• Pragerisms

    For a more comprehensive list of Pragerisms visit
    Dennis Prager Wisdom.

    • "The left is far more interested in gaining power than in creating wealth."
    • "Without wisdom, goodness is worthless."
    • "I prefer clarity to agreement."
    • "First tell the truth, then state your opinion."
    • "Being on the Left means never having to say you're sorry."
    • "If you don't fight evil, you fight gobal warming."
    • "There are things that are so dumb, you have to learn them."
  • Liberalism’s Seven Deadly Sins

    • Sexism
    • Intolerance
    • Xenophobia
    • Racism
    • Islamophobia
    • Bigotry
    • Homophobia

    A liberal need only accuse you of one of the above in order to end all discussion and excuse himself from further elucidation of his position.

  • Glenn’s Reading List for Die-Hard Pragerites

    • Bolton, John - Surrender is not an Option
    • Bruce, Tammy - The Thought Police; The New American Revolution; The Death of Right and Wrong
    • Charen, Mona - DoGooders:How Liberals Hurt Those They Claim to Help
    • Coulter, Ann - If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans; Slander
    • Dalrymple, Theodore - In Praise of Prejudice; Our Culture, What's Left of It
    • Doyle, William - Inside the Oval Office
    • Elder, Larry - Stupid Black Men: How to Play the Race Card--and Lose
    • Frankl, Victor - Man's Search for Meaning
    • Flynn, Daniel - Intellectual Morons
    • Fund, John - Stealing Elections
    • Friedman, George - America's Secret War
    • Goldberg, Bernard - Bias; Arrogance
    • Goldberg, Jonah - Liberal Fascism
    • Herson, James - Tales from the Left Coast
    • Horowitz, David - Left Illusions; The Professors
    • Klein, Edward - The Truth about Hillary
    • Mnookin, Seth - Hard News: Twenty-one Brutal Months at The New York Times and How They Changed the American Media
    • Morris, Dick - Because He Could; Rewriting History
    • O'Beirne, Kate - Women Who Make the World Worse
    • Olson, Barbara - The Final Days: The Last, Desperate Abuses of Power by the Clinton White House
    • O'Neill, John - Unfit For Command
    • Piereson, James - Camelot and the Cultural Revolution: How the Assassination of John F. Kennedy Shattered American Liberalism
    • Prager, Dennis - Think A Second Time
    • Sharansky, Natan - The Case for Democracy
    • Stein, Ben - Can America Survive? The Rage of the Left, the Truth, and What to Do About It
    • Steyn, Mark - America Alone
    • Stephanopolous, George - All Too Human
    • Thomas, Clarence - My Grandfather's Son
    • Timmerman, Kenneth - Shadow Warriors
    • Williams, Juan - Enough: The Phony Leaders, Dead-End Movements, and Culture of Failure That Are Undermining Black America--and What We Can Do About It
    • Wright, Lawrence - The Looming Tower

College Grades Inflated as College “Educated” Pay More to Know Less

There is no doubt as education becomes more feminized, American college students are paying a lot more tuition yet amass less and less knowledge as each year of study goes by. Feelings, not knowledge dominate the culture. In order to please the less learned, it is feminist to provide higher scores for less performance to make everyone feel better about themselves. Feminists dictate curricula and teaching of social ‘science’ classes and departments from the Atlantic to the Pacific and have for more than a generation.

Honesty has never been a cherished value among feminists.

The following report is made possible through the National Center for Policy Analysis:

Grade Inflation Rampant on College Campuses

August 29, 2014

Grade inflation is a serious problem in colleges and universities, contends Thomas Lindsay in a new report for the Texas Public Policy Foundation.

The numbers are stark:

In the first half of the 1960s, 15 percent of college grades were As.
Today, 43 percent of all college grades are As.
An A is the most common grade given in colleges across the country.
Seventy-three percent of all college grades given today are As or Bs.
Some schools have tried to bring transparency to student grading. As far back as 20 years ago, Dartmouth placed the median course grade and the class size on students’ transcripts, next to the grade earned in each class, in response to the rise in the average GPA from 3.06 in 1968 to 3.23 in 1994. Even so, grades continued to rise at Dartmouth: by 1999, the number of As and A-minuses had reached 44 percent of all grades.

And Dartmouth is hardly an outlier. In 1969, over one quarter of all grades given at Duke University were Cs. Today, fewer than 10 percent of grades at Duke are Cs. And grade inflation is a problem at both public and private schools:

Private colleges saw the average GPA rise from 3.09 in 1991 to 3.30 in 2006.
At public schools, the average GPA increased from 2.85 to 3.01 between 1991 and 2006.
In 2006, highly selective private schools sported an average GPA of 3.43, while highly selective public schools had an average GPA of 3.22
Among public schools, major state universities in the South show the largest grade inflation from 1990 to 2006.
According to Christopher Healey, professor at Furman University, the subject with the toughest grading standards is math, in which only 29 percent of grades are As. That number is much lower than in music, where 67 percent of grades are As, or in education, where 71 percent of grades are As. As a result, Lindsay writes that grade inflation pulls students towards classes in the humanities and away from classes in science and math.

The Texas legislature has made efforts to address grade inflation in its state. While the act has not yet passed, the Honest Transcript bill would require all public colleges in the state to report the average grade given to the entire class next to each grade on a student’s transcript.

Source: Thomas K. Lindsay, “Combating the ‘Other’ Inflation: Arresting the Cancer of College Grade Inflation,” Texas Public Policy Foundation, August 2014.

Washington’s Fascism Invading American Schools at Tax Payers’ Expense

The Growth of Federal Involvement in Education

August 28, 2014 from the National Center for Policy Analysis:

Federal intervention in elementary and secondary education has exploded over the last 50 years, according to a new report for the Mercatus Center by Courtney Collins, assistant professor of economics at Rhodes College.

The federal government had little involvement in elementary and secondary education in the United States until 1965, when President Lyndon Johnson signed the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA). Originally intended to provide federal funding to schools with high populations of students from low-income families, the ESEA has ballooned into a law more than 20 times its original size, writes Collins. Federal education funding for elementary and secondary education was $6.7 billion in 1964 (in 2013 dollars). By 1966, it was more than $14 billion. In 2010, it was $80 billion.

As new federal programs have been created over the last half-century, new federal requirements have been imposed on schools:

The ESEA was amended in 1966 with Title VI, which covered the education of handicapped children. It provided money to states that promised to create plans to expand programs for children with disabilities.
In 1968, the law was amended to include the Bilingual Education Act, which provided states with funds to create new programs to serve students who were not native English speakers.
In 1974, the ESEA was expanded to include grants for a number of additional programs, including new funds to teach the metric system in U.S. schools and categorical programs for gifted children, career education and the arts.
In 1978, these categorical programs multiplied, adding new projects related to youth employment, health education, women’s educational equity and book distribution programs. The ESEA also established new offices, including the Office of Environmental Education and the National Council on Ethnic Heritage Studies.
The Department of Education also grew during this time, issuing new regulations from year to year. The total number of regulatory constraints (regulations issued by the Department of Education including the words “may not,” “shall,” or “required,” and the like) in 1980 was 2,000. By 2010, it had reached 10,800. All of these requirements, writes Collins, represent the replacement of state and local control with federal educational mandates.

Significantly, American students’ scores in math and reading from 1971 to 2012 have hardly changed. While 9- and 13-year-old students have performed slightly better during that time, 17-year-olds have performed worse in math and shown no change in reading.

Source: Courtney A. Collins, “Reading, Writing, and Regulations: A Survey of the Expanding Federal Role in Elementary and Secondary Education Policy,” Mercatus Center, August 25, 2014.

America’s Sisterhood War against the Human Male

It’s now about 40 years since the beginnings of the most recent onslaught of the western feminist mouth and mind upon American ears. These days are exciting for the human animal at university of more female varieties.

Female human animals have now come to own the nation’s public schools enough to sculpt future Americans monosexing young male ‘students’ to adjust to its new passive role in life, to submit to the power of sisterhood to become more sensitive, passive peace-loving versions of weepy sensitives feeling love and accomplishment for occupying space.

In the middle East American males are being beheaded. Others are joining the beheaders. Sisterhood’s prize, Barack Obama, may be controlling the White House, but his sisterhood hasn’t yet reached much further than his Oval office staff and the New York Times reporters.

Sisterhood’s war on boys in elementary school has been particularly pharmaceutic in its weaponry over the years maintaining control of lads by drugging them up to calm them down to more female levels of passivity and therefore peaceful and peaceloving agreement.

For the American Left, one sex fits all.

Yet, one might wonder what happens to the lassified laddies when they reach male life beyond feminist programming at school?

Even bored lads will find something more exciting to do than being forced to play lassie all of their school lives.

Please think about the lassification of the American lad and his American future as you read the following article:


Climate Man Obama Seeks Way to ”Climate Control” without Senate Okay

Obama Pushes International Climate Agreement

August 28, 2014 from the National Center for Policy Analysis:

Reports have emerged that the Obama administration plans to push for an “international climate change agreement” that, unlike a formal treaty, would be entered into without Senate approval.

According to the Washington Times, the goal is to reach a deal by next year. Broadly, the agreement would call for signatories to commit to carbon dioxide emission reduction goals, as well as to send money to poor nations to deal with global warming.

The agreement would be enforced, however, only with pressure and shaming from the other participants, as the group would issue progress reports detailing which parties had not met their goals. The New York Times reported that “President Obama’s climate negotiators are devising what they call a ‘politically binding’ deal that would ‘name and shame’ countries into cutting their emissions,” in order to bypass the requirement that treaties must be ratified.

According to the Washington Times, the negotiators plan to use the United Nations Framework on Climate Change — a pact passed in 1992 and ratified by the United States — and add new, “voluntary pledges” to it.

Source: Victor Morton, “Obama seeks to bypass Congress for U.N. climate change deal: report,” Washington Times, August 26, 2014.

