• Pragerisms

    For a more comprehensive list of Pragerisms visit
    Dennis Prager Wisdom.

    • "The left is far more interested in gaining power than in creating wealth."
    • "Without wisdom, goodness is worthless."
    • "I prefer clarity to agreement."
    • "First tell the truth, then state your opinion."
    • "Being on the Left means never having to say you're sorry."
    • "If you don't fight evil, you fight gobal warming."
    • "There are things that are so dumb, you have to learn them."
  • Liberalism’s Seven Deadly Sins

    • Sexism
    • Intolerance
    • Xenophobia
    • Racism
    • Islamophobia
    • Bigotry
    • Homophobia

    A liberal need only accuse you of one of the above in order to end all discussion and excuse himself from further elucidation of his position.

  • Glenn’s Reading List for Die-Hard Pragerites

    • Bolton, John - Surrender is not an Option
    • Bruce, Tammy - The Thought Police; The New American Revolution; The Death of Right and Wrong
    • Charen, Mona - DoGooders:How Liberals Hurt Those They Claim to Help
    • Coulter, Ann - If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans; Slander
    • Dalrymple, Theodore - In Praise of Prejudice; Our Culture, What's Left of It
    • Doyle, William - Inside the Oval Office
    • Elder, Larry - Stupid Black Men: How to Play the Race Card--and Lose
    • Frankl, Victor - Man's Search for Meaning
    • Flynn, Daniel - Intellectual Morons
    • Fund, John - Stealing Elections
    • Friedman, George - America's Secret War
    • Goldberg, Bernard - Bias; Arrogance
    • Goldberg, Jonah - Liberal Fascism
    • Herson, James - Tales from the Left Coast
    • Horowitz, David - Left Illusions; The Professors
    • Klein, Edward - The Truth about Hillary
    • Mnookin, Seth - Hard News: Twenty-one Brutal Months at The New York Times and How They Changed the American Media
    • Morris, Dick - Because He Could; Rewriting History
    • O'Beirne, Kate - Women Who Make the World Worse
    • Olson, Barbara - The Final Days: The Last, Desperate Abuses of Power by the Clinton White House
    • O'Neill, John - Unfit For Command
    • Piereson, James - Camelot and the Cultural Revolution: How the Assassination of John F. Kennedy Shattered American Liberalism
    • Prager, Dennis - Think A Second Time
    • Sharansky, Natan - The Case for Democracy
    • Stein, Ben - Can America Survive? The Rage of the Left, the Truth, and What to Do About It
    • Steyn, Mark - America Alone
    • Stephanopolous, George - All Too Human
    • Thomas, Clarence - My Grandfather's Son
    • Timmerman, Kenneth - Shadow Warriors
    • Williams, Juan - Enough: The Phony Leaders, Dead-End Movements, and Culture of Failure That Are Undermining Black America--and What We Can Do About It
    • Wright, Lawrence - The Looming Tower
  • Advertisements

HOPE!! A Burp of Truth Arises from the Fascist Daily Beast! WOW!


The Democrats’ Only Hope: Give Up Leftism for Lambism

Conor Lamb was plenty liberal—Obamacare, union support, more. But he didn’t check every box or play the identity politics game.


“Somewhere in heaven, the late Republican Henry “Scoop” Jackson is smiling about Conor Lamb’s victory in Pennsylvania’s 18th Congressional District. In a part of the state’s southwestern blue-collar areas, usually viewed as solid Trump country, Lamb won by 627 votes —in an area in which President Trump won over Hillary Clinton by 20 points.

Jackson, a Democratic senator from the state of Washington, had a program like that enunciated by Lamb. He sought the Democratic nomination for president in 1972, but had to drop out, since it was clear the left-liberal candidate, Sen. George McGovern of South Dakota, had all the votes necessary to win. In the November election, McGovern won the electoral college vote of only one state, liberal Massachusetts, and Richard M. Nixon easily won the White House.

Jackson supported New Deal and Fair Deal policies but was a hawk on national security, gaining him the name “Cold War liberal.” He knew, like Lamb, that he could not antagonize the working-class voters. His adviser Ben Wattenberg urged him to become “the voice of the working-men in America, black and white,” who had just resentment against elitists who continually put them down.

