• Pragerisms

    For a more comprehensive list of Pragerisms visit
    Dennis Prager Wisdom.

    • "The left is far more interested in gaining power than in creating wealth."
    • "Without wisdom, goodness is worthless."
    • "I prefer clarity to agreement."
    • "First tell the truth, then state your opinion."
    • "Being on the Left means never having to say you're sorry."
    • "If you don't fight evil, you fight gobal warming."
    • "There are things that are so dumb, you have to learn them."
  • Liberalism’s Seven Deadly Sins

    • Sexism
    • Intolerance
    • Xenophobia
    • Racism
    • Islamophobia
    • Bigotry
    • Homophobia

    A liberal need only accuse you of one of the above in order to end all discussion and excuse himself from further elucidation of his position.

  • Glenn’s Reading List for Die-Hard Pragerites

    • Bolton, John - Surrender is not an Option
    • Bruce, Tammy - The Thought Police; The New American Revolution; The Death of Right and Wrong
    • Charen, Mona - DoGooders:How Liberals Hurt Those They Claim to Help
    • Coulter, Ann - If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans; Slander
    • Dalrymple, Theodore - In Praise of Prejudice; Our Culture, What's Left of It
    • Doyle, William - Inside the Oval Office
    • Elder, Larry - Stupid Black Men: How to Play the Race Card--and Lose
    • Frankl, Victor - Man's Search for Meaning
    • Flynn, Daniel - Intellectual Morons
    • Fund, John - Stealing Elections
    • Friedman, George - America's Secret War
    • Goldberg, Bernard - Bias; Arrogance
    • Goldberg, Jonah - Liberal Fascism
    • Herson, James - Tales from the Left Coast
    • Horowitz, David - Left Illusions; The Professors
    • Klein, Edward - The Truth about Hillary
    • Mnookin, Seth - Hard News: Twenty-one Brutal Months at The New York Times and How They Changed the American Media
    • Morris, Dick - Because He Could; Rewriting History
    • O'Beirne, Kate - Women Who Make the World Worse
    • Olson, Barbara - The Final Days: The Last, Desperate Abuses of Power by the Clinton White House
    • O'Neill, John - Unfit For Command
    • Piereson, James - Camelot and the Cultural Revolution: How the Assassination of John F. Kennedy Shattered American Liberalism
    • Prager, Dennis - Think A Second Time
    • Sharansky, Natan - The Case for Democracy
    • Stein, Ben - Can America Survive? The Rage of the Left, the Truth, and What to Do About It
    • Steyn, Mark - America Alone
    • Stephanopolous, George - All Too Human
    • Thomas, Clarence - My Grandfather's Son
    • Timmerman, Kenneth - Shadow Warriors
    • Williams, Juan - Enough: The Phony Leaders, Dead-End Movements, and Culture of Failure That Are Undermining Black America--and What We Can Do About It
    • Wright, Lawrence - The Looming Tower

Bill Clinton’s Military Heroism Reviewed

BILL CLINTON’S MILITARY CAREER

by Cdr. Hamilton McWhorter USN (ret)

Bill Clinton registers for the draft on September 08, 1964,

Accepting all contractual conditions of registering for the draft.

Selective Service Number is 326 46 228.

Bill Clinton classified 2-S on November 17, 1964.

Bill Clinton reclassified 1-A on March 20, 1968.

Bill Clinton ordered to report for induction on July 28, 1969.

Bill Clinton refuses to report and is not inducted into the military.

Bill Clinton reclassified 1-D after enlisting in the United States

Army Reserves on August 07, 1969, under authority

Of COL. E. Holmes.

Clinton signs enlistment papers and takes oath of enlistment.

Bill Clinton fails to report to his duty station at

The University of Arkansas ROTC, September 1969.

Bill Clinton reclassified 1-A on October 30, 1969,

As enlistment with Army Reserves is revoked by

Colonel E. Holmes and Clinton now AWOL and

Subject to arrest under Public Law 90-40 (2) (a) –

Registrant who has failed to report…

Remain liable for induction.

Bill Clinton’s birth date lottery number is 311,

Drawn December 1, 1969, but anyone who has

Already been ordered to report for induction is INELIGIBLE!

Bill Clinton runs for Congress (1974), while a fugitive

From justice under Public Law 90-40.

Bill Clinton runs for Arkansas Attorney General

(1976), while a fugitive from justice.

Bill Clinton receives pardon on January 21, 1977,

From President Carter.

