• Pragerisms

    For a more comprehensive list of Pragerisms visit
    Dennis Prager Wisdom.

    • "The left is far more interested in gaining power than in creating wealth."
    • "Without wisdom, goodness is worthless."
    • "I prefer clarity to agreement."
    • "First tell the truth, then state your opinion."
    • "Being on the Left means never having to say you're sorry."
    • "If you don't fight evil, you fight gobal warming."
    • "There are things that are so dumb, you have to learn them."
  • Liberalism’s Seven Deadly Sins

    • Sexism
    • Intolerance
    • Xenophobia
    • Racism
    • Islamophobia
    • Bigotry
    • Homophobia

    A liberal need only accuse you of one of the above in order to end all discussion and excuse himself from further elucidation of his position.

  • Glenn’s Reading List for Die-Hard Pragerites

    • Bolton, John - Surrender is not an Option
    • Bruce, Tammy - The Thought Police; The New American Revolution; The Death of Right and Wrong
    • Charen, Mona - DoGooders:How Liberals Hurt Those They Claim to Help
    • Coulter, Ann - If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans; Slander
    • Dalrymple, Theodore - In Praise of Prejudice; Our Culture, What's Left of It
    • Doyle, William - Inside the Oval Office
    • Elder, Larry - Stupid Black Men: How to Play the Race Card--and Lose
    • Frankl, Victor - Man's Search for Meaning
    • Flynn, Daniel - Intellectual Morons
    • Fund, John - Stealing Elections
    • Friedman, George - America's Secret War
    • Goldberg, Bernard - Bias; Arrogance
    • Goldberg, Jonah - Liberal Fascism
    • Herson, James - Tales from the Left Coast
    • Horowitz, David - Left Illusions; The Professors
    • Klein, Edward - The Truth about Hillary
    • Mnookin, Seth - Hard News: Twenty-one Brutal Months at The New York Times and How They Changed the American Media
    • Morris, Dick - Because He Could; Rewriting History
    • O'Beirne, Kate - Women Who Make the World Worse
    • Olson, Barbara - The Final Days: The Last, Desperate Abuses of Power by the Clinton White House
    • O'Neill, John - Unfit For Command
    • Piereson, James - Camelot and the Cultural Revolution: How the Assassination of John F. Kennedy Shattered American Liberalism
    • Prager, Dennis - Think A Second Time
    • Sharansky, Natan - The Case for Democracy
    • Stein, Ben - Can America Survive? The Rage of the Left, the Truth, and What to Do About It
    • Steyn, Mark - America Alone
    • Stephanopolous, George - All Too Human
    • Thomas, Clarence - My Grandfather's Son
    • Timmerman, Kenneth - Shadow Warriors
    • Williams, Juan - Enough: The Phony Leaders, Dead-End Movements, and Culture of Failure That Are Undermining Black America--and What We Can Do About It
    • Wright, Lawrence - The Looming Tower

Robert Kennedy’s Infamous “I dream” Quote

This from Wikiquote:   You see things; and you say, ‘Why?’ But I dream things that never were; and I say, ‘Why not?’”. Robert’s brother Edward famously quoted it (paraphrasing it even further), to conclude his eulogy to his late brother after his assassination (8 June 1968): Some men see things as they are and say why? I dream things that never were and say why not?(Eulogy in CBS news video)

Comment:  One of the reasons I am so attached to the clarity and personage of Dennis Prager is his review of the notorious quote which so passionately spilled out of the mouth of Robert F. Kennedy.  

Whether dreamers like Hitler, Attila, Speer, Lenin, Marx, or Robert F. Kennedy,  those who bow to the impossible dream, the twisted, delusional dream, or a dream because it is a dream that sounds good or feels good…..are dangerous to all mankind if they are near any center of power.   One loses reality when bowing to the impossible dream and therefore should never worship it.

Mr. Kennedy was a very exciteable person……bordering on the fanatic.  Unlike Obama, he could truly electrify his audiences, and inspirit them, not with tiresome, high school cliches, but with moving, creative language.   Watch some of the film of his speeches….especially his thrill of the coming revolution which he was so excited about….hoping it would be peaceful, but then, so what, it was going to  come anyway, he shivered.

I liked this Kennedy’s oler brother, the President, not the vast  “Lion of the Senate”, Ted…..the felony guy.   The one devoted to loading up the court system with Leftwing ideologues.

This Robert Kennedy, thank God, had he lived,  would never have become President.  Even I, as a lefty in those days, was afraid of his fanaticism.  So were my friends and colleagues.  He was known for the fanatic he was.  He was not popular.

Kennedy folklore usually does not include that chapter of history in which this Kennedy was a  runner for Senator Joseph Raymond McCarthy from Wisconsin.

Nevertheless, Robert F. Kennedy was a far better human being that his younger brother, Edward. the potentate called by Lefties, the  “Lion”.

Obamatalk At Laborfest, Milwaukee, Wisconsin

The following is the core of Obamatalk given Labor Day in Milwaukee to the Organized Labor audience.   You may want to review his words of support for reinvigorating the American middle class, that group which he has spent so much energy trying  to cripple by his insatiable appetite to ruin America financially.

It was working men and women who made the 20th century the American century. It was the labor movement that helped secure so much of what we take for granted today.  (Applause.)  The 40-hour work week, the minimum wage, family leave, health insurance, Social Security, Medicare, retirement plans.  The cornerstones of the middle-class security all bear the union label.  (Applause.) 

And it was that greatest generation that built America into the greatest force of prosperity and opportunity and freedom that the world has ever known — Americans like my grandfather, who went off to war just boys, then returned home as men, and then they traded in one uniform and set of responsibilities for another.  And Americans like my grandmother, who rolled up her sleeves and worked in a factory on the home front.  And when the war was over, they studied under the GI Bill, and they bought a home under the FHA, and they raised families supported by good jobs that paid good wages with good benefits.

It was through my grandparents’ experience that I was brought up to believe that anything is possible in America.  (Applause.)  But, Milwaukee, they also knew the feeling when opportunity is pulled out from under you. They grew up during the Depression, so they’d tell me about seeing their fathers or their uncles losing jobs; how it wasn’t just the loss of a paycheck that hurt so bad.  It was the blow to their dignity, their sense of self-worth.  I’ll bet a lot of us have seen people who’ve been changed after a long bout of unemployment.  It can wear you down, even if you’ve got a strong spirit.  If you’re out of work for a long time, it can wear you down.

So my grandparents taught me early on that a job is about more than just a paycheck.  A paycheck is important.  But a job is about waking up every day with a sense of purpose, and going to bed each night feeling you’ve handled your responsibilities.  (Applause.)  It’s about meeting your responsibilities to yourself and to your family and to your community.  And I carried that lesson with me all those years ago when I got my start fighting for men and women on the South Side of Chicago after their local steel plant shut down.  And I carried that lesson with me through my time as a state senator and a U.S. senator, and I carry that lesson with me today.  (Applause.) 

And I know — I know that there are folks right here in this audience, folks right here in Milwaukee and all across America, who are going through these kinds of struggles.  Eight million Americans lost their jobs in this recession.  And even though we’ve had eight straight months of private sector job growth, the new jobs haven’t been coming fast enough. Now, here’s the honest truth, the plain truth.  There’s no silver bullet.  There’s no quick fix to these problems.  I knew when I was running for office, and I certainly knew by the time I was sworn in, I knew it would take time to reverse the damage of a decade worth of policies that saw too few people being able to climb into the middle class, too many people falling behind.  (Applause.)  

We all knew this.  We all knew that it would take more time than any of us want to dig ourselves out of this hole created by this economic crisis. But on this Labor Day, there are two things I want you to know.  Number one:  I am going to keep fighting every single day, every single hour, every single minute, to turn this economy around and put people back to work and renew the American Dream, not just for your family, not just for all our families, but for future generations.  That I can guarantee you. (Applause.)  

 Number two — I believe this with every fiber of my being:  America cannot have a strong, growing economy without a strong, growing middle class, and the chance for everybody, no matter how humble their beginnings, to join that middle class — (applause) — a middle class built on the idea that if you work hard, if you live up to your responsibilities, then you can get ahead; that you can enjoy some basic guarantees in life.  A good job that pays a good wage. Health care that will be there when you get sick.  (Applause.)  A secure retirement even if you’re not rich.  (Applause.)  An education that will give your children a better life than we had. (Applause.)  These are simple ideas.  These are American ideas. These are union ideas.  That’s what we’re fighting for. (Applause.) 

I was thinking about this last week.  I was thinking about this last week on the day I announced the end of our combat mission in Iraq. (Applause.)  And I spent some time, as I often do, with our soldiers and our veterans.  And this new generation of troops coming home from Iraq, they’ve earned their place alongside the greatest generation. (Applause.)  Just like that greatest generation, they’ve got the skills, they’ve got the training, they’ve got the drive to move America’s economy forward once more.  We’ve been investing in new care and new opportunities and a new commitment to our veterans, because we’ve got to serve them just the way they served us. (Applause.)  

But, Milwaukee, they’re coming home to an economy hit by a recession deeper than anything we’ve seen since the 1930s.  So the question is, how do we create the same kinds of middle-class opportunities for this generation as my grandparents’ generation came home to?  How do we build our economy on that same strong, stable foundation for growth?  

Now, anybody who thinks that we can move this economy forward with just a few folks at the top doing well, hoping that it’s going to trickle down to working people who are running faster and faster just to keep up, you’ll never see it.  (Applause.)  If that’s what you’re waiting for, you should stop waiting, because it’s never happened in our history.  That’s not how America was built.  It wasn’t built with a bunch of folks at the top doing well and everybody else scrambling.  We didn’t become the most prosperous country in the world just by rewarding greed and recklessness.  We didn’t come this far by letting the special interests run wild.  We didn’t do it just by gambling and chasing paper profits on Wall Street.  We built this country by making things, by producing goods we could sell.  We did it with sweat and effort and innovation.  (Applause.)  We did it on the assembly line and at the construction site.  (Applause.) 

We did it by investing in the people who built this country from the ground up –- the workers, middle-class families, small business owners.  We out-worked folks and we out-educated folks and we out-competed everybody else.  That’s how we built America.  (Applause.) 

And, Milwaukee, that’s what we’re going to do again.  That’s been at the heart what we’ve been doing over these last 20 months: building our economy on a new foundation so that our middle class doesn’t just survive this crisis -– I want it to thrive.  I want it to be stronger than it was before.

And over the last two years, that’s meant taking on some powerful interests — some powerful interests who had been dominating the agenda in Washington for a very long time.  And they’re not always happy with me.  They talk about me like a dog.  (Applause.)  That’s not in my prepared remarks, it’s just — but it’s true.  

You know, that’s why we passed financial reform to provide new accountability and tough oversight of Wall Street; stopping credit card companies from gouging you with hidden fees and unfair rate hikes.  (Applause.)  Ending taxpayer bailouts of Wall Street once and for all.  They’re not happy with it, but it was the right thing to do.  (Applause.) 

That’s why we eliminated tens of billions of dollars in wasteful taxpayer subsidies, handouts to the big banks that were providing student loans.  We took that money, tens of billions of dollars, and we’re going to go to make sure that your kids and your grandkids can get student loans and grants at a cheap rate and afford a college education.  (Applause.)  They’re not happy with it, but it was the right thing to do.  (Applause.)  

Yes, we’re using those savings to put a college education within reach for working families.

That’s why we passed health insurance reform to make coverage affordable. (Applause.)  Reform that ends the indignity of insurance companies jacking up your premiums at will, denying you coverage just because you get sick; reform that gives you control, gives you the ability if your child is sick to be able to get an affordable insurance plan, making sure they can’t drop it.  

That’s why we’re making it easier for workers to save for retirement, with new ways of saving your tax refunds, a simpler system for enrolling in plans like 401(k)s, and fighting to strengthen Social Security for the future. (Applause.)   And if everybody is still talking about privatizing Social Security, they need to be clear:  It will not happen on my watch.  Not when I’m President of the United States of America.  (Applause.) 

That’s why — we’ve given tax cuts — except we give them to folks who need them.  (Applause.)  We’ve given them to small business owners.  We’ve given them to clean energy companies. We’ve cut taxes for 95 percent of working Americans, just like I promised you during the campaign.  You all got a tax cut.  (Applause.) 

And instead of giving tax breaks to companies that are shipping jobs overseas, we’re cutting taxes to companies that are putting our people to work right here in the United States of America.  (Applause.)   

See, we want to invest in growth industries like clean energy and manufacturing.  You’ve got leaders here in Wisconsin — Tom Barrett, Jim Doyle — they’ve been fighting to bring those jobs to Milwaukee, fighting to bring those jobs here to Wisconsin.  I don’t want to see solar panels and wind turbines and electric cars made in China.  I want them made right here in the United States of America.  (Applause.) 

I don’t want to buy stuff from someplace else.  I want to grow our exports so that we’re selling to someplace else — products that say “Made in the U.S.A.”  (Applause.)

 AUDIENCE: U.S.A.!  U.S.A.!  U.S.A.!

 THE PRESIDENT:  That’s right.  There are no better workers than American workers.  (Applause.)  I’ll put my money on you any day of the week.  And when the naysayers said, well, you can’t save the auto industry, just go ahead and let hundreds of thousands of jobs vanish, we said we’re going to stand by those workers.  If the management is willing to make tough choices, if everybody is willing to come together, I’m confident that the American auto industry can compete once again -– and today, that industry is on the way back.  They said no, we said yes to the American worker.  They’re coming back. (Applause.) 

 Now, let me tell you, another thing we’ve done is to make long-overdue investments in upgrading our outdated, our inefficient national infrastructure.  We’re talking roads.  We’re talking bridges.  We’re talking dams, levees.  But we’re also talking a smart electric grid that can bring clean energy to new areas. We’re talking about broadband Internet so that everybody is plugged in.  We’re talking about high-speed rail lines required to compete in a 21st century economy.  (Applause.)  I want to get down from Milwaukee down to Chicago quick.  (Applause.)  Avoid a traffic jam.  

 We’re talking investments in tomorrow that are creating hundreds of thousands of private sector jobs right now.

Because of these investments, and the tens of thousands of projects they spurred all across the country, the battered construction sector actually grew last month for the first time in a very long time.  (Applause.)  

But, you know, the folks here in the trades know what I’m talking about — nearly one in five construction workers are unemployed.  One in five.  Nobody has been hit harder than construction workers.  And a lot of those folks, they had lost their jobs in manufacturing and went into construction; now they’ve lost their jobs again. 

It doesn’t do anybody any good when so many hardworking Americans have been idled for months, even years, at a time when there is so much of America that needs rebuilding.

So, that’s why, Milwaukee, today, I am announcing a new plan for rebuilding and modernizing America’s roads and rails and runways for the long term.  (Applause.)  I want America to have the best infrastructure in the world.  We used to have the best infrastructure in the world.  We can have it again.  We are going to make it happen.  (Applause.) 

Over the next six years, over the next six years, we are going to rebuild 150,000 miles of our roads -– that’s enough to circle the world six times.  That’s a lot of road.  We’re going to lay and maintain 4,000 miles of our railways –- enough to stretch coast to coast. We’re going to restore 150 miles of runways.  And we’re going to advance a next-generation air-traffic control system to reduce travel time and delays for American travelers.  (Applause.)  I think everybody can agree on that.  Anybody want more delays in airports?

AUDIENCE: No!

THE PRESIDENT:  No, I didn’t think so.  That’s not a Republican or a Democratic idea.  We all want to get to where we need to go.  I mean, I’ve got Air Force One now, it’s nice. (Laughter.)  But I still remember what it was like.  

This is a plan that will be fully paid for.  It will not add to the deficit over time -– we’re going to work with Congress to see to that.  We want to set up an infrastructure bank to leverage federal dollars and focus on the smartest investments.  We’re going to continue our strategy to build a national high-speed rail network that reduces congestion and travel times and reduces harmful emissions.  We want to cut waste and bureaucracy and consolidate and collapse more than 100 different programs that too often duplicate each other.  So we want to change the way Washington spends your tax dollars.  We want to reform a haphazard, patchwork way of doing business.  We want to focus on less wasteful approaches than we’ve got right now.  We want competition and innovation that gives us the best bang for the buck.  

But the bottom line is this, Milwaukee — this will not only create jobs immediately, it’s also going to make our economy hum over the long haul.  It’s a plan that history tells us can and should attract bipartisan support.  It’s a plan that says even in the aftermath of the worst recession in our lifetimes, America can still shape our own destiny.  We can still move this country forward.  We can still leave our children something better.  We can still leave them something that lasts.  (Applause.) 

So these are the things we’ve been working for.  These are some of the victories you guys have helped us achieve.  And we’re not finished.  We’ve got a lot more progress to make.  And I’m confident we will.

But there are some folks in Washington who see things differently. (Boos.)  You know what I’m talking about.  (Applause.) When it comes to just about everything we’ve done to strengthen our middle class, to rebuild our economy, almost every Republican in Congress says no.  (Boos.)  Even on things we usually agree on, they say no. If I said the sky was blue, they say no.  (Laughter and applause.) If I said fish live in the sea, they’d say no.  (Laughter.) They just think it’s better to score political points before an election than to solve problems.  So they said no to help for small businesses, even when the small businesses said we desperately need this.  This used to be their key constituency, they said.  They said no.  No to middle-class tax cuts.  They say they’re for tax cuts; I say, okay, let’s give tax cuts to the middle class.  No. (Laughter.)  No to clean energy jobs.  No to making college more affordable.  No to reforming Wall Street.  They’re saying right now, no to cutting more taxes for small business owners and helping them get financing.  

You know, I heard — somebody out here was yelling “Yes we can.” Remember that was our slogan?  Their slogan is “No we can’t.”  (Applause.)  No, no, no, no. 

AUDIENCE: Yes we can!  Yes we can!  Yes we can!

THE PRESIDENT:  I mean, I personally think “Yes we can” is more inspiring than “No we can’t.”  (Applause.)  To steal a line from our old friend Ted Kennedy:  What is it about working men and women that they find so offensive?  (Laughter.)  

When we passed a bill earlier this summer to help states save jobs — the jobs of hundreds of thousands of teachers and nurses and police officers and firefighters that were about to be laid off, they said no. (Applause.)  And the Republican who thinks he’s going to take over as Speaker — (boos) — I’m just saying that’s his opinion — (laughter) — he’s entitled to his opinion.  But when he was asked about this, he dismissed those jobs as “government jobs” that weren’t worth saving.  (Boos.)  That’s what he said, I’m quoting — “government jobs.”

Now, think about this.  These are the people who teach our children. These are the people who keep our streets safe.  These are the people who put their lives on the line, who rush into a burning building.  Government jobs?  I don’t know about you, but I think those jobs are worth saving.  (Applause.)  I think those jobs are worth saving. (Applause.)  

 By the way, this bill that we passed to save all those jobs, we made sure that bill wouldn’t add to the deficit.  You know how we paid for it? By closing one of these ridiculous tax loopholes that actually rewarded corporations for shipping jobs and profits overseas.  (Applause.)

 I mean, this — this was one of those loopholes that allowed companies to write off taxes they pay to foreign governments –- even though they weren’t paying taxes here in the United States.  So middle-class families were footing tax breaks for companies creating jobs somewhere else.  I mean, even a lot of America’s biggest corporations agreed that this loophole didn’t make sense, agreed that it needed to be closed, agreed that it wasn’t fair -– but the man who thinks he’s going to be Speaker, he wants to reopen this loophole.  (Boos.)

 Look, the bottom line is this:  These guys, they just don’t want to give up on that economic philosophy that they have been peddling for most of the last decade.  You know that philosophy — you cut taxes for millionaires and billionaires; you cut all the rules and regulations for special interests; and then you just cut working folks loose — you cut them loose to fend for themselves.

 You remember they called it the ownership society, but what it really boiled down to was, if you couldn’t find a job, you couldn’t afford college, you were born poor, your insurance company dropped you even though your kid was sick, that you were on your own.

 Well, you know what, that philosophy didn’t work out so well for middle-class families all across America.  It didn’t work out so well for our country.  All it did was rack up record deficits and result in the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression.  I mean, think about it, we have tried what they’re peddling.  We did it for 10 years.  We ended up with the worst economy since the 1930s and record deficits to boot.  (Applause.) It’s not like we haven’t tried what they’re trying to sell us. 

Now, I’m bringing this up not because I’m trying to re-litigate the past; I’m bringing it up because I don’t want to re-live the past.  (Applause.)  

It’d be one thing, Milwaukee, if Republicans in Washington had some new ideas, if they had said, you know what, we really screwed up, and we’ve learned from our mistakes; we’re going to do things differently this time. That’s not what they’re doing.  

When the leader of their campaign committee was asked on national television what Republicans would do if they took over Congress, you know what he said? He said, we’ll do exactly the same thing we did the last time. (Applause.)  That’s what he said.  It’s on tape.

So basically, here’s what this election comes down to.  They’re betting that between now and November, you’re going to come down with amnesia.  (Laughter.)  They figure you’re going to forget what their agenda did to this country.  They think you’ll just believe that they’ve changed.

These are the folks whose policies helped devastate our middle class.  They drove our economy into a ditch.  And we got in there and put on our boots and we pushed and we shoved.  And we were sweating and these guys were standing, watching us and sipping on a Slurpee.  (Laughter.)  And they were pointing at us saying, how come you’re not pushing harder, how come you’re not pushing faster?  And then when we finally got the car up — and it’s got a few dings and a few dents, it’s got some mud on it, we’re going to have to do some work on it — they point to everybody and say, look what these guys did to your car. (Laughter.)  After we got it out of the ditch!  And then they got the nerve to ask for the keys back!  (Laughter and applause.)  I don’t want to give them the keys back.  They don’t know how to drive.  (Applause.)   

I mean, I want everything to think about it here.  When you want to go forward in your car, what do you do?

AUDIENCE: D!

THE PRESIDENT:  You put it in D.  They’re going to pop it in reverse. They’d have those special interests riding shotgun, then they’d hit the gas and we’d be right back in the ditch.  (Laughter.) 

Milwaukee, we are not going backwards.  That’s the choice we face this fall.  Do we want to go back?  Or do we want to go forward?  I say we want to move forward.  America always moves forward.  We keep moving forward every day.  (Applause.)  

Let me say this, Milwaukee.  I know these are difficult times.  I know folks are worried.  I know there’s still a lot of hurt out here. I hear it when I travel around the country.  I see it in the letters that I read every night from folks who are looking for a job or lost their home.  It breaks my heart, because those are the folks that I got into politics for.  You’re the reason I’m here.  (Applause.) 

And when times are tough — when times are tough, I know it can be easy to give in to cynicism.  I know it can be easy to give in to fear and doubt.   And you know, it’s easy sometimes for folks to stir up stuff and turn people on each other, and it’s easy to settle for something less, to set our sights a little bit lower.

But I just want everybody here to remember, that’s not who we are. That’s not the country I know.  We do not give up.  We do not quit.  We face down war.  We face down depression.  We face down great challenges and great threats.  We have lit the way for the rest of the world.

Whenever times have seemed at their worst, Americans have been at their best. That’s when we roll up our sleeves.  That’s when we remember we rise or fall together –- as one nation and as one people. (Applause.)  That’s the spirit that started the labor movement, the idea that alone, we may be weak.  Divided, we may fall.  But we are united, we are strong.  That’s why they call them unions. That’s why we call this the United States of America.  (Applause.) 

I’m going to make this case across the country between now and November.  And I am asking for your help.  And if you are willing to join me and Tom Barrett and Gwen Moore and Russ Feingold and Herb Kohl, we can strengthen our middle class and make this economy work for all Americans again and restore the American Dream and give it to our children and our grandchildren.  (Applause.) 

God bless you, and God bless the United States of America.  (Applause.) 

Comment:  The president seems interested today in people who roll up their sleeves and work, perhaps actually solve problems.

Yet, he politicks for so many who wish to sit on their duffs and wait for Obamacare  checks to roll up their sleeves instead and have government decide what type light bulbs, health insurance,  and food to buy,  and what ralion and television news programs should be forbidden to the public.

Obamatalk doesn’t remind the  audience that his Marxism didn’t create America.  His rationing health care; his desire to ration wages, and that the soul of America was established long before the violence and corruption of Organized Labor he so cuddly about.  Obamatalk did not explain the president’s own animosity toward the country he leads……..Nor is he honest or forthright regarding the Marxism he espouses…..He doesn’t dare in a country that still has relatively honest elections.

The British Big Lefty, The BBC, Cannot Understand the Tea Party Movement

Americans should never forget that Great Britain for much of the twentieth century was a major socialist, semiMarxist state……”if Marxism can be semied.”   Private enterprise was allowed, but major corporations including some radio and television channels were owned by the STATE.  The BBC was one of those government owned, government managed, and government education departments. 

Yet, the Brits hadn’t lost all  democratic sensitivities to Leftist Labor, but it was assumed in British living that Government ownership was permanent and its power  likely to expand depending on  the whims of  organized Labor.   Stagnation followed stagnation, and then Margaret Thatcher occurred and the dark clouds of the smog of Big Labor cleared enough for some sunshine of free enterprise and competition to be reborn.

But the leftwing messenger, the BBC, remained the leftwing messenger.   It even has its cable channel for Minnesotan lefties to enjoy watching Charlie Schumer explain American conservatism to the BBC audience, an audience   of 11 Marxists and me.

Because Brits are still Brits, they almost always have had a yen for trying hard to do their view of right in the local as they enjoyed the local  riches, plundered or purchased…….to allow variety of voices without beheadings…..generally writing, that is.  

In those days of colonial tyranny, if one had to be invaded and “civilized”, how could anyone in the world be so lucky as to be overwhelmed by the Union Jack  as were our beloved America,  and don’t forget Canada and Australia, and organized India, and even civilized Pakistan until the Islamist radicals showed up).

But the BBC remains Labor, unmoved by the freer world.   It is hung up on the Tea Party being Nazi, and reports the like to our English brethren. 

There is resistance from some quarters, however.  Please read the following article by Janet Daley, writing at Telegraph.co.UK….”The BBC completely fails to understand Tea Party movement”.

“With the smug incomprehension in which it takes so much pride (can’t understand – won’t understand!), the BBC sets about the American Tea Party Movement as if it were a cross between the Klu Klux Klan and the German neo-fascist brigade. Not once in all the demonic depictions I have seen and heard (last week’s Newsnight package was particularly outrageous) have I heard a mention of what the TPM is actually about: taxation. (Note to BBC editors: the movement is named after the Boston Tea Party because it is protesting about the imposition of higher federal taxes and over-weening controls on citizens who believe their voices have been ignored.)

The British generally and the BBC in particular have a real problem understanding the obsessive suspicion in which the power of central government is held in the US. This is not some funny redneck eccentricity: it is fundamental to the Constitution which gives individual states much greater sovereignty than the countries of the European Union enjoy. The states have independent judicial systems (some states have capital punishment, others do not) and separate taxation systems (some have sales taxes, others do not). Only a Supreme Court ruling can over-turn state law by, for example, declaring something (such as abortion) to be a legal right which a state legislature may not deny.

Traditionally there is only one nationally imposed tax – federal income tax – which is designed to pay for those functions that must be carried out by national government. Resistance to the Obama healthcare reforms is as passionate as it is precisely because it imposes a federal requirement to purchase health insurance which seems to contravene the basic economic freedom guaranteed by the Constitution. The BBC obviously finds it impossible to believe that ordinary people could actually take issues like this seriously. (They can only be racists or hillibilly know-nothings.) The Corporation  really ought to encourage its correspondents to get out more and talk to some of the articulate Americans who don’t spend their lives in liberal salons.”

Tags: , ,

Comment:  Like the BBC Left, the Obama folk have no clue that such a non Marxist   America can still exist.  Worse, one that is civil and orderly.  

 How can that be when so many of  the professors in the country profess Marxist, Women’s Sexist,  Black Racist, and  Homosexual hates for America?  

Obama Government Will “Reform” Standardized Tests, K-12

U.S. Asks Educators to Reinvent Student Tests, and How They Are Given

Standardized exams — the multiple-choice, bubble-in tests for math and reading — are being overhauled.  Over the next four years, two groups of states, 44 in all, will get $330 million to work with hundreds of university professors and testing experts to design a series of new assessments that officials say will look very different from those in use today, says the New York Times.

  • One group, led by Florida, will be made up of 25 states and the District of Columbia.  Among its members are several large states like California, Illinois and New York.  Known as the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers, the group was awarded $170 million.
  • The other group, whose membership overlaps the first, has 31 states and is led by Washington.  It includes other Western states like Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon and Utah, as well as some in the East, like Maine, New Hampshire and Vermont.  The group, which won $160 million, calls itself the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium.

The new tests are to be ready for the 2014-2015 school year.  They will be computer-based and will measure higher-order skills ignored by the multiple-choice exams used in nearly every state, including students’ ability to read complex texts, synthesize information and do research projects, says the Times.

Secretary of Education Arne Duncan set aside $350 million from the billions that Congress voted last year for the Race to the Top grant competition to finance the testing initiative.  The department has not yet said what it will do with the $20 million not awarded to either group of states, says the Times.

Source:  Sam Dillon, “U.S. Asks Educators to Reinvent Student Tests, and How They Are Given,” New York Times, September 2, 2010.

For text:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/03/education/03testing.html?_r=3&adxnnl=1&ref=us&adxnnlx=1283544140-ImvQnWOW2yrm0XQlRX4cRA

For more on Education Issues:

http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_Category=27

Comment:  In this use, “U.S.” means Barack Hussein Obama and his administration….so there likely  will be more Marxism in our future. 

I spent a number of years in post high school “education”.    Beyone my bachelor’s degree about five or six, depending on definitions,  were spent in a university “Department of Education” in a place where the powers that were, were supposed to teach teacher to teach. 

It’s a hard task, however, to teach teachers who have such little knowledge regarding what they are supposed to teach.  We live in such a society.  The purpose of education in this modern America in practice   is not to teach knowledge and problem solving, it is to teach social agendas regarding creating a new world……one in which good people are socialist lambs in a world where  lions are told  not to eat flesh and everyone will be equal, except teacher union leaders who will be paid in prestige and higher pay for watching over and protecting the system.

It has developed over the years, that  the American Library Association has come to be led by a host of angry antiAmerican Marxists.  The university teaching of teachers suffers from  a similar foreign, antiAmerican agenda.   Bill Ayers, noted American Marxist terrorist, recently was president of one of these education groups, one quite open about its Marxism.  Please read the following review of the pedagogic ideals  of the Bill Ayers group:

Found at Verum Serum:

“[Morgen: Geoffrey is a regular commenter who we invited to post on occasion, based on his depth of analysis and clear writing ability. The ground war over the future of our nation’s values is being waged in our school systems, and people like Bill Ayers are generals in this war. As they are wont to do, they mask their philosophies and strategies under the cloak of academic research and arcane terminology. Geoffrey’s piece is a great primer on the core of liberal (socialist) strategy to subvert the education of our children.]

The motivational and foundational philosophical theorems of the American Left’s political, social and educational views are ‘Critical Pedagogy’ theory and ‘Cultural Marxism’. Bill Ayers is simply an influential, ‘celebrity’ advocate of these ideologies.

 

The Critical Pedagogy Movement is coming to a school near you and it means to change the world.

One child at a time.

Most people have never heard the term, ‘Critical Pedagogy’. That is intentional.

Anyone not involved in the educational community would have little reason to be aware of this leftist theory of education. If it were merely a theory however, there would be little reason for concern.

The primary assumption of critical pedagogy is that disparities between individual and social group outcomes in life are due to entrenched societal oppression. So, if anyone or any group has ‘more’ than another it is because they are either oppressing others or benefiting from the ‘oppression of the masses’.

Thus, all whites benefit from an unjust social system and, as a result are inherently guilty of racism.

Advocates implicitly deny any definition of the ‘pursuit of happiness’, which does not result in equality of outcome. That necessarily limits American’s liberty and their pursuit of happiness to the politically correct calculus of Critical Pedagogy theory.

Pedagogy is defined as ‘the art or profession of teaching’. That definition is sometimes shortened by advocates into ‘the teaching’. The theory of critical pedagogy was first fully developed and then popularized in 1968 by the Brazilian educator and influential theorist Paulo Freire. His seminal work, the Pedagogy [The Teaching] of the Oppressed, was highly influential within the US leftist academic community and in 1969 Freire was offered a visiting professorship at Harvard University.

His subsequent work was highly influential with the Bill Ayers of the world. One might think of Paulo Freire as the Saul Alinsky of the US leftist educational community. Critical Pedagogy is the educational arm of the ‘social justice movement’, which is the political arm of “liberation theology”, all of which are aspects of ‘Cultural Marxism’.

Some of the basic tenants of critical pedagogy are:

  • ALL education is inherently political…
  • A social and educational vision of justice and equality should be the foundation for all education
  • Race, class, gender, sexuality, religion, and physical ability are important domains of oppression
  • The purpose of education is the alleviation of oppression and human suffering
  • Schools must not hurt students–good schools don’t blame students for their failures
  • Good schools don’t judge the beliefs students have about their life’s experiences
  • Part of the role of any educator involves becoming a researcher into social oppression
  • Education must promote emancipatory change

Sixteen of the top educational schools in America are heavily influenced by Critical Pedagogy and are shaping the future leaders of our educational system. This belief system is now spreading out of the colleges into our K-12 systems and being promulgated by radical teachers as its ‘agents of change’. It’s a well-organized, widespread movement, firmly entrenched in many Universities and its advocates are actively seeking to spread it worldwide.

Thus, most recently in Minnesota the agenda of radical teacher education came to light; The University of Minnesota redesigns teachers. Here is what the Univ. of Minnesota’s new teacher certification program requires:

Students are required to adopt “race, culture, class and gender” identity politics in order to be recommended for a teaching license.

Students must accept that teachers’ lack of “cultural competence” is a major reason for many minority students performing poorly in Minnesota schools.

All prospective teachers have to meet 14 “outcomes”, as well as “assessment” methods to assure they had achieved the outcomes. The first outcome is typical: “Future teachers will be able to discuss their own histories and current thinking drawing on notions of white privilege, hegemonic masculinity, hetero-normativity, and internalized oppression.” [Think carefully upon that terminology, it’s quite revealing]

Other highlights deserve attention:

“Future teachers accept that they are privileged or marginalized depending on context.”

“Future teachers will recognize & demonstrate understanding of white privilege.”

“Future teachers are able to explain how institutional racism works in schools”

“Future teachers can construct and articulate a sophisticated and nuanced critical analysis of [the American Dream]…. In pursuing this analysis, students will make use of…the following:

o Myth of meritocracy in the United States
o The historical use of scientific racism to justify assumptions of fixed mental capacity
o History of demands for assimilation to white, middle-class, Christian values
o History of white racism, with special focus on current colorblind ideology

Students are evaluated and graded on whether they conform to the “race, class, gender” agenda. They must, for example, write a “self-discovery paper” in which they “describe their own ethno-cultural background.” They must describe their own prejudices and stereotypes, question their “cultural” motives for wishing to become teachers, and take two “cultural intelligence”-type assessments. They are graded (for example) on “the extent to which they find intrinsic satisfaction” in “cross-cultural interactions.”

Students must not only demonstrate changed thinking — they must become activists. They must learn that schools are “critical sites for social and cultural transformation.” One outcome reads: “Future teachers create & fight for social justice even if only in the classroom”

Future teachers are required to subscribe to the prescribed ideology, “Every faculty member at our university that trains our teachers must comprehend and commit to the centrality of race, class, culture, and gender issues in teaching and learning, and then frame their teaching and course foci accordingly.”

The goal of critical pedagogy is social transformation, which is the product of the practice of social ‘justice’ at the collective level. Social transformation is accomplished through indoctrination of the young, leading to social transformation of the larger society as succeeding generations inculcate the ‘lessons of awareness’ transmitted to them by their ‘teachers’.

Teachers are urged not to mince words with children about the evils of the existing social order. They should portray “homelessness as a consequence of the private dealings of landlords, an arms buildup as a consequence of corporate decisions, racial exclusion as a consequence of a private property-holder’s choice.” In other words, they should turn the little ones into young socialists and critical theorists.

Young, impressionable children are no longer being taught to feel good about being Americans. Their schools teachers, who traditionally embody socially approved values, are teaching them to be ashamed of being Americans.

Spreading out from the schools that teach our teachers, this ideology is being inculcated into our nations’ K-12 schools and is anti-American in the most profound meaning of the term. It is a movement that is teaching future generations that capitalism and traditional American values are intrinsically evil.

Critical pedagogy and its advocates, in their vehement antipathy toward capitalism, private property and traditional American values amount to a classic fifth subversive column, no less dangerous to freedom than Communism. Its advocates are seeking to transform western societies by covertly indoctrinating our young, through an essentially clandestine and subversive transformation of its culture.”

It’s a hard task, however, to teach teachers who have such little knowledge regarding what they are supposed to teach.  We live in such a society.  The purpose of education in this modern America in practice   is not to teach knowledge and problem solving, it is to teach social agendas regarding creating a new world……one in which good people are socialist lambs in a world where  lions are told  not to eat flesh and everyone will be equal, except teacher unions who watch over and protect the system.”

(Although the eggs have been layed, the hen, Bill Ayers, has recently  announced retirement from his “higher education” post.)