Wattenberg urged him to be the only candidate “crying out against the Left/Berserk flank of the party.” Had Jackson won, he clearly would have gained more states than McGovern in the national election. But the left had taken over the party, totally ignoring the kind of people whose votes Democrats used to have. They even threw out the Chicago delegation to their convention, which was heavily made up of trade union leaders, replacing them with middle-class so-called New Democrats…….”   Please continue reading below:



Trump Democrat Guy Beats Trump’s Republican Guy by “a hair” in Pennsylvania

Democrats Win by Running as Trump, not Clinton

by Brian C. Joondeph     at American Thinker:

“One of the few beneficial legacies of the Barack Obama presidency is the  electoral decimation of the Democratic Party.  Over a thousand seats, national and statewide, flipped from Democrat to Republican control during the fundamental transformation of America from 2009-2016.

Democrats are pinning their hopes on the 2018 midterms.  If they can win the House, they may be able to impeach President Trump.  If they control the Senate, too, they might be able to remove him from office.  This is their last option to stop the Trump train now that the Russian collusion story is going up in smoke.

It’s a tall order for Democrats to win either the House or the Senate, much less both, and an even higher hurdle for them to gather enough votes for impeachment.  Let them try.  Impeaching Trump over nonsense is the surest path for Democrats to lose control of Congress in 2020 and all but guarantee Trump’s re-election.  If they don’t try to impeach him or fail in their efforts, their unhinged far-left base will go insane and chase Nancy Pelosi and her leadership team with torches and pitchforks.  Either way it’s good for Trump.

Democrats are giddy after winning this week’s special election in Pennsylvania.  Democrat Conor Lamb defeated Republican Rick Saccone by a fraction of a percent, despite a Monmouth poll predicting Lamb by 6 points.  It seems polling hasn’t improved much since the not so long ago days when Hillary Clinton was supposed to win the presidency by a landslide.

Pollsters frequently oversample Democrat voters and can’t seem to find many Republican voters willing to speak to pollsters, hence the inaccurate predictions.  But that’s a separate issue.

How did a Democrat win a district that Trump won by 20 points just 16 months ago?  Simple.  By pretending to be Donald Trump.  Sure, Trump’s personality and charisma helped propel him to victory, but don’t forget the issues.

Whom does this sound like?  “My first priority is to get things moving again.  I will work with anyone to protect our people and bring good jobs here.”  Or this: “I’ll never forget that the only people I work for are right here at home.”  Trump or Lamb?

That was all from Conor Lamb’s website.  He went farther: “I understand the responsibility of carrying the mantle and I will never ever let you down.”  No, just kidding on the last one, which was Trump in 2016, but notice the similarities?

Where are the typical Democrat bromides?  You didn’t hear anything like this from Conor Lamb: “And his whole campaign, Make America Great Again, was looking backwards.  You don’t like black people getting rights, you don’t like women getting jobs, you don’t want to see that Indian-American succeeding more than you are, whatever that problem is, I am going to solve it.”

That’s the sore loser Hillary Clinton, still in denial, and the current face of the Democratic Party.  If Lamb spoke like that, he would have lost, just as Clinton did.  So he got smart and asked, “What would Donald do?” and spoke accordingly.

What else did the Donald wannabe say?

“We need modern airports, roads, and bridges, locks, and dams – to move people and goods into and out of our region, to attract new businesses, and to create jobs.”  On the House leader: “I don’t support Nancy Pelosi.”

On guns, Lamb called for a stronger system of background checks but no new gun restrictions.  He supports President Trump’s steel and aluminum tariffs.  He personally opposes abortion.  Lamb supports “robust and responsible energy development.”

Even more Trumpism.  He proudly stands for the pledge of allegiance and supports more funding for border security.

Lamb’s professed conservatism paid off, although barely.  And his term is only until the midterms in a few months, when his district disappears into the whimsical imaginations of the black robes on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.

Whether he stands up to his far-left party leadership as he says or becomes Nancy Pelosi’s boy-toy, toeing the party line, remains to be seen.  He can run as a Trumpster, but the reality is that the heart and soul of the Democratic Party is clearly Clinton and Obama – with faithful stooges Pelosi, Schumer, Waters, and Schiff.

