is happening[.] … Men are taught there is something wrong with them.  We took a close look at the numbers, and we found them so shocking that we’re devoting the month of March to a special series on men in America.”

Carlson concluded, “You’ll be stunned by the scope of the crisis.  We were.  It’s a largely ignored disaster.  It affects every person in America.”

He noted, for example: “Men account for 77 percent of the nation’s suicides, they are more than twice as likely to become alcoholics, they are more likely to die of an overdose than women, and 90 percent of inmates are men.”

So what are the causes?  Eighteen years ago, Christina Hoff Sommers published The War on Boys: How Misguided Feminism Is Harming Our Young Men.  Sommers concluded, “It’s a bad time to be a boy in America.  Boys are less likely than girls to go to college or do their homework.  They’re more likely to cheat on tests, wind up in detention, or drop out[.]”  In short, Sommers found the causes in feminist theory and, more surprisingly, inside the nation’s classrooms.

The dirty big secret here is that our public schools don’t announce social engineering; they simply do it, especially with regard to altering how children view themselves.  Public schools suppress boys and uplift girls in many furtive ways.  This manipulation has been hugely successful: 57% of college students are female; 43% are male.  More women stay in college and earn advanced degree.  Women wear business suits, and men drive pickup trucks.  Culturally similar men and women who used to marry each other are now separated by class differences!

The question still haunts us: how exactly are America’s social engineers able to win this war for females?

The discussion is tricky from every point of view.  However you might describe boys and girls, you’ll invite argument about what is good and what is bad.  If you say girls are “more sensitive,” is that an insult or a compliment?  The Atlantic Monthly nicely dances among many competing viewpoints:

[A] host of cross-cultural studies show that females … are more apt to plan ahead, set academic goals, and put effort into achieving those goals.  They also are more likely than boys to feel intrinsically satisfied with the whole enterprise of organizing their work, and more invested in impressing themselves and their teachers with their efforts[.] … On the whole, boys approach schoolwork differently.  They are more performance-oriented.  Studying for and taking tests taps into their competitive instincts.  For many boys, tests are quests that get their hearts pounding.

David Sortino, a teacher, argues on his blog: “[G]irls work best when sitting in a circle facing each other and find it more comfortable to learn in a group setting.  Instead, boys often excel in a traditional class structure with desks lined in rows, which could support their more competitive energies and attention getting behaviors.

“Girls respond to stress as a threat, which drives blood to the gut rather than to the brain, placing them in a fight or flight persona.  However, for boys, it’s the opposite.  They love to take risks and almost always overestimate their abilities.”

QED: There are big, very real differences.  We should wonder if these differences are artificially induced and then exaggerated.  Oh, so that’s why some schools have all students sitting around tables – because it’s good for girls…?

What we know for sure is that girls are outperforming boys at all levels.  Is this good for the country?  Is it good for the girls?

The Economist reported:

A new study by the OECD [Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development], a club of mostly rich countries, examined how 15-year-old boys and girls performed at reading, mathematics and science.  Boys still score somewhat better at maths, and in science the genders are roughly equal.  But when it comes to the students who really struggle, the difference is stark: boys are 50% more likely than girls to fall short of basic standards in all three areas [emphasis added].

Why are girls performing better at school than their male classmates?

“First,” according to the OECD study, “girls read more than boys.  Reading proficiency is the basis upon which all other learning is built.  When boys don’t do well at reading, their performance in other school subjects suffers too.”

The basis upon which all other learning is built.  That is ominous.  Suppose social engineers figured out how to undercut reading.

One statistical site states that “[w]omen are more likely to develop solid reading skills.  Around 38% of men report reading at the lowest proficiency levels, compared to 33% for women.”

Suppose our social engineers routinely seek to widen this gap.  That would be feasible because boys and girls respond in different ways to absurd instruction.

Girls, as noted, feel more comfortable in a group setting.  They want the whole group to move along harmoniously; they want their teacher to be successful.  The result is that they are more patient and long-suffering with dumb curricula and wrongly trained teachers.  Boys, on the other hand, are not so patient.  If there is a skill or a task, boys want to do well quickly.  Fair enough.  But what if the curriculum is inherently stupid and impossible to master?  Boys at some point will declare, I can’t do this.  I don’t want to do this.  I’m walking away.

Today, in Common Core, we see many absurdities almost perfectly designed to drive boys to escape and evasion.  The internet is full of videos of children weeping because instruction seems so illogical.  Little seven-year-olds are already beat up.

But the paradigm of stupid instruction remains Whole Word.  That’s where the student has to memorize the English language one word at a time.  The famous Dr. Samuel Orton, a neurologist, did a study in 1926-28 and declared that this method doesn’t work…and, in addition, it will damage every child it touches.  He was exactly correct, and the Education Establishment knows it.  What do we see in the schools of America?  Millions of semi-literate children with messed up minds.

StatisticBrain claims that 32 million Americans “can’t read.”  Tens of millions more read marginally.  This is a vast national  tragedy.  Ask yourself, why is this tolerated?  Perhaps because it makes the population easier to control.  Perhaps because it enables the stratification of the sexes.

You want to fix it?  Fix reading.  I think the smarter people understand this.  But the Education Establishment won’t let go because this particular stupid curriculum is the foundation for making women more successful and making men less successful.

Here is a good overview by TeacherMag:

But what if today’s classroom and curriculum structure catered (however unintentionally) to one gender more than the other?  Many researchers say this is now the case, with boys facing an upward struggle from primary school on.  For many boys, co-educational public schools can be uncomfortable, unfriendly, unproductive places.  Teaching styles and disciplinary habits are often not suited to the average boy[.] … In learning environments biased against their strengths, boys may become turned off or frustrated and may attempt to have their needs met by seeking negative attention.  This rebellion completes the circle of failure … with many boys labelled as troublemakers or diagnosed with hyperactivity.

That can mean drugs, which make boys weaker and less manly….”

Note by ghr:  There is no doubt that compared to the almost  three generations I have lived   the American ‘girl’  (by birth) has been butched up in feature and dress, fattened up tremendously everywhere, and ditsier by head.   Mother is working.  Dad might be absent.  Schools have become empty of learning, loaded with twits of all ages and sexes.   No history is taught.  No history books allowed for they advance the story of the human male…..a crime of the first order in the fascist state of Barack Hussein Obama and Hillary R. Clinton.

What IS taught is the garbage poison arriving from feminist mouths of all colors, shapes, sexes and sizes, that there is no differences between human female and male animals.

Then their is the black  feminist-atheist lie sold in the American knowledge-free, hate white filled public and private schools where ever they exist, that the human white male animal  has been the source of  World evil throughout human history…..which is at maximum ten years of racist memorization  in the American urban black so-called “education” system…..After all that is what the Sovietized Urban Black-White Racist leftists sell in their protests, attacks, and burnings since November, 2016.
And don’t forget the tricks played by the Charles Blow news world  of racist sales in the world closer to Wall Street.    Hillary and her herd are certain that males  outside of her leftist government ilk  are deplorables  and worse.   She is a man hater especially if he is white.
Worst of all, the arrogant leftists, especially the wealthy  Jewish political and intellectual LEFT led in my day by Alan Dershowitz,   have worked overtime during the past  sixty  years  following World War II to destroy JudeoChristianity, the very  core of human decency, freedom,  and civilization, the greatness upon which  our American republic was based, the civilization now conquered by corporate greed and the worship of ignorance to make human male and female EQUAL!
Please do read the following article: