Barack Hussein Obama appears to be an exceedingly skilled con-artist, for he clearly speaks and performs like a star winning with charm, tens of millions of American , mostly the usual lefties, single and divorced women, Jews, Gays and Lesbians, Latinos, Marxists, particularly the Bill Ayers crowd and rasistly 95 % of the ‘colored’ American vote: a disingenuous, deceitful, duplicitous, devious, dishonest person in speech and message.
Dennis Prager limits a liar to be a person who knows what he conveys is, indeed, a lie. There may be some courtesy conveyed in this Prager definition. But, when a person is so consistently dishonest in whatever he or she conveys, and has no clean character whatsoever, even when caught in the lies, knowingly or not, is still a LIAR by habit, if not by intention.
But, don’t anyone believe this Barack Hussein Obama isn’t aware of the chaos he is causing. Beyond his script the American citizenry has to put up with every time Obama puts his ego and its mouth into the spotlight he is not a comfortable clever actor. He pretends he is Christian, but there is absolutely, absolutely no evidence of it in his verbs, habits, and the man has no sincerity core from which he can pull a plum when needed.
There are some folks who believe Obama is God-sent to awaken Americans to the foul the Left has cooked up for a culture which has lost its way in the battle of seeking Truth over Evil since the sex and drug revolt of the 1960s and 1970s and the universities it has morphed since. It has become feminized, hysterical, sensitive, authoritarian, low on morality, but high on feelings and lost of mind and purpose.
Friend, neighbor, and fellow conservative, Arlene Taber sent the following resume of the real (of course, my view of the evidence displayed by this 44th American president) Barack HusseinObama an the consequences of his occupying that important seat in the White House, written by Matt Patterson, a political writer at the disappearing Newsweek magazine:
> Finally, Matt Patterson and Newsweek speak out about Obama. This is timely and
tough. As many of you know, Newsweek has a reputation for being extremely
liberal. The fact that their editor saw fit to print the following article
about Obama and the one that appears in the latest Newsweek, makes this a truly
amazing event, and a news story in and of itself. At last, the truth about our
President and his agenda are starting to trickle through the protective wall
built around him by the liberal media….
> By Matt Patterson (Newsweek Columnist – Opinion Writer)
> Years from now, historians may regard the 2008 election of Barack Obama as an
inscrutable and disturbing phenomenon, the result of a baffling breed of mass
hysteria akin perhaps to the witch craze of the Middle Ages. How, they will
wonder, did a man so devoid of professional accomplishment beguile so many into
thinking he could manage the world’s largest economy, direct the world’s most
powerful military, execute the world’s most consequential job?
> Imagine a future historian examining Obama’s pre-presidential life:
> ushered into and through the Ivy League, despite unremarkable grades and test
scores along the way; a cushy non-job as a “community organizer;” a brief
career as a state legislator devoid of legislative achievement (and in fact
nearly devoid of his attention, less often did he vote “present”); and finally
an unaccomplished single term in the United States Senate, the entirety of
which was devoted to his presidential ambitions.
> He left no academic legacy in academia, authored no signature legislation as a
legislator. And then there is the matter of his troubling
> associations: the white-hating, America-loathing preacher who for decades
served as Obama’s “spiritual mentor;” a real-life, actual terrorist who served
as Obama’s colleague and political sponsor. It is easy to imagine a future
historian looking at it all and asking: how on Earth was such a man elected
president? There is no evidence that he ever attended or worked for any
university or that he ever sat for the Illinois bar. We have no documentation
for any of his claims. He may well be the greatest hoax in history.
> Not content to wait for history, the incomparable Norman Podhoretz
> addressed the question recently in the Wall Street Journal: To be sure, no
white candidate who had close associations with an outspoken hater of America
like Jeremiah Wright and an unrepentant terrorist like Bill Ayers, would have
lasted a single day. But because Mr. Obama was black, and therefore entitled in
the eyes of liberal Dom to have hung out with protesters against various
American injustices, even if they were ‘a bit’ extreme, he was given a pass.
Let that sink in: Obama was given a pass – held to a lower standard because of
the color of his skin.
> Podhoretz continues: And in any case, what did such ancient history matter
when he was also so articulate and elegant and (as he himself had said)
“non-threatening,” all of which gave him a fighting chance to become the first
black president and thereby to lay the curse of racism to rest?
> Podhoretz puts his finger, I think, on the animating pulse of the Obama
> phenomenon – affirmative action. Not in the legal sense, of course. But
> certainly in the motivating sentiment behind all affirmative action laws and
regulations, which are designed primarily to make white people, and especially
white liberals, feel good about themselves.
> Unfortunately, minorities often suffer so that whites can pat themselves
> on the back. Liberals routinely admit minorities to schools for which they are
not qualified, yet take no responsibility for the inevitable poor
> performance and high drop-out rates which follow. Liberals don’t care if these
minority students fail; liberals aren’t around to witness the emotional
devastation and deflated self-esteem resulting from the racist policy that is
affirmative action. Yes, racist. Holding someone to a separate standard merely
because of the color of his skin – that’s affirmative action in a nutshell, and
if that isn’t racism, then nothing is.
> And that is what America did to Obama. True, Obama himself was never troubled
by his lack of achievements, but why would he be? As many have noted, Obama was
told he was good enough for Columbia despite undistinguished grades at
Occidental; he was told he was good enough for the US Senate despite a mediocre
record in Illinois; he was told he was good enough to be president despite no
record at all in the Senate. All his life, every step of the way, Obama was
told he was good enough for the next step, in spite of ample evidence to the
> What could this breed if not the sort of empty narcissism on display every
time Obama speaks? In 2008, many who agreed that he lacked executive
qualifications nonetheless raved about Obama’s oratory skills, intellect, and
cool character. Those people – conservatives included – ought now to be deeply
> The man thinks and speaks in the hoariest of cliches, and that’s when he has
his Teleprompters in front of him; when the prompter is absent he can barely
think or speak at all. Not one original idea has ever issued from his mouth -
it’s all warmed-over Marxism of the kind that has failed over and over again
for 100 years. (An example is his 2012 campaign speeches which are almost word
for word his 2008 speeches)
> And what about his character? Obama is constantly blaming anything and
everything else for his troubles. Bush did it; it was bad luck; I inherited
this mess. Remember, he wanted the job, campaigned for the task. It is
embarrassing to see a president so willing to advertise his own powerless-ness,
so comfortable with his own incompetence. (The other day he actually came out
and said no one could have done anything to get our economy and country back on
track). But really, what were we to expect? The man has never been responsible
for anything, so how do we expect him to act responsibly?In short: our
president is a small-minded man, with neither the temperament nor the intellect
to handle his job. When you understand that, and only when you understand that,
will the current erosion of liberty and prosperity make sense. It could not
have gone otherwise with such an impostor in the Oval Office.
Comment: Thank you great and courageous American, Matt Patterson, writer at the late, former Lefty American news magazaine, Newsweek.
Unfortunately for all Americans, your review is all too true.