This strategy may work in a purple district, or even in a red one if the GOP runs a weak candidate.  But nationally, it won’t work.  The left-wing media won’t support it, and neither will the Democrat donors and hardcore base.  Yet for select elections, it might work.

It looks as though the Democrats have found a winning formula.  Run youthful, energetic candidates who sound like Donald Trump.  Rather than a Roy Moore, with a dodgy past dragging him down.  Or a Rick Saccone: a good guy and solid on the issues, but who looks more like a department manager at the local Sears and Roebuck store than a rising political star.

Looks and optics matter.  JFK versus Nixon.  Trump versus Low Energy Jeb or Crooked Hillary. Obama versus McCain.  Democrats seem to understand this better than Republicans, at least until Trump came along – a TV reality show star who understands optics and marketing inside and out.

Trump is the winning formula.  Be like The Donald and win.  Run as a far-left loon and good luck, unless you are running in a safe deep blue district.  Run as a NeverTrump in a district Trump won, and your GOP voters will stay home.

It’s not complicated.  Republicans can easily maintain control of the House and Senate if they try and if they want to.  Both are necessary.  Many NeverTrumps may be happy to cede control of Congress and their majority if it means damaging or removing President Trump from the White House.

Hopefully the Republicans pay attention and campaign to win.  Pick the right candidate who is solid on the issues.  It’s not that hard.



The Feminization of the American Male…..”Men seem to be becoming less male!”

K-12: The War on Boys and Men

by Bruce Deitrick Price at American Thinker:

“Fox News just announced an upcoming series about the plight of Men in America.

“Men seem to be becoming less male,” Tucker Carlson said.  “Something ominous is happening[.] … Men are taught there is something wrong with them.  We took a close look at the numbers, and we found them so shocking that we’re devoting the month of March to a special series on men in America.”

Carlson concluded, “You’ll be stunned by the scope of the crisis.  We were.  It’s a largely ignored disaster.  It affects every person in America.”

He noted, for example: “Men account for 77 percent of the nation’s suicides, they are more than twice as likely to become alcoholics, they are more likely to die of an overdose than women, and 90 percent of inmates are men.”

So what are the causes?  Eighteen years ago, Christina Hoff Sommers published The War on Boys: How Misguided Feminism Is Harming Our Young Men.  Sommers concluded, “It’s a bad time to be a boy in America.  Boys are less likely than girls to go to college or do their homework.  They’re more likely to cheat on tests, wind up in detention, or drop out[.]”  In short, Sommers found the causes in feminist theory and, more surprisingly, inside the nation’s classrooms.

The dirty big secret here is that our public schools don’t announce social engineering; they simply do it, especially with regard to altering how children view themselves.  Public schools suppress boys and uplift girls in many furtive ways.  This manipulation has been hugely successful: 57% of college students are female; 43% are male.  More women stay in college and earn advanced degree.  Women wear business suits, and men drive pickup trucks.  Culturally similar men and women who used to marry each other are now separated by class differences!

The question still haunts us: how exactly are America’s social engineers able to win this war for females?

The discussion is tricky from every point of view.  However you might describe boys and girls, you’ll invite argument about what is good and what is bad.  If you say girls are “more sensitive,” is that an insult or a compliment?  The Atlantic Monthly nicely dances among many competing viewpoints:

[A] host of cross-cultural studies show that females … are more apt to plan ahead, set academic goals, and put effort into achieving those goals.  They also are more likely than boys to feel intrinsically satisfied with the whole enterprise of organizing their work, and more invested in impressing themselves and their teachers with their efforts[.] … On the whole, boys approach schoolwork differently.  They are more performance-oriented.  Studying for and taking tests taps into their competitive instincts.  For many boys, tests are quests that get their hearts pounding.

David Sortino, a teacher, argues on his blog: “[G]irls work best when sitting in a circle facing each other and find it more comfortable to learn in a group setting.  Instead, boys often excel in a traditional class structure with desks lined in rows, which could support their more competitive energies and attention getting behaviors.