Al Franken TOP Obamaling Democrat in the Senate

Do you remember the name, Al Franken, the Saturday Night Live gangster, a Minnesotan who moved into the U.S. Senate via mysteriously counted Duluth and Iron Range lefty votes by the living and the dead early 2009? He has been creeping in and around the shadows of the nation’s capital ever since he arrived in time to become the 60th vote to pass the ObamaCare fascism bill to dictate the nation’s health.

You remember the bill, don’t you……the one the Lefty House of Representative-Czarina at the time, Nancy Pelosi, announced that the ObamaCare bill had to be passed for Americans to find out what goodies are in it?

Senator Franken is an Obamaling man. He is now campaigning for re-election, a shoe-in in Minnesota, a blue state if there ever has been one where the rich join the feminists and blacks to be programmed to hate the white human male. It is the modern, 21st Century United Nations thing to think….and Minnesotans love to be modern…..in the lead. Our winters are very long and harsh.

In public Minnesotans especially at the establishment level, still love their man, Barack Hussein, his Marxism, failures, racism, incompetence and all, for Mr. Obama long ago declared himself to be black. He often thinks and acts black, and feminist as well, especially when he wallows in his Marxist moods to change America forever. Any concept in our present culture less than worship of the man, would be considered white racism, the sin of sins, a commandment forbidding the Minnesota Left to criticize this president in public or private. His mistakes of judgment, behavior, speech, his deceit and dishonesty and the rest must not be allowed into the human mind….. evidence of white racism and anti-womenism .

Although religiously Marxist, overwhelmingly lefty Minnesotans have come from Christianity as a religion of their past where they learned in Church and from family, “If you can’t speak favorably about someone, don’t speak at all”…..now a ‘law’interpreted by Mr. Franken and his political friends from synagogue and university to exorcise against anything, anyone, alive or dead, yesterday or today, unfavorable politically, intellectually, and culturally dangerous to Marxism’s march to equality.

The oily Franken, having checked and double checked opinion polls regarding the president’s popularity, now denies his magnetic attachment to everything Obamaling. His oil gushes nearly every time he speaks in public. He practices Marxism, reversing whatever is True into untruth, an affliction invading, stimulating, Obamaling speech everywhere.

Below is a chart of Obamaling votes of Democrats the U. S. Senate and their percentages of kinship to the president’s Marxist antiAmerican agenda:

Al’s votes with Dems, Obama Actions

Sent by Mark Waldeland

Voting With Party
This is a ranking of how often Democratic Senators vote with a majority of the Senate Democratic caucus. It factors every single vote that has been taken since the beginning of the current 113th session of Congress. All votes are weighted equally in this ranking, so a non-binding resolution honoring a collegiate sports team, for example, is considered equal to a vote on passing health care reform. Since the vast majority of the hundreds of votes factored in are routine in nature, the result is that even highly-independent senators have a seemingly high score on voting with their party. But it’s the context that matters, and this ranking attempts to provide that. Obviously, this gives only a partial picture of the ideological spectrum. If you want to see how senators have voted on major legislation in Congress, check out our section of Hot Bills or use our head-to-head vote comparison tool to compare the voting records of any two members of Congress. The average Democrat — Jack Reed — votes with his party 95.0% of the time.

Rank Name Total Votes Votes With Party Rate
1 Al Franken 161 159 98.8%
2 Benjamin L. Cardin 160 158 98.8%
3 Barbara A. Mikulski 158 156 98.7%
4 Maria Cantwell 161 158 98.1%
5 Brian Schatz 161 158 98.1%
6 Elizabeth Warren 157 154 98.1% …….. for a more complete listing, click below:


B. O. on ISIS: …….Folks: “We Don’t Have a Strategy Yet”

Obama on Dealing with ISIS: “We don’t have a strategy yet.”

Video below from realclearpolitics:

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: I have consulted with Congress throughout this process. I am confident that as commander in chief I have the authority to engage in the acts we are conducting currently. As our strategy develops, we will continue to consult with Congress, and it will be important for Congress to weigh in, for our consultations with Congress continue to develop so the American people are part of the debate.

(There’s more….please read on below for more Bama explanation:


Senator Creepy, Al Franken, a Man of Few Words?

Why are nearly all the politically creepy in America, Democrats? Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Dick Durbin, Rep. Maxine Waters, Senators Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer and Governor Brown in California for starters…..the ones who are elected for life and beyond?

Arlen Specter now believed to be dead, was a king creep of his days in the U.S. Senate. For years he bore a “Republican” title. Eventually his constituencies discovered his malady and began to ask the popular creep, Arlen, important questions about serious issues in contemporary American life, corruption in Washington and the U.S. Senate, and where his creepiness fit into solving problems. Mr. Specter felt too important to have to answer to his public… too proud to answer questions in public or private. He demanded to be a free thinking creep and quickly changed his political title to a home where he belonged all of his political life…..DEMOCRAT.

Al Franken frighteningly appears either to be either a clone or a child of Arlen Specter. He occasionally appears to be actually alive as well. One can tell by his often foul mouth.

Many Democrats are so creepy, they convince themselves and their followers they will live in Congress forever and a day, conquering death as well as America with creepiness.

Learn more about Al Franken’s ‘winsome’ creepiness in the National Journal article by Josh Kraushaar below:




Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 330 other followers