Bill Clinton becomes the FIRST PARDONED FEDERAL FELON

Ever to serve as President of the United States.

All these facts come from Freedom of Information requests,

Public laws, and various books that have been published,

And have not been refuted by Clinton .

After the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, President Clinton

Promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.

After the 1995 bombing in Saudi Arabia ,which killed five U.S.

Military personnel,

Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.

After the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing in Saudi Arabia ,

Which killed 19 and injured 200 U.S. Military personnel,

Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.

After the 1998 bombing of U.S. Embassies in Africa ,

Which killed 224 and injured 5,000,

Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.

After the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole,

Which killed 17 and injured 39 U.S. Sailors,

Clinton promised that those responsible be hunted down and punished.

Maybe if Clinton had kept those promises, an estimated 3,000 people

In New York and Washington , DC , who are now dead

Would be alive today.

“Nigger” is just a six letter word…. Why the Racist Harrassment?

The word “nigger” is most commonly used in American culture among the urban racially black community.

Should they who ‘habit’ the word be harrassed, fired from jobs, isolated, imprisoned, fined, killed, beat up, spat upon and other delicacies of modern American life suffered as many whites have over the years for uttering this six letter word?

Why are those who are not African-American who occasion the word punished but blacks are not?

Could it be the American Left views certain Americans incapable of growing up? That they require perpetual government aid to escape adolescence?

Well, this is the United States of America in the year 2013 where the female mind and Barack Hussein Obama are running wild in American politics, press, education, entertainment, religion, business, and so on. They know evil whites when they hear them and own the American vocabulary……but Negroes, oops, another word erased by the Lefty pure by that same collection of ‘super righteous’ knotheads who for years banned Mark Twain’s “Huckleberry Finn” from American readership because the name of white boy Huck’s dear friend and roll model, was “Nigger” Jim.

“Nigger” is still alive among the Lefty Fifth Column assassins, because it has such meaning appropriately describing so many characters in the American Congress, these days. The word still bears some kind of special meaning…..with Al Sharpton or Bill Maher and other lefties, for calculated political use.

I have no idea who Paula Deen is or was…..But the following article challenges Lefty ruled America these days which buys American African votes acting like Hitler’s gestapo pressing for punishing free speech of one kind of folks of one race for using one word.

Larry Elder Reviews the Issue in his article at Invester’s Business Daily:

If Paula Deen Is Out, Please Explain Maher and Sharpton
By Larry Elder – June 27, 2013

If celebrity cook Paula Deen is out because of her decades-old private use of the “n” word, what about its public AND private use by MSNBC’s Al Sharpton? What about HBO host Bill Maher’s use of the “c” word?

The crisis Deen must deal with confirms the observation of a former editor of the conservative magazine National Review. “White racism exists,” said John O’Sullivan. “But its social power is weak; the social power against it, overwhelming.”

Deen has — so far — lost her show on the Food Network and her spokesperson gig for Smithfield Foods. QVC, Sears, Wal-Mart and others are deciding whether to continue their relationship with the embattled chef.

What did the 66-year-old native of Georgia do that now threatens their enterprises?

In a deposition given in a harassment lawsuit filed by a white ex-employee at a Deen family-owned restaurant, Deen admitted using the “n-word” in the past, during a private conversation: “When a black man burst into the bank that I was working at and put a gun to my head,” she said, “I didn’t feel real favorable to him.” Deen says she didn’t use the word during the holdup, but “probably” used it later, “in telling my husband.”

Asked if she ever used the word again, Deen responded, “I’m sure I have, but it’s been a very long time.”

When pressed to recall specific instances, Deen could not, saying: “I don’t know, maybe in repeating something that was said to me. … But that’s just not a word that we use as time has gone on. Things have changed since the ’60s in the South. And my children and my brother object to that word being used in any cruel or mean behavior, as well as I do.”

Deen has, so far, apologized, apologized and apologized.

That the ex-employee is white, not black, and worked for her for five years did not seem to matter. Nor does it seem to matter that others have not come forward to corroborate her alleged racism. Does she refuse to hire blacks? Has she mistreated them or paid them below the wages of white workers? And, for what it’s worth, Deen supported and campaigned for President Barack Obama.

If Deen’s crime is the private use of the n-word, why does the Rev. Al Sharpton, who hosts a nightly hour-long show on MSNBC, get a pass?

Sharpton, of course, rocketed to fame by falsely accusing two white men of raping and sodomizing black teenager Tawana Brawley. A New York grand jury investigation concluded that the whole case was fraudulent and that Brawley flat-out lied to avoid punishment for staying out too late. To this day, Sharpton refuses to apologize to former Assistant District Attorney Steven Pagones, one of the men Sharpton accused of rape, even after a jury found Sharpton liable for defamation.

One of Sharpton’s top aides became so disgusted with the farce that he turned against his boss. Sharpton, the former aide said, could not have cared less whether Brawley was telling the truth because, according to Sharpton, “We beat this, we will be the biggest n–gers in New York.”

Sharpton called the former Marine, magna cum laude graduate, lawyer, professor and then-Mayor David Dinkins — New York City’s first and only black mayor — a “n–ger whore.”

Apparently MSNBC and the Food Network see the “n” word differently.

Sharpton has called Jews “diamond merchants” and described whites moving businesses into Harlem as “interlopers.” Sharpton helped incite three days of anti-Semitic rioting in Crown Heights, where two people died and over 100 were wounded. A Columbia University professor called Crown Heights “a modern-day pogrom.”

Then there’s Freddy’s Fashion Mart. A Jewish store owner in Harlem was accused of driving a black record store subtenant out of business by raising his rent. At one of many rallies meant to scare the Jewish owner away, Sharpton said, “There is a systematic and methodical strategy to eliminate our people from doing business off 125th Street. I want to make it clear … that we will not stand by and allow them to move this brother so that some white interloper can expand his business.” Later, one of the protestors, a black man, stormed Freddy’s Fashion Mart with a pistol, screaming: “It’s on now! All blacks out!” In addition to the shooting, he set fire to the building, eventually killing seven before turning the gun on himself.

If Paula Deen is out because of the “n” word, what about HBO’s Bill Maher and his use of the “c” word?

Maher, on more than one occasion, publicly called former vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin the “c” word.

He has called her a “dumb tw-t” — a derisive slang word for female genitalia. He has described her son Trig, who has Down syndrome, as “retarded.”

But, to be fair, neither Sharpton nor Maher — at least to our knowledge — has called Palin the “n” word. That must explain it.

The Ugly Senate Immigration Bill Goes to the House

Timing of legalization becomes key to immigration reform chances

By Russell Berman at the Hill:

The timing of when to grant legal status to the nation’s estimated 11 million illegal immigrants has emerged as the key point of dispute between the House and the Senate, which is poised to approve its immigration bill as soon as Thursday.

Differences over the issue could keep the House and Senate from reaching a deal and prevent President Obama from fulfilling the top priority of his second term despite the momentum gained from a successful Senate vote.

Republicans in the House say the border security amendment added to the Senate bill Wednesday to bolster GOP support in both chambers improves the legislation — but not enough to gain their support.

Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) again assured House Republicans in a private meeting Wednesday that the House would not simply take up and pass the Senate bill, leaving prospects for immigration reform reaching Obama’s desk unclear.

Conservatives said the border security amendment does not address what they see as the Senate bill’s fatal flaw: It grants the nation’s illegal immigrants provisional legal status before border security and enforcement enhancements are implemented.

“I’m not going to call it a fig leaf. I think it is an actual enforcement amendment,” said Rep. Raúl Labrador (R-Idaho), a former immigration lawyer who worked for months with a bipartisan House group crafting immigration legislation. “The issue with it is that it legalizes 11 million people before it is put into place all the way.”

The likelihood of an eventual compromise could hinge, Republicans say, on whether Democrats give ground on the timing of legalization.

“There’s no question that’s a major dividing point,” said Rep. Tom Cole (R-Okla.).

Senate Democrats have held out hope that their concessions on border security will pave the way to a deal with the House.

And there have been some positive sides from key House Republicans.

Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), a champion of comprehensive immigration reform, said on Tuesday that passage of the amendment brokered by GOP Sens. Bob Corker (Tenn.) and John Hoeven (N.D.) moved the Senate “closer to the House’s position,” and made a final bill “more likely.”

Yet House leaders have repeatedly said the proposal will have to move further to the right to have any chance across the Capitol.

The Corker-Hoeven amendment “made the bill better, no question about that, and the mere fact that it won significant Republican support is an indication of that,” said Cole. “But is that sufficient to make it pass over here? No.”

The amendment provides $30 billion for border security and requires the construction of 700 miles of fencing on the U.S.-Mexico border before immigrants in a provisional legal status can apply for a green card on a path to citizenship that, for most, will take at least 13 years.

But most illegal immigrants could still obtain provisional legal status within six months of the law’s enactment, once the secretary of Homeland Security has submitted border security and fencing strategies to Congress.

“If you flip it, and you say the Corker-Hoeven amendment has to be in place before you legalize 11 million people, then I would be more supportive of it,” Labrador said.

At issue, Republicans say, is the lack of trust that their constituents have in the federal government to enforce immigration laws and secure the border after immigrants are legalized.

“My constituents believe that border security is a condition precedent,” said Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.), chairman of the House Judiciary Committee’s subcommittee on Immigration. “I cannot go to my district and ask people to trust us. I just can’t.”

The Obama administration and Senate Democratic negotiators have balked at any delay in legalization, arguing the path to citizenship must be workable and clear from the start of the process. Democrats also see as unrealistic GOP demands for enhanced interior enforcement and for the employer e-verify system to first be implemented before legalization occurs.

House Republicans plan to meet on July 10 to discuss immigration, after which GOP leaders could bring to the floor a series of individual bills the Judiciary Committee is approving along party lines.

“We’ll do our own bill, through regular order, and it’ll be a bill that reflects the will of our majority and the people we represent,” Boehner told Republicans behind closed doors on Wednesday, according to a person in the room.

Boehner has said he would not bring up an immigration bill that lacks the support of a majority of his conference, and two more House conservatives said Wednesday he could lose his job if he goes back on his word.

“Whether he should or not, I think he would,” said Rep. Matt Salmon (R-Ariz.), who is circulating a petition calling for the House to formalize the “Hastert Rule,” which refers to a policy of only taking up measures that have the support of “the majority of the majority.”

“The American people elected a Republican majority in the House of Representatives,” added Rep. Tom McClintock (R-Calif.). “For a leader of that majority to use his authority to circumvent that majority would be cause for removal in my judgment.”

Boehner would have more options if a bipartisan group of House lawmakers finishes its work on immigration, but negotiators are still haggling over details and have missed repeated self-imposed deadlines for introducing their bill. The members have kept their proposal almost entirely under wraps, and while Democrats in the group have begun briefing their colleagues, most rank-and-file Republicans remain in the dark about their work.

“What bipartisan group?” Rep. John Fleming (R-La.) said when asked about it on Wednesday. “They’re an apparition.”

Food Stamps Are Unsuccessful (Except for Buying Obama Votes)

Food Stamps Are Unsuccessful
June 27, 2013

from the National Center for Policy Analysis:

In recent years, enrollment in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) has increased dramatically, rising from 26 million beneficiaries in 2007 (one in twelve Americans) to nearly 47 million in 2012 (one in seven Americans). Costs have increased dramatically as well, rising from $35 billion in 2007 to $80 billion in 2012, making it the second most expensive means-tested federal welfare program. As such, it is vital to understand the serious flaws in current food stamp programs, says Andrew Montgomery of FreedomWorks.

•Ineffective at reducing hunger: A report compiled by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) noted that while SNAP has had some positive results, “The literature is inconclusive regarding whether SNAP alleviates hunger and malnutrition in low-income households.”
•Subject to large scale fraud and error: The GAO reports that despite great progress, “The amount of SNAP benefits paid in error is substantial, totaling about $2.2 billion in 2009.”
•Lack of transparency: The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) does not disclose product purchases or how many total SNAP dollars are spent on each product, nor does the USDA disclose how much money retailers make off of SNAP.
•Form of corporate welfare: Food stamp programs guarantee large corporations consistent cash flow, creating a powerful corporate lobbying group that seeks to prevent cuts or changes to SNAP.
•Overlap and inefficiencies: A report compiled by the GAO found that, “The 18 food assistance programs show signs of program overlap, which can create unnecessary work and lead to inefficient use of resources.” Indeed, administrative costs equal about $5.5 billion per year, or about 10 percent of the value of food stamps distributed.
•Create dependency: The goal of any government welfare program should be to get people back on their feet, not to keep them in poverty and hunger. Current food stamp programs have little work required as a condition of assistance, encouraging the relatively well off to freeload off the system and those in need to remain in poverty.
Source: Andrew Montgomery, “10 Reasons Food Stamps Need to Be Reformed,” FreedomWorks, June 13, 2013.

Comment: “Food Stamps Unsuccessful”….Strange headline, that….Food stamps helped Barack Hussein Obama win re-election in 2012, the very reason for his political invasion into the food stamp world.