“Girls respond to stress as a threat, which drives blood to the gut rather than to the brain, placing them in a fight or flight persona.  However, for boys, it’s the opposite.  They love to take risks and almost always overestimate their abilities.”

QED: There are big, very real differences.  We should wonder if these differences are artificially induced and then exaggerated.  Oh, so that’s why some schools have all students sitting around tables – because it’s good for girls…?

What we know for sure is that girls are outperforming boys at all levels.  Is this good for the country?  Is it good for the girls?

The Economist reported:

A new study by the OECD [Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development], a club of mostly rich countries, examined how 15-year-old boys and girls performed at reading, mathematics and science.  Boys still score somewhat better at maths, and in science the genders are roughly equal.  But when it comes to the students who really struggle, the difference is stark: boys are 50% more likely than girls to fall short of basic standards in all three areas [emphasis added].

Why are girls performing better at school than their male classmates?

“First,” according to the OECD study, “girls read more than boys.  Reading proficiency is the basis upon which all other learning is built.  When boys don’t do well at reading, their performance in other school subjects suffers too.”

The basis upon which all other learning is built.  That is ominous.  Suppose social engineers figured out how to undercut reading.

One statistical site states that “[w]omen are more likely to develop solid reading skills.  Around 38% of men report reading at the lowest proficiency levels, compared to 33% for women.”

Suppose our social engineers routinely seek to widen this gap.  That would be feasible because boys and girls respond in different ways to absurd instruction.

Girls, as noted, feel more comfortable in a group setting.  They want the whole group to move along harmoniously; they want their teacher to be successful.  The result is that they are more patient and long-suffering with dumb curricula and wrongly trained teachers.  Boys, on the other hand, are not so patient.  If there is a skill or a task, boys want to do well quickly.  Fair enough.  But what if the curriculum is inherently stupid and impossible to master?  Boys at some point will declare, I can’t do this.  I don’t want to do this.  I’m walking away.

Today, in Common Core, we see many absurdities almost perfectly designed to drive boys to escape and evasion.  The internet is full of videos of children weeping because instruction seems so illogical.  Little seven-year-olds are already beat up.

But the paradigm of stupid instruction remains Whole Word.  That’s where the student has to memorize the English language one word at a time.  The famous Dr. Samuel Orton, a neurologist, did a study in 1926-28 and declared that this method doesn’t work…and, in addition, it will damage every child it touches.  He was exactly correct, and the Education Establishment knows it.  What do we see in the schools of America?  Millions of semi-literate children with messed up minds.

StatisticBrain claims that 32 million Americans “can’t read.”  Tens of millions more read marginally.  This is a vast national  tragedy.  Ask yourself, why is this tolerated?  Perhaps because it makes the population easier to control.  Perhaps because it enables the stratification of the sexes.

You want to fix it?  Fix reading.  I think the smarter people understand this.  But the Education Establishment won’t let go because this particular stupid curriculum is the foundation for making women more successful and making men less successful.

Here is a good overview by TeacherMag:

But what if today’s classroom and curriculum structure catered (however unintentionally) to one gender more than the other?  Many researchers say this is now the case, with boys facing an upward struggle from primary school on.  For many boys, co-educational public schools can be uncomfortable, unfriendly, unproductive places.  Teaching styles and disciplinary habits are often not suited to the average boy[.] … In learning environments biased against their strengths, boys may become turned off or frustrated and may attempt to have their needs met by seeking negative attention.  This rebellion completes the circle of failure … with many boys labelled as troublemakers or diagnosed with hyperactivity.

That can mean drugs, which make boys weaker and less manly….”

Note by ghr:  There is no doubt that compared to the almost  three generations I have lived   the American ‘girl’  (by birth) has been butched up in feature and dress, fattened up tremendously everywhere, and ditsier by head.   Mother is working.  Dad might be absent.  Schools have become empty of learning, loaded with twits of all ages and sexes.   No history is taught.  No history books allowed for they advance the story of the human male…..a crime of the first order in the fascist state of Barack Hussein Obama and Hillary R. Clinton.

What IS taught is the garbage poison arriving from feminist mouths of all colors, shapes, sexes and sizes, that there is no differences between human female and male animals.

Then their is the black  feminist-atheist lie sold in the American knowledge-free, hate white filled public and private schools where ever they exist, that the human white male animal  has been the source of  World evil throughout human history…..which is at maximum ten years of racist memorization  in the American urban black so-called “education” system…..After all that is what the Sovietized Urban Black-White Racist leftists sell in their protests, attacks, and burnings since November, 2016.
And don’t forget the tricks played by the Charles Blow news world  of racist sales in the world closer to Wall Street.    Hillary and her herd are certain that males  outside of her leftist government ilk  are deplorables  and worse.   She is a man hater especially if he is white.
Worst of all, the arrogant leftists, especially the wealthy  Jewish political and intellectual LEFT led in my day by Alan Dershowitz,   have worked overtime during the past  sixty  years  following World War II to destroy JudeoChristianity, the very  core of human decency, freedom,  and civilization, the greatness upon which  our American republic was based, the civilization now conquered by corporate greed and the worship of ignorance to make human male and female EQUAL!
Please do read the following article:



Female Plus Feminist = Feminazi


IF TRUTH COULD BE TOLD, Homo sapiens’, the male animal, was, is born, developed  by Nature’s God to be a killer when needed to perpetuate his species’ existence.  He, not she, was blessed, cursed by his genetic material  to defend and provide for himself, his mate, his offspring, his clan, his nation for the survival of the species.

He was Nature’s God animal  born  to wonder, be curious, a thinker, to problem solve, to explore, to build,  defend  and protect his space for his mate and offspring.

To solve problems the Human Male seeks TRUTH!

Homo sapiens, the female animal, was born to  physically smaller, weaker,  to be protected, in order to carry and deliver offspring, and therefore  the survival of the animal species.

She was not an animal born by  body or drive to be  a killer  beyond, if needed,  defending her own offspring.   She was born ditsy, clever, sly,  driven by feelings, to catch, control, seduce her mate to continue  life for herself,  her offspring.

She is NOT driven to seek TRUTH!   As an animal her feelings dominate Truth to achieve satisfaction!    Tough Truth is a guy genetics problem to solve….NOT female, by NATURE’S GOD!

Two plus two to a human female animal doesn’t necessarily equal four….especially when in the mood when feelings dictate uber alles, when she becomes upset, challenged, insecure,  deceptive, when she becomes a fascist, a leftist, a today’s American Democrat…..or today’s despicable misuse of children!   In all GOD-oriented  religions throughout  history known to today’s human animal,  THE GOD OF GODS IS, WAS, MALE!    Have you ever wondered why?

The human male, not the human female, is genetically driven to seek and identify Truth to overcome  Feelings for the survival of the species,  programmed by Nature’s God.

What happens when a number of human female animals “feel” superior, “act” superior”,  reeking their “superior”  feelings over Truth?   What are the consequences?   ghr.

Please read the article below written by John Hinderaker at PowerLine:


Do Hillary women ever tolerate reality or Truth?



Michael Gerson Goes After America’s Christians for Electing Trump

The Last Temptation: Trump And Evangelicals

by Michael Gerson  at HotAir:

“It is true that insofar as Christian hospitals or colleges have their religious liberty threatened by hostile litigation or government agencies, they have every right to defend their institutional identities—to advocate for a principled pluralism. But this is different from evangelicals regarding themselves, hysterically and with self-pity, as an oppressed minority that requires a strongman to rescue it. This is how Trump has invited evangelicals to view themselves. He has treated evangelicalism as an interest group in need of protection and preferences.

A prominent company of evangelical leaders—including Dobson, Falwell, Graham, Jeffress, Metaxas, Perkins, and Ralph Reed—has embraced this self-conception. Their justification is often bluntly utilitarian: All of Trump’s flaws are worth his conservative judicial appointments and more-favorable treatment of Christians by the government. But they have gone much further than grudging, prudential calculation. They have basked in access to power and provided character references in the midst of scandal. Graham castigated the critics of Trump’s response to the violence during a white-supremacist rally in Charlottesville, Virginia (“Shame on the politicians who are trying to push blame on @POTUS”). Dobson has pronounced Trump a “baby Christian”—a political use of grace that borders on blasphemy. “Complaining about the temperament of the @POTUS or saying his behavior is not presidential is no longer relevant,” Falwell tweeted. “[Donald Trump] has single-handedly changed the definition of what behavior is ‘presidential’ from phony, failed & rehearsed to authentic, successful & down to earth.”

It is remarkable to hear religious leaders defend profanity, ridicule, and cruelty as hallmarks of authenticity and dismiss decency as a dead language. Whatever Trump’s policy legacy ends up being, his presidency has been a disaster in the realm of norms. It has coarsened our culture, given permission for bullying, complicated the moral formation of children, undermined standards of public integrity, and encouraged cynicism about the political enterprise…….”

Please continue reading below:



American Christians know something that the secular and left-wing elites do not.

Why Christians Support Israel

by Dennis Prager   at  the Stream:                  (Article sent by Mark Waldeland.)

In speeches to fellow Jews around America, I often point out that many American Jews are experiencing cognitive dissonance. The institution Jews most admire — the university — turns out to be the most significant source of Israel hatred in America and the rest of the West. At the same time, the people many Jews most distrust — Christians (especially evangelical and other conservative Christians) — turn out to be the Jews’ and Israel’s best friends.

‘Deceptive’ Reasons

Given that these two facts are undeniable, how do many American Jews deal with this dissonance? They largely ignore the Israel hatred on campuses, and they dismiss the authenticity of the Christian support. They dismiss it by denying it is genuine. Christians who support Israel, they (and non-Jews on the left) argue, do so for two deceptive reasons.

One is they seek to convert Jews.

That Christians seek to convert non-Christians is, of course, true. The primary aim of Christianity, after all, is to spread belief in Christ. But why would anyone think supporting Israel will convert Jews? Does anyone think that Christians who support Israel’s enemies are making Muslims convert to Christianity? The fact is there isn’t a shred of evidence that Jews have converted to Christianity, because of Christian support for Israel. Indeed, the Jews who most support Israel are either the most religious or the most strongly identifying secular Jews. Neither is a candidate for conversion.

Another way Christian support for Israel is belittled is by claiming that Christians support Israel in order to hasten the Second Coming of Jesus. But pastor John Hagee, head of Christians United for Israel, the largest pro-Israel organization in America, has said countless times nothing a Christian can do will hasten the return of Jesus; only God will decide when that happens — and in His own good time.

Moreover, even if this were the reason Christians support the Jews and Israel, why would it disturb Jews? It would mean that Christians would support them until Jesus returns. What’s wrong with that?

The Support is Genuine

Having spoken at numerous churches’ “Night to Honor Israel” events, I know how genuine this support is. But last week in Nashville, I witnessed a particularly convincing example of the sincerity of this support. I spoke before thousands of Christians at the National Religious Broadcasters Convention when they gathered one evening solely to express their support for Israel. Maybe five Jews were present. Isn’t thousands of Christians devoting an entire evening to express support for Israel — with essentially no Jews in attendance to witness it — about as convincing a proof of the authenticity of this support as one could imagine?

So, why do Christians support Israel? They believe in supporting American allies and supporting countries that share their moral values. And, unlike the left, they have moral problems with Islamism, not with Zionism.

But the primary reason virtually every Israel-supporting Christian gives is the biblical verse from Genesis in which God says to Abraham, “I will bless those who bless you and curse those who curse you.” These Christians believe (as does this Jew) God blesses those who treat the Jews decently and curse those who seek to harm the Jews.

You don’t have to be a believer in the God of Abraham or the Bible to accept this proposition. All the Jews’ ancient enemies disappeared from history. And look at what happened to Spain after it expelled its Jews in 1492. One of the greatest powers of the world became largely irrelevant to history within a couple of generations. As for Germans, the perpetrators of the Holocaust, they endured a staggering amount of death and suffering as a result of their support for the greatest Jew hater in history; and their country was divided in half for the next half-century. Likewise, the countries today that most curse the Jews — Arab and other Muslim countries — are among the most benighted countries in the world. If they were to devote to building their countries the money and energy they devote to attempting to destroy Israel, they would be in far better condition morally, socially, economically and politically.

Meanwhile, the country that has most blessed Israel and the Jews is America. No country in the modern period has treated its Jews as well as America has, and no country has stood by Israel as much as America has. And America has been almost uniquely blessed.

These American Christians know something that the secular and left-wing elites do not: The day America abandons Israel will be the beginning of the end of America as we know it.

These people are not fools.

Their detractors are.


Dennis Prager’s latest book, The Ten Commandments: Still the Best Moral Code, was published by Regnery. He is a nationally syndicated radio show host and creator of PragerUniversity.com.


Sleaze and the Salem Radio Network

Here in  Leftyland,   Minnesota, citizens seeking “honest” Truth listen to Dennis Prager at 1280 AM on ones radio dial in the Twin Cities.

It was  at Salem Radio Network, 1280 on my AM dial that day when  I first met Our Dennis Prager a week or so before  the ELEVATION OF KING SLEAZE, John F. Kerry of VietNam FAKE FILM FAME, that fake news political STARman, Kerry,  that fake news movie-star DIRECTORman,  John F. Kerry, that  ACTORman,  John F. Kerry of fake news Leftist fame who was expected to become President   PHONYman first class, John F. Kerry of the United States of America.

(Kerry married wealthfully……  I haven’t bought anything name “Heinz” ever since.)

I could tell immediately this radio guy, Dennis Prager,  was some kind of a true conservative, a rare breed in those days…..and better yet, wasn’t afraid to expose Truth from his thoughts as he had studied it.

Although twenty years past retirement, I still work outdoors for a living from April to November, which means I still have winter to settle indoors during lunch hour praying Dennis Prager is still Dennis Prager at SRN 1280.

I am NOT a fan of shallow-man, Michael Medved who follows Our Dennis on SRN in our schedule of the week day.

SRN is NOT a radio channel in love with Our Donald, U.S. President Trump.  It sells itself as a Christian network as described here by leftist Wikileaks:


“Salem Radio Network is a United States-based radio network that specializes in syndicated Christian talk, music, and secular news/talk programming. It is a division of the Salem Media Group.”

For many months, perhaps going back to the time Our Donald was Inaugurated a year ago last January, SRN’s news reports during Dennis Prager’s conservative radio show, Monday through Friday have a fixation against the President as if the Dennis Prager show is sponsored by CNN, MSNBC, at their worst.

Today’s  first hour SRN news interlude contained a lengthy ‘expose’ news of the day of  an alleged sexual liaison Our Donald some well known hooker received $130,000 for the evening and/or not advertising the event.

Another interlude for SRN  “news selling”  during   Prager time announced that some male in the Donald Trump world had mailed some personal material with government paid stamps.

I admit I don’t like American President Donald J. Trump, for I LOVE DONALD J. TRUMP AS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!!

He is the only American public figure of today I esteem more for his drive to make America Great Again, than Dennis Prager, who stands alone far above the crowd in second place.

I follow other SRN American stars during the morning and early evening, even visiting Michael Medved occasionally to see if the only thing he is still selling is himself.   THE ONLY ANTI CONSERVATIVE “NEWS” ATTACKS BY SRN SALESMANSHIP ARE THOSE WHICH ‘SMEAR’ OUR DONALD DURING THE DENNIS PRAGER SHOW.

Our President, Donald J. Trump could not have become the 45th President of our United States without the overwhelming numbers of votes from our country’s Christian community.  I am so proud of us.

I am not fond of Fox News….It’s New Yorker stuff, tar and street urban stuff, snobby college class know nothing about Earth and Life stuff, yesterday stuff.   They sell contrived news of the business eastern establishment!!!

However, their blacks are not lefty racist blacks, most of their feminists are not feminazis, and they don’t advertise fascism, antiAmericanism, Marxism, and other such things to satisfy the foreign Spanish every day….which means Fox is NOT a carbon copy of MSNBC, NBC, ABC, CBS, CNN, PBS, and other such modern college farms of know-nothings graduates, especially those sold stupidity regarding the creeping weather of MAN-MADE Killer Global Warming!

Yet, why the  leftist poison  SRN seems to be selling during the Dennis Prager Radio Show these days…..Or does  smearing Our Donald during the Prager hours bring in bigger profits